Christine Timms

Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND Screening for amblyopia in early childhood is done in many countries to ensure that affected children are detected and treated within the critical period, and achieve a level of vision in their amblyopic eye that would be useful should they lose vision in their non-amblyopic eye later in life. We aimed to investigate the risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment attributable to loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye. METHODS For 24 months from July, 1997, national surveillance was done to identify all individuals in the UK with unilateral amblyopia (acuity worse than 6/12) who had newly acquired vision loss in the non-amblyopic eye, resulting in acuity of worse than 6/12 or visual-field restriction precluding driving. Information about participants was obtained at presentation and 1 year later. Participants were categorised as having socially significant visual impairment, or visual impairment, severe visual impairment, or blindness, in accordance with WHO taxonomy. FINDINGS Of 370 eligible individuals, at presentation 104 (28%) had socially significant visual impairment, 180 (49%) visual impairment, and 86 (23%) severe visual impairment or blindness. The minimum risk of permanent visual impairment by age 95 years was 32.9 (95% CI 29.1-36.9) per 100,000 total population. The projected lifetime risk of vision loss for an individual with amblyopia was at least 1.2% (95% CI 1.1-1.4). Only 36 (35%) of 102 people previously in paid employment were able to continue. INTERPRETATION In the UK, where screening for amblyopia is under review, risk of serious vision loss affecting the non-amblyopic eye and its results are greater than that previously assumed. Thus, in addition to the benefits of improved vision in the amblyopic eye, treatment of amblyopia during childhood is a potentially valuable strategy to prevent incapacitating vision loss later in life.

Prediction of improved vision in the amblyopic eye after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye

Amblyopia arises from abnormal visual experiences in early childhood. Improved function of the amblyopic eye after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye could be a model for residual neural plasticity. We aimed to establish the likelihood of, and predictive factors for, this improvement in function. We identified 254 individuals aged 11 years or older with unilateral amblyopia who were visually impaired after loss of vision in their non-amblyopic eye but had no other disorder affecting their amblyopic eye. 25 (10%) of 254 people had improved visual acuity in their amblyopic eye. These findings suggest there is some plasticity in the visual system of a few visually mature individuals with amblyopia, which warrants further study. Children should remain the focus of detection and treatment.

Saccadic strategies in children with hemianopia

Multiple hypometric (undershooting) saccades are generally reported as a compensatory strategy in adults with homonymous hemianopia. However, hypermetric (overshooting) saccades have been reported to develop spontaneously as a beneficial strategy in response to predictable targets. We examined the saccades of 10 children (aged 5 to 16 years) with homonymous hemianopia to determine the type of compensatory eye‐movement strategies employed 6 months to 16 years after hemianopia onset. Homonymous hemianopia was identified using perimetry and/or pattern visual evoked potentials and supported with results of neuroimaging. Eye movements were recorded using bitemporal electrooculography. Saccades were elicited to a red light source in a semipredictable paradigm. We found that hypermetria was not a consistent compensatory strategy in our patients. In spite of the predictability of our paradigm and the long follow‐up period, multiple hypometric saccades into the blind field appeared to be the preferred strategy.