Christine J. Weegink

Ribavirin treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of a placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIMS Small, uncontrolled studies of ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C have reported efficacy in chronic hepatitis C. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of oral ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C, compared to placebo. METHODS A total of 114 patients were randomised to ribavirin or placebo. Ribavirin was administered in doses of 1000 or 1200 mg/day for 24 weeks. Efficacy was determined in the intention-to-treat population: 76 received ribavirin and 38 placebo. RESULTS Ribavirin was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing and normalising serum ALT levels: 42/76 (55%) of ribavirin-treated patients vs 2/38 (5%) placebo recipients had either normalisation of the ALT levels or a reduction from baseline of at least 50% (p < 0.001). ALT levels were normal in 22/76 (29%) of ribavirin-treated patients vs 0/38 placebo recipients (p < 0.001). Twenty-four weeks after stopping ribavirin, the majority of patients had abnormal ALT levels. There was no difference between the treatment groups in reduction or disappearance of HCV-RNA levels. HCV RNA disappeared during treatment in 3% of ribavirin-treated patients and 3% of placebo recipients. More ribavirin than placebo patients showed improvement in total Knodell score (45% vs 31%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Analysis of each component of a histology activity index revealed no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Ribavirin patients had fewer lymphoid aggregates than did placebo recipients at the post-treatment assessment (p = 0.05). Ribavirin was associated with reversible haemolytic anaemia: a fall in haemoglobin occurred in 3% of placebo- and 32% (25/78) of ribavirin-treated patients, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that ribavirin was no more effective than placebo in reducing or eliminating HCV-RNA levels, and was not significantly more effective than placebo in improving hepatic histology after 6 months of treatment. The role of a 6-month treatment of chronic hepatitis C with ribavirin alone, without a significant effect on HCV RNA, is therefore limited.

Antiviral activity of telaprevir (VX‐950) and peginterferon alfa‐2a in patients with hepatitis C

Telaprevir (VX‐950), an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease, substantially decreased plasma HCV RNA levels in a prior clinical study. The present study evaluated viral kinetics and safety during dosing with telaprevir alone and in combination with peginterferon alfa‐2a for 14 days. Previously untreated patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C were randomized to receive placebo and peginterferon alfa‐2a (n = 4); telaprevir (n = 8); or telaprevir and peginterferon alfa‐2a (n = 8). Telaprevir was given as 750 mg oral doses every 8 hours; peginterferon alfa‐2a was given as weekly 180 μg subcutaneous injections. The median change in HCV RNA from baseline to day 15 was −1.09 log10 (range, −2.08 to −0.46) in the placebo and peginterferon alfa‐2a group; −3.99 log10 (range, −5.28 to −1.26) in the telaprevir group, and −5.49 log10 (range, −6.54 to −4.30) in the telaprevir and peginterferon alfa‐2a group. Day 15 HCV RNA levels were undetectable in 4 patients who received telaprevir and peginterferon alfa‐2a and in 1 patient who received telaprevir alone. No viral breakthrough occurred in patients who received telaprevir and peginterferon alfa‐2a. The majority of adverse events were mild. There were no serious adverse events or premature discontinuations. Twelve weeks after starting off‐study standard therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in all 8 patients in the telaprevir and peginterferon alfa‐2a group, 5 patients in the telaprevir group, and 1 patient in the placebo and peginterferon alfa‐2a group. Conclusion: This study confirmed the substantial antiviral effects of telaprevir and showed an increased antiviral effect of telaprevir combined with peginterferon alfa‐2a. (HEPATOLOGY 2007;46:640–648.)

Rapid HCV-RNA Decline With Once Daily TMC435: A Phase I Study in Healthy Volunteers and Hepatitis C Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS The search for targeted anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) drugs is driven by the adverse effect profile and limited efficacy of the current standard of care (pegylated interferon-alpha/ribavirin). In a first-in-human trial, we tested the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the macrocyclic HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor TMC435 in healthy volunteers, followed by HCV genotype 1-infected patients to assess antiviral activity. METHODS The TMC435350-C101 study was a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 49 healthy volunteers, followed by an open-label, nonplacebo-controlled panel in 6 genotype 1 hepatitis C patients. Healthy volunteers received oral, single, ascending doses (up to 600 mg) or 5-day multiple ascending doses (200 mg twice daily or 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily). Patients received 200 mg once daily for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics and safety were evaluated for all panels, and plasma HCV-RNA levels were determined in patients. RESULTS There were no serious adverse events, no grade 3 reactions, and no treatment-related discontinuations; pharmacokinetics supported a once daily dosing regimen. Plasma HCV-RNA levels dropped rapidly in all patients, with a median maximal reduction of 3.9-log(10) IU/mL and a median of 6 days to maximal reduction. The initial steep reduction of HCV-RNA (median 3.5-log(10) IU/mL at day 3) was followed by a more gradual decline that was maintained over the dosing period. No viral breakthroughs (>1-log(10) IU/mL HCV-RNA increase from nadir) were observed during treatment nor in the 3 days posttreatment; HCV-RNA returned to pretreatment levels by week 4. CONCLUSIONS Once daily TMC435 given orally was generally safe and well tolerated and demonstrated potent antiviral activity.

Hepatitis C testing and treatment among active drug users in Amsterdam: results from the DUTCH-C project.

Background Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has shown to be effective, uptake of treatment among active drug users is still low. The Drug Users Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis-C project aims to offer active drug users in Amsterdam HCV testing and treatment using a multidisciplinary approach. Methods The study population comprises drug users participating in the Amsterdam Cohort Studies and drug users referred to the Drug Users Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis-C unit. Drug users were offered HCV testing and, if chronically infected, medical and psychiatric screening and HCV treatment. Various specialists collaborated to provide optimal care. We assessed test-uptake and treatment-uptake and outcomes. Results Four hundred and ninety-seven Amsterdam Cohort Studies drug users were offered HCV testing: 449 out of 497 (90%) accepted. HCV antibodies were found in 267 out of 449 (60%): 183 out of 267 (69%) were HCV-viremic and 49 out of 183 (27%) were HIV-co-infected. Of the 134 HCV-monoinfected patients, 102 (76%) initiated additional medical screening and 44 started treatment by 1 July 2009. Sixty-two drug users referred from methadone clinics were also HCV-monoinfected, of whom 14 started treatment by 1 July 2009. In total 58 persons were treated: 16 (27%) with genotype 1 or 4, 42 (72%) with genotype 2 or 3. Eighty-four percent used methadone, 97% used drugs (heroin, cocaine or amphetamine) at least once in the 6 months before treatment, 19% were active injectors. Sixty-two percent used alcohol, 41% had psychiatric disease other than substance abuse. Of the 57 individuals with sufficient follow-up, 37 (65%) achieved sustained virological response. Conclusion In a multidisciplinary setting, HIV-negative drug users with chronic HCV infection can be treated successfully despite active drug or alcohol use and psychiatric diseases. Therefore, access to HCV therapy using an integrated approach should be increased for this population.

Baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as predictor of sustained HBsAg loss in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon-α2a and adefovir

BACKGROUND In this study, we aimed to identify baseline predictors of response in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with a combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α2a and adefovir. METHODS We treated 92 chronic hepatitis B patients (44 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 48 HBeAg-negative) with HBV DNA > 100,000 copies/ml (> 17,182 IU/ml) with PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks and followed them up for 2 years. Baseline markers for HBeAg loss, combined response (HBeAg negativity, HBV DNA levels ≤ 2,000 IU/ml and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] normalization) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss were evaluated. RESULTS Two years after the end of treatment, rates of HBeAg loss and HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients were 18/44 (41%) and 5/44 (11%), respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, rates of combined response and HBsAg loss were 12/48 (25%) and 8/48 (17%), respectively. HBeAg-negative patients with HBsAg loss had lower baseline HBsAg levels than those without HBsAg loss (mean HBsAg 2.35 versus 3.55 log10 IU/ml; P < 0.001). They also had lower HBV DNA levels and were more often (PEG-)IFN experienced. Baseline HBsAg was the only independent predictor of HBsAg loss (OR 0.02; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS With combination therapy of PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks, a high rate of HBsAg loss was observed in both HBeAg-positive (11%) and HBeAg-negative (17%) patients 2 years after treatment ended. In HBeAg-negative patients, a low baseline HBsAg level was a strong predictor for HBsAg loss.

High incidence of type 1 diabetes mellitus during or shortly after treatment with pegylated interferon alpha for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Background: Development of diabetes mellitus (DM) during or shortly after treatment with interferon α (IFN‐α) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been reported sporadically. We prospectively screened for DM during and after IFN‐α therapy for chronic HCV infection.

Efficacy of Re-treatment With TMC435 as Combination Therapy in Hepatitis C Virus–Infected Patients Following TMC435 Monotherapy

In the TMC435-C101 study, 6 patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 were treated with the protease inhibitor TMC435 (200 mg once daily) as monotherapy for 5 days. Approximately 1.5 years later, 5 of these patients were re-treated with TMC435 (200 mg once daily) plus pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PegIFNα-2a and RBV) for 4 weeks, followed by PegIFNα-2a and RBV until week 48 (in the Optimal Protease inhibitor Enhancement of Response to therApy [OPERA-1] study). TMC435-resistant variants, which emerged in all 5 patients during the TMC435-C101 study, were no longer detected at the beginning of the OPERA-1 study based on virus population sequencing. During the OPERA-1 study, 3 patients had a sustained virologic response; deep sequencing indicated low-level persistence of resistant variants in the remaining 2 patients, which might have affected their response to re-treatment.

Randomised clinical trial: Anti-viral activity of ANA773, an oral inducer of endogenous interferons acting via TLR7, in chronic HCV

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 443–453

Intrahepatic response markers in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a and adefovir.

Background and Aim:  We investigated whether intrahepatic markers could predict response in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients treated with peg‐interferon and adefovir for 48 weeks.

Genetic variation in IL28B and treatment outcome in HBeAg-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B patients treated with Peg interferon alfa-2a and adefovir.

Abstract In a cohort of 95 chronic hepatitis B patients, who were treated with peg-interferon and adefovir for 1 year, and who had 15% HBsAg loss (overall), no association was found between IL28B polymorphisms and HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg clearance. These findings suggest that any association with outcome, if present, is less than that seen in chronic hepatitis C. Additional studies are needed to enlarge sample size and to refine our understanding of IL28B biology in the context of chronic hepatitis B response to immunomodulatory and direct antiviral therapy.