Christine Adams-Hosking
University of Queensland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christine Adams-Hosking.
Wildlife Research | 2011
Christine Adams-Hosking; Hedley S. Grantham; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Clive McAlpine; Patrick Moss
Context The impacts of climate change on the climate envelopes, and hence, distributions of species, are of ongoing concern for biodiversity worldwide. Knowing where climate refuge habitats will occur in the future is essential to conservation planning. The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is recognised by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as a species highly vulnerable to climate change. However, the impact of climate change on its distribution is poorly understood. Aims We aimed to predict the likely shifts in the climate envelope of the koala throughout its natural distribution under various climate change scenarios and identify potential future climate refugia. Methods To predict possible future koala climate envelopes we developed bioclimatic models using Maxent, based on a substantial database of locality records and several climate change scenarios. Key results The predicted current koala climate envelope was concentrated in south-east Queensland, eastern New South Wales and eastern Victoria, which generally showed congruency with their current known distribution. Under realistic projected future climate change, with the climate becoming increasingly drier and warmer, the models showed a significant progressive eastward and southward contraction in the koala’s climate envelope limit in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria. The models also indicated novel potentially suitable climate habitat in Tasmania and south-western Australia. Conclusions Under a future hotter and drier climate, current koala distributions, based on their climate envelope, will likely contract eastwards and southwards to many regions where koala populations are declining due to additional threats of high human population densities and ongoing pressures from habitat loss, dog attacks and vehicle collisions. In arid and semi-arid regions such as the Mulgalands of south-western Queensland, climate change is likely to compound the impacts of habitat loss, resulting in significant contractions in the distribution of this species. Implications Climate change pressures will likely change priorities for allocating conservation efforts for many species. Conservation planning needs to identify areas that will provide climatically suitable habitat for a species in a changing climate. In the case of the koala, inland habitats are likely to become climatically unsuitable, increasing the need to protect and restore the more mesic habitats, which are under threat from urbanisation. National and regional koala conservation policies need to anticipate these changes and synergistic threats. Therefore, a proactive approach to conservation planning is necessary to protect the koala and other species that depend on eucalypt forests.
Landscape Ecology | 2010
Clive McAlpine; Leonie Seabrook; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Martine Maron; Carl Smith; Michiala Bowen; Sarah Butler; Owen Powell; Justin G. Ryan; Christine T. Fyfe; Christine Adams-Hosking; Andrew T. Smith; Oliver Robertson; Alison Howes; Lorenzo Cattarino
The need to avert unacceptable and irreversible environmental change is the most urgent challenge facing society. Landscape ecology has the capacity to help address these challenges by providing spatially-explicit solutions to landscape sustainability problems. However, despite a large body of research, the real impact of landscape ecology on sustainable landscape management and planning is still limited. In this paper, we first outline a typology of landscape sustainability problems which serves to guide landscape ecologists in the problem-solving process. We then outline a formal problem-solving approach, whereby landscape ecologists can better bring about disciplinary integration, a consideration of multiple landscape functions over long time scales, and a focus on decision making. This framework explicitly considers multiple ecological objectives and socio-economic constraints, the spatial allocation of scarce resources to address these objectives, and the timing of the implementation of management actions. It aims to make explicit the problem-solving objectives, management options and the system understanding required to make sustainable landscape planning decisions. We propose that by adopting a more problem-solving approach, landscape ecologists can make a significant contribution towards realising sustainable future landscapes.
The Australian zoologist | 2011
Christine Adams-Hosking; Patrick Moss; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Hedley S. Grantham; Clive McAlpine
The koala Phascolarctos cinereus is the only member of the once diverse marsupial family Phascolarctidae to have survived the Last Glacial Maximum. A climate envelope model for P. cinereus was developed to predict the range for this species at present and at the Last Glacial Maximum. The model was compared to the contemporary koala records and the known fossil records of P. cinereus during the Quaternary.The predicted current core range for koalas was concentrated in southeast Queensland, eastern New South Wales and eastern Victoria. At the Last Glacial Maximum their predicted core range contracted significantly to southeast Queensland and northeast New South Wales. Our findings concord with other studies that find species experienced range contractions during glacial maxima. In the context of the future conservation planning for koalas in the wild, our historical perspective demonstrates the past adaptations of koalas to changes in climate and their probable range contraction to climatic refugia.The future survival of wide-ranging specialist species, such as the koala, may depend on identifying and protecting, future climatic refugia.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Cintia Camila Silva Angelieri; Christine Adams-Hosking; Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros Ferraz; Marcelo Pereira de Souza; Clive McAlpine
A mosaic of intact native and human-modified vegetation use can provide important habitat for top predators such as the puma (Puma concolor), avoiding negative effects on other species and ecological processes due to cascade trophic interactions. This study investigates the effects of restoration scenarios on the puma’s habitat suitability in the most developed Brazilian region (São Paulo State). Species Distribution Models incorporating restoration scenarios were developed using the species’ occurrence information to (1) map habitat suitability of pumas in São Paulo State, Southeast, Brazil; (2) test the relative contribution of environmental variables ecologically relevant to the species habitat suitability and (3) project the predicted habitat suitability to future native vegetation restoration scenarios. The Maximum Entropy algorithm was used (Test AUC of 0.84 ± 0.0228) based on seven environmental non-correlated variables and non-autocorrelated presence-only records (n = 342). The percentage of native vegetation (positive influence), elevation (positive influence) and density of roads (negative influence) were considered the most important environmental variables to the model. Model projections to restoration scenarios reflected the high positive relationship between pumas and native vegetation. These projections identified new high suitability areas for pumas (probability of presence >0.5) in highly deforested regions. High suitability areas were increased from 5.3% to 8.5% of the total State extension when the landscapes were restored for ≥ the minimum native vegetation cover rule (20%) established by the Brazilian Forest Code in private lands. This study highlights the importance of a landscape planning approach to improve the conservation outlook for pumas and other species, including not only the establishment and management of protected areas, but also the habitat restoration on private lands. Importantly, the results may inform environmental policies and land use planning in São Paulo State, Brazil.
Biological Conservation | 2015
Clive McAlpine; Daniel Lunney; Alistair Melzer; Peter Menkhorst; Stephen Phillips; David N. Phalen; William Ellis; William J. Foley; Greg Baxter; Deidré L. de Villiers; Rodney P. Kavanagh; Christine Adams-Hosking; Charles R. Todd; Desley A. Whisson; Robyn Molsher; Michele Walter; Ivan R. Lawler; Robert Close
Diversity and Distributions | 2012
Christine Adams-Hosking; Clive McAlpine; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Hedley S. Grantham; Patrick Moss
Diversity and Distributions | 2016
Christine Adams-Hosking; Marissa F. McBride; Greg Baxter; Mark A. Burgman; Deidré L. de Villiers; Rodney P. Kavanagh; Ivan R. Lawler; Daniel Lunney; Alistair Melzer; Peter Menkhorst; Robyn Molsher; Ben D. Moore; David N. Phalen; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Charles R. Todd; Desley A. Whisson; Clive McAlpine
Conservation Letters | 2015
Christine Adams-Hosking; Clive McAlpine; Jonathan R. Rhodes; Patrick Moss; Hedley S. Grantham
congress on modelling and simulation | 2011
Jianting Chu; Jozef Syktus; Clive McAlpine; Marcus Thatcher; Peter Scarth; Stephen Jeffrey; Jack Katzfey; Hong Zhang; John L. McGregor; Christine Adams-Hosking
Archive | 2012
Clive McAlpine; Alistair Melzer; Dan Lunnery; Bill Foley; Christine Adams-Hosking; Ivan R. Lawler; Desley A. Whisson; Steve Phillips; Rod Kavanagh; Steve Whisson; Greg Baxter; Greg Gordon; Bill Ellis; Deidré L. de Villiers; Michele Walter; Robyn Molsher; Charles R. Todd; Ben D. Moore; Peter Menkhorst; Robert Close; David N. Phalen; Jonathan R. Rhodes