Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christine P. Bird is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christine P. Bird.


Nature Genetics | 2007

Population genomics of human gene expression

Barbara E. Stranger; Alexandra C. Nica; Matthew S. Forrest; Antigone S. Dimas; Christine P. Bird; Claude Beazley; Catherine E. Ingle; Mark Dunning; Paul Flicek; Daphne Koller; Stephen B. Montgomery; Simon Tavaré; Panagiotis Deloukas; Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis

Genetic variation influences gene expression, and this variation in gene expression can be efficiently mapped to specific genomic regions and variants. Here we have used gene expression profiling of Epstein-Barr virus–transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines of all 270 individuals genotyped in the HapMap Consortium to elucidate the detailed features of genetic variation underlying gene expression variation. We find that gene expression is heritable and that differentiation between populations is in agreement with earlier small-scale studies. A detailed association analysis of over 2.2 million common SNPs per population (5% frequency in HapMap) with gene expression identified at least 1,348 genes with association signals in cis and at least 180 in trans. Replication in at least one independent population was achieved for 37% of cis signals and 15% of trans signals, respectively. Our results strongly support an abundance of cis-regulatory variation in the human genome. Detection of trans effects is limited but suggests that regulatory variation may be the key primary effect contributing to phenotypic variation in humans. We also explore several methodologies that improve the current state of analysis of gene expression variation.


Nature Genetics | 2006

Conserved noncoding sequences are selectively constrained and not mutation cold spots

Jared A. Drake; Christine P. Bird; James Nemesh; Daryl J. Thomas; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Alexandre Reymond; Laurent Excoffier; Homa Attar; Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis; Joel N. Hirschhorn

Noncoding genetic variants are likely to influence human biology and disease, but recognizing functional noncoding variants is difficult. Approximately 3% of noncoding sequence is conserved among distantly related mammals, suggesting that these evolutionarily conserved noncoding regions (CNCs) are selectively constrained and contain functional variation. However, CNCs could also merely represent regions with lower local mutation rates. Here we address this issue and show that CNCs are selectively constrained in humans by analyzing HapMap genotype data. Specifically, new (derived) alleles of SNPs within CNCs are rarer than new alleles in nonconserved regions (P = 3 × 10−18), indicating that evolutionary pressure has suppressed CNC-derived allele frequencies. Intronic CNCs and CNCs near genes show greater allele frequency shifts, with magnitudes comparable to those for missense variants. Thus, conserved noncoding variants are more likely to be functional. Allele frequency distributions highlight selectively constrained genomic regions that should be intensively surveyed for functionally important variation.


Nature Genetics | 2010

Mutation spectrum revealed by breakpoint sequencing of human germline CNVs

Donald F. Conrad; Christine P. Bird; Ben Blackburne; Sarah J. Lindsay; Lira Mamanova; Charles Lee; Daniel J. Turner

Precisely characterizing the breakpoints of copy number variants (CNVs) is crucial for assessing their functional impact. However, fewer than 10% of known germline CNVs have been mapped to the single-nucleotide level. We characterized the sequence breakpoints from a dataset of all CNVs detected in three unrelated individuals in previous array-based CNV discovery experiments. We used targeted hybridization-based DNA capture and 454 sequencing to sequence 324 CNV breakpoints, including 315 deletions. We observed two major breakpoint signatures: 70% of the deletion breakpoints have 1−30 bp of microhomology, whereas 33% of deletion breakpoints contain 1−367 bp of inserted sequence. The co-occurrence of microhomology and inserted sequence is low (10%), suggesting that there are at least two different mutational mechanisms. Approximately 5% of the breakpoints represent more complex rearrangements, including local microinversions, suggesting a replication-based strand switching mechanism. Despite a rich literature on DNA repair processes, reconstruction of the molecular events generating each of these mutations is not yet possible.


Chromosome Research | 2007

Genes flanking Xist in mouse and human are separated on the X chromosome in American marsupials.

Alexander I. Shevchenko; Irina S. Zakharova; E. A. Elisaphenko; Nicolay N. Kolesnikov; S. Whitehead; Christine P. Bird; Mark T. Ross; Jennifer R. Weidman; Randy L. Jirtle; Tatiana V. Karamysheva; Nicolay B. Rubtsov; John L. VandeBerg; Nina A. Mazurok; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M. Zakian

X inactivation, the transcriptional silencing of one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals, achieves dosage compensation of X-linked genes relative to XY males. In eutherian mammals X inactivation is regulated by the X-inactive specific transcript (Xist), a cis-acting non-coding RNA that triggers silencing of the chromosome from which it is transcribed. Marsupial mammals also undergo X inactivation but the mechanism is relatively poorly understood. We set out to analyse the X chromosome in Monodelphis domestica and Didelphis virginiana, focusing on characterizing the interval defined by the Chic1 and Slc16a2 genes that in eutherians flank the Xist locus. The synteny of this region is retained on chicken chromosome 4 where other loci belonging to the evolutionarily ancient stratum of the human X chromosome, the so-called X conserved region (XCR), are also located. We show that in both M. domestica and D. virginiana an evolutionary breakpoint has separated the Chic1 and Slc16a2 loci. Detailed analysis of opossum genomic sequences revealed linkage of Chic1 with the Lnx3 gene, recently proposed to be the evolutionary precursor of Xist, and Fip1, the evolutionary precursor of Tsx, a gene located immediately downstream of Xist in eutherians. We discuss these findings in relation to the evolution of Xist and X inactivation in mammals.


Genomics | 2003

Comparative and functional analyses of LYL1 loci establish marsupial sequences as a model for phylogenetic footprinting

Michael Chapman; Fadi J Charchar; Sarah Kinston; Christine P. Bird; Darren Grafham; Jane Rogers; Frank Grützner; Jennifer A. Marshall Graves; Anthony R. Green; Berthold Göttgens

Comparative genomic sequence analysis is a powerful technique for identifying regulatory regions in genomic DNA. However, its utility largely depends on the evolutionary distances between the species involved. Here we describe the screening of a genomic BAC library from the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura, formerly known as the narrow-footed marsupial mouse. We isolated a clone containing the LYL1 locus, completely sequenced the 60.6-kb insert, and compared it with orthologous human and mouse sequences. Noncoding homology was substantially reduced in the human/dunnart analysis compared with human/mouse, yet we could readily identify all promoters and exons. Human/mouse/dunnart alignments of the LYL1 candidate promoter allowed us to identify putative transcription factor binding sites, revealing a pattern highly reminiscent of critical regulatory regions of the LYL1 paralogue, SCL. This newly identified LYL1 promoter showed strong activity in myeloid progenitor cells and was bound in vivo by Fli1, Elf1, and Gata2-transcription factors all previously shown to bind to the SCL stem cell enhancer. This study represents the first large-scale comparative analysis involving marsupial genomic sequence and demonstrates that such comparisons provide a powerful approach to characterizing mammalian regulatory elements.


Science | 2007

Relative Impact of Nucleotide and Copy Number Variation on Gene Expression Phenotypes

Barbara E. Stranger; Matthew S. Forrest; Mark Dunning; Catherine E. Ingle; Claude Beazley; Natalie P. Thorne; Richard Redon; Christine P. Bird; Anna de Grassi; Charles Lee; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel P. Carter; Stephen W. Scherer; Simon Tavaré; Panagiotis Deloukas; Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis


Genome Biology | 2007

Fast-evolving noncoding sequences in the human genome

Christine P. Bird; Barbara E. Stranger; Maureen Liu; Daryl J. Thomas; Catherine E. Ingle; Claude Beazley; Webb Miller; Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2005

Progressive proximal expansion of the primate X chromosome centromere

Mary G. Schueler; John M. Dunn; Christine P. Bird; Mark T. Ross; Luigi Viggiano; Mariano Rocchi; Huntington F. Willard; Eric D. Green


Current Opinion in Genetics & Development | 2006

Functional variation and evolution of non-coding DNA.

Christine P. Bird; Barbara E. Stranger; Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis


Genome Research | 2007

Islands of euchromatin-like sequence and expressed polymorphic sequences within the short arm of human chromosome 21.

Robert Lyle; Paola Prandini; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Boudewijn ten Hallers; Sean Humphray; Baoli Zhu; Eduardo Eyras; Robert Castelo; Christine P. Bird; Sarantos Gagos; Carol Scott; Antony Cox; Samuel Deutsch; Catherine Ucla; Marc Cruts; Sophie Dahoun; Xinwei She; Frédérique Béna; Sheng-Yue Wang; Christine Van Broeckhoven; Evan E. Eichler; Roderic Guigó; Jane Rogers; Pieter J. de Jong; Alexandre Reymond

Collaboration


Dive into the Christine P. Bird's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catherine E. Ingle

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claude Beazley

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darren Grafham

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge