Christian M. Jespersen

High serum YKL-40 concentration is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease

AIMS Macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques secrete YKL-40. We tested the hypothesis if high serum YKL-40 concentration predicts coronary events and death of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS During the 2.6 years follow-up period (median 2.77 year, interquartile range 0.23 year), 270 patients among the 4298 patients with stable CAD in the CLARICOR trial suffered myocardial infarction (MI) and 377 died (187 classified as cardiovascular death). Serum YKL-40 transformed as Y=log[max(82, serum YKL-40/microg/L)] was significantly associated with cardiovascular death [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54-2.31, P < 0.001], all-cause mortality (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.75-2.31, P < 0.001), and MI (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.13-1.68, P = 0.002). Following multivariable adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, previous MI, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and selected medical treatments Y contributed significantly to prediction of all-cause mortality (P < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.001), but not MI (P = 0.25). CONCLUSION High serum YKL-40 is associated with MI, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with stable CAD.

Clarithromycin for 2 Weeks for Stable Coronary Heart Disease: 6-Year Follow-Up of the CLARICOR Randomized Trial and Updated Meta-Analysis of Antibiotics for Coronary Heart Disease

Objectives: We have reported increased 2.6-year mortality in clarithromycin- versus placebo-exposed stable coronary heart disease patients, but meta-analysis of randomized trials in coronary heart disease patients showed no significant effect of antibiotics on mortality. Here we report the 6-year mortality of clarithromycin- versus placebo-exposed patients and updated meta-analyses. Methods: Centrally randomized, placebo controlled multicenter trial. All parties were blinded. Analyses were by intention to treat. Meta-analyses followed the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Results: We randomized 4,372 patients with stable coronary heart disease to clarithromycin 500 mg (n = 2,172) or placebo (n = 2,200) once daily for 2 weeks. Mortality was followed through public register. Nine hundred and twenty-three patients (21.1%) died. Six-year mortality was significantly higher in the clarithromycin group (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.38). Adjustment for entry characteristics (sex, age, prior myocardial infarction, center, and smoking) did not change the results (1.18, 1.04–1.35). Addition of our data to that of other randomized trials on antibiotics for patients with coronary heart disease versus placebo/no intervention (17 trials, 25,271 patients, 1,877 deaths) showed a significantly increased relative risk of death from antibiotics of 1.10 (1.01–1.20) without heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our results stress the necessity to consider carefully the strength of the indication before administering antibiotics to patients with coronary heart disease.

Verapamil and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

Verapamil is effective as antianginal medication but contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve survival in patients with congestive heart failure but have limited effect on patients with angina pectoris. No studies have been published on the combined treatment with verapamil and ACE inhibitors in patients with stable angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction. We performed an open study in 14 patients with angina pectoris and ejection fraction < 40%. The patients received verapamil 180 mg and trandolapril 2 mg twice daily for 3 months. We found a significant increase in ejection fraction from 28 +/- 6 to 35 +/- 11 (p < 0.03), wall motion index from 1.0 +/- 0.3 to 1.2 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.03), exercise duration from 6.9 +/- 2.5 to 7.7 +/- 2.9 minutes (p < 0.01), and ratio of exercise to rest rate-pressure product from 2.2 +/- 0.4 to 2.5 +/- 0.6 (p < 0.02). Use of nitroglycerin and number of angina pectoris attacks were both significantly reduced after 3 months of treatment. These findings support the hypothesis that the combination of verapamil and trandolapril is useful in patients with attenuated left ventricular function and angina pectoris.

Intervention with Clarithromycin in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease

Background: There is a growing body of evidence linking Chlamydia pneumoniae to the progression of coronary heart disease. Smaller studies have indicated that intervention with macrolide antibiotics might reduce coronary events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To describe the design of a large-scale intervention study on the effects of a macrolide antibiotic on coronary events in patients with stable coronary heart disease (documented myocardial infarction and/or angina pectoris). Methods: This study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study with parallel groups. Patients are randomised to 14 days of treatment with clarithromycin (500 mg, once daily) or matching placebo. The follow-up period is 2 years, and the primary end point is a composite end point of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris, whichever occurs first. Recruitment began in October 1999 and will be completed in 2000. In total, 4,600 patients will be randomised. Prospectives: The study is powered to detect a reduction in coronary events of 20%. Also, the study will examine the question of whether the presence of a C. pneumoniae antibody titre is associated with a significantly increased risk of future coronary events. Finally, in the case of a significant outcome, it will be possible to test whether the effect is restricted to patients with C. pneumoniae antibodies only, or to a universal effect without any coherence to C. pneumoniae antibodies.

Excess Sudden Cardiac Deaths after Short-Term Clarithromycin Administration in the CLARICOR Trial: Why Is This So, and Why Are Statins Protective?

Objectives: To elucidate potential mechanisms for the clarithromycin-induced excess mortality observed in the CLARICOR trial during 2.6 year follow-up of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods: Cox analyses using out-of-hospital death as a proxy for sudden death compared to in-hospital (nonsudden) death. Result: In 100 of 189 (53%) cardiovascular (CV) deaths in which it was possible to examine the question, there was a strong association between place of death and the classification of CV death as sudden or not-sudden. The excess mortality in the clarithromycin group was confined to sudden CV death in patients not on statins at trial entry (HR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.69–4.05, p < 0.0005). Other categories of deaths showed no marked drug-placebo difference. Conclusions: Short-term clarithromycin administration was significantly associated with increased risk of sudden CV death in stable coronary heart disease patients not using statins.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a prognostic study within the CLARICOR Trial

Abstract Background. Patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) have a poor prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the extent to which serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement alone or together could be prognostic biomarkers in patients with stable CAD. Materials and methods. During the 2.6-year follow-up period 270 patients among the 4264 patients with stable CAD in the CLARICOR trial suffered myocardial infarction (MI) and 377 died (187 cardiovascular deaths (CVD)). Results. Serum NT-proBNP was significantly associated with MI (hazard ratio (HR), 1. 65 (refers to a 2.72 fold increase in serum level, p = 0.0005), CVD (HR, 2.42, p < 0.0005) and non-CVD (HR, 1.79, p < 0.0005). When correcting for hs-CRP, NT-proBNP was still significantly associated with MI (HR, 1.63, p = 0.0005), CVD (HR, 2.36, p < 0.0005) and non-CVD (HR, 1.66, p < 0.0005). Serum hs-CRP was compared to NT-proBNP less associated with MI (HR, 1.20, p = 0.001), CVD (HR, 1.39, p < 0.0005) and non-CVD (HR, 1.67, p < 0.0005). When corrected for NT-proBNP, hs-CRP was only associated with non-CVD (HR, 1.51, p < 0.0005). When adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors hs-CRP predicted non-CVD (HR, 1.46) and all-cause death (HR, 1.24) and NT-proBNP predicted MI (HR, 1.50), CVD (HR, 1.98), non-CVD (HR, 1.39), and all-cause death (HR, 1.62)(p < 0.0005 for all). Conclusion. Increased serum NT-proBNP was a stronger predictor of MI, cardiovascular death and non-cardiovascular death than hs-CRP in patients with stable CAD. Once NT-proBNP was taken into account, hs-CRP did not improve predictions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00121550.

Agreement between public register and adjudication committee outcome in a cardiovascular randomized clinical trial

UNLABELLED The objective of this study is to describe the agreement between randomized trial outcome assessment by committee and outcomes entirely identified through public registers. METHODS In the CLARICOR trial, 4,372 patients with stable coronary heart disease received a short course of clarithromycin versus placebo and were followed up for 2.6 years. The pertinent hospital records and death certificates had originally been evaluated by the adjudication committee using common definitions of outcomes mapped into a 6-category list. We now mechanically converted the International Classification of Diseases-coded diagnoses of the public registries into the same categories. After cross-tabulation of the committee diagnoses with National Patient Register diagnoses and Register of Causes of Death, we calculate agreement and compare the estimated intervention effects of the 2 data sets. RESULTS With public register data, the protocol-specified categories were slightly more frequent. Overall agreement was 74% for hospital discharges and 60% for cause of death, but the intervention effect, expressed as a hazard ratio, stayed within 4% of the value originally obtained with the adjudication committee (P ≥ .35). CONCLUSIONS Our results show a modest agreement between formal adjudication and outcomes deducible from public registers. However, the estimated intervention effect did not differ noticeably between the 2 data sources. If studies on a wide range of public registers confirm these findings, register outcomes may be considered as a replacement for adjudication committees.

Statin Treatment Prevents Increased Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality Associated With Clarithromycin in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease

In the CLARICOR trial, significantly increased cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality in stable patients with coronary heart disease were observed after a short course of clarithromycin. We report on the impact of statin treatment at entry on the CV and all-cause mortality. The multicenter CLARICOR trial randomized patients to oral clarithromycin (500 mg daily; n = 2172) versus matching placebo (daily; n = 2201) for 2 weeks. Patients were followed through public databases. In the 41% patients on statin treatment at entry, no significant effect of clarithromycin was observed on CV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.22; P = 0.20) or all-cause mortality (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.71-1.65; P = 0.72) at 2.6-year follow up. In the patients not on statin treatment at entry, clarithromycin was associated with a significant increase in CV (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.34-2.67; P = 0.0003; statin-clarithromycin interaction P = 0.0029) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67; P = 0.016; statin-clarithromycin interaction P = 0.41). Multivariate analysis and 6-year follow up confirmed these results. Concomitant statin treatment in stable patients with coronary heart disease abrogated the observed increased CV mortality associated with 2 weeks of clarithromycin.

Good interobserver agreement was attainable on outcome adjudication in patients with stable coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVE In clinical trials, agreement on outcomes is of utmost importance for valid estimation of intervention effects. As there is limited knowledge about adjudicator agreement in cardiology, we examined the level of agreement among three cardiology specialists adjudicating all possible events in a randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with stable coronary heart disease. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING All information (hospital records, death certificates, etc.) was forwarded to two randomly selected blinded adjudicators. If they disagreed, the third arbiter had to choose the more likely of the two alternatives. Files of 5,475 nonfatal and 362 fatal events were evaluated. RESULTS For nonfatal outcomes, pairwise kappa values ranged from 0.75 to 0.80. The three adjudicators had 4.3%, 9.5%, and 6.1% of their nonfatal outcome classifications overruled by their arbiter. If stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, and acute myocardial infarction were treated as one, agreement increased minimally. For fatal outcomes, the pairwise kappa values ranged from 0.65 to 0.90. The three adjudicators had 12%, 9%, and 10% of their death classifications overruled. CONCLUSION Specialists in cardiology can attain a reasonably high agreement on outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease.

Compliance with and short-term adverse events from clarithromycin versus placebo in patients with stable coronary heart disease: the CLARICOR trial

BACKGROUND The randomized placebo-controlled double-blind CLARICOR trial investigated the influence of clarithromycin versus placebo on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00121550). The trial randomized 2172 patients to 500 mg of clarithromycin daily versus 2200 patients to matching placebo for 14 days. This paper presents protocol-specified analysis of the patient-reported information regarding their compliance and non-serious adverse events during the 14 days of treatment as well as serious adverse events (mortality and hospitalizations) during the first 30 days after randomization. METHODS Randomized clinical trial focusing on patient-reported information regarding their compliance and adverse events. RESULTS Of the randomized patients, 99% reported information regarding their compliance and adverse events. A 100% tablet intake was reported by 90% of the clarithromycin group and by 93.7% of the placebo group. Of the clarithromycin patients, 39.5% reported at least one non-serious adverse event versus 25.1% of the placebo patients (P < 0.001). Gastrointestinal adverse reactions were reported 950 times by 697 patients (32.3%) in the clarithromycin group and 485 times by 390 patients (17.9%) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in other non-serious or serious adverse events during the first month after inclusion. Short-term non-serious adverse events did not explain the previously reported long-term significantly increased mortality associated with clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal adverse reactions are common during clarithromycin administration, but at least half are also seen with a placebo.