Christine McCluskey

Phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma

BACKGROUND Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with antineoplastic and antiangiogenic effects in glioma that may work synergistically with bevacizumab. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of panobinostat combined with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG). METHODS Patients with recurrent HGG were treated with oral panobinostat 30 mg 3 times per week, every other week, in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week. The primary endpoint was a 6-month progression-fee survival (PFS6) rate for participants with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Patients with recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG) were evaluated as an exploratory arm of the study. RESULTS At interim analysis, the GBM arm did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM arm was closed. A total of 24 patients with GBM were accrued prior to closure. The PFS6 rate was 30.4% (95%, CI 12.4%-50.7%), median PFS was 5 months (range, 3-9 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 9 months (range, 6-19 months). Accrual in the AG arm continued to completion, and a total of 15 patients were enrolled. The PFS6 rate was 46.7% (range, 21%-73%), median PFS was 7 months (range, 2-10 months), and median OS was 17 months (range, 5 months-27 months). CONCLUSIONS This phase II study of panobinostat and bevacizumab in participants with recurrent GBM did not meet criteria for continued accrual, and the GBM cohort of the study was closed. Although it was reasonably well tolerated, the addition of panobinostat to bevacizumab did not significantly improve PFS6 compared with historical controls of bevacizumab monotherapy in either cohort.

Phase II study of monthly pasireotide LAR (SOM230C) for recurrent or progressive meningioma

Objective: A subset of meningiomas recur after surgery and radiation therapy, but no medical therapy for recurrent meningioma has proven effective. Methods: Pasireotide LAR is a long-acting somatostatin analog that may inhibit meningioma growth. This was a phase II trial in patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or progressive meningioma designed to evaluate whether pasireotide LAR prolongs progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Patients were stratified by histology (atypical [World Health Organization grade 2] and malignant [grade 3] meningiomas in cohort A and benign [grade 3] in cohort B). Results: Eighteen patients were accrued in cohort A and 16 in cohort B. Cohort A had median age 59 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80, 17 (94%) had previous radiation therapy, and 11 (61%) showed high octreotide uptake. Cohort B had median age 52 years, median Karnofsky performance status 90, 11 (69%) had previous radiation therapy, and 12 (75%) showed high octreotide uptake. There were no radiographic responses to pasireotide LAR therapy in either cohort. Twelve patients (67%) in cohort A and 13 (81%) in cohort B achieved stable disease. In cohort A, PFS6 was 17% and median PFS 15 weeks (95% confidence interval: 8–20). In cohort B, PFS6 was 50% and median PFS 26 weeks (12–43). Treatment was well tolerated. Octreotide uptake and insulin-like growth factor–1 levels did not predict outcome. Expression of somatostatin receptor 3 predicted favorable PFS and overall survival. Conclusions: Pasireotide LAR has limited activity in recurrent meningiomas. The finding that somatostatin receptor 3 is associated with favorable outcomes warrants further investigation. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that in patients with recurrent or progressive meningioma, pasireotide LAR does not significantly increase the proportion of patients with PFS at 6 months.

A Multicenter, Phase II, Randomized, Noncomparative Clinical Trial of Radiation and Temozolomide with or without Vandetanib in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients

Purpose: Vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of KDR (VEGFR2), EGFR, and RET, may enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative, phase II study of radiation (RT) and temozolomide with or without vandetanib in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Experimental Design: We planned to randomize a total of 114 newly diagnosed GBM patients in a ratio of 2:1 to standard RT and temozolomide with (76 patients) or without (38 patients) vandetanib 100 mg daily. Patients with age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60, and not on enzyme-inducing antiepileptics were eligible. Primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS) from the date of randomization. Secondary endpoints included median progression-free survival (PFS), 12-month PFS, and safety. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics as well as tissue and serum biomarker analysis. Results: The study was terminated early for futility based on the results of an interim analysis. We enrolled 106 patients (36 in the RT/temozolomide arm and 70 in the vandetanib/RT/temozolomide arm). Median OS was 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0–22.5 months] in the RT/temozolomide arm and 16.6 months (95% CI, 14.9–20.1 months) in the vandetanib/RT/temozolomide (log-rank P = 0.75). Conclusions: The addition of vandetanib at a dose of 100 mg daily to standard chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma was associated with potential pharmacodynamic biomarker changes and was reasonably well tolerated. However, the regimen did not significantly prolong OS compared with the parallel control arm, leading to early termination of the study. Clin Cancer Res; 21(16); 3610–8. ©2015 AACR.

Phase I and biomarker study of plerixafor and bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma

Purpose: Although antiangiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma (HGG) is promising, responses are not durable. Correlative clinical studies suggest that the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis may mediate resistance to VEGFR inhibition. Preclinical data have demonstrated that plerixafor (a reversible CXCR4 inhibitor) could inhibit glioma progression after anti-VEGF pathway inhibition. We conducted a phase I study to determine the safety of plerixafor and bevacizumab in recurrent HGG. Patients and Methods: Part 1 enrolled 23 patients with a 3 × 3 dose escalation design to a maximum planned dose of plerixafor 320 μg/kg subcutaneously on days 1 to 21 and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses. Plasma and cellular biomarkers were evaluated before and after treatment. Part 2 enrolled 3 patients and was a surgical study to determine plerixafors penetration in tumor tissue. Results: In Part 1, no dose-limiting toxicities were seen at the maximum planned dose of plerixafor + bevacizumab. Treatment was well tolerated. After plerixafor 320 μg/kg treatment, the average CSF drug concentration was 26.8 ± 19.6 ng/mL. Plerixafor concentration in resected tumor tissue from patients pretreated with plerixafor was 10 to 12 μg/g. Circulating biomarker data indicated that plerixafor + bevacizumab induces rapid and persistent increases in plasma SDF-1α and placental growth factor. Progression-free survival correlated with pretreatment plasma soluble mesenchymal–epithelial transition receptor and sVEGFR1, and overall survival with the change during treatment in CD34+ progenitor/stem cells and CD8 T cells. Conclusions: Plerixafor + bevacizumab was well tolerated in HGG patients. Plerixafor distributed to both the CSF and brain tumor tissue, and treatment was associated with biomarker changes consistent with VEGF and CXCR4 inhibition. Clin Cancer Res; 24(19); 4643–9. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract 5631: Personal neoantigen-targeting vaccination generates neoepitope-specific T cell responses in tumors of patients with glioblastoma

Personal vaccines directed at neoantigens arising from tumor mutations can induce neoepitope-specific T cell responses in patients with highly mutated tumors such as melanoma. It remains unknown if this approach can be successfully applied in tumors with low mutation frequency. We conducted a phase 1/1b study to determine the safety and feasibility of patient-specific neoantigen-targeting vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed, methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated glioblastoma, administered following maximum surgical resection and conventional radiotherapy. Tumor-specific mutations were identified by whole-exome sequencing. Each vaccine, composed of up to 20 synthetic long peptides containing predicted tumor neoepitopes admixed with poly-ICLC, was administered subcutaneously on a prime-boost schedule. Among 8 treated patients, adverse events were limited to mild injection site reactions. Seven patients (88%) received a vaccine with ≥10 neoepitope peptides (median 12, range, 7-20), with median time to vaccine initiation of 18.6 weeks from surgery. All patients died from progressive disease. Median progression-free and overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.2, 9.7) and 16.8 months (90% CI: 9.6, 21.3), respectively. 3 patients dropped out of the study due to disease progression. We analyzed vaccine responses on 5 patients that got at least one booster immunization. All 3 patients who required dexamethasone during vaccine priming failed to generate interferon-γ responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast, 2 patients who did not receive dexamethasone during vaccine priming, generated robust de novo immune responses against multiple personal neoantigens. Circulating vaccine-induced polyfunctional neoantigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were enriched for memory and activated phenotypes, and increased numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected in these 2 patients. T cell receptor analysis identified identical clonotypes isolated from post-vaccination glioblastoma tissue and peripheral blood including a clonotype specific for ARHGAP35, a neoantigen targeted by vaccination. To our knowledge we provide the first evidence that tumor specific T cells can traffic from the periphery into glioblastoma tumors and that neoantigen-targeting vaccines can favorably alter the tumor immune milieu of glioblastoma. In conclusion, individualized, multi-neoepitope vaccination is feasible, safe, and generates neoantigen-specific T cell responses in the periphery and intracranial tumors of patients with glioblastoma. Citation Format: Derin B. Keskin, Itay Tirosh, Annabelle Anandappa, Jing Sun, Nathan D. Mathewson, Sachet A. Shukla, Evisa Gjini, Shuqiang Li, Letitia Li, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Phuong M. Le, Zhuting Hu, Wandi Zhang, Oriol Olive, Christine McCluskey, Heather Daley, Patrick Y. Wen, Antonio E. Chiocca, Maegan Harden, Niall Lennon, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Donna Neuberg, Jerome Ritz, Eric S. Lander, Aviv Regev, Kai Wucherpfennig, Mario Suva, Edward F. Fritsch, Rodig Scott, Keith L. Ligon, Kenneth J. Livak, Hacohen Nir, Patrick A. Ott, Catherine J. Wu, David A. Reardon. Personal neoantigen-targeting vaccination generates neoepitope-specific T cell responses in tumors of patients with glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5631.