Christine Struthers

Telehome monitoring in patients with cardiac disease who are at high risk of readmission

Patients with chronic conditions are heavy users of the health care system. There are opportunities for significant savings and improvements to patient care if patients can be maintained in their homes. A randomized control trial tested the impact of 3 months of telehome monitoring on hospital readmission, quality of life, and functional status in patients with heart failure or angina. The intervention consisted of video conferencing and phone line transmission of weight, blood pressure, and electrocardiograms. Telehome monitoring significantly reduced the number of hospital readmissions and days spent in the hospital for patients with angina and improved quality of life and functional status in patients with heart failure or angina. Patients found the technology easy to use and expressed high levels of satisfaction. Telehealth technologies are a viable means of providing home monitoring to patients with heart disease at high risk of hospital readmission to improve their self-care abilities.

Giant cell myocarditis: clinical presentation, bridge to transplantation with mechanical circulatory support, and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND The multicenter Giant Cell Myocarditis Registry recorded 64 cases from 36 centers before 1996. The median transplant-free survival of 30 patients without immunosuppression was 3 months. Of 34 patients who received heart transplantations, 9 experienced recurrence of giant cell myocarditis in their transplanted hearts and 1 patient died. METHODS We reviewed our experience in 340 heart transplantations since 1984. Unexpected giant cell myocarditis was found in the explanted hearts of 7 patients (6 men and 1 female, aged 18-65 years). RESULTS The duration from the onset of symptoms to assist-device implant or transplantation ranged from 11 days to 9 years, whereas the time interval from referral or deterioration ranged from 2 days to 4 months. Four patients required mechanical circulatory support before surgery (total artificial hearts in 2 and left ventricular assist devices in 2), and 3 patients required inotropic drugs. Six patients are alive with no sign of recurrent giant cell myocarditis at 12 to 113 months after surgery. One patient died suddenly 75 months after surgery, and autopsy showed severe graft vascular disease with no recurrence of giant cell myocarditis. Surveillance, right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy specimens showed recurrent asymptomatic giant cell myocarditis in 3 patients at 5 to 13 months after surgery, and found recurrence in 1 patient 30 months after surgery. This patient received augmented immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS Giant cell myocarditis often is not diagnosed before transplantation. It can present as dilated cardiomyopathy with late deterioration, or it can present with rapid hemodynamic deterioration. In our experience, these patients can be bridged successfully to transplant with mechanical circulatory assist. Giant cell myocarditis may recur after transplantation but may respond to augmented immunosuppression.

Determinants of hospital survival after cardiac transplantation

To identify the preoperative factors that influence hospital survival after transplantation we analyzed our consecutive experience of 183 transplantations in 179 patients over a 10-year period. There were 151 male and 29 female transplant recipients ranging in age from 10 days to 70 years (mean, 48 +/- 1 years). Diagnoses included coronary disease in 110 patients, cardiomyopathy in 55 patients, valvular disease in 6 patients, and congenital heart disease in 9 patients. Seventy-seven had undergone a previous cardiac operation, and 30 patients required preoperative mechanical support. Forty patients received hearts from donors who were 40 years old or older (range, 40 to 62 years). Ischemic time was greater than 240 minutes in 32 cases, and pulmonary vascular resistance was greater than 3 Wood units in 40 patients (range, 3.1 to 10.0 Wood units). Cyclosporine induction was used in 52 patients, whereas 128 recipients received polyclonal antibody prophylaxis. There were 25 hospital deaths. Recipient diagnosis, use of mechanical support, donor age, and the immune suppression protocol were related to hospital survival according to univariate analysis. Using multiple logistic regression, only the method of immune suppression induction and the use of mechanical assists were significant independent determinants of survival. In conclusion, we believe that extended ischemic times and donor age do not adversely affect the early success of transplantation, whereas induction with immune globulin may reduce early mortality. Patients requiring mechanical support before transplantation continue to be a challenge.

Cardiac Transplantation After Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Canadian Perspective

BACKGROUND To assess the relative efficacy of cardiac transplantation after mechanical circulatory support with a variety of support systems, we analyzed our consecutive series of patients who had and did not have mechanical support before transplantation. METHODS A review of 209 patients undergoing cardiac transplantation from 1984 to May 1995 was performed. Group 1 consisted of 110 patients who were maintained on oral medications while awaiting transplantation, and group 2 consisted of 60 patients who required intravenous inotropic support. Group 3 included 39 patients who had transplantation after mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. The indication for device implantation was acute onset of cardiogenic shock in 38 patients and deterioration while awaiting transplantation in 1 patient. The support systems were an intraaortic balloon pump in 13 (subgroup 3A), a ventricular assist device in 7 (subgroup 3B), and a total artificial heart in 19 patients (subgroup 3C). RESULTS After transplantation, infection was more common in group 3 (56%) than in group 1 (28%) or group 2 (32%) (p = 0.005). Survival to discharge was lower for group 3 (71.7%) than for group 1 (90.9%) or 2 (88.3%) (p = 0.009). For mechanically supported patients, survival to discharge was 84.6% in subgroup 3A, 71.4% in subgroup 3B, and 63.1% in subgroup 3C (p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS Transplantation after mechanical support offers acceptable results in this group of patients for whom the only alternative is certain death. Patient selection and perioperative management remain the challenge to improving these results.

Effect of orlistat in obese patients with heart failure: a pilot study

Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization. Obesity is increasingly common and is a major public health problem. The aim of this study is to assess whether obese patients with heart failure can benefit from losing weight via an orlistat-assisted diet. This randomized clinical trial included obese patients with ejection fractions < or =40%. Orlistat and diet counseling were compared with diet counseling alone. Twenty-one consecutive obese patients with heart failure were recruited. Significant improvement in 6-minute walk test (45.8 m; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-86.4 m; p=0.031), functional class (-0.6+/-0.5, p=0.014), weight loss (-8.55 kg; 95% confidence interval, -13.0 to -4.1 kg; p<0.001) and also significant decreases in total cholesterol (p=0.017), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p=0.03), and triglycerides (p=0.036) were observed in the orlistat group. Orlistat can promote significant weight loss and symptoms of relief in obese patients with heart failure, as measured by 6-minute walk test and functional capacity. The lipid profile improved. Orlistat was safe and well tolerated.