Christian M. Carrico

Characteristics of atmospheric ice nucleating particles associated with biomass burning in the US: Prescribed burns and wildfires

An improved understanding of atmospheric ice nucleating particles (INP), including sources and atmospheric abundance, is needed to advance our understanding of aerosol-cloud-climate interactions. This study examines diverse biomass burning events to better constrain our understanding of how fires impact populations of INP. Sampling of prescribed burns and wildfires in Colorado and Georgia, U.S.A., revealed that biomass burning leads to the release of particles that are active as condensation/immersion freezing INP at temperatures from −32 to −12°C. During prescribed burning of wiregrass, up to 64% of INP collected during smoke-impacted periods were identified as soot particles via electron microscopy analyses. Other carbonaceous types and mineral-like particles dominated INP collected during wildfires of ponderosa pine forest in Colorado. Total measured nINP and the excess nINP associated with smoke-impacted periods were higher during two wildfires compared to the prescribed burns. Interferences from non-smoke sources of INP, including long-range transported mineral dust and local contributions of soils and plant materials lofted from the wildfires themselves, presented challenges in using the observations to develop a smoke-specific nINP parameterization. Nevertheless, these field observations suggest that biomass burning may serve as an important source of INP on a regional scale, particularly during time periods that lack other robust sources of INP such as long-range transported mineral dust.

Rapidly evolving ultrafine and fine mode biomass smoke physical properties: Comparing laboratory and field results

Combining field and laboratory results, we present biomass smoke physical properties. We report sub-0.56u2009µm diameter (Dp) particle sizing (fast mobility particle sizer, FMPS) plus light absorption and scattering at 870u2009nm (photoacoustic extinctiometer). For Dpu2009 u2009100u2009nm), while flaming combustion produced very high number concentrations of smaller (Dpu2009~u200950u2009nm) absorbing particles. Due to smoldering and particle growth processes, Dp approached 100u2009nm within 3u2009h after emission. Increased particle cross-sectional area and Mie scattering efficiency shifted the relative importance of light absorption (flaming maximum) and light scattering (smoldering maximum), increasing ω over time. Measurements showed a consistent picture of smoke properties from emission to aging.

NOx instrument intercomparison for laboratory biomass burning source studies and urban ambient measurements in Albuquerque, New Mexico

ABSTRACT Understanding nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) measurement techniques is important as air-quality standards become more stringent, important sources change, and instrumentation develops. NOx observations are compared in two environments: source testing from the combustion of Southwestern biomass fuels, and urban, ambient NOx. The latter occurred in the urban core of Albuquerque, NM, at an EPA NCORE site during February–March 2017, a relatively clean photochemical environment with ozone (O3) <60 ppb for all but 6 hr. We compare two techniques used to measure NOx in biomass smoke during biomass burning source testing: light absorption at 405 nm and a traditional chemiluminescence monitor. Two additional oxides of nitrogen techniques were added in urban measurements: a cavity attenuated phase shift instrument for direct NO2, and the NOy chemiluminescence instrument (conversion of NOy to NO by molybdenum catalyst). We find agreement similar to laboratory standards for NOx, NO2, and NO comparing all four instruments (R2 > 0.97, slopes between 0.95 and 1.01, intercepts < 2 ppb for 1-hr averages) in the slowly varying ambient setting. Little evidence for significant interferences in NO2 measurements was observed in comparing techniques in late-winter urban Albuquerque. This was also confirmed by negligible NOz contributions as measured with an NOy instrument. For the rapidly varying (1-min) higher NOx concentrations in biomass smoke source testing, larger variability characterized chemiluminescence and absorption instruments. Differences between the two instruments were both positive and negative and occurred for total NOx, NO, and NO2. Nonetheless, integrating the NOx signals over an entire burn experiment and comparing 95 combustion experiments, showed little evidence for large systematic influences of possible interfering species biasing the methods. For concentrations of <2 ppm, a comparison of burn integrated NOx, NO2, and NO yielded slopes of 0.94 to 0.96, R2 of 0.83 to 0.93, and intercepts of 8 to 25 ppb. We attribute the latter, at least in part, to significant noise particularly at low NOx concentrations, resulting from short averaging times during highly dynamic lab burns. Discrepancies between instruments as indicated by the intercepts urge caution with oxides of nitrogen measurements at concentrations <50 ppb for rapidly changing conditions. Implications: Multiple NOx measurement methods were employed to measure NOx concentrations at an EPA NCORE site in Albuquerque, NM, and in smoke produced by the combustion of Southwestern biomass fuels. Agreement shown during intercomparison of these NOx techniques indicated little evidence of significant interfering species biasing the methods in these two environments. Instrument agreement is important to understand for accurately characterizing ambient NOx conditions in a range of environments.