Christophe Vandenbriele

Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to the vessel wall under flow is mediated by von Willebrand factor-binding protein

Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to blood vessels under shear stress requires von Willebrand factor (VWF). Several bacterial factors have been proposed to interact with VWF, including VWF-binding protein (vWbp), a secreted coagulase that activates the hosts prothrombin to generate fibrin. We measured the adhesion of S aureus Newman and a vWbp-deficient mutant (vwb) to VWF, collagen, and activated endothelial cells in a microparallel flow chamber. In vivo adhesion of S aureus was evaluated in the mesenteric circulation of wild-type (WT) and VWF-deficient mice. We found a shear-dependent increase in adhesion of S aureus to the (sub)endothelium that was dependent on interactions between vWbp and the A1-domain of VWF. Adhesion was further enhanced by coagulase-mediated fibrin formation that clustered bacteria and recruited platelets into bacterial microthrombi. In vivo, deficiency of vWbp or VWF as well as inhibition of coagulase activity reduced S aureus adhesion. We conclude that vWbp contributes to vascular adhesion of S aureus through 2 independent mechanisms: shear-mediated binding to VWF and activation of prothrombin to form S aureus-fibrin-platelet aggregates.

PEAR1 attenuates megakaryopoiesis via control of the PI3K/PTEN pathway

Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) participates in platelet aggregation via sustaining αIIbβ3 activation. To investigate the role of PEAR1 in platelet formation, we monitored and manipulated PEAR1 expression in vitro in differentiating human CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells and in vivo in zebrafish embryos. PEAR1 expression rose during CD34(+) cell differentiation up to megakaryocyte (MK) maturation. Two different lentiviral short hairpin knockdowns of PEAR1 did not affect erythropoiesis in CD34(+) cells, but increased colony-forming unit MK cell numbers twofold vs control in clonogenic assays, without substantially modifying MK maturation. The PEAR1 knockdown resulted in a twofold reduction of the phosphatase and TENsin homolog (PTEN) phosphatase expression and modulated gene expression of several phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt and Notch pathway genes. In zebrafish, Pear1 expression increased progressively during the first 3 days of embryo development. Both ATG and splice-blocking PEAR1 morpholinos enhanced thrombopoiesis, without affecting erythropoiesis. Western blots of 3-day-old Pear1 knockdown zebrafish revealed elevated Akt phosphorylation, coupled to transcriptional downregulation of the PTEN isoform Ptena. Neutralization by morpholinos of Ptena, but not of Ptenb, phenocopied the Pear1 zebrafish knockdown and triggered enhanced Akt phosphorylation and thrombocyte formation. In summary, this is the first demonstration that PEAR1 influences the PI3K/PTEN pathway, a critical determinant of Akt phosphorylation, itself controlling megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis.

Shear-Resistant Binding to von Willebrand Factor Allows Staphylococcus lugdunensis to Adhere to the Cardiac Valves and Initiate Endocarditis

BACKGROUND Staphylococcus lugdunensis is an emerging cause of endocarditis. To cause endovascular infections, S. lugdunensis requires mechanisms to overcome shear stress. We investigated whether platelets and von Willebrand factor (VWF) mediate bacterial adhesion to the vessel wall and the cardiac valves under flow. METHODS S. lugdunensis binding to VWF, collagen, and endothelial cells was studied in a parallel flow chamber in the absence and presence of platelets. In vivo adhesion of S. lugdunensis was evaluated in a mouse microvasculature perfusion model and a new mouse model of endocarditis. RESULTS Contrary to other coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. lugdunensis bound to VWF under flow, thus enabling its adhesion to endothelial cells and to the subendothelial matrix. In inflamed vessels of the mesenteric circulation, VWF recruited S. lugdunensis to the vessel wall. In a novel endocarditis mouse model, local inflammation and the resulting release of VWF enabled S. lugdunensis to bind and colonize the heart valves. CONCLUSIONS S. lugdunensis binds directly to VWF, which proved to be vital for withstanding shear forces and for its adhesion to the vessel wall and cardiac valves. This mechanism explains why S. lugdunensis causes more-aggressive infections, including endocarditis, compared with other coagulase-negative staphylococci.

A Human Platelet Receptor Protein Microarray Identifies the High Affinity Immunoglobulin E Receptor Subunit α (FcεR1α) as an Activating Platelet Endothelium Aggregation Receptor 1 (PEAR1) Ligand

Genome-wide association studies to identify loci responsible for platelet function and cardiovascular disease susceptibility have repeatedly identified polymorphisms linked to a gene encoding platelet endothelium aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1), an “orphan” cell surface receptor that is activated to stabilize platelet aggregates. To investigate how PEAR1 signaling is initiated, we sought to identify its extracellular ligand by creating a protein microarray representing the secretome and receptor repertoire of the human platelet. Using an avid soluble recombinant PEAR1 protein and a systematic screening assay designed to detect extracellular interactions, we identified the high affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptor subunit α (FcεR1α) as a PEAR1 ligand. FcεR1α and PEAR1 directly interacted through their membrane-proximal Ig-like and 13th epidermal growth factor domains with a relatively strong affinity (KD ∼ 30 nm). Precomplexing FcεR1α with IgE potently inhibited the FcεR1α-PEAR1 interaction, and this was relieved by the anti-IgE therapeutic omalizumab. Oligomerized FcεR1α potentiated platelet aggregation and led to PEAR1 phosphorylation, an effect that was also inhibited by IgE. These findings demonstrate how a protein microarray resource can be used to gain important insight into the function of platelet receptors and provide a mechanistic basis for the initiation of PEAR1 signaling in platelet aggregation.

Pharmacotherapy with oral Xa inhibitors for venous thromboembolism

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. The traditional treatment of VTE, with an initial therapy with (low molecular weight) heparin or fondaparinux and a continued treatment with vitamin K antagonists, is effective but has limitations. Areas covered: The current review summarizes the results of the Phase III trials with the new oral direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and provides a meta-analysis of these trials in the subgroups of elderly patients (> 75 years) and patients with impaired renal function. Expert opinion: The practical use of direct Xa inhibitors in the treatment of VTE in general and in specific subgroups is discussed. For elderly patients, patients with extremes of body weight, cancer patients or patients with moderate renal impairment, pooled data suggest that the direct oral Xa inhibitors are a reasonable alternative to standard therapy. For other indications, such as treatment of VTE in children, during pregnancy or in the context of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, further data from clinical trials are needed.

Rivaroxaban for the treatment of consumptive coagulopathy associated with a vascular malformation

The localized activation of coagulation in vascular malformations can lead to a consumptive coagulopathy characterized by elevated D-dimers and a consumption of fibrinogen and platelets, eventually giving rise to a bleeding tendency. By reducing coagulation activation, anticoagulant treatment with heparin is able to limit this haemostatic dysregulation and the associated bleeding diathesis. Here, we present a case of a consumptive coagulopathy due to a large venous malformation with a sustained correction of the fibrinogen depletion and associated bleeding tendency both with subcutaneous enoxaparin and with the oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban.

PEAR1 is not a human hypertension-susceptibility gene

Abstract Objective: Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) is a membrane protein involved in platelet contact-induced activation and sustained platelet aggregation. Experimental studies identified PEAR1, as a candidate gene that may be linked to the blood-pressure driven kidney injury in salt-sensitive Dahl rats. Aim: In a family-based European population study (mean age 39.7 years; 52.2% women), we searched for association of changes in blood pressure or incidence of hypertension with genetic variation in PEAR1. Methods: Among 1973 randomly recruited people, genotyped for PEAR1, we measured blood pressure at baseline and follow-up. Results: Median follow-up was 10.0 years. While accounting for family clusters and blood pressure at baseline and with adjustments applied for sex, age, body mass index, smoking and drinking, total cholesterol, and antihypertensive drug treatment, all associations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes with nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PEAR1 were all non-significant (p ≥ 0.059). With similar adjustments, the incidence of hypertension (397 cases among 1532 participants were normotensive at baseline [25.9%]) was not related to the SNPs in PEAR1 (hazard ratios ≤ 1.09; p ≥ 0.09). Conclusion: Our study suggests that PEAR1 is not a hypertension susceptibility gene in humans.

QTc in the elderly

A 76-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for the evaluation of significant mitral regurgitation. She had a history of mastectomy for breast cancer, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, treated with amiodarone (200 mg once daily), and non-vitamin-K-oral anticoagulation; and fibromyalgia, necessitating the chronic intake of duloxetine (tricyclic antidepressant). Because of insufficient paint relief, her general practitioner had associated pregabilin (150 mg twice daily) a couple of days before admission. Almost immediately after presentation, she collapsed because of a ventricular-fibrillation-arrest, prompting two cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and one shock. The potassium postarrest was low (2.8 mmol/L), calcium and magnesium were within the normal range. Her post-arrest electrocardiogram (Panel) showed an extremely prolonged QT: 760 ms (QTc: 694 ms, rate 50 b.p.m., normal QRS-width) without evidence for acute ischaemia. After withholding the amiodarone and duloxetine, correcting the potassium levels, and weaning the pregabilin, the QTc-interval normalised (458 ms). Our patient recovered well and underwent an uncomplicated MitraClip procedure.

Absence of Pear1 does not affect murine platelet function in vivo.

BACKGROUND Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor-1 (PEAR1) is a transmembrane platelet receptor that amplifies the activation of the platelet fibrinogen receptor (αIIbβ3) during platelet aggregation. In man, Pear1 polymorphisms are associated with changes in platelet aggregability. In this report, we characterized Pear1 expression and function in murine platelets. METHODS Pear1 phosphorylation and signaling, platelet aggregation, α-degranulation and clot retraction were studied in WT and Pear1-/- platelets. The function of Pear1 in haemostasis and thrombosis was studied in a mouse tail vein bleeding and ferric chloride-induced mesenteric thrombosis model. RESULTS Mature murine platelets express Pear1 on their membrane and clustering of Pear1 by anti-Pear1 antibodies triggered platelet aggregation. Pear1 was weakly phosphorylated during collagen-induced murine platelet aggregation and was translocated to the cytoskeleton. Absence of murine Pear1 impaired dextran sulfate-induced platelet aggregation, but did not impact collagen-, AYPGK and ADP-induced platelet aggregation, coupled to a lower Pear1 expression in murine than in human platelets and to weaker Pear1-mediated downstream signaling. Neither clot retraction nor α-degranulation was affected in Pear1-/- mice. Likewise, in vivo tests like the tail vein bleeding time and thrombus formation in mesenteric veins were similar in WT and Pear1-/- mice. CONCLUSION Murine platelet Pear1 shares a number of characteristics with human platelet PEAR1. Nevertheless, murine Pear1 contributes less to platelet function as does human PEAR1 and does not overtly impact haemostasis and thrombosis in mice.

[PP.07.05] PLATELET ENDOTHELIAL AGGREGATION RECEPTOR 1 IS NOT A SUSCEPTIBILITY GENE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN THE GENERAL POPULATION

Objective: Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor 1 (PEAR1), a membrane protein highly expressed in platelets and endothelial cells, mediates platelet contact-induced activation and sustained platelet aggregation. Among patients with coronary heart disease on antiplatelet agents, PEAR1 rs12041331 A allele carriers experienced more adverse cardiovascular outcomes and had higher death rates than GG homozygotes. We investigated whether in a white population genetic variation in PEAR1 predicts cardiovascular outcome. Design and method: Among 1938 participants enrolled in the Flemish Study on Environment, Genes and Health Outcomes (51.3% women; mean age 43.6 years), we genotyped 9 SNPs and reconstructed haplotypes in PEAR1, measured baseline cardiovascular risk factors, and recorded fatal and non-fatal outcomes. For SNPs, we contrasted cardiovascular disease incidence of minor-allele heterozygotes and homozygotes (variant) vs. major-allele homozygotes (reference) and for haplotypes carriers vs. non-carriers. Results: Among these 1938 participants, 238 died and 182 experienced a major cardiovascular endpoint. In adjusted analyses, we accounted for baseline variables, including sex, age, body mass index, systolic pressure, the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, smoking and drinking, antihypertensive drug treatment and history of cardiovascular disease. The hazard ratios expressing the risk of death or of a cardiovascular endpoint in minor allele carriers vs. major allele homozygotes of 10 PEAR1 SNPs, including rs12041331, ranged from 0.95 to 1.03 (P > = 0.38) and from 0.72 to 1.36 (P > = 0.23), respectively. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios expressing the risk in carriers vs. non-carriers of three haplotypes with frequency > = 15% ranged from 0.89 to 1.09 (P > = 0.38) for mortality and from 0.67 to 1.26 (P > = 0.20) for a cardiovascular complications. These results were not influenced by intake of antiplatelet drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or both (P-values for interaction > = 0.27). Conclusions: In a white population, we could not replicate previous reports suggesting that PEAR1 might be a susceptibility gene for cardiovascular complications. Our findings were consistent irrespective of the use of antiplatelet agents.