Christian Swinney

Incontinentia Pigmenti: A Comprehensive Review and Update.

Incontinentia pigmenti (IP) is a rare syndrome with skin lesions, ocular abnormalities in the retina and elsewhere, central nervous system abnormalities, and teeth defects. The authors present an updated review of the literature, highlighting diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of IP. IP is an X-linked dominant syndrome with an incidence of 0.0025%; most patients are female. IP is caused by a mutation in the IKBKG gene, causing a loss of function of NF-κß, leaving cells susceptible to apoptosis from intrinsic factors. The cardinal feature of IP is four stages of skin distinctive lesions. Of those with IP, 36.5% have detectable eye pathology and 60% to 90% of those have retinal issues. Peripheral avascularity and macular occlusive disease commonly occur. The authors performed a comprehensive review of Medline from 1947 to 2014. All papers mentioning IP in ophthalmologic journals were reviewed as well as applicable publications from other medical specialties.

Postoperative Visual Loss Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors by Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND Postoperative visual loss (POVL) is a potentially devastating complication of lumbar spine surgery that may lead to significant functional impairment. Although POVL is rare, a review of the literature shows that it is being reported with increasing frequency. A systematic analysis detailing the etiology and prognosis of the 3 main types of POVL has yet to be published. We reviewed potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for ischemic optic neuropathy (ION), central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and cortical blindness (CB) after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS A PubMed and Google literature search was completed in the absence of time constraints. Relevant articles on POVL after spine surgery were identified and reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS We identified 4 large-scale studies that statistically analyzed risk factors for POVL. ION, CRAO, and CB were the most frequently reported POVL types in the literature. Data were abstracted from 19 ION case reports, 3 CRAO case reports, and 5 CB case reports. CONCLUSIONS We reviewed the preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for each of the 3 main POVL types, using several published case reports to supplement the limited large-scale studies available. ION risks may be influenced by a longer operative time in the prone position with anemia, hypotension, and blood transfusion. The risk for CRAO is usually due to improper positioning during the surgery. Prone positioning and obesity were found to be most commonly associated with CB development. The prognosis, prevention techniques, and treatment of each POVL type can vary considerably.

Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool

OBJECTIVE The ability to assess the risk of adverse events based on known patient factors and comorbidities would provide more effective preoperative risk stratification. Present risk assessment in spine surgery is limited. An adverse event prediction tool was developed to predict the risk of complications after spine surgery and tested on a prospective patient cohort. METHODS The spinal Risk Assessment Tool (RAT), a novel instrument for the assessment of risk for patients undergoing spine surgery that was developed based on an administrative claims database, was prospectively applied to 246 patients undergoing 257 spinal procedures over a 3-month period. Prospectively collected data were used to compare the RAT to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator. Study end point was occurrence and type of complication after spine surgery. RESULTS The authors identified 69 patients (73 procedures) who experienced a complication over the prospective study period. Cardiac complications were most common (10.2%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to compare complication outcomes using the different assessment tools. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed comparable predictive accuracy between the RAT and the ACS NSQIP calculator (0.670 [95% CI 0.60-0.74] in RAT, 0.669 [95% CI 0.60-0.74] in NSQIP). The CCI was not accurate in predicting complication occurrence (0.55 [95% CI 0.48-0.62]). The RAT produced mean probabilities of 34.6% for patients who had a complication and 24% for patients who did not (p = 0.0003). The generated predicted values were stratified into low, medium, and high rates. For the RAT, the predicted complication rate was 10.1% in the low-risk group (observed rate 12.8%), 21.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 31.8%), and 49.7% in the high-risk group (observed 41.2%). The ACS NSQIP calculator consistently produced complication predictions that underestimated complication occurrence: 3.4% in the low-risk group (observed 12.6%), 5.9% in the medium-risk group (observed 34.5%), and 12.5% in the high-risk group (observed 38.8%). The RAT was more accurate than the ACS NSQIP calculator (p = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS While the RAT and ACS NSQIP calculator were both able to identify patients more likely to experience complications following spine surgery, both have substantial room for improvement. Risk stratification is feasible in spine surgery procedures; currently used measures have low accuracy.

Retrosigmoid Versus Translabyrinthine Approach for Acoustic Neuroma Resection: An Assessment of Complications and Payments in a Longitudinal Administrative Database

Object Retrosigmoid (RS) and translabyrinthine (TL) surgery remain essential treatment approaches for symptomatic or enlarging acoustic neuromas (ANs). We compared nationwide complication rates and payments, independent of tumor characteristics, for these two strategies. Methods We identified 346 and 130 patients who underwent RS and TL approaches, respectively, for AN resection in the 2010-2012 MarketScan database, which characterizes primarily privately-insured patients from multiple institutions nationwide. Results Although we found no difference in 30-day general neurological or neurosurgical complication rates, in TL procedures there was a decreased risk for postoperative cranial nerve (CN) VII injury (20.2% vs 10.0%, CI 0.23–0.82), dysphagia (10.4% vs 3.1%, CI 0.10–0.78), and dysrhythmia (8.4% vs 2.3%, CI 0.08–0.86). Overall, there was no difference in surgical repair rates of CSF leak; however, intraoperative fat grafting was significantly higher in TL approaches (19.8% vs 60.2%, CI 3.95–9.43). In patients receiving grafts, there was a trend towards a higher repair rate after RS approach, while in those without grafts, there was a trend towards a higher repair rate after TL approach. Median total payments were

Complications, Readmissions, and Revisions for Spine Procedures Performed by Orthopedic Surgeons Versus Neurosurgeons: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Study.

16,856 higher after RS approaches (

Optimization of tumor resection with intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging.

67,774 vs

Optimization of Tumor Resection with Intra-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comprehensive Review

50,918, p < 0.0001), without differences in physician or 90-day postoperative payments. Conclusions Using a nationwide longitudinal database, we observed that the TL, compared to RS, approach for AN resection experienced lower risks of CN VII injury, dysphagia, and dysrhythmia. There was no significant difference in CSF leak repair rates. The payments for RS procedures exceed payments for TL procedures by approximately

Intraocular Nematode Affixed to Posterior Lens Capsule.

17,000. Data from additional years and non-private sources will further clarify these trends.

Multimodal imaging of posterior dislocation of crystalline lens nucleus following vitrectomy

Study Design: Retrospective database analysis. Objective: To examine the impact of training pathway, either neurosurgical or orthopedic, on complications, readmissions, and revisions in spine surgery. Summary of Background Data: Training pathway has been shown to have an impact on outcomes in various surgical subspecialties. Although training pathway has not been shown to have a significant impact on spine surgery outcomes in the perioperative period, long-term results are unknown. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 197,682 patients receiving 1 of 3 common spine surgeries [lumbar laminectomy, lumbar fusion, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)] between 2006 and 2010 was conducted. Patient data were obtained from a large claims database. Postoperative adverse effects, all-cause readmission, revision surgery rates, and intermediary payments in these cohorts of patients were compared between spine surgeons with either neurosurgical or orthopedic backgrounds. Results: Patient demographics, hospital-stay characteristics, and medical comorbidities were similar between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The risks of surgical complications, all-cause readmission, and revision surgery were also similar between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons across all procedure types assessed, with several minor exceptions: neurosurgeons had marginally higher odds of any complication for lumbar fusions [odds ratio (OR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–1.20] and ACDFs (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.15). Neurosurgeons also had slightly higher rates of revision surgery for concurrent lumbar laminectomy with fusion (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08–1.22), and ACDFs (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14–1.28). No associations between surgeon type and any particular complication were consistently observed for all procedure groups. There were also no associations between surgeon type and 30-day all-cause readmission. Median total intermediary payments were somewhat higher for neurosurgery patients for all procedure groups assessed. Conclusions: Few significant associations between surgeon type and patient outcomes exist in the context of spine surgery. Those which do are small and unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

An assessment of data and methodology of online surgeon scorecards

Intra-operative MRI (ioMRI) may be used to optimize tumor resection. Utilization of this technology allows for the removal of residual tumor mass following initial tumor removal, maximizing the extent of resection. This, in turn, has been shown to lead to improved outcomes. Individual studies have examined the impact of ioMRI on the rate of extended resection, but a comprehensive review of this topic is needed. A literature review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases revealed 12 eligible studies. This included 804 primary operations and 238 extended resections based on ioMRI findings. Use of ioMRI led to extended tumor resection in 13.3-54.8% of patients (mean 37.3%). Stratification by tumor type showed additional resection occurred, on average, in 39.1% of glioma resections (range 13.3-70.0%), 23.5% of pituitary tumor resections (range 13.3-33.7%), and 35.0% of nonspecific tumor resections (range 17.5-40%). Tumor type (glioma vs. pituitary) did not significantly influence the rate of further excision following ioMRI (p=0.309). There was no difference in secondary resection rate between studies limited to pediatric patients and those including adults (p=0.646). Thus, the use of intra-operative MRI frequently results in further resection of tumors. It is primarily used for the resection of gliomas and pituitary tumors. Tumor type does not appear to be a significant contributing factor to the rate of secondary tumor removal. Limited evidence suggests that extended resection may translate into improved clinical outcomes and mortality rates. However, results have not been unanimous, while clinical effect sizes have often been modest.