Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christine E. Kistler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christine E. Kistler.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2014

The Harms of Screening: A Proposed Taxonomy and Application to Lung Cancer Screening

Russell Harris; Stacey Sheridan; Carmen L. Lewis; Colleen Barclay; Maihan B. Vu; Christine E. Kistler; Carol E. Golin; Jessica T. DeFrank; Noel T. Brewer

IMPORTANCE Making rational decisions about screening requires information about its harms, but high-quality evidence is often either not available or not used. One reason may be that we lack a coherent framework, a taxonomy, for conceptualizing and studying these harms. OBJECTIVE To create a taxonomy, we categorized harms from several sources: systematic reviews of screening, other published literature, and informal discussions with clinicians and patients. We used this information to develop an initial taxonomy and vetted it with local and national experts, making revisions as needed. RESULTS We propose a taxonomy with 4 domains of harm from screening: physical effects, psychological effects, financial strain, and opportunity costs. Harms can occur at any step of the screening cascade. We provide definitions for each harm domain and illustrate the taxonomy using the example of screening for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The taxonomy provides a systematic way to conceptualize harms as experienced by patients. As shown in the lung cancer screening example, the taxonomy also makes clear where (which domains of harms and which parts of the screening cascade) we have useful information and where there are gaps in our knowledge. The taxonomy needs further testing and validation across a broad range of screening programs. We hope that further development of this taxonomy can improve our thinking about the harms of screening, thus informing our research, policy making, and decision making with patients about the wisdom of screening.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2014

Successfully Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in Nursing Homes

Sheryl Zimmerman; Philip D. Sloane; Rosanna M. Bertrand; Lauren E. W. Olsho; Anna Song Beeber; Christine E. Kistler; Louise S. Hadden; Alrick S. Edwards; David J. Weber; C. Madeline Mitchell

To determine whether antibiotic prescribing can be reduced in nursing homes using a quality improvement (QI) program that involves providers, staff, residents, and families.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2010

Patient Perceptions of Mistakes in Ambulatory Care

Christine E. Kistler; Louise C. Walter; C. Madeline Mitchell; Philip D. Sloane

BACKGROUND Little information exists about current patient perceptions of medical mistakes in ambulatory care within a diverse population. We aimed to learn about the perceptions of medical mistakes, what factors were associated with perceived mistakes, and whether the participants changed physicians because of these perceived mistakes. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey at 7 primary care practices in North Carolina of English- or Spanish-speaking adults, aged 18 years and older, who saw a health care professional during 2008. Main outcome measures were 4 questions about patient perceptions of medical mistakes in the ambulatory care setting, including (1) overall experience with a medical mistake; type of mistake, such as a (2) diagnostic mistake or (3) treatment mistake, and its associated harm; and (4) effect of this mistake on changing physicians. RESULTS Of 1697 participants, 265 (15.6%) responded that a physician had made a mistake, 227 (13.4%) reported a wrong diagnosis, 212 (12.5%) reported a wrong treatment, and 239 (14.1%) reported having changed physicians because of a mistake. Participants perceived mistakes and harm in both diagnostic care and medical treatment. Patients with chronic back pain, higher educational attainment, and poor physical health were at increased odds of perceiving mistakes, whereas African American patients were less likely to perceive mistakes. CONCLUSIONS Patients perceived mistakes in their diagnostic and treatment care in the ambulatory setting. These perceptions had a concrete effect on the physician-patient relationship, often leading patients to seek another health care professional.


American Journal of Public Health | 2010

Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Screening Mammography Use in Older US Women

Kala M. Mehta; Kathy Z. Fung; Christine E. Kistler; Anna Chang; Louise C. Walter

OBJECTIVES We evaluated mammography rates for cognitively impaired women in the context of their life expectancies, given that guidelines do not recommend screening mammography in women with limited life expectancies because harms outweigh benefits. METHODS We evaluated Medicare claims for women aged 70 years or older from the 2002 wave of the Health and Retirement Study to determine which women had screening mammography. We calculated population-based estimates of 2-year screening mammography prevalence and 4-year survival by cognitive status and age. RESULTS Women with severe cognitive impairment had lower rates of mammography (18%) compared with women with normal cognition (45%). Nationally, an estimated 120,000 screening mammograms were performed among women with severe cognitive impairment despite this groups median survival of 3.3 years (95% confidence interval = 2.8, 3.7). Cognitively impaired women who had high net worth and were married had screening rates approaching 50%. CONCLUSIONS Although severe cognitive impairment is associated with lower screening mammography rates, certain subgroups with cognitive impairment are often screened despite lack of probable benefit. Given the limited life expectancy of women with severe cognitive impairment, guidelines should explicitly recommend against screening these women.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2011

Lack of Follow-up After Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Older Adults: Inappropriate Screening or Failure to Follow Up?

Charlotte M. Carlson; Katharine A. Kirby; Michele A. Casadei; Melissa R. Partin; Christine E. Kistler; Louise C. Walter

BACKGROUND It is unclear whether lack of follow-up after screening fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in older adults is due to screening patients whose comorbidity or preferences do not permit follow-up vs failure to complete follow-up in healthy patients. METHODS A prospective cohort study of 2410 patients 70 years or older screened with FOBT was conducted at 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) medical centers from January 1 to December 31, 2001. The main outcome measure was receipt of follow-up within 1 year of FOBT based on national VA and Medicare data. For patients with positive FOBT results, age and Charlson comorbidity scores were evaluated as potential predictors of receiving a complete colon evaluation (colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema), and medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for lack of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 212 patients (9%) had positive FOBT results; 42% received a complete colon evaluation within 1 year. Age and comorbidity were not associated with receipt of a complete follow-up, which was similar among patients 70 to 74 years old with a Charlson score of 0 compared with patients 80 years or older with a Charlson score of 1 or higher (48% vs 41%; P=.28). The VA site, number of positive FOBT cards, and number of VA outpatient visits were predictors. Of 122 patients who did not receive a complete follow-up within 1 year, 38% had documentation that comorbidity or preferences did not permit follow-up, and over the next 5 years 76% never received a complete follow-up. CONCLUSIONS While follow-up after positive FOBT results was low regardless of age or comorbidity, screening patients in whom complete evaluation would not be pursued substantially contributes to lack of follow-up. Efforts to improve follow-up should address the full chain of decision making, including decisions to screen and decisions to follow up.


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2011

Long-term Outcomes Following Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results in Older Adults: Benefits and Burdens

Christine E. Kistler; Katharine A. Kirby; Delia Lee; Michele A. Casadei; Louise C. Walter

BACKGROUND In the United States, older adults have low rates of follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) result. The long-term outcomes of these real world practices and their associated benefits and burdens are unknown. METHODS Longitudinal cohort study of 212 patients 70 years or older with a positive FOBT result at 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities in 2001 and followed up through 2008. We determined the frequency of downstream outcomes during the 7 years of follow-up, including procedures, colonoscopic findings, outcomes of treatment, complications, and mortality based on chart review and national VA and Medicare data. Net burden or benefit from screening and follow-up was determined according to each patients life expectancy. Life expectancy was classified into 3 categories: best (age, 70-79 years and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index [CCI], 0), average, and worst (age, 70-84 years and CCI, ≥4 or age, ≥85 years and CCI, ≥1). RESULTS Fifty-six percent of patients received follow-up colonoscopy (118 of 212), which found 34 significant adenomas and 6 cancers. Ten percent experienced complications from colonoscopy or cancer treatment (12 of 118). Forty-six percent of those without follow-up colonoscopy died of other causes within 5 years of FOBT (43 of 94), while 3 died of colorectal cancer within 5 years. Eighty-seven percent of patients with worst life expectancy experienced a net burden from screening (26 of 30) as did 70% with average life expectancy (92 of 131) and 65% with best life expectancy (35 of 51) (P = .048 for trend). CONCLUSIONS Over a 7-year period, older adults with best life expectancy were less likely to experience a net burden from current screening and follow-up practices than are those with worst life expectancy. The net burden could be decreased by better targeting FOBT screening and follow-up to healthy older adults.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2014

Role of Body Temperature in Diagnosing Bacterial Infection in Nursing Home Residents

Philip D. Sloane; Christine E. Kistler; C. Madeline Mitchell; Anna Song Beeber; Rosanna M. Bertrand; Alrick S. Edwards; Lauren E. W. Olsho; Louise S. Hadden; James R. Bateman; Sheryl Zimmerman

To provide empirically based recommendations for incorporating body temperature into clinical decision‐making regarding diagnosing infection in nursing home (NH) residents.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2013

Challenges of antibiotic prescribing for assisted living residents: perspectives of providers, staff, residents, and family members.

Christine E. Kistler; Philip D. Sloane; Timothy F. Platts-Mills; Anna Song Beeber; Christine Khandelwal; David J. Weber; C. Madeline Mitchell; David Reed; Latarsha Chisholm; Sheryl Zimmerman

To better understand the antibiotic prescribing process in assisted living (AL) communities given the growing rate of antibiotic resistance.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2015

Oral health care for older adults with serious illness: When and how?

Xi Chen; Christine E. Kistler

Older adults with serious illness are particularly vulnerable to oral disease due to worsened overall health, progressive functional loss and polypharmacy. Meanwhile, inability to communicate oral health needs, increased functional disability and psychological distress also hamper timely oral health care and lead to prolonged suffering and compromised quality of life. While many seriously-ill older adults with poor oral health receive no oral health care prior to death, unnecessary treatment is also common. In response to these issues, a new oral health care model is proposed to better address the oral health needs of older adults with serious illness. This model aims to promote comfort, maintain oral function and improve quality of life. End-of-life oral health trajectories and stage-appropriate oral health care strategies are also introduced to guide the care of these vulnerable individuals.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2017

The Antibiotic Prescribing Pathway for Presumed Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents

Christine E. Kistler; Sheryl Zimmerman; Kezia Scales; Kimberly Ward; David Weber; David Reed; Mallory McClester; Philip D. Sloane

Due to the high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for presumed urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home (NH) residents, we sought to examine the antibiotic prescribing pathway and the extent to which it agrees with the Loeb criteria; findings can suggest strategies for antibiotic stewardship.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christine E. Kistler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stacey Sheridan

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cathy L Melvin

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen N Lohr

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda J Lux

Research Triangle Park

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carmen L. Lewis

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip D. Sloane

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge