Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christian Ottensmeier is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christian Ottensmeier.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010

Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

F. Stephen Hodi; David F. McDermott; R. W. Weber; Jeffrey A. Sosman; John B. A. G. Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia Vaubel; Gerald P. Linette; David Hogg; Christian Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbe; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I. Clark; Jedd D. Wolchok; Jeffrey S. Weber; Jason Tian; Michael Yellin; Geoffrey Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J. Urba

BACKGROUND An improvement in overall survival among patients with metastatic melanoma has been an elusive goal. In this phase 3 study, ipilimumab--which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response--administered with or without a glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide vaccine was compared with gp100 alone in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. METHODS A total of 676 HLA-A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, whose disease had progressed while they were receiving therapy for metastatic disease, were randomly assigned, in a 3:1:1 ratio, to receive ipilimumab plus gp100 (403 patients), ipilimumab alone (137), or gp100 alone (136). Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, was administered with or without gp100 every 3 weeks for up to four treatments (induction). Eligible patients could receive reinduction therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS The median overall survival was 10.0 months among patients receiving ipilimumab plus gp100, as compared with 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; P<0.001). The median overall survival with ipilimumab alone was 10.1 months (hazard ratio for death in the comparison with gp100 alone, 0.66; P=0.003). No difference in overall survival was detected between the ipilimumab groups (hazard ratio with ipilimumab plus gp100, 1.04; P=0.76). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 to 15% of patients treated with ipilimumab and in 3% treated with gp100 alone. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Ipilimumab, with or without a gp100 peptide vaccine, as compared with gp100 alone, improved overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Adverse events can be severe, long-lasting, or both, but most are reversible with appropriate treatment. (Funded by Medarex and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094653.)


Journal of Translational Medicine | 2012

Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force

Jérôme Galon; Franck Pagès; Francesco M. Marincola; Helen K. Angell; Magdalena Thurin; Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Anne Berger; Carlo Bifulco; Gerardo Botti; Fabiana Tatangelo; Cedrik M. Britten; Sebastian Kreiter; Lotfi Chouchane; Paolo Delrio; Hartmann Arndt; Michele Maio; Giuseppe Masucci; Martin C. Mihm; Fernando Vidal-Vanaclocha; James P. Allison; Sacha Gnjatic; Leif Håkansson; Christoph Huber; Harpreet Singh-Jasuja; Christian Ottensmeier; Heinz Zwierzina; Luigi Laghi; Fabio Grizzi; Pamela S. Ohashi

Prediction of clinical outcome in cancer is usually achieved by histopathological evaluation of tissue samples obtained during surgical resection of the primary tumor. Traditional tumor staging (AJCC/UICC-TNM classification) summarizes data on tumor burden (T), presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that clinical outcome can significantly vary among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information, and does not predict response to therapy. Recent literature has alluded to the importance of the host immune system in controlling tumor progression. Thus, evidence supports the notion to include immunological biomarkers, implemented as a tool for the prediction of prognosis and response to therapy. Accumulating data, collected from large cohorts of human cancers, has demonstrated the impact of immune-classification, which has a prognostic value that may add to the significance of the AJCC/UICC TNM-classification. It is therefore imperative to begin to incorporate the ‘Immunoscore’ into traditional classification, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool. Introduction of this parameter as a biomarker to classify cancers, as part of routine diagnostic and prognostic assessment of tumors, will facilitate clinical decision-making including rational stratification of patient treatment. Equally, the inherent complexity of quantitative immunohistochemistry, in conjunction with protocol variation across laboratories, analysis of different immune cell types, inconsistent region selection criteria, and variable ways to quantify immune infiltration, all underline the urgent requirement to reach assay harmonization. In an effort to promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings, an international task force was initiated. This review represents a follow-up of the announcement of this initiative, and of the J Transl Med. editorial from January 2012. Immunophenotyping of tumors may provide crucial novel prognostic information. The results of this international validation may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).


Nature Reviews Cancer | 2008

DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer.

Jason Rice; Christian Ottensmeier; Freda K. Stevenson

DNA vaccination has suddenly become a favoured strategy for inducing immunity. The molecular precision offered by gene-based vaccines, together with the facility to include additional genes to direct and amplify immunity, has always been attractive. However, the apparent failure to translate operational success in preclinical models to the clinic, for reasons that are now rather obvious, reduced initial enthusiasm. Recently, novel delivery systems, especially electroporation, have overcome this translational block. Here, we assess the development, current performance and potential of DNA vaccines for the treatment of cancer.


Science Translational Medicine | 2014

Anti–CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response

Pia Kvistborg; Daisy Philips; Sander Kelderman; Lois Hageman; Christian Ottensmeier; Deborah Joseph-Pietras; Marij J. P. Welters; Sjoerd H. van der Burg; Ellen Kapiteijn; Olivier Michielin; Emanuela Romano; Carsten Linnemann; Daniel E. Speiser; Christian U. Blank; John B. A. G. Haanen; Ton N. M. Schumacher

Anti–CTLA-4 treatment increases the diversity of the melanoma-specific CD8 T cell response. Anti–CTLA-4 Therapy Expands T Cell Range An antibody to the immune inhibitory molecule CTLA-4, ipilimumab, can improve survival in patients with advanced melanoma. However, how anti–CTLA-4 works to improve the tumor immune response in humans remains unclear. Now, Kvistborg et al. show that although the magnitude of T cell responses was largely unaltered after therapy, the number of different T cell responses was significantly increased. Indeed, this increased breadth suggests that anti–CTLA-4 may work by increasing priming of T cells to tumor-related antigens rather than boosting preexisting immune responses. If so, other strategies that improve the range of T cells may have similar success battling cancer. Anti–CTLA-4 treatment improves the survival of patients with advanced-stage melanoma. However, although the anti–CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab is now an approved treatment for patients with metastatic disease, it remains unknown by which mechanism it boosts tumor-specific T cell activity. In particular, it is unclear whether treatment amplifies previously induced T cell responses or whether it induces new tumor-specific T cell reactivities. Using a combination ultraviolet (UV)–induced peptide exchange and peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) combinatorial coding, we monitored immune reactivity against a panel of 145 melanoma-associated epitopes in a cohort of patients receiving anti–CTLA-4 treatment. Comparison of pre- and posttreatment T cell reactivities in peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples of 40 melanoma patients demonstrated that anti–CTLA-4 treatment induces a significant increase in the number of detectable melanoma-specific CD8 T cell responses (P = 0.0009). In striking contrast, the magnitude of both virus-specific and melanoma-specific T cell responses that were already detected before start of therapy remained unaltered by treatment (P = 0.74). The observation that anti–CTLA-4 treatment induces a significant number of newly detected T cell responses—but only infrequently boosts preexisting immune responses—provides strong evidence for anti–CTLA-4 therapy–enhanced T cell priming as a component of the clinical mode of action.


Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | 2008

The CIMT-monitoring panel: a two-step approach to harmonize the enumeration of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by structural and functional assays

Cedrik M. Britten; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Marij J. P. Welters; Graham Pawelec; Sven Koch; Christian Ottensmeier; Ann Mander; Steffen Walter; A. Paschen; J. Müller-Berghaus; I. Haas; Andreas Mackensen; Tania Køllgaard; P thor Straten; Michael Schmitt; K. Giannopoulos; R. Maier; H. Veelken; C. Bertinetti; A. Konur; Christoph Huber; Stefan Stevanovic; T. Wölfel; S. H. van der Burg

The interpretation of the results obtained from immunomonitoring of clinical trials is a difficult task due to the variety of methods and protocols available to detect vaccine-specific T-cell responses. This heterogeneity as well as the lack of standards has led to significant scepticism towards published results. In February 2005, a working group was therefore founded under the aegis of the Association for Immunotherapy of Cancer (“CIMT”) in order to compare techniques and protocols applied for the enumeration of antigen-specific T-cell responses. Here we present the results from two consecutive phases of an international inter-laboratory testing project referred to as the “CIMT monitoring panel”. A total of 13 centers from six European countries participated in the study in which pre-tested PBMC samples, synthetic peptides and PE-conjugated HLA-tetramers were prepared centrally and distributed to participants. All were asked to determine the number of antigen-specific T-cells in each sample using tetramer staining and one functional assay. The results of the first testing round revealed that the total number of cells analyzed was the most important determinant for the sensitive detection of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells by tetramer staining. Analysis by ELISPOT was influenced by a combination of cell number and a resting phase after thawing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Therefore, the experiments were repeated in a second phase but now the participants were asked to change their protocols according to the new guidelines distilled from the results of the first phase. The recommendations improved the number of antigen-specific T-cell responses that were detected and decreased the variability between the laboratories. We conclude that a two-step approach in inter-laboratory testing allows the identification of distinct variables that influence the sensitivity of different T-cell assays and to formally show that a defined correction to the protocols successfully increases the sensitivity and reduces the inter-center variability. Such “two-step” inter-laboratory projects could define rational bases for accepted international guidelines and thereby lead to the harmonization of the techniques used for immune monitoring.


Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | 2010

Response definition criteria for ELISPOT assays revisited

Zoe Moodie; Leah Price; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Ann Mander; Sylvia Janetzki; Martin Löwer; Marij J. P. Welters; Christian Ottensmeier; S. H. van der Burg; Cedrik M. Britten

No consensus has been reached on how to determine if an immune response has been detected based on raw data from an ELISPOT assay. The goal of this paper is to enable investigators to understand and readily implement currently available methods for response determination. We describe empirical and statistical approaches, identifying the strengths and limitations of each approach to allow readers to rationally select and apply a scientifically sound method appropriate to their specific laboratory setting. Five representative approaches were applied to data sets from the CIMT Immunoguiding Program and the response detection and false positive rates were compared. Simulation studies were also performed to compare empirical and statistical approaches. Based on these, we recommend the use of a non-parametric statistical test. Further, we recommend that six medium control wells or four wells each for both medium control and experimental conditions be performed to increase the sensitivity in detecting a response, that replicates with large variation in spot counts be filtered out, and that positive responses arising from experimental spot counts below the estimated limit of detection be interpreted with caution. Moreover, a web-based user interface was developed to allow easy access to the recommended statistical methods. This interface allows the user to upload data from an ELISPOT assay and obtain an output file of the binary responses.


British Journal of Cancer | 2014

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict for outcome in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer

Matthew Ward; Steve Thirdborough; Toby Mellows; C Riley; Scott Harris; Krishna Suchak; A. Webb; C Hampton; N N Patel; C J Randall; H.J. Cox; Sanjay Jogai; John Primrose; Kim Piper; Christian Ottensmeier; Emma King; Gareth J. Thomas

Background:Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) is associated with improved survival compared with HPV-negative disease. However, a minority of HPV-positive patients have poor prognosis. Currently, there is no generally accepted strategy for identifying these patients.Methods:We retrospectively analysed 270 consecutively treated OPSCC patients from three centres for effects of clinical, pathological, immunological, and molecular features on disease mortality. We used Cox regression to examine associations between factors and OPSCC death, and developed a prognostic model for 3-year mortality using logistic regression analysis.Results:Patients with HPV-positive tumours showed improved survival (hazard ratio (HR), 0.33 (0.21–0.53)). High levels of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) stratified HPV-positive patients into high-risk and low-risk groups (3-year survival; HPV-positive/TILhigh=96%, HPV-positive/TILlow=59%). Survival of HPV-positive/TILlow patients did not differ from HPV-negative patients (HR, 1.01; P=0.98). We developed a prognostic model for HPV-positive tumours using a ‘training’ cohort from one centre; the combination of TIL levels, heavy smoking, and T-stage were significant (AUROC=0·87). This model was validated on patients from the other centres (detection rate 67%; false-positive rate 5.6%; AUROC=0·82).Interpretation:Our data suggest that an immune response, reflected by TIL levels in the primary tumour, has an important role in the improved survival seen in most HPV-positive patients, and is relevant for the clinical evaluation of HPV-positive OPSCC.


Advances in Cancer Research | 2001

The occurrence and significance of V gene mutations in B cell—Derived human malignancy

Freda K. Stevenson; Surinder S. Sahota; Christian Ottensmeier; Delin Zhu; Francesco Forconi; Terry J. Hamblin

The classification of B cell tumors has relevance for refining and improving clinical strategies. However, consensus has been difficult to establish, and although a scheme is now available, objective criteria are desirable. Genetic technology will underpin and extend current knowledge, and it is certain to reveal further subdivisions of current tumor categories. The Ig variable region genes of B cell tumors present a considerable asset for this area of investigation. The unique sequences carried in neoplastic B cells are easily isolated and sequenced. In addition to acting as clone-specific markers of each tumor, they indicate where the cell has come from and track its history following transformation. There is emerging clinical value in knowing whether the cell of origin has encountered antigen and has moved from the naive compartment to the germinal center, where somatic mutation is activated. This is amply illustrated by the subdivision of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into two subsets, unmutated or mutated, each with very different prognosis. Other tumors may be subdivided in a similar way. Microarray technology is developing rapidly to probe gene expression and to further divide tumor categories. All these genetic analyses will provide objective data to enhance both our understanding of B cell tumors and our ability to treat them.


Cancer Research | 2006

Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Locus Events and Expression of Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase in Epithelial Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Gavin Babbage; Christian Ottensmeier; Jeremy P. Blaydes; Freda K. Stevenson; Surinder S. Sahota

When cells transform, phenotypic and genetic profiles can be dramatically altered. Nevertheless, a recent report identifying IgG in breast cancer cells was unexpected, revealing differentiation features normally associated with B lymphocytes. To extend these findings, we focused on immunoglobulin variable (V) region gene analysis using well-defined breast cancer cell lines expressing the epithelial marker, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). V(H) gene transcripts were identifiable by nested reverse transcription-PCR either as single or dual V, diversity (D), and joining (J) rearrangements in four of six lines, most being potentially functional. V(D)J transcripts were observed in sequential cultures, indicating stable expression. To exclude coexisting lymphocytes, each cell line was shown to be EBV negative, with CD19/CD20 and cytoplasmic/surface immunoglobulin also absent by flow cytometry. Identified V(H) transcripts were then sought in individual tumor cells, isolated as EpCAM+ single cells by flow cytometry. Importantly, in three of three selected cell lines, V(H) genes were identifiable in a significant fraction (approximately 32%) of single cells. In five of six identified V(H) genes, somatic mutations were apparent with no intraclonal variation, indicating cessation of mutational activity. V(H) transcripts were pre- and post-isotype switch, with activation of switch events evident from expressed germ-line switch transcripts in two of six lines. Strikingly, six of six cell lines expressed activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) essential for mutational and switch activity. These data suggest either a de novo rearrangement and modification of V(H) genes in epithelial tumor cells or assimilation of lymphocyte-derived chromatin. Constitutive AID activation in malignant epithelial cells further raises a potential for inducing aberrant mutational activity.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1995

CD44 variant expression is a common feature of epithelial ovarian cancer: lack of association with standard prognostic factors.

Stephen A. Cannistra; Graziella Abu-Jawdeh; Jonathan M. Niloff; Thomas Strobel; Linda Swanson; Janet Andersen; Christian Ottensmeier

PURPOSE CD44 is a hyaluronic acid receptor that exists as a standard 90-kd form (CD44S) as well as several CD44 variant isoforms produced through alternative splicing. Expression of CD44 variants is associated with clinically aggressive behavior in some human tumors. The purpose of the present study is to define the expression of CD44 variant isoforms in ovarian cancer and to investigate whether the expression of these molecules is associated with adverse prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six specimens of normal ovarian surface epithelium (NOSE) and 31 separate cases of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer were studied by a combination of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunoperoxidase staining. Clinical correlation was made between CD44 variant expression and stage (I/II v III/IV), residual disease (< or = 2.0- v > 2.0-cm mass), age (< or = 65 v > 65 years), histology (papillary serous v other), grade, and survival. RESULTS RT-PCR analysis revealed that NOSE predominantly expressed transcripts for CD44S, as well as a restricted pattern of transcripts characteristic of CD44 splice variants. CD44S and CD44 variant exon nine sequences (CD44-9v) were focally expressed in one of two NOSE specimens examined by immunoperoxidase staining. In comparison, the majority (71%) of ovarian cancer specimens expressed a complex pattern of CD44 splice variants by RT-PCR analysis. Immunoperoxidase studies revealed that the majority of ovarian cancer specimens expressed both CD44S and CD44-9v, whereas expression of sequences from variant exons 3, 4, and 6 was uncommon. There was no association between CD44 variant expression (transcript or protein) and stage, residual disease, age, histology, grade, or survival. CONCLUSION Expression of CD44S and CD44-9v is a common feature of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. The lack of a significant association between CD44 variant expression and prognosis suggests that other factors may be more important in determining the clinical behavior of this disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christian Ottensmeier's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Danson

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Lorigan

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tom Maishman

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angelica Cazaly

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emma King

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cedrik M. Britten

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marij J. P. Welters

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge