Christoph Lehmann
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christoph Lehmann.
Archive | 2018
Christoph Lehmann; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
OpenGeoSys (OGS) together with its predecessors looks back at a long history as a simulation code of coupled thermal, hydraulic, mechanical and chemical (THMC) phenomena in fractured porous media: starting as the Fortran code Rockflow in the 1986, ranging over a C implementation and now using different flavours of the C++ programming language; in the meantime undergoing two renames, namely to GeoSys and now OpenGeoSys.
Archive | 2018
Christoph Lehmann; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
In this chapter, the first real-world scenario is simulated using the model developed in Chap. 2.
Archive | 2018
Christoph Lehmann; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
In this chapter a mathematical model for a fixed bed of adsorbent pellets in an open-mode heat storage device is derived. At first a the general modelling workflow is presented. Afterwards the governing equations of the system are derived from the physical balance laws in combination with constitutive relations for material properties. Special focus is laid on the constitutive relations for the sorption equilibrium and kinetics.
Archive | 2016
Christoph Lehmann; Thomas Nagel
Water adsorption to zeolites is a promising means for heat storage , including the seasonal storage of solar energy. We have added a material model to OpenGeoSys that calculates the equilibrium water loading of the zeolite and the heat of adsorption using the Dubinin-Polanyi theory of adsorption to microporous solids .
A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research | 2016
Christoph Lehmann; Daniel Tillich
Quantifying credit risk with default probabilities is a standard technique for financial institutes, investors or rating agencies. To get a higher precision of default probabilities, one idea is the aggregation of different available ratings (i.e. default probabilities) to a so called ‘consensus rating’. But does the concept of ‘consensus rating’ really make sense? What is a ‘real’ consensus rating? This paper tries to clarify under which conditions a consensus rating exists. Therefore, the term of ‘consensus information’ is used. This leads to a concept that deals with the precision of aggregated rating characteristics. Within this framework the problem of misinformation resp. contradictory information is addressed. It is shown that consensus information is not necessarily more informative than individual information. Furthermore, the aggregation aspects are discussed from a statistical perspective.
Applied Energy | 2016
Thomas Nagel; Steffen Beckert; Christoph Lehmann; Roger Gläser; Olaf Kolditz
Applied Energy | 2017
Christoph Lehmann; Steffen Beckert; Roger Gläser; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
Applied Energy | 2017
Christoph Lehmann; Steffen Beckert; Thomas Nonnen; Roger Gläser; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
The Journal of Risk Model Validation | 2010
Stefan Huschens; Christoph Lehmann; Daniel Tillich
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer | 2019
Christoph Lehmann; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel