Christina K. Holub
San Diego State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christina K. Holub.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2013
Christina K. Holub; John P. Elder; Elva M. Arredondo; Simón Barquera; Christina M. Eisenberg; Luz María Sánchez Romero; Juan A. Rivera; Felipe Lobelo; Eduardo J. Simoes
CONTEXT Latinos are the largest and fastest-growing ethnically diverse group in the U.S.; they are also the most overweight. Mexico is now second to the U.S. in experiencing the worst epidemic of obesity in the world. Objectives of this study were to (1) conduct a systematic review of obesity-related interventions targeting Latinos living in the U.S. and Latin America and (2) develop evidence-based recommendations to inform culturally relevant strategies targeting obesity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Obesity-related interventions, published between 1965 and 2010, were identified through searches of major electronic databases in 2010-2011. Selection criteria included evaluation of obesity-related measures; intervention conducted in a community setting; and at least 50.0% Latino/Latin American participants, or with stratified results by race/ethnicity. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Body of evidence was based on the number of available studies, study design, execution, and effect size. Of 19,758 articles, 105 interventions met final inclusion criteria. Interventions promoting physical activity and/or healthy eating had strong or sufficient evidence for recommending (1) school-based interventions in the U.S. and Latin America; (2) interventions for overweight or obese children in the healthcare context in Latin America; (3) individual-based interventions for overweight or obese adults in the U.S.; (4) individual-based interventions for adults in Latin America; and (5) healthcare-based interventions for overweight or obese adults in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS Most intervention approaches combined physical activity and healthy eating to address both sides of the energy-balance equation. Results can help guide comprehensive evidence-based efforts to tackle the obesity epidemic in the U.S. and Latin America.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2013
Christina K. Holub; John P. Elder; Elva M. Arredondo; Simón Barquera; Christina M. Eisenberg; Luz María Sánchez Romero; Juan Rivera; Felipe Lobelo; Eduardo J. Simoes
CONTEXT Latinos are the largest and fastest-growing ethnically diverse group in the U.S.; they are also the most overweight. Mexico is now second to the U.S. in experiencing the worst epidemic of obesity in the world. Objectives of this study were to (1) conduct a systematic review of obesity-related interventions targeting Latinos living in the U.S. and Latin America and (2) develop evidence-based recommendations to inform culturally relevant strategies targeting obesity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Obesity-related interventions, published between 1965 and 2010, were identified through searches of major electronic databases in 2010-2011. Selection criteria included evaluation of obesity-related measures; intervention conducted in a community setting; and at least 50.0% Latino/Latin American participants, or with stratified results by race/ethnicity. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Body of evidence was based on the number of available studies, study design, execution, and effect size. Of 19,758 articles, 105 interventions met final inclusion criteria. Interventions promoting physical activity and/or healthy eating had strong or sufficient evidence for recommending (1) school-based interventions in the U.S. and Latin America; (2) interventions for overweight or obese children in the healthcare context in Latin America; (3) individual-based interventions for overweight or obese adults in the U.S.; (4) individual-based interventions for adults in Latin America; and (5) healthcare-based interventions for overweight or obese adults in Latin America. CONCLUSIONS Most intervention approaches combined physical activity and healthy eating to address both sides of the energy-balance equation. Results can help guide comprehensive evidence-based efforts to tackle the obesity epidemic in the U.S. and Latin America.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2013
Lilian G. Perez; Elva M. Arredondo; John P. Elder; Simón Barquera; Brian Nagle; Christina K. Holub
CONTEXT Latinos have one of the highest prevalences of obesity in the U.S. Efforts to address U.S. Latino health have expanded to include obesity prevention and treatment initiatives. The objectives of this review were to (1) conduct a systematic review of obesity-related treatment interventions targeting U.S. Latino adults and (2) develop evidence-based recommendations to inform culturally relevant strategies for obesity treatment targeting U.S. Latino adults. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Obesity treatment interventions, published between 1990 and 2010, were identified through a systematic search of electronic databases conducted between January 2010 and December 2011. Details of the screening process and selection/exclusion criteria are reported in the Guide to Obesity Prevention in Latin America and the U.S. (GOL) parent study. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 325 studies identified in the GOL parent study, 105 met the inclusion criteria, and 22 involved obesity treatment interventions for Latinos and were included in the present review. The 22 studies were evaluated (between January 2010 and December 2011) for strength of study design and execution; effect sizes were also estimated for treatment effects on obesity-related outcomes. Interventions for physical activity or diet behavioral changes with strong or sufficient evidence included (1) community-based, culturally relevant, RCTs, and non-randomized controlled trials; (2) church-based interventions; and (3) promotora-led interventions. CONCLUSIONS Most interventions targeted physical activity and/or diet behavioral modification in Latinas and were led by bicultural/bilingual professionals. Potential key intervention settings include community clinics/centers and churches. Although there was limited literature on obesity treatment interventions for U.S. Latinos, the review findings provide valuable insight to researchers and practitioners involved in obesity treatment for U.S. Latino adults.
Journal of School Health | 2013
Felipe Lobelo; Isabel Garcia de Quevedo; Christina K. Holub; Brian Nagle; Elva M. Arredondo; Simón Barquera; John P. Elder
BACKGROUND Rapidly rising childhood obesity rates constitute a public health priority in Latin America which makes it imperative to develop evidence-based strategies. Schools are a promising setting but to date it is unclear how many school-based obesity interventions have been documented in Latin America and what level of evidence can be gathered from such interventions. METHODS We performed a systematic review of papers published between 1965 and December 2010. Interventions were considered eligible if they had a school-based component, were done in Latin America, evaluated an obesity related outcome (body mass index [BMI], weight, %body fat, waist circumference, BMI z-score), and compared youth exposed vs not exposed. RESULTS Ten studies were identified as having a school-based component. Most interventions had a sample of normal and overweight children. The most successful interventions focused on prevention rather than treatment, had longer follow-ups, a multidisciplinary team, and fewer limitations in execution. Three prevention and 2 treatment interventions found sufficient improvements in obesity-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We found sufficient evidence to recommend school-based interventions to prevent obesity among youth in Latin America. Evidence-based interventions in the school setting should be promoted as an important component for integrated programs, policies, and monitoring frameworks designed to reverse the childhood obesity in the region.
Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2015
Elva M. Arredondo; Jessica Haughton; Guadalupe X. Ayala; Donald J. Slymen; James F. Sallis; Kari Herzog Burke; Christina K. Holub; Dayana Chanson; Lilian G. Perez; Rodrigo Valdivia; Sherry Ryan; John P. Elder
OBJECTIVES To describe both conditions of a two-group randomized trial, one that promotes physical activity and one that promotes cancer screening, among churchgoing Latinas. The trial involves promotoras (community health workers) targeting multiple levels of the Ecological Model. This trial builds on formative and pilot research findings. DESIGN Sixteen churches were randomly assigned to either the physical activity intervention or cancer screening comparison condition (approximately 27 women per church). In both conditions, promotoras from each church intervened at the individual- (e.g., beliefs), interpersonal- (e.g., social support), and environmental- (e.g., park features and access to health care) levels to affect change on target behaviors. MEASUREMENTS The studys primary outcome is min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at baseline and 12 and 24 months following implementation of intervention activities. We enrolled 436 Latinas (aged 18-65 years) who engaged in less than 250 min/wk of MVPA at baseline as assessed by accelerometer, attended church at least four times per month, lived near their church, and did not have a health condition that could prevent them from participating in physical activity. Participants were asked to complete measures assessing physical activity and cancer screening as well as their correlates at 12- and 24-months. SUMMARY Findings from the current study will address gaps in research by showing the long term effectiveness of multi-level faith-based interventions promoting physical activity and cancer screening among Latino communities.
Journal of School Health | 2014
Christina K. Holub; Felipe Lobelo; Setoo Mehta; Luz María Sánchez Romero; Elva M. Arredondo; John P. Elder
BACKGROUND In the past 30 years, childhood obesity rates have tripled, disproportionately affecting Latino children. From 2003 to 2006, 43.0% of Mexican-American children were classified as overweight compared with 36.9% of non-Hispanic Whites. Obesity interventions targeting children can have a significant impact in the school setting. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of evidence-based, obesity-related interventions in the school setting. Inclusion criteria included: having 50% or more Latino children in the study, and usage of obesity-related outcomes (eg, body mass index [BMI] z-score, weight, and waist circumference, and body fat). RESULTS The majority of identified studies included interventions that targeted both nutrition and physical activity. The most successful interventions were randomized, controlled trials or quasi-experimental controlled studies and had few limitations in execution in the study; however, overall results were mixed. There are promising results for interventions targeting Latino children who are already overweight or obese, but evidence of effectiveness is sparse. CONCLUSIONS This review is the first to gather evidence-based research systematically aimed at obesity-related interventions in the school setting that are specifically focused on Latino children. Results of the review are promising and timely, given the exigency of the needed evidence, and the current state of childhood obesity in the United States.
Family & Community Health | 2014
Elva M. Arredondo; Monica Morello; Christina K. Holub; Jessica Haughton
Physical activity (PA) rates in young Latina girls are low. This study examined acceptability and feasibility of implementing a mother-daughter intervention targeting individual and family-level correlates of PA. Eleven mother-daughter dyads participated in an 8-week intervention promoting PA in preadolescents. Preliminary data suggest increases in self-report PA, reductions in television watching, and improvements in parenting and mother-daughter communication. Focus group data suggest that participants benefited from receiving the intervention in a group format. Findings suggest that mother-daughter interventions promoting PA in young Latinas are feasible. Physical activity may improve family communication and mother-daughter relations.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2013
Simon J. Marshall; Eduardo J. Simoes; Christina M. Eisenberg; Christina K. Holub; Elva M. Arredondo; Simón Barquera; John P. Elder
CONTEXT Between 1974 and 1997, the prevalence of overweight increased 300% among Brazilian children and adolescents. A systematic review was conducted between January 2010 and December 2011 of obesity-related interventions targeting Brazilian children and adolescents. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Manuscripts from 1965 to December 2010 were evaluated based on inclusion criteria including evaluating obesity-related outcomes and at least 50% of participants living in Brazil. Methods were adapted from the CDCs Community Guide. Evidence was based on the number of available studies, study design, execution, quality, and effect size. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sixteen articles were abstracted; five met final inclusion criteria. All intervention samples (range n=14-78; mean n=40.6) included overweight or obese children aged 8-17 years. The intervention duration range was 3-6 months, and dose frequency ranged from two to five times per week. Three of the five interventions included healthy eating and physical activity; two included only physical activity. Two interventions studies were rated as having greatest design suitability. Only one intervention had the greatest design suitability and a large effect size. CONCLUSIONS Intervention approaches that combined physical activity and healthy eating had the strongest effects. However, small sample bias, 95% CIs of primary effects, and poor-to-moderate quality of research designs and implementation suggest the combined evidence is best rated as Insufficient. This prohibits the recommendation of specific strategies or settings. Findings suggest that more well-designed evidence-based childhood obesity interventions in Brazil are needed and that promising, but yet unproven, interventions should be evaluated rigorously.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2015
William Arguelles; Maria M. Llabre; Ralph L. Sacco; Frank J. Penedo; Mercedes R. Carnethon; Linda C. Gallo; David J. Lee; Diane J. Catellier; Hector M. González; Christina K. Holub; Laura R. Loehr; Elsayed Z. Soliman; Neil Schneiderman
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Empirical investigation of the adequacy of metabolic syndrome (MetS) diagnostic criteria, and whether meaningful subtypes of MetS exist, is needed among Hispanics/Latinos. METHODS In 15,825 US Hispanics/Latinos from HCHS/SOL, latent class analysis of MetS components (waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and antihypertensive, lipid- and glucose-lowering medication use) was used to investigate (1) whether distinct subtypes of MetS could be identified, and how component levels differed between them, and (2) how identified subtypes related to covariates and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence. RESULTS Two latent clusters emerged in both men (n=6317) and women (n=9508): one characterized by relatively healthy mean levels (Non-MetS cluster, 77.1% of men and 67.1% of women) and the other by clinically elevated mean levels (MetS cluster, 22.9% of men and 32.9% of women) across most MetS components. These clusters showed expected associations with covariates and CVD prevalence. Notable results suggest that (1) HDL cholesterol may poorly differentiate between US Hispanics/Latinos with and without MetS (mean=45.4 vs. 44.6 mg/dL for men and 51.3 vs. 52.0 mg/dL for women in the MetS vs. Non-MetS clusters, respectively) and (2) the NCEP-ATP III 88 cm waist circumference cutoff for US females may not optimize diagnosis among Hispanic/Latino women (MetS cluster mean waist circumference=102.5 cm). CONCLUSIONS Beyond classification into having MetS or not, additional subtypes of MetS do not clearly emerge in US Hispanics/Latinos. Current diagnostic cutoffs for some components may not optimize MetS identification among this population.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2013
Simon J. Marshall; Eduardo J. Simoes; Christina M. Eisenberg; Christina K. Holub; Elva M. Arredondo; Simón Barquera; John P. Elder
CONTEXT Between 1974 and 1997, the prevalence of overweight increased 300% among Brazilian children and adolescents. A systematic review was conducted between January 2010 and December 2011 of obesity-related interventions targeting Brazilian children and adolescents. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Manuscripts from 1965 to December 2010 were evaluated based on inclusion criteria including evaluating obesity-related outcomes and at least 50% of participants living in Brazil. Methods were adapted from the CDCs Community Guide. Evidence was based on the number of available studies, study design, execution, quality, and effect size. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sixteen articles were abstracted; five met final inclusion criteria. All intervention samples (range n=14-78; mean n=40.6) included overweight or obese children aged 8-17 years. The intervention duration range was 3-6 months, and dose frequency ranged from two to five times per week. Three of the five interventions included healthy eating and physical activity; two included only physical activity. Two interventions studies were rated as having greatest design suitability. Only one intervention had the greatest design suitability and a large effect size. CONCLUSIONS Intervention approaches that combined physical activity and healthy eating had the strongest effects. However, small sample bias, 95% CIs of primary effects, and poor-to-moderate quality of research designs and implementation suggest the combined evidence is best rated as Insufficient. This prohibits the recommendation of specific strategies or settings. Findings suggest that more well-designed evidence-based childhood obesity interventions in Brazil are needed and that promising, but yet unproven, interventions should be evaluated rigorously.