Christiane Otto

GPR30 Does Not Mediate Estrogenic Responses in Reproductive Organs in Mice

Abstract The G protein-coupled receptor Gpr30 (Gper) was recently claimed to bind to estradiol and to activate cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways in response to estradiol. However, there are conflicting data regarding the role of Gpr30 as an estrogen receptor (ER): several laboratories were unable to demonstrate estradiol binding to GPR30 or estradiol-activated signal transduction in Gpr30-expressing cells. To clarify the potential role of Gpr30 as an ER, we generated Gpr30-deficient mice. Although Gpr30 was expressed in all reproductive organs, histopathological analysis did not reveal any abnormalities in these organs in Gpr30-deficient mice. Mutant male and female mice were as fertile as their wild-type littermates, indicating normal function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Moreover, we analyzed estrogenic responses in two major estradiol target organs, the uterus and the mammary gland. For that purpose, we examined different readout paradigms such as morphological measures, cellular proliferation, and target gene expression. Our data demonstrate that in vivo Gpr30 is dispensable for the mediation of estradiol effects in reproductive organs. These results are in clear contrast to the phenotype of mice lacking the classic ER alpha (Esr1) or aromatase (Cyp19a1). We conclude that the perception of Gpr30 (based on homology related to peptide receptors) as an ER might be premature and has to be reconsidered.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 Localizes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Is Not Activated by Estradiol

The classical estrogen receptor (ER) mediates genomic as well as rapid nongenomic estradiol responses. In case of genomic responses, the ER acts as a ligand-dependent transcription factor that regulates gene expression in estrogen target tissues. In contrast, nongenomic effects are initiated at the plasma membrane and lead to rapid activation of cytoplasmic signal transduction pathways. Recently, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, GPR30, has been claimed to bind to and to signal in response to estradiol. GPR30 therefore might mediate some of the nongenomic estradiol effects. The present study was performed to clarify the controversy about the subcellular localization of GPR30 and to gain insight into the in vivo function of this receptor. In transiently transfected cells as well as cells endogenously expressing GPR30, we confirmed that the receptor localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. However, using radioactive estradiol, we observed only saturable, specific binding to the classical ER but not to GPR30. Estradiol stimulation of cells expressing GPR30 had no impact on intracellular cAMP or calcium levels. To elucidate the physiological role of GPR30, we performed in vivo experiments with estradiol and G1, a compound that has been claimed to act as selective GPR30 agonist. In two classical estrogen target organs, the uterus and the mammary gland, G1 did not show any estrogenic effect. Taken together, we draw the conclusion that GPR30 is still an orphan receptor.

A critical review of fundamental controversies in the field of GPR30 research

The female sex hormone estradiol plays an important role in reproduction, mammary gland development, bone turnover, metabolism, and cardiovascular function. The effects of estradiol are mediated by two classical nuclear receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta). In 2005, G-protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) was claimed to act as a non-classical estrogen receptor that was also activated by the ERalpha and ERbeta antagonists tamoxifen and fulvestrant (ICI 182780). Despite many conflicting results regarding the potential role of GPR30 as an estrogen receptor, the official nomenclature was changed to GPER (G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor). This review revisits the inconsistencies that still exist in the literature and focuses on selected publications that basically address the following two questions: what is the evidence for and against the hypothesis that GPR30 acts as an estrogen receptor? What is the potential in vivo role of GPR30? Thus, in the first part we focus on conflicting results from in vitro studies analysing the subcellular localization of GPR30, its ability to bind (or not to bind) estradiol and to signal (or not to signal) in response to estradiol. In the second part, we discuss the strengths and limitations of four available GPR30 mouse models. We elucidate the potential impact of different targeting strategies on phenotypic diversity.

Expression pattern of G protein-coupled receptor 30 in LacZ reporter mice.

Multiple reports implicated the function of G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)-30 with nongenomic effects of estrogen, suggesting that GPR30 might be a G-protein coupled estrogen receptor. However, the findings are controversial and the expression pattern of GPR30 on a cell type level as well as its function in vivo remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify cell types that express Gpr30 in vivo by analyzing a mutant mouse model that harbors a lacZ reporter (Gpr30-lacZ) in the Gpr30 locus leading to a partial deletion of the Gpr30 coding sequence. Using this strategy, we identified the following cell types expressing Gpr30: 1) an endothelial cell subpopulation in small arterial vessels of multiple tissues, 2) smooth muscle cells and pericytes in the brain, 3) gastric chief cells in the stomach, 4) neuronal subpopulations in the cortex as well as the polymorph layer of the dentate gyrus, 5) cell populations in the intermediate and anterior lobe of the pituitary gland, and 6) in the medulla of the adrenal gland. In further experiments, we aimed to decipher the function of Gpr30 by analyzing the phenotype of Gpr30-lacZ mice. The body weight as well as fat mass was unchanged in Gpr30-lacZ mice, even if fed with a high-fat diet. Flow cytometric analysis revealed lower frequencies of T cells in both sexes of Gpr30-lacZ mice. Within the T-cell cluster, the amount of CD62L-expressing cells was clearly reduced, suggesting an impaired production of T cells in the thymus of Gpr30-lacZ mice.

Impaired left-ventricular cardiac function in male GPR30-deficient mice

G-protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) has been reported to act as a membrane-bound estrogen receptor that is involved in the mediation of non-genomic estradiol signalling. In this study, we demonstrated that male, but not female, GPR30-deficient mice suffer from impaired left‑ventricular cardiac function. Left ventricles from male mutant mice were enlarged. There were no malformations in the valves or outflow tract of the heart. Both the contractility and relaxation capacity of the left ventricle were reduced, leading to increased left‑ventricular end-diastolic pressure in GPR30-deficient mice. In conclusion, our data support a role for GPR30 in the gender-specific aspects of heart failure.

In vitro characterization of ZK 230211—A type III progesterone receptor antagonist with enhanced antiproliferative properties

The progesterone receptor (PR) is a key regulator of female reproductive functions. Compounds with progesterone inhibiting effects (PR antagonists) have found numerous utilities in female reproductive health, ranging from contraception to potential treatment of progesterone-dependent diseases like uterine leiomyomas. Based on in vitro characteristics such as DNA binding activity and partial agonistic transcriptional behavior in the presence of protein kinase A activators (cyclic-AMP), three types of PR modulators with antagonistic properties have been defined. In this study, we analyzed the in vitro characteristics of the PR antagonist ZK 230211 in comparison to the classical antagonists onapristone and mifepristone. We focused on PR actions in genomic signaling pathways, including DNA binding activity, nuclear localization and association with the nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) as well as actions in non-genomic signaling, such as the activation of c-Src kinase signaling and cyclin D1 gene promoter activity. ZK 230211 represents a type of PR antagonist with increased inhibitory properties in comparison to mifepristone and onapristone. When liganded to the progesterone receptor, ZK 230211 induces a strong and persistent binding to its target response element (PRE) and increases NCoR recruitment in CV-1 cells. Furthermore, ZK 230211 displays less agonistic properties with regard to the association of PR isoform B and the cytoplasmic c-Src kinase in HeLa cells. It represses T47D cell cycle progression, in particular estradiol-induced S phase entry. In summary, our studies demonstrate ZK 230211 to be a type III progesterone receptor antagonist which is characterized by very strong DNA binding activity and strong antiproliferative effects in the cancer cell lines HeLa and T47D.

In vivo characterization of estrogen receptor modulators with reduced genomic versus nongenomic activity in vitro.

Estrogen receptor (ER) ligands that are able to prevent postmenopausal bone loss, but have reduced activity in the uterus and the mammary gland might be of great value for hormone therapy. It is well established that the classical ER can activate genomic as well as nongenomic signal transduction pathways. In this study, we analyse the in vivo behaviour of ER ligands that stimulate nongenomic ER effects to the same extent as estradiol, but show clearly reduced activation of genomic ER effects in vitro. Using different readout parameters such as morphological changes, cellular proliferation, and target gene induction, we are able to demonstrate that ER ligands with reduced genomic activity in vitro show a better dissociation of bone versus uterine and mammary gland effects than estradiol that stimulates genomic and nongenomic effects to the same extent. We conclude that pathway-selective ER ligands may represent an interesting option for hormone therapy.

Comparative Analysis of the Uterine and Mammary Gland Effects of Drospirenone and Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

The role of progestins in combined hormone therapy is the inhibition of uterine epithelial cell proliferation. The Womens Health Initiative study provided evidence for an increased risk of breast cancer in women treated with conjugated equine estrogens plus the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), compared with conjugated equine estrogens-only treatment. These findings continue to be discussed, and it remains to be clarified whether the results obtained for MPA in the Womens Health Initiative study are directly applicable to other progestins used in hormone therapy. In this study we compared in a mouse model the effects of the synthetic progestins, MPA, and drospirenone in two major target organs: the uterus and mammary gland. As quantitative measures of progestin activity, we analyzed maintenance of pregnancy, ductal side branching in the mammary gland, and proliferation of mammary and uterine epithelial cells as well as target gene induction in both organs. The outcome of this study is that not all synthetic progestins exhibit the same effects. MPA demonstrated uterine activity and mitogenic activity in the mammary gland at the same doses. In contrast, drospirenone behaved similarly to the natural hormone, progesterone, and exhibited uterine activity at doses lower than those leading to considerable proliferative effects in the mammary gland. We hypothesize that the safety of combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women may be associated with a dissociation between the uterine and mammary gland activities of the progestin component.

A Dual Estrogen Receptor TR-FRET Assay for Simultaneous Measurement of Steroid Site Binding and Coactivator Recruitment

The human estrogen receptors (hER) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) superfamily and represent important drug targets for the pharmaceutical industry. Initially, ligand binding assays were used to identify novel ligands using receptors purified from native tissues. With the advent of molecular cloning techniques, cell-based transactivation assays have been the gold standard for many years of drug discovery. With the elucidation of the structural mechanisms underlying the activation of NHRs, cell-free assays with purified receptors have become important tools to directly assess different binding sites (e.g., the hormone binding site or the cofactor binding site). The available cell-free assays have so far facilitated the study of one binding site at a time. With the introduction of Terbium (Tb3+)–based time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET), it has become possible to measure 2 different interactions within 1 test tube in parallel. The authors have applied this technology to develop a dual readout system for the simultaneous monitoring of steroid hormone site binding and cofactor peptide recruitment. They took advantage of a commercially available fluorescent tracer as an indicator for classical steroid site binding and designed a novel peptide derived from the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1a (PGC1a) as an indicator for functional agonistic behavior of a test compound. The established assay is able to differentiate between agonists, antagonists, partial agonists, and compounds binding to the cofactor recruitment site. The IC50 values obtained for a number of reference compounds in the multiplexed assay are in concordance with published data. The simple 1-step mix-and-measure protocol gives excellent quality and robustness and can be miniaturized to 5-µL volume.

Comparative analysis of the uterine and mammary gland effects of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVESnIn combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) progestins are used to inhibit estradiol-activated uterine epithelial cell proliferation. In comparison to estradiol-only therapy, combined HRT leads to enhanced proliferation of mammary epithelial cells. In a quantitative mouse model, we assessed the balance between uterine and undesired mammary gland effects for two progestins that are widely used in HRT, progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnMice were ovariectomized and after 14 days they were treated subcutaneously with either vehicle, estradiol (100 ng) or estradiol plus increasing doses of progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate for three weeks.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURESnMeasures for progestogenic mammary gland activity were stimulation of side-branching and stimulation of epithelial cell proliferation. Progestogenic activity in the uterus was assessed by measuring inhibition of estradiol-activated uterine epithelial cell proliferation. ED(50) and ID(50) values for the distinct readouts were obtained and dissociation factors for uterine versus mammary gland activity were calculated.nnnRESULTSnMPA demonstrated uterine activity and mitogenic activity in the mammary gland at the same doses. In contrast, progesterone showed uterine activity at doses lower than those leading to significant stimulation of epithelial cell proliferation in the mammary gland.nnnCONCLUSIONSnProgestins do not behave the same. Use of the natural hormone progesterone, but not MPA, in combined hormone therapy might offer a safety window between uterine effects and undesired proliferative activity in the mammary gland.