Christian Mazel

Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours.

Cervical and Thoracic Spine Tumor Management: Surgical Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Since the first pioneering work in the area of tumors of the spine, medical professionals have sought to determine the proper role of spine surgery in the management of spinal tumors. Experience has proven that spine surgery is effective in the treatment of spinal cord compression for decreasing pain and improving quality of life with low rates of surgical complications. We use several staging systems to assess the patients prognosis, to determine the best type of tumoral resection in preoperative surgical planning, and to provide guidance as to the best therapeutic option for the patient. In the surgical treatment of spine tumors, one of two opposing strategies must be chosen: (1) palliative surgery with cord decompression and spine stabilization or (2) curative surgery with en bloc radical resection of the tumor and stabilization. In this article, we describe indications and surgical techniques related to cervical spinal tumors: fixation and laminectomy of the upper and lower cervical spines, corporectomy, and partial and total vertebrectomy. For tumors of the cervicothoracic region, the most frequent level of spine metastasis and thoracic spine tumors, we describe the fixation and laminectomy technique, en bloc tumor resection, and partial and total vertebrectomy. The last part of the article addresses outcomes following spinal surgery, including outcomes related to en bloc Pancoast Tobias tumor resection, malignant dumbbell schwanomas, and metastasis.

Prediction of Quality of Life and Survival After Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Determine Suitability for Surgical Treatment.

BACKGROUND Surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases aims to improve quality of life, pain, function, and stability. Complications in the postoperative period are not uncommon; therefore, it is important to select appropriate patients who are likely to benefit the greatest from surgery. Previous studies have focused on predicting survival rather than quality of life after surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine preoperative patient characteristics that predict postoperative quality of life and survival in patients who undergo surgery for spinal metastases. METHODS In a prospective cohort study of 922 patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery, we performed preoperative and postoperative assessment of EuroQol EQ-5D quality of life, visual analog score for pain, Karnofsky physical functioning score, complication rates, and survival. RESULTS The primary tumor type, number of spinal metastases, and presence of visceral metastases were independent predictors of survival. Predictors of quality of life after surgery included preoperative EQ-5D (P = .002), Frankel score (P < .001), and Karnofsky Performance Status (P < .001). CONCLUSION Data from the largest prospective surgical series of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases revealed that tumor type, the number of spinal metastases, and the presence of visceral metastases are the most useful predictors of survival and that quality of life is best predicted by preoperative Karnofsky, Frankel, and EQ-5D scores. The Karnofsky score predicts quality of life and survival and is easy to determine at the bedside, unlike the EQ-5D index. Karnofsky score, tumor type, and spinal and visceral metastases should be considered the 4 most important prognostic variables that influence patient management.

Rapid improvements in pain and quality of life are sustained after surgery for spinal metastases in a large prospective cohort.

Abstract Introduction Metastatic spinal cancer is a common condition that may lead to spinal instability, pain and paralysis. In the 1980s, surgery was discouraged because results showed worse neurological outcomes and pain compared with radiotherapy alone. However, with the advent of modern imaging and spinal stabilisation techniques, the role of surgery has regained centre stage, though few studies have assessed quality of life and functional outcomes after surgery. Objective We investigated whether surgery provides sustained improvement in quality of life and pain relief for patients with symptomatic spinal metastases by analysing the largest reported surgical series of patients with epidural spinal metastases. Methods A prospective cohort study of 922 consecutive patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery, from the Global Spine Tumour Study Group database. Pre- and post-operative EQ-5D quality of life, visual analogue pain score, Karnofsky physical functioning score, complication rates and survival were recorded. Results Quality of life (EQ-5D), VAS pain score and Karnofsky physical functioning score improved rapidly after surgery and these improvements were sustained in those patients who survived up to 2 years after surgery. In specialised spine centres, the technical intra-operative complication rate of surgery was low, however almost a quarter of patients experienced post-operative systemic adverse events. Conclusion Surgical treatment for spinal metastases produces rapid pain relief, maintains ambulation and improves good quality of life. However, as a group, patients with cancer are vulnerable to post-operative systemic complications, hence the importance of appropriate patient selection.

Assessment of quality of life after surgery for spinal metastases: position statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

OBJECTIVE To review suitable measures of patient-assessed outcome of surgery for spinal metastases, and suggest the Health-Related Quality of Life measures that are useful and practical for this group of patients. METHODS Surgery for metastatic spinal tumors is becoming more common, but the impact of surgery on the patient, as determined by patient-assessed outcome measures, is not well known. The authors of this article include members of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumors. During the development of a research database for the study of patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases, the different outcome measures were discussed by a panel of spinal surgeons, and quality of life measures were chosen for inclusion, based on expert opinion and literature review. RESULTS Several different measures are available to assess outcome after spinal surgery for metastatic disease, each with specific advantages and limitations, which are discussed. Our position is to use the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire, because of its simplicity and reliability. CONCLUSIONS We recommend the use of the EQ-5D measure in research for assessment of patient-centered outcomes and calculation of cost effectiveness of surgery for spinal metastases. Routine use of the measure in clinical practice is also encouraged, because it is a simple and quick method to assess overall clinical outcome.

Characteristics of Patients Who Survived 2 Years After Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Can We Avoid Inappropriate Patient Selection?

PURPOSE Survival after metastatic cancer has improved at the cost of increased presentation with metastatic spinal disease. For patients with pathologic spinal fractures and/or spinal cord compression, surgical intervention may relieve pain and improve quality of life. Surgery is generally considered to be inappropriate if anticipated survival is < 3 months. The aim of this international multicenter study was to analyze data from patients who died within 3 months or 2 years after surgery, to identify preoperative factors associated with poor or good survival, and to avoid inappropriate selection of patients for surgery in the future. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1,266 patients underwent surgery for impending pathologic fractures and/or neurologic deficits and were prospectively observed. Data collected included tumor characteristics, preoperative fitness (American Society of Anesthesiologists advisory [ASA]), neurologic status (Frankel scale), performance (Karnofsky performance score [KPS]), and quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensions questionnaire [EQ-5D]). Outcomes were survival at 3 months and 2 years postsurgery. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to find preoperative factors associated with short-term and long-term survival. RESULTS In univariable analysis, age, emergency surgery, KPS, EQ-5D, ASA, Frankel, and Tokuhashi/Tomita scores were significantly associated with short survival. In multivariable analysis, KPS and age were significantly associated with short survival (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.62; and OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.27, respectively). Associated with longer survival in univariable analysis were age, number of levels included in surgery, KPS, EQ-5D, Frankel, and Tokuhashi/Tomita scores. In multivariable analysis, the number of levels included in surgery (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.38) and primary tumor type were significantly associated with longer survival. CONCLUSION Poor performance status at presentation is the strongest indicator of poor short-term survival, whereas low disease load and favorable tumor histology are associated with longer-term survival.

Surgery for metastatic spine tumors in the elderly. Advanced age is not a contraindication to surgery

BACKGROUND With recent advances in oncologic treatments, there has been an increase in patient survival rates and concurrently an increase in the number of incidence of symptomatic spinal metastases. Because elderly patients are a substantial part of the oncology population, their types of treatment as well as the possible impact their treatment will have on healthcare resources need to be further examined. PURPOSE We studied whether age has a significant influence on quality of life and survival in surgical interventions for spinal metastases. STUDY DESIGN We used data from a multicenter prospective study by the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG). This GSTSG study involved 1,266 patients who were admitted for surgical treatments of symptomatic spinal metastases at 22 spinal centers from different countries and followed up for 2 years after surgery. PATIENT SAMPLE There were 1,266 patients recruited between March 2001 and October 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient demographics were collected along with outcome measures, including European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), neurologic functions, complications, and survival rates. METHODS We realized a multicenter prospective study of 1,266 patients admitted for surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases. They were divided and studied into three different age groups: <70, 70-80, and >80 years. RESULTS Despite a lack of statistical difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Frankel neurologic score, or Karnofsky functional score at presentation, patients >80 years were more likely to undergo emergency surgery and palliative procedures compared with younger patients. Postoperative complications were more common in the oldest age group (33.3% in the >80, 23.9% in the 70-80, and 17.9% for patients <70 years, p=.004). EQ-5D improved in all groups, but survival expectancy was significantly longer in patients <70 years old (p=.02). Furthermore, neurologic recovery after surgery was lower in patients >80 years old. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons should not be biased against operating elderly patients. Although survival rates and neurologic improvements in the elderly patients are lower than for younger patients, operating the elderly is compounded by the fact that they undergo more emergency and palliative procedures, despite good ASA scores and functional status. Age in itself should not be a determinant of whether to operate or not, and operations should not be avoided in the elderly when indicated.

Extrinsic thoracic spinal cord compression related to supine position: from diagnosis to the creation of a spinal protection shield

BACKGROUND Rapidly progressing extrinsic spinal cord compression syndromes are rare, especially when the compression is associated with the supine position. PURPOSE This work presents a case of extrinsic thoracic spinal cord compression related to the supine position and describes our approach from diagnosis to the technical therapeutic creation of a spinal protection shield. STUDY DESIGN One case of a patient suffering from extrinsic spinal cord compression syndrome is reported. PATIENT SAMPLE We report the case of a Coptic priest patient who, as a result of Pott disease sequelae, underwent several decompressive and stabilizing surgeries for major kyphoscoliosis. Consequently, he developed extrinsic thoracic spinal cord compression caused by the supine position. OUTCOME MEASURES After each instrumentation device removal, we noticed progressive severe paraparesis when the patient was supine. Imaging assessment confirmed spinal dynamic and intermittent compressions triggered by the supine position, which was facilitated by the exposure and vulnerability of the thoracic spine cord. METHODS We implanted a tailored titanium mesh spinal protection shield and a trapezius flap for spine coverage. This work presents the diagnostic aspects as well as several surgical technique options. RESULTS At the 6-year follow-up, the patients neurologic conditions were significantly improved. We report neurologic improvements, no sphincter disorder, persistent spasticity, and lower limbs weakness not affecting full ambulation. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, no other case of spinal protection shield in compressions caused by the supine position have been studied. The surgical and technical management therefore remains innovative.

The Intervertebral Disc: Physiology and Pathology of a Brittle Joint

BACKGROUND Intervertebral disc (ID) degeneration represents the number one cause for outpatient clinic visits worldwide. Mechanisms are discussed but not yet clearly established. Consequently, back pain management is commonly limited to symptomatic treatment therapies. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to evaluate major progress and to unravel the biology and pathology of ID discogenic pain. METHODS The design of this study is a systematic review. A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases, with no time constraints to locate relevant literature. Significant articles (literature reviews, therapeutic essays, clinical-human-research studies, animal research, and laboratory research) on the intervertebral disc were identified and reviewed. The exclusion criteria were the following: case reports and clinical studies with <10 patients. RESULTS Through a dense review of the literature, the ID is deciphered and described as a fragile anatomic entity. For this systematic review, 132 studies were identified and 79 were retained. The main deterioration and alteration mechanisms that lead to the programmed death of the ID are summarized. In addition, the large variety of biological therapies that override surgical treatment are determined. CONCLUSIONS The degeneration mechanisms of the ID are well defined and decrypted. Although therapies have progressed, none has been effective. The regeneration of the ID remains highly challenging because of the complexity of its natural composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties.

Metastatic Spine Tumor Epidemiology: Comparison of Trends in Surgery Across Two Decades and Three Continents

BACKGROUND Indications for surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have become better defined in recent years, and suitable outcome measures have been established against a changing backdrop of patient characteristics, tumor behavior, and oncologic treatments. Nonetheless, variations still exist in the local management of patients with spinal metastases. In this study, we aimed to review global trends and habits in the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases, and to examine how these have changed over the last 25 years. METHODS In this cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases, data were collected using a secure Internet database from 22 centers across 3 continents. All patients were invited to participate in the study, except those unable or unwilling to give consent. RESULTS There was a higher incidence of colonic, liver, and lung carcinoma metastases in Asian countries, and more frequent presentation of breast, prostate, melanoma metastases in the West. Trends in surgical technique were broadly similar across the centers. Overall survival rates after surgery were 53% at 1 year, 31% at 2 years, and 10% at 5 years after surgery (standard error 0.013 for all). Survival improved over successive time periods, with longer survival in patients who underwent surgery in 2011-2016 compared with those who underwent surgery in earlier time periods. CONCLUSIONS Surgical habits have been fairly consistent among countries worldwide and over time. However, patient survival has improved in later years, perhaps due to medical advances in the treatment of cancer, improved patient selection, and operating earlier in the course of disease.