Christine Durier

Clinical safety of HIV lipopeptides used as vaccines in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected adults.

Background:HIV-1 lipopeptides have been developed by the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) for use as candidate vaccine against HIV since 1994. Between 1996 and 2005, four different lipopeptide constructs were tested alone or in combination with recombinant canarypox HIV vaccines in 10 trials conducted in France. The aim of this study was to review clinical safety of HIV lipopeptides. Methods:A meta-analysis based on individual subject data examined clinical safety data collected in eight preventive trials and two therapeutic trials enrolling 200 HIV-1-uninfected healthy volunteers and 48 HIV-1-infected patients. Results:Of 248 trial participants, eight (3.2%) did not complete follow-up: seven among the 200 healthy volunteers, and one among the 48 HIV-1 infected patients. During the 354 person-years of follow-up, 860 lipopeptides injections were administered. Local reactions were common. However, in trials where lipopeptides were tested without adjuvant and appropriate diluents, none of the vaccinees experienced severe local response. Systemic reactions were generally mild and transient. No grade 4 reaction was reported; 18 subjects experienced grade 3 systemic events related to the vaccination, mainly asthenia, fever, headache and arthralgia. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex, number of injections and diluent (more reactions in 5% glucose alone than in combination with Tris-HCl buffer) significantly increased systemic reactions related to the vaccination. Conclusion:These data demonstrate that reactogenicity and systemic safety of HIV lipopeptides vaccine are acceptable both in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected adults.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Monovalent 2009 Influenza A/H1N1v Vaccine Adjuvanted With AS03A or Unadjuvanted in HIV-Infected Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients have decreased immune response to vaccines. Few data are available about pandemic flu vaccination in this population. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, patient-blinded, randomized trial in a cohort of HIV-infected adults. Patients received 2 injections 21 days apart of a AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 3.75 μg hemagglutinin (HA) or a nonadjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 15 μg HA to assess hemagglutination inhibition (HI) response and safety. RESULTS A total of 309 patients were randomized, and 306 were vaccinated. After the first vaccine dose, HI titers ≥1:40 were observed in 93.4% of the patients in the adjuvanted group (A group) (n = 155) and in 75.5% in the nonadjuvanted group (B group) (n = 151) (P < .001); seroconversion rates were 88.8% and 71.2%, and factor increases in geometric mean titers (GMT) of 21.9 and 15.1, respectively. After 2 injections, 98.6% of patients of the A group and 92.1% of the B group demonstrated HI titers ≥1:40 (P = .018); seroconversion rates were 96.5% and 87.1%, respectively, and factor increases in GMT were 45.5 and 21.2, respectively. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; no impact on CD4+ cell count or viral load has been detected. CONCLUSIONS In HIV-1-infected adults, the AS03(A)-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine yielded a higher immune response than did the nonadjuvanted one, with no impact on HIV infection.

Immunogenicity and safety of an HIV-1 lipopeptide vaccine in healthy adults: a phase 2 placebo-controlled ANRS trial

Background:French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitiss HIV-LIPO-5 vaccine includes five HIV-1 peptides, containing multiple CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell epitopes and coupled to a palmitoyl tail. Whether HIV-LIPO-5 immunogenicity varies with the dose is unknown. Methods:HIV-negative volunteers were randomized to receive HIV-LIPO-5 vaccine at 50 μg/lipopeptide (N = 32), 150 μg/lipopeptide (N = 32), 500 μg/lipopeptide (N = 33) or placebo (N = 34) at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24. HIV-1-specific CD8+ (interferon-γ ELISpot on peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured for 12 days) and CD4+ responses (peripheral blood mononuclear cell lymphoproliferation) were assessed at baseline, after each injection and at week 48. Results:Local reactions were dose-dependent but no differences in systemic reactions appeared between groups. Sustained (at least on two separate occasions) CD8+ response rates to at least one given HIV-1 pool were obtained in 22 of 32 (69%), 21 of 33 (64%) and 21 of 34 (62%) individuals for LIPO-5 50, 150 and 500 groups, respectively (P ≤ 0.0001 for all comparisons to the placebo). Cumulative CD4+ response rates were obtained in 15 of 32 (47%), 18 of 33 (55%) and 15 of 34 (44%) individuals (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons to placebo). At week 48, CD8+ responses persisted in 47 of 91 (52%) HIV-LIPO-5 recipients. Conclusion:Doses of 50, 150 and 500 μg of French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitiss HIV-LIPO-5 vaccine were able to elicit HIV-specific sustained CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses in healthy adults. Safety is good and all doses appear appropriate in further ‘prime-boost’ trials.

Cellular immune responses induced with dose-sparing intradermal administration of HIV vaccine to HIV-uninfected volunteers in the ANRS VAC16 trial.

Objective The objective was to compare the safety and cellular immunogenicity of intradermal versus intramuscular immunization with an HIV-lipopeptide candidate vaccine (LIPO-4) in healthy volunteers. Methodology A randomized, open-label trial with 24 weeks of follow-up was conducted in France at six HIV-vaccine trial sites. Sixty-eight healthy 21– to 55–year-old HIV-uninfected subjects were randomized to receive the LIPO-4 vaccine (four HIV lipopeptides linked to a T-helper–stimulating epitope of tetanus-toxin protein) at weeks 0, 4 and 12, either intradermally (0.1 ml, 100 µg of each peptide) or intramuscularly (0.5 ml, 500 µg of each peptide). Comparative safety of both routes was evaluated. CD8+ T-cell immune responses to HIV epitopes (ELISpot interferon-γ assay) and tetanus toxin-specific CD4+ T-cell responses (lymphoproliferation) were assessed at baseline, two weeks after each injection, and at week 24. Results and Conclusion No severe, serious or life-threatening adverse events were observed. Local pain was significantly more frequent after intramuscular injection, but local inflammatory reactions were more frequent after intradermal immunization. At weeks 2, 6, 14 and 24, the respective cumulative percentages of induced CD8+ T-cell responses to at least one HIV peptide were 9, 33, 39 and 52 (intradermal group) or 14, 20, 26 and 37 (intramuscular group), and induced tetanus toxin-specific CD4+ T-cell responses were 6, 27, 33 and 39 (intradermal), or 9, 46, 54 and 63 (intramuscular). In conclusion, intradermal LIPO-4 immunization was well tolerated, required one-fifth of the intramuscular dose, and induced similar HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Moreover, the immunization route influenced which antigen-specific T-cells (CD4+ or CD8+) were induced. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00121121

Long-term effects of intermittent interleukin-2 therapy in chronic HIV-infected patients (ANRS 048-079 Trials).

Objective:Interleukin (IL)-2 therapy leads to significant CD4 cell increases in HIV-infected patients. Since phase III trials are ongoing, studies supporting the long-term feasibility of this strategy are needed. Methods:We studied the long-term outcomes of 131 patients treated with IL-2 in two studies initiated either before (ANRS 048) or following (ANRS 079) the advent of HAART. Results:At the last assessment (median follow-up 3.4 years), these patients experienced a gain of 428 cells/μl and a decrease in plasma HIV RNA to 1.70 log10 copies/ml. In both studies, high CD4 cell counts were maintained with a median of ten 5-day cycles of subcutaneous IL-2. Median time since the last cycle was 2 years. At last assessment, 59% of 048 patients maintained a non-HAART regimen. Detailed analysis at week 170 showed that median CD4 cell counts were 856 (048) and 964 (079) cells/μl. This corresponded to a gain from baseline of 515 (048) and 627 (079) cells/μl. The median viral load decreases from baseline and corresponded to 1.70 (048) and 1.88 (079) log10 copies/ml. Comparisons across the studies showed that CD4 gains and viral load changes were similar whether HAART or non-HAART was used. The frequency of cycling, but not CD4 cell counts, viral loads or antiviral regimen at baseline, was predictive of long-term CD4 gain (P = 0.03). Conclusion:Altogether, these observations support IL-2 as a long-term therapeutic strategy in HIV infection.

On the use of magnitude of reduction in HIV-1 RNA in clinical trials: statistical analysis and potential biases.

Clinical trials endpoints based on magnitude of reduction in HIV-1 RNA levels provide an important complement to endpoints based on either virologic failure or a proportion of patients having HIV-1 RNA levels below a threshold value. However, reductions in HIV-1 RNA often are not completely observed, because many patients have HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification at the primary follow-up visit. The crude method of analyzing such data is to define all HIV-1 RNA levels that fall below the limit of quantification as being equal to that limit of quantification. This method is widely used even though the underestimation inherent in such a method may also lead to underestimation of treatment difference in terms of HIV-1 RNA reduction. Analyses based on Kaplan-Meier method and censored regression can be used to estimate such a reduction. When a high percentage of patients have HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification at the time of primary follow-up, which corresponds to censored observations, the Kaplan-Meier method does not always provide an estimate of the median HIV-1 RNA reduction. We discuss a statistical method to provide lower and upper limits of such median reduction or of other percentiles of reduction. We found that when the percentage of censoring is high, the censored method may overestimate the HIV-1 RNA reduction and then may also overestimate the treatment difference. Although the censored method is preferable to the crude method, when the level of censoring is high, we suggest computation of the upper and lower limits either to provide a range of potential values of HIV-1 RNA reduction or to detect overestimation by the censored method.

Long-term CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses induced in HIV-uninfected volunteers following intradermal or intramuscular administration of an HIV-lipopeptide vaccine (ANRS VAC16).

BACKGROUND We have shown that the intradermal (ID) administration of an HIV-1 lipopeptide candidate vaccine (LIPO-4) is well tolerated in healthy volunteers, with one fifth the IM dose delivered by this route inducing HIV-1-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses of a magnitude and quality similar to those achieved by IM administration. In this long-term follow-up, we aimed to investigate the sustainability and epitopic breadth of the immune responses induced. METHODS In a prospective multicentre trial, 68 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive, at weeks 0, 4 and 12, either a 0.5 ml IM (500 μg of each lipopeptide; 35 volunteers) dose or a 0.1 ml ID (100 μg of each lipopeptide; 33 volunteers) dose of the LIPO-4 vaccine, in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm. All 68 volunteers received the first two vaccinations, and 44 volunteers in the ID group and 22 in the IM group received the third. We describe here the long-term CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cell immune responses, up to 48 weeks after the first immunisation. RESULTS Response frequency was highest at week 14 for CD4(+) T cells, at 85% (28/33) for the IM group and 61% (20/33) for the ID group (p=0.027), and at week 48 for CD8(+) T cells, at 36% (12/33) for the ID group and 31% (11/35) for the IM group (p=0.67). Response rates tended to be lower for volunteers receiving the third vaccination boost, whether IM or ID. Finally, we also observed a striking change in the specificity of the CD8(+) T-cell responses induced shortly (2 weeks) or several months (48 weeks) after LIPO-4 vaccination. CONCLUSION Lipopeptide vaccines elicited sustainable CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses, following IM or ID administration. CD8(+) T-cell responses had shifted and expanded to different epitopes after one year of follow-up. These results should facilitate the design of the next generation of prime-boost trials with repeated doses of lipopeptide vaccines.

Cytokine and gene transcription profiles of immune responses elicited by HIV lipopeptide vaccine in HIV-negative volunteers.

Objective:To dissect the biological mechanisms involved in the cellular responses to a candidate vaccine containing 5 HIV peptides coupled to a palmytoil tail (HIV-LIPO-5) in healthy volunteers, by using extensive immunogenicity assessments with different stimulation durations. Design:Immunogenicity substudy of a randomized phase II prophylactic HIV vaccine trial (ANRS VAC 18). Methods:HIV-LIPO-5 or placebo was administered at W0, W4, W12 and W24. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a subset of participants at W0 and W14 were stimulated with HIV-LIPO-5, Gag peptides contained in the vaccine and control peptides. ELISpot, lymphoproliferation, intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), cytokine multiplex and transcriptomic analyses were performed. Different time points and stimulation conditions were compared, controlling for test multiplicity. Results:Cultured ELISpot and lymphoproliferation responses were detected at W14. Ex-vivo ICS showed mainly interleukin (IL)-2-producing cells. Secretion of interferon (IFN)-&ggr;, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-&agr;, IL-5 and IL-13 increased significantly after culture and Gag stimulation at W14 compared to W0. Metallothionein genes were consistently overexpressed after HIV-LIPO-5 stimulation at W0 and W14. At W14, significant probes increased substantially, including IFN-&ggr;, CXCL9, IL2RA, TNFAIP6, CCL3L1 and IL-6. Canonical pathway analyses indicated a role of interferon signalling genes in response to HIV-LIPO-5. Conclusion:HIV-LIPO-5 vaccination elicited Th1 and Th2 memory precursor responses and a consistent modulation in gene expression. The response profile before vaccination suggests an adjuvant effect of the lipid tail of HIV-LIPO-5. Our combined immunogenicity analyses allowed to identify a specific signature profile of HIV-LIPO-5 and indicate that HIV-LIPO-5 could be further developed as a prime in heterologous prime-boost strategies.

Long-term immunogenicity of two doses of 2009 A/H1N1v vaccine with and without AS03(A) adjuvant in HIV-1-infected adults.

Objective:In immunocompromised patients, alternative schedules more immunogenic than the standard influenza vaccine regimen are necessary to enhance and prolong vaccine efficacy. We previously reported that the AS03A-adjuvanted 2009 A/H1N1v vaccine yielded a higher short-term immune response than the nonadjuvanted one in HIV-1-infected adults. This study reports the long-term persistence of the immune response. Design and methods:In a prospective, multicenter, randomized, patient-blinded trial, two doses of AS03A-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 3.75 &mgr;g haemagglutinin (n = 155; group A) or nonadjuvanted H1N1v vaccine containing 15 &mgr;g haemagglutinin (n = 151; group B), were administered 21 days apart. Haemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibodies were assessed 6 and 12 months after vaccination. Results:In group A and B, the seroprotection rates were 83.7 and 59.4% at month 6, and 70.4 and 49.3 at month 12, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, persistence of seroprotection 12 months after vaccination was negatively associated with current smoking (odds ratio = 0.6, P = 0.03) and positively related with the AS03A-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine (odds ratio = 2.7, P = 0.0002). Conclusion:In HIV-1-infected adults, two doses of adjuvanted influenza vaccine induce long-term persistence of immune response up to 1 year after vaccination.

Interleukine-2 therapy does not increase the risk of Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-infected patients: results from FHDH ANRS CO4.

Background:Concerns have been raised about a possible excess risk of lymphomas in HIV-infected patients exposed to interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy. Here we compared the risks of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in IL-2-treated and IL-2-untreated HIV-infected patients. Methods:Patients monitored through the French Hospital Database on HIV between May 1, 1995, and December 31, 2005, were enrolled in this study. Lymphomas that occurred between the day after study entry and the end of follow-up were eligible for analysis. Poisson regression models were used in 2 separate analyses to quantify the possible relationship between IL-2 therapy and the incidence of NHL and HL. Results:The IL-2-treated group consisted of 861 patients and the IL-2-untreated group of 77,605 patients. Follow-up lasted a total of 3643 and 382,720 person-years, respectively. After adjustment for sex and time-updated age, period, the CD4 cell counts, the plasma HIV RNA levels, and AIDS status, the relative rates of NHL and HL associated with IL-2 therapy were 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 1.65) and 0.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 2.86), respectively. Conclusions:In this large observational study, IL-2 therapy did not increase the risk of lymphoma, either NHL or HL, in HIV-infected patients.