Christian Reyher

A Multicenter Trial of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery

BACKGROUND Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is reported to reduce biomarkers of ischemic and reperfusion injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but uncertainty about clinical outcomes remains. METHODS We conducted a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving adults who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass under total anesthesia with intravenous propofol. The trial compared upper-limb RIPC with a sham intervention. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or acute renal failure up to the time of hospital discharge. Secondary end points included the occurrence of any individual component of the primary end point by day 90. RESULTS A total of 1403 patients underwent randomization. The full analysis set comprised 1385 patients (692 in the RIPC group and 693 in the sham-RIPC group). There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of the composite primary end point (99 patients [14.3%] in the RIPC group and 101 [14.6%] in the sham-RIPC group, P=0.89) or of any of the individual components: death (9 patients [1.3%] and 4 [0.6%], respectively; P=0.21), myocardial infarction (47 [6.8%] and 63 [9.1%], P=0.12), stroke (14 [2.0%] and 15 [2.2%], P=0.79), and acute renal failure (42 [6.1%] and 35 [5.1%], P=0.45). The results were similar in the per-protocol analysis. No treatment effect was found in any subgroup analysis. No significant differences between the RIPC group and the sham-RIPC group were seen in the level of troponin release, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit or the hospital, new onset of atrial fibrillation, and the incidence of postoperative delirium. No RIPC-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Upper-limb RIPC performed while patients were under propofol-induced anesthesia did not show a relevant benefit among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. (Funded by the German Research Foundation; RIPHeart ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01067703.).

Multiple Electrode Aggregometry for the Assessment of Acquired Platelet Dysfunctions during Extracorporeal Circulation

BACKGROUND There have been many reports on how the usage of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is independently associated with the induction of platelet dysfunctions. The aim of the present investigation was to study the capability of the multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using the Multiplate (Roche AG, Grenzach, Germany) device to reflect the extent of ECC-associated platelet dysfunctions. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population consisted of patients who were treated with either hypothermic (cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB]) or normothermic (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) ECC. Hemostatic analyses included conventional laboratory coagulation tests and aggregometric measures following stimulation with different agonists using MEA. The area under the aggregation curve in the ADPtest (ex vivo adenosine diphosphate induced platelet aggregation) of the MEA was defined as the primary end point. The analyses were performed before the usage of ECC (baseline) and 90 minutes (T1), 120 minutes (T2), 150 minutes (T3), and 180 minutes (T4) after the usage of ECC. In the hypothermic ECC group, additional hemostatic analyses were performed after the patients postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (T5). Periprocedural data and results of other hemostatic testing were defined as secondary end points. RESULTS A total of n = 40 patients were assessed for eligibility and n = 25 patients were finally enrolled into the study (hypothermic ECC group: n = 20; normothermic ECC group: n = 5). The extent of ADP-induced platelet aggregation decreased significantly between baseline and consecutive measuring points during hypothermic ECC and remained unchanged between T4 and T5. In the normothermic ECC group, ADP-induced aggregability was significantly lower at T1 compared with baseline and remained unchanged from T1 onward. CONCLUSION Data from the present study indicate that ex vivo ADP-induced platelet aggregation in MEA reflects the time-dependent extent of ECC-induced platelet dysfunction.

The influence of selective pulmonary perfusion on the inflammatory response and clinical outcome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES Patients undergoing cardiac surgery presenting with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a higher 30-day mortality risk. In these patients, pulmonary dysfunction linked to an inflammatory response is frequent after cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which causes pulmonary hypoperfusion. We hypothesize that selective pulmonary perfusion (sPP) of the lungs leads to a reduction of pulmonary inflammation and a better clinical outcome. METHODS Fifty-nine COPD patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity <70%) undergoing cardiac surgery procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting 64%, valve 14%) were block-randomized to sPP (venous blood, temperature 2°C, 4 l) or standard CPB (28/28). The primary end-point of the study was to evaluate the effect of pulmonary perfusion on gas exchange by measuring alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient. The surrogate end-points were inflammatory response, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, time on respirator (TOR) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. A cytokine assay for interleukin-1β, IL-6, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and polymorphonuclear elastase was performed with peripheral blood at different time-points [(t1) pre-CPB, (t2) end of CPB, (t3) 3 h, (t4) 24 h, (t5) 48 h postoperatively]. Repeated-measure analysis of variance and non-parametric statistics were used to assess the between-group and during time differences. RESULTS The two groups proved comparable for perioperative variables. Serum cytokines were not different in the two groups throughout the study (P > 0.05 at single time-points), but as a function of time, the markers of the inflammatory response increased after CBP (P < 0.05 pre-CPB to 24 h). Clinical end-points were statistically comparable in both groups, but with a trend towards a shorter TOR (72 ± 159 h/106 ± 193 h) and ICU stay (3.9 ± 7.2 days/5.5 ± 9.2 days) in the sPP group despite a slightly longer time on extracorporeal circulation (120 vs 158 min). CONCLUSIONS These results indicate a non-significant trend that repeated hypothermic lung perfusion with venous blood during CPB may have a protective effect on the lungs. A multicentre study design and larger cohort seem necessary to demonstrate the benefits of sPP more clearly.

Use of lidocaine in endotracheal intubation. Blood and urine concentrations in patients and deceased after unsuccessful resuscitation

In toxicological analysis of postmortem samples the local anesthetic lidocaine is often identified. In most cases, lidocaine levels result from its use as aid in endotracheal intubation. The range of the drugs concentration in blood and urine was studied under controlled conditions from a cohort of cardiac surgery patients (n=35). Plasma concentrations 1 h after exposure to lidocaine in the range of the recommended 81 mg coating the endotracheal tube were less than 0.2 mg/l, its metabolite monoethylglycinxylidide (MEGX) less than 0.05 mg/l (median ratio 0.18, range 0.03-1.23). Also the concentrations of lidocaine and MEGX in urine samples were low (less than 1.2 and 0.1 mg/l, respectively) with MEGX/lidocaine ratios of 0.11 (median, range up to 1.2). These data were compared with results obtained by analyzing postmortem blood and urine samples of 18 deceased with a documented cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt prior to death. Blood concentrations were in the same range (lidocaine median 0.07, range 0.02-1.07 mg/l; MEGX median 0.01, range <0.001-0.044 mg/l); besides low lidocaine concentrations in urine. MEGX was detected only in 2 out of 9 urine samples. The results of the present study confirm that lidocaine is absorbed in the trachea from the endotracheal tube coated with lidocaine containing gel. Postmortem quantitative results can be explained on the basis of the data obtained in the controlled study.

Pre-filling of the extracorporeal circuit with autologous blood is safe, but not effective in optimizing biocompatibility in high-risk patients

Objectives: Haemodilution resulting from crystalloid priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit represents a major risk factor for blood transfusions in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We designed this study to evaluate the effects of antegrade autologous priming (AAP) on reducing perioperative blood transfusion and markers of the inflammatory response in older patients (>75 years). Methods: Seventy-two patients undergoing first-time coronary bypass and/or aortic valve replacement were prospectively randomised to a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with or without AAP. AAP was performed by adding the patient’s own blood to the prime solution (mean 280ml). Perfusion and anaesthetic techniques were as usual. The haematocrit was maintained at a minimum of 21% during CPB. Patients were well matched for all preoperative variables, including established transfusion risk factors. The primary endpoint was the requirement of red cell transfusion. The surrogate endpoints were renal function, inflammatory response and ischaemic parameters. Blood samples were drawn pre- and intraoperatively and at intervals of 6 hours till POD 6. Results: Current analysis shows no differences in patients receiving homologous packed red cell transfusions. Also, markers of the inflammatory response (IL6, IL8), renal function (cystatin C, creatinine) and myocardial ischaemia (troponin T, CK-MB) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). Clinical outcomes were similar with respect to pulmonary, renal and hepatic function, length of ICU stay and hospital stay. Conclusion: These data suggest that antegrade autologous priming is a safe procedure, but an ineffective way for improving biocompatibility and reducing the need for blood transfusion in older patients.

Real-Time Measurement of Rectal Mucosal Microcirculation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

OBJECTIVES Mesenteric ischemia is still a fatal event after cardiac procedures. No adequate intraoperative methods are available to monitor the gastrointestinal mucosal microcirculation in real-time conditions. The aim of the study was to assess a newly designed microprobe using laser Doppler flowmetry and remission spectroscopy. DESIGN One-group, prospective, nonrandomized, open, pilot diagnostic study. SETTING Monocenter university hospital. PARTICIPANTS 50 patients (n = 38 males, 67±6 years) scheduled for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were prospectively included. INTERVENTION During anesthetic induction, the transrectal microprobe (30×15 mm) was positioned between the inferior and middle rectal valve (5-8 cm). Time periods were summarized at T1 = pre-CPB, T2 = CPB, T3 = post-CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS In 39 of 50 patients, data recruitment with the microprobe was successful. Measurement failures were due to fecal contaminations and probe dislocations. Rectal blood flow and velocity significantly decreased after bypass initiation (T2). Lowest flow rates were recorded after cross-clamp removal and did not recover at the end of bypass (T3). No side effects of the probe were noted. CONCLUSIONS The new microprobe allows reproducible, safe, intraoperative, real-time evaluation of the rectal mucosal microcirculation. It could be a useful diagnostic tool to prevent mesenteric ischemia by optimizing extracorporeal circulation in future studies. However, first correlation of rectal blood flow and postoperative events (eg, ischemia, lactate) in a large cohort are necessary.

Antifactor Xa Activity for the Management of Anticoagulation during Cardiac Surgery.

Background In patients with autoimmune diseases associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, precise management of anticoagulation during extracorporeal circulation (ECC) is complicated. It was the aim of the present study to determine whether antifactor Xa (aXa) activity is useful in guiding heparin therapy during ECC. Methods In 15 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and its reversal with protamine were guided using activated clotting time (ACT) (>400 second during ECC; ≤100 second for UFH reversal). For each ACT, the corresponding aXa activity levels were measured. Results A total of 144 blood samples were obtained. ACT and aXa activity were significantly correlated (r = 0.771, p< 0.0001, Spearman rank-order correlation). Using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, the cutoffvalues for aXa activity were 1.14 IU/mL (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.89; inaccuracy rate: 9.4%) to predict ACT > 400 seconds and 0.55 IU/mL (AUC: 0.85; inaccuracy rate: 13.3%) for ACT ≤ 100 seconds. Conclusion AXa activity is strongly correlated with ACT, and therefore may be feasible for managing anticoagulation with UFH during ECC.

Retrospective analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors for readmission to the intensive care unit after fast track cardiac surgery

Objectives: The introduction of fast-track treatment procedures following cardiac surgery has significantly shortened hospitalisation times in intensive care units (ICU). Readmission to intensive care units is generally considered a negative quality criterion. The aim of this retrospective study is to statistically analyse risk factors and predictors for re-admission after a fast-track patient management program. Methods: 229 operated patients (67 ± 11 ys, 75% male, BMI 27 ± 3, 6/2010 – 5/2011) with use of extracorporeal circulation (70 ± 31 min aortic crossclamping, CABG 62%) were selected for a preoperative fast-track procedure (transfer on the day of surgery to an intermediate care (IMC) unit, stable circulatory conditions, extubated). 58 items were recorded and analysed. Results: Over the 11-month study period, 36% of all preoperatively declared fast-track patients could not be transferred to an IMC unit on the day of surgery or had to be readmitted to the ICU after the first postoperative day usually because of bleeding- (22%), pulmonary- (14%) or renal (11%) problems. Readmission signifies a dramatic worsening of the patient outcome (mortality 0/10%, hospital stay 10.3 ± 2.5/16.5 ± 16.3, transfusion rate 1.4 ± 1.7/5.3 ± 9.1). Predicators for failure of the fast-track procedure are a preoperative ASA> 3, NYHA>III and an operation time > 267 min ± 74. The significant risk factors for a major postoperative event are a poor EF (OR 2.7 CI 95% 0.98 – 7.6) and the described ICU readmission (OR 0.14 CI95% 0.05 – 0.36). Conclusions: The failure of a fast-track patient management concept is associated with a high loss of patient outcome. Major pre-operative selection factors of suitable fast-track patients are the ASA- and NYHA classes as well as intraoperatively recorded operation time.