Christina W. Yde
University of Southern Denmark
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christina W. Yde.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2013
Susan Thrane; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Mathilde S. Larsen; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Christina W. Yde
Resistance to tamoxifen is a major clinical challenge in the treatment of breast cancer; however, it is still unclear which signaling pathways are the major drivers of tamoxifen-resistant growth. To characterize resistance mechanisms, we have generated different tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines from MCF-7. In this model, we investigated whether signaling from human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs), their downstream kinases, or from the estrogen receptor α (ERα) was driving tamoxifen-resistant cell growth. Increased expression of EGFR and increased phosphorylation of HER3 were observed upon acquisition of tamoxifen resistance, and the extracellular activated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway was highly activated in the resistant cells. The EGFR inhibitor gefitinib and the ERK pathway inhibitor U0126 resulted in partial and preferential growth inhibition of tamoxifen-resistant cells. All the tamoxifen-resistant cell lines retained ERα expression but at a lower level compared to that in MCF-7. Importantly, we showed via ERα knockdown that the tamoxifen-resistant cells were dependent on functional ERα for growth and we observed a clear growth stimulation of resistant cell lines with clinically relevant concentrations of tamoxifen and 4-OH-tamoxifen, indicating that tamoxifen-resistant cells utilize agonistic ERα stimulation by tamoxifen for growth. The tamoxifen-resistant cells displayed high phosphorylation of ERα at Ser118 in the presence of tamoxifen; however, treatment with U0126 neither affected the level of Ser118 phosphorylation nor expression of the ERα target Bcl-2, suggesting that ERK contributes to cell growth independently of ERα in our cell model. In support of this, combined treatment against ERα and ERK signaling in resistant cells was superior to single-agent treatment and as effective as fulvestrant treatment of MCF-7 cells. Together, these findings demonstrate that ERα is a major driver of growth in tamoxifen-resistant cells supported by HER/ERK growth signaling, implying that combined targeting of these pathways may have a clinical potential for overcoming tamoxifen resistance.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2012
Christina W. Yde; Kristina B. Emdal; Barbara Guerra; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt
Resistance to endocrine therapy is a major clinical challenge in current treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The molecular mechanisms underlying resistance are yet not fully clarified. In this study, we investigated whether NFκB signaling is causally involved in antiestrogen resistant cell growth and a potential target for re-sensitizing resistant cells to endocrine therapy. We used an MCF-7-derived cell model for antiestrogen resistant breast cancer to investigate dependence on NFκB signaling for antiestrogen resistant cell growth. We found that targeting NFκB preferentially inhibited resistant cell growth. Antiestrogen resistant cells expressed increased p50 and RelB, and displayed increased phosphorylation of p65 at Ser529 and Ser536. Moreover, transcriptional activity of NFκB after stimulation with tumor necrosis factor α was enhanced in antiestrogen resistant cell lines compared to the parental cell line. Inhibition of NFκB signaling sensitized tamoxifen resistant cells to the growth inhibitory effects of tamoxifen but was not sufficient to fully restore sensitivity of fulvestrant resistant cells to fulvestrant. In support of this, depletion of p65 with siRNA in tamoxifen resistant cells increased sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment. Our data provide evidence that NFκB signaling is enhanced in antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells and plays an important role for antiestrogen resistant cell growth and for sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment in resistant cells. Our results imply that targeting NFκB might serve as a potential novel treatment strategy for breast cancer patients with resistance toward antiestrogen.
Anti-Cancer Drugs | 2009
Christina W. Yde; Mathias P. Clausen; Martin V. Bennetzen; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Ole G. Mouritsen; Barbara Guerra
Tamoxifen resistance is a major clinical problem in the treatment of estrogen receptor &agr;-positive breast tumors. It is, at present, unclear what exactly causes tamoxifen resistance. For decades, chlorpromazine has been used for treating psychotic diseases, such as schizophrenia. However, the compound is now also recognized as a multitargeting drug with diverse potential applications, for example, it has antiproliferative properties and it can reverse resistance toward antibiotics in bacteria. Furthermore, chlorpromazine can reverse multidrug resistance caused by overexpression of P-glycoprotein in cancer cells. In this study, we have investigated the effect of chlorpromazine on tamoxifen response of human breast cancer cells. We found that chlorpromazine worked synergistically together with tamoxifen with respect to reduction of cell growth and metabolic activity, both in the antiestrogen-sensitive breast cancer cell line, MCF-7, and in a tamoxifen-resistant cell line, established from the MCF-7 cells. Tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant cells were killed equally well by combined treatment with chlorpromazine and tamoxifen. This synergistic effect could be prevented by addition of estrogen, suggesting that chlorpromazine enhances the effect of tamoxifen through an estrogen receptor-mediated mechanism. To investigate this putative mechanism, we applied biophysical techniques to simple model membranes in the form of unilamellar liposomes of well-defined composition and found that chlorpromazine interacts strongly with lipid bilayers of different composition leading to increased permeability. This implies that chlorpromazine can change influx properties of membranes hence suggesting that chlorpromazine may be a promising chemosensitizing compound for enhancing the cytotoxic effect of tamoxifen.
Oncogene | 2015
S Thrane; A M Pedersen; M B H Thomsen; Tove Kirkegaard; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen; Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Martin Bak; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Christina W. Yde
Antiestrogen resistance is a major problem in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, the search for new therapeutic targets and biomarkers for antiestrogen resistance is crucial. In this study, we performed a kinase inhibitor screen on antiestrogen responsive MCF-7 cells and a panel of MCF-7-derived tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cell lines. Our focus was to identify common and distinct molecular mechanisms involved in tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cell growth. We identified 18 inhibitors, of which the majority was common for both tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cell lines. Two compounds, WP1130 and JNJ-7706621, exhibiting prominent preferential growth inhibition of antiestrogen-resistant cell lines, were selected for further studies. WP1130, a deubiquitinase inhibitor, induced caspase-mediated cell death in both tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cell lines by destabilization of the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1. Mcl-1 expression was found upregulated in the antiestrogen-resistant cell lines and depletion of Mcl-1 in resistant cells caused decreased viability. JNJ-7706621, a dual Aurora kinase and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, specifically inhibited growth and caused G2 phase cell cycle arrest of the tamoxifen-resistant cell lines. Knockdown studies showed that Aurora kinase A is essential for growth of the tamoxifen-resistant cells and inhibition of Aurora kinase A resensitized tamoxifen-resistant cells to tamoxifen treatment. Preferential growth inhibition by WP1130 and JNJ-7706621 was also found in T47D-derived tamoxifen-resistant cell lines, pointing at Mcl-1 and Aurora kinase A as potential treatment targets. In addition, tumor samples from 244 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen showed that higher expression level of Aurora kinase A was significantly associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival, demonstrating the potential of Aurora kinase A as a biomarker for tamoxifen resistance.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2007
Christina W. Yde; Mads Gyrd-Hansen; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Olaf-Georg Issinger; Jan Stenvang
Antiestrogens are currently used for treating breast cancer patients who have estrogen receptor–positive tumors. However, patients with advanced disease will eventually develop resistance to the drugs. Therefore, compounds effective on antiestrogen-resistant tumors will be of great importance for future breast cancer treatment. In this study, we have investigated the effect of the chemotherapeutic compound cisplatin using a panel of antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cell lines established from the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. We show that the antiestrogen-resistant cells are significantly more sensitive to cisplatin-induced cell death than antiestrogen-sensitive MCF-7 cells and we show that cisplatin induces cell death by activating both the caspase and lysosomal death pathways. The antiestrogen-resistant cell lines express lower levels of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein compared with parental MCF-7 cells. Our data show that Bcl-2 can protect antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells from cisplatin-induced cell death, indicating that the reduced expression of Bcl-2 in the antiestrogen-resistant cells plays a role in sensitizing the cells to cisplatin treatment. [Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(6): 1869–76]
Steroids | 2014
Johan Lundqvist; Christina W. Yde; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt
Resistance to antiestrogens is a major clinical problem in current breast cancer treatment and development of new treatment strategies for these tumors is highly prioritized. In this study, we have investigated the effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the proliferation of tamoxifen-resistant cells. Further, we have investigated on a molecular level the effects of vitamin D on NFkB signaling in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Parental human breast cancer MCF-7 cells and four tamoxifen-resistant sublines have been used to investigate the effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on cell proliferation using a colorimetric method, gene expression using quantitative PCR, protein phosphorylation using Western blot analysis and cellular localization of proteins using immunofluorescence microscopy. We found that 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is able to strongly decrease the growth of both tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer cells and that this antiproliferative effect of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 might be mediated via inhibition of the NFκB pathway. We found that 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 stimulates the gene expression of IkB, an NFκB-inhibiting protein, and that cells pretreated with 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 have a decreased sensitivity to TNFα stimulation. Further, we show that 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment strongly decreases the TNFα-induced translocation of p65 into the nucleus. This manuscript reports novel findings regarding the effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on NFκB signaling in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells and suggests that vitamin D might be interesting for further evaluation as a new strategy to treat antiestrogen-resistant breast cancers.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2015
Stine Hole; Astrid M. Pedersen; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Christina W. Yde
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used for treatment of estrogen receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer; however, resistance is a major obstacle for optimal outcome. This preclinical study aimed at identifying potential new treatment targets in AI-resistant breast cancer cells. Parental MCF-7 breast cancer cells and four newly established cell lines, resistant to the AIs exemestane or letrozole, were used for a functional kinase inhibitor screen. A library comprising 195 different compounds was tested for preferential growth inhibition of AI-resistant cell lines. Selected targets were validated by analysis of cell growth, cell cycle phase distribution, protein expression, and subcellular localization. We identified 24 compounds, including several inhibitors of Aurora kinases e.g., JNJ-7706621 and barasertib. Protein expression of Aurora kinase A and B was found upregulated in AI-resistant cells compared with MCF-7, and knockdown studies showed that Aurora kinase A was essential for AI-resistant cell growth. In AI-resistant cell lines, the clinically relevant Aurora kinase inhibitors alisertib and danusertib blocked cell cycle progression at the G2/M phase, interfered with chromosome alignment and spindle pole formation, and resulted in preferential growth inhibition compared with parental MCF-7 cells. Even further growth inhibition was obtained when combining the Aurora kinase inhibitors with the antiestrogen fulvestrant. Our study is the first to demonstrate that Aurora kinase A and B may be treatment targets in AI-resistant cells, and our data suggest that therapy targeting both ER and Aurora kinases may be a potent treatment strategy for overcoming AI resistance in breast cancer.
International Journal of Oncology | 2014
Astrid M. Pedersen; Susan Thrane; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Christina W. Yde
Tamoxifen‑resistant breast cancer is a major clinical problem and new treatment strategies are highly warranted. In this study, the multitargeting kinase inhibitors sorafenib and nilotinib were investigated as potential new treatment options for tamoxifen‑resistant breast cancer. The two compounds inhibited cell growth, reduced expression of total estrogen receptor α (ER), Ser118-phosphorylated ER, FOXA1 and AIB1 and resensitized tamoxifen‑resistant cells to tamoxifen. The ER downmodulator fulvestrant exerted strong growth inhibition of tamoxifen‑resistant cells and addition of sorafenib and nilotinib could not further suppress growth, showing that sorafenib and nilotinib exerted growth inhibition via ER. In support of this, estradiol prevented sorafenib and nilotinib mediated growth inhibition. These results demonstrate that sorafenib and nilotinib act via ER and ER-associated proteins, indicating that these kinase inhibitors in combination with tamoxifen may be potential new treatments for tamoxifen‑resistant breast cancer.
International Journal of Oncology | 2015
Stine Hole; Astrid M. Pedersen; Susanne K. Hansen; Johan Lundqvist; Christina W. Yde; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt
Aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is first-line systemic treatment for the majority of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumor. Although many patients benefit from treatment, some will develop resistance, and models mimicking acquired resistance will be valuable tools to unravel the resistance mechanisms and to find new treatments and biomarkers. Cell culture models for acquired resistance to the three clinically relevant AIs letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane were developed by selection and expansion of colonies of MCF-7 breast cancer cells surviving long-term AI treatment under conditions where endogenous aromatase-mediated conversion of androgen to estrogen was required for growth. Four cell lines resistant to each of the AIs were established and characterized. Maintenance of ER expression and function was a general finding, but ER loss was seen in one of twelve cell lines. HER receptor expression was increased, in particular EGFR expression in letrozole-resistant cell lines. The AI-resistant cell lines had acquired ability to grow without aromatase-mediated conversion of testosterone to estradiol, but upon withdrawal of AI treatment, testosterone induced minor growth stimulation. Letrozole, exemestane and tamoxifen were able to abrogate the testosterone stimulation but could not reduce growth to below the level in standard growth medium with AI, demonstrating cross-resistance between letrozole, exemestane and tamoxifen. In contrast, fulvestrant totally blocked growth of the AI resistant cell lines both after withdrawal of AI and with AI treatment. These data show that ER is the main driver of growth of the AI-resistant cell lines and indicate ligand-independent activation of ER. Fulvestrant is an efficient treatment option for these AI-resistant breast cancer cells, and the cell lines will be useful tools to disclose the underlying molecular mechanism for resistance to the different AIs.
BMC Cancer | 2015
Sarah Larsen; Christina W. Yde; Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen; Martin Bak; Anne E. Lykkesfeldt; Tove Kirkegaard
BackgroundResistance to antiestrogen therapy is a major clinical challenge in the treatment of estrogen receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer. The aim of the study was to explore the growth promoting pathways of antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells to identify biomarkers and novel treatment targets.MethodsAntiestrogen sensitive and resistant T47D breast cancer cell lines were used as model systems. Parental and fulvestrant resistant cell lines were subjected to a kinase inhibitor library. Kinase inhibitors preferentially targeting growth of fulvestrant resistant cells were identified and the growth inhibitory effect verified by dose–response cell growth experiments. Protein expression and phosphorylation were investigated by western blot analysis. Cell cycle phase distribution and cell death were analyzed by flow cytometry. To evaluate Aurora kinase B as a biomarker for endocrine resistance, immunohistochemistry was performed on archival primary tumor tissue from breast cancer patients who have received adjuvant endocrine treatment with tamoxifen.ResultsThe selective Aurora kinase B inhibitor barasertib was identified to preferentially inhibit growth of fulvestrant resistant T47D breast cancer cell lines. Compared with parental cells, phosphorylation of Aurora kinase B was higher in the fulvestrant resistant T47D cells. Barasertib induced degradation of Aurora kinase B, caused mitotic errors, and induced apoptotic cell death as measured by accumulation of SubG1 cells and PARP cleavage in the fulvestrant resistant cells. Barasertib also exerted preferential growth inhibition of tamoxifen resistant T47D cell lines. Finally, high percentage of Aurora kinase B positive tumor cells was significantly associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival in 261 ER-positive breast cancer patients, who have received tamoxifen as first-line adjuvant endocrine treatment.ConclusionsOur results indicate that Aurora kinase B is a driving factor for growth of antiestrogen resistant T47D breast cancer cell lines, and a biomarker for reduced benefit of tamoxifen treatment. Thus, inhibition of Aurora kinase B, e.g. with the highly selective kinase inhibitor barasertib, could be a candidate new treatment for breast cancer patients with acquired resistance to antiestrogens.