Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christine Dipchand is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christine Dipchand.


BMJ | 2012

Cardiovascular disease in kidney donors: matched cohort study

Amit X. Garg; Aizhan Meirambayeva; Anjie Huang; Joseph Kim; G. V. Ramesh Prasad; Greg Knoll; Neil Boudville; Charmaine Lok; Philip A. McFarlane; Martin Karpinski; Leroy Storsley; Scott Klarenbach; Ngan N. Lam; Sonia M. Thomas; Christine Dipchand; Peter P. Reese; Mona D. Doshi; Eric M. Gibney; Ken Taub; Ann Young

Objective To determine whether people who donate a kidney have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Design Retrospective population based matched cohort study. Participants All people who were carefully selected to become a living kidney donor in the province of Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 2009. The information in donor charts was manually reviewed and linked to provincial healthcare databases. Matched non-donors were selected from the healthiest segment of the general population. A total of 2028 donors and 20 280 matched non-donors were followed for a median of 6.5 years (maximum 17.7 years). Median age was 43 at the time of donation (interquartile range 34-50) and 50 at the time of follow-up (42-58). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite of time to death or first major cardiovascular event. The secondary outcome was time to first major cardiovascular event censored for death. Results The risk of the primary outcome of death and major cardiovascular events was lower in donors than in non-donors (2.8 v 4.1 events per 1000 person years; hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.90). The risk of major cardiovascular events censored for death was no different in donors than in non-donors (1.7 v 2.0 events per 1000 person years; 0.85, 0.57 to 1.27). Results were similar in all sensitivity analyses. Older age and lower income were associated with a higher risk of death and major cardiovascular events in both donors and non-donors when each group was analysed separately. Conclusions The risk of major cardiovascular events in donors is no higher in the first decade after kidney donation compared with a similarly healthy segment of the general population. While we will continue to follow people in this study, these interim results add to the evidence base supporting the safety of the practice among carefully selected donors.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2015

Gout After Living Kidney Donation: A Matched Cohort Study

Ngan N. Lam; Eric McArthur; S. Joseph Kim; G. V. Ramesh Prasad; Krista L. Lentine; Peter P. Reese; Bertram L. Kasiske; Charmaine E. Lok; Liane S. Feldman; Amit X. Garg; Jennifer Arnold; Neil Boudville; Ann Bugeja; Christine Dipchand; Mona D. Doshi; John S. Gill; Martin Karpinski; Scott Klarenbach; Greg Knoll; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Christopher Y. Nguan; Jessica M. Sontrop; Leroy Storsley; Darin Treleaven; Ann Young

BACKGROUND In the general population, high serum uric acid concentration is a risk factor for gout. It is unknown whether donating a kidney increases a living donors risk of gout as serum uric acid concentration increases in donors after nephrectomy. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective matched cohort study using large health care databases. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS We studied living kidney donors who donated in 1992 to 2010 in Ontario, Canada. Matched nondonors were selected from the healthiest segment of the general population. 1,988 donors and 19,880 matched nondonors were followed up for a median of 8.4 (maximum, 20.8) years. PREDICTOR Living kidney donor nephrectomy. OUTCOMES The primary outcome was time to a diagnosis of gout. The secondary outcome in a subpopulation was receipt of medications typically used to treat gout (allopurinol or colchicine). MEASUREMENTS We assessed the primary outcome with health care diagnostic codes. RESULTS Donors compared with nondonors were more likely to be given a diagnosis of gout (3.4% vs 2.0%; 3.5 vs 2.1 events/1,000 person-years; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1; P<0.001). Similarly, donors compared with nondonors were more likely to receive a prescription for allopurinol or colchicine (3.8% vs 1.3%; OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-6.7; P=0.002). Results were consistent in multiple additional analyses. LIMITATIONS The primary outcome was assessed using diagnostic codes in health care databases. Laboratory values for serum uric acid and creatinine in follow-up were not available in our data sources. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that donating a kidney modestly increases an individuals absolute long-term incidence of gout. This unique observation should be corroborated in future studies.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2016

CanVasc Recommendations for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody-associated Vasculitides

Lucy McGeoch; Marinka Twilt; Leilani Famorca; Volodko Bakowsky; Lillian Barra; Susan M. Benseler; David A. Cabral; Simon Carette; Gerald P. Cox; Navjot Dhindsa; Christine Dipchand; Aurore Fifi-Mah; Michelle Goulet; Nader Khalidi; Majed M. Khraishi; Patrick Liang; Nataliya Milman; Christian A. Pineau; Nooshin Samadi; Kam Shojania; Regina M. Taylor-Gjevre; Tanveer Towheed; Judith Trudeau; Michael P. Walsh; Elaine Yacyshyn; Christian Pagnoux

Objective. The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims is to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada. Methods. Diagnostic and therapeutic questions were developed based on the results of a national needs assessment survey. A systematic review of existing non-Canadian recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AAV and studies of AAV published after the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism/European Vasculitis Society recommendations (publication date: January 2009) until November 2014 was performed in the Medline database, Cochrane library, and main vasculitis conference proceedings. Quality of supporting evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was graded. The full working group as well as additional reviewers, including patients, reviewed the developed therapeutic recommendations and nontherapeutic statements using a modified 2-step Delphi technique and through discussion to reach consensus. Results. Nineteen recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management were developed, as well as appendices for practical use, for rheumatologists, nephrologists, respirologists, general internists, and all other healthcare professionals more occasionally involved in the management of patients with AAV in community and academic practice settings. Conclusion. These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence, and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context, with the intention of promoting best practices and improving healthcare delivery for patients with AAV.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2014

Living kidney donor estimated glomerular filtration rate and recipient graft survival

Ann Young; S. Joseph Kim; Amit X. Garg; Anjie Huang; Greg Knoll; G. V. Ramesh Prasad; Darin Treleaven; Charmaine E. Lok; Jennifer Arnold; Neil Boudville; Ann Bugeya; Christine Dipchand; Mona D. Doshi; Liane S. Feldman; Amit Gerg; Colin C. Geddes; Eric M. Gibney; John S. Gill; Martin Karpinski; Joseph Kim; Scott Klarenbach; Charmaine Laok; Philip A. McFarlane; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Norman Muirhead; Immaculate Nevis; Christopher Y. Nguan; Chirag R. Parikh; Emilio D. Poggio; Leroy Storsley

BACKGROUND Kidney transplants from living donors with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) may be at risk for increased graft loss compared with a recipient who receives a kidney from a living donor with a higher eGFR. METHODS This retrospective cohort study considered 2057 living kidney donors and their recipients from July 1993 to March 2010 at five centres in Ontario, Canada, and linked them to population-based, universal healthcare databases. Recipients were divided into five groups based on their donors baseline eGFR. The median (inter-quartile range) for the lowest eGFR group was 73 (68-77) mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Subjects were followed for a median of 6 years (IQR: 3-10 years). RESULTS There was no significant difference in the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss when comparing recipients in each eGFR category to the referent group (≥110 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)). The adjusted HRs (95% CI) from the lowest (<80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) to highest (100-109.9 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) eGFR categories were 1.27 (0.84-1.92), 1.43 (0.96-2.14), 1.23 (0.86-1.77) and 1.23 (0.85-1.77), respectively. Similar results were observed when dichotomizing the baseline donor eGFR using a cut-point of 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)-adjusted HR 1.01 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) (0.76-1.44)]. CONCLUSIONS Further research in this setting should clarify whether additional tests (i.e. measured GFR) should be performed in potential donors whose eGFR is considered borderline, whether eGFR values should be standardized to body surface area, and the outcomes for donors after nephrectomy.


Canadian journal of kidney health and disease | 2016

Hemodialysis Tunneled Catheter-Related Infections

Lisa M. Miller; Edward G. Clark; Christine Dipchand; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Charmaine Lok; Rick Luscombe; Louise Moist; Matthew J. Oliver; Jennifer M. MacRae

Catheter-related bloodstream infections, exit-site infections, and tunnel infections are common complications related to hemodialysis central venous catheter use. The various definitions of catheter-related infections are reviewed, and various preventive strategies are discussed. Treatment options, for both empiric and definitive infections, including antibiotic locks and systemic antibiotics, are reviewed.


Transplantation | 2015

Kidney Paired Donation Protocol for Participating Donors 2014.

Robert M. Richardson; Maureen T. Connelly; Christine Dipchand; Amit X. Garg; Anand Ghanekar; Isabelle Houde; Olwyn Johnston; Rahul Mainra; Ruth McCarrell; Thomas Mueller; Peter Nickerson; Christine Pippy; Leroy Storsley; K. Tinckam; Linda Wright; Serdar Yilmaz; David Landsberg

Purpose of the Protocol This Protocol has been developed to ensure the harmonization of donor assessment and acceptance practices for enrolling living donors in the Kidney Paired Donation Program, managed and operated by Canadian Blood Services in collaboration with the provincial Living Kidney Donation and Transplant programs across the country. Assessment and acceptance criteria for living donors vary between programs across Canada as shown throughout this Protocol. This variability has two primary effects on the Kidney Paired Donation Program: declines of matched donors and delays in accepting a donor by the recipient’s program because of the need for additional testing to meet local assessment and acceptance criteria. Implementation of this protocol by participating Living Kidney Donation programs should help to minimize the problem of donors being declined when matched with a candidate in the Kidney Paired Donation Program.


Canadian journal of kidney health and disease | 2016

Arteriovenous Access Infection, Neuropathy, and Other Complications

Jennifer M. MacRae; Christine Dipchand; Matthew J. Oliver; Louise Moist; Serdar Yilmaz; Charmaine Lok; Kelvin Leung; Edward G. Clark; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Rick Luscombe; Lisa M. Miller

Complications of vascular access lead to morbidity and may reduce quality of life. In this module, we review both infectious and noninfectious arteriovenous access complications including neuropathy, aneurysm, and high-output access. For the challenging patients who have developed many complications and are now nearing their last vascular access, we highlight some potentially novel approaches.


Canadian journal of kidney health and disease | 2016

Practical Aspects of Nontunneled and Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

Edward G. Clark; Joanne Kappel; Jennifer M. MacRae; Christine Dipchand; Swapnil Hiremath; Mercedeh Kiaii; Charmaine Lok; Louise Moist; Matthew J. Oliver; Lisa M. Miller

Nontunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) are typically used when vascular access is required for urgent renal replacement therapy. The preferred site for NTHC insertion in acute kidney injury is the right internal jugular vein followed by the femoral vein. When aided by real-time ultrasound, mechanical complications related to NTHC insertion are significantly reduced. The preferred site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters placement is the right internal jugular vein followed by the left internal jugular vein. Ideally, the catheter should be inserted on the opposite side of a maturing or planned fistula/graft. Several dual-lumen, large-diameter catheters are available with multiple catheter tip designs, but no one catheter has shown significant superior performance.


Canadian journal of kidney health and disease | 2016

Hemodialysis Tunneled Catheter Noninfectious Complications

Lisa M. Miller; Jennifer M. MacRae; Mercedeh Kiaii; Edward G. Clark; Christine Dipchand; Joanne Kappel; Charmaine Lok; Rick Luscombe; Louise Moist; Matthew J. Oliver; Pamela Pike; Swapnil Hiremath

Noninfectious hemodialysis catheter complications include catheter dysfunction, catheter-related thrombus, and central vein stenosis. The definitions, causes, and treatment strategies for catheter dysfunction are reviewed below. Catheter-related thrombus is a less common but serious complication of catheters, requiring catheter removal and systemic anticoagulation. In addition, the risk factors, clinical manifestation, and treatment options for central vein stenosis are outlined.


Canadian journal of kidney health and disease | 2016

Arteriovenous Vascular Access Selection and Evaluation

Jennifer M. MacRae; Matthew J. Oliver; Edward G. Clark; Christine Dipchand; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Charmaine Lok; Rick Luscombe; Lisa M. Miller; Louise Moist

When making decisions regarding vascular access creation, the clinician and vascular access team must evaluate each patient individually with consideration of life expectancy, timelines for dialysis start, risks and benefits of access creation, referral wait times, as well as the risk for access complications. The role of the multidisciplinary team in facilitating access choice is reviewed, as well as the clinical evaluation of the patient.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christine Dipchand's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charmaine Lok

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amit X. Garg

University of Western Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Louise Moist

University of Western Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mercedeh Kiaii

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanne Kappel

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew J. Oliver

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge