Christopher Bowd

Direction-selective Coding of Stereoscopic (Cyclopean) Motion

This study employed a selective adaptation paradigm and investigated thresholds for direction discrimination of translational stereoscopic motion (moving binocular disparity information). The stimuli were moving arrays of randomly positioned stereoscopic discs created from disparity embedded in dynamic random-element stereograms. When discrimination thresholds were measured across a range of base directions following adaptation in a fixed direction, discrimination thresholds were maximally elevated 20-30 deg away from adaptation and reduced in the same direction as adaptation. These results are consistent with a distributed-channel model of direction coding and indicate that the direction of stereoscopic motion is encoded by adaptable direction-selective mechanisms similar to those proposed for luminance-defined motion.

Properties of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect.

Across four experiments, this study investigated properties of the stereoscopic motion aftereffect (adaptation from moving retinal disparity information). The results showed that stereoscopic motion can induce an adaptation aftereffect across a wide range of conditions and observers, provided that the duration of adaptation is sufficiently long and a perceptually salient test pattern is viewed. Motion adaptation was found to transfer between the stereoscopic and luminance domains [replicating a previous report by Fox, Patterson and Lehmkuhle (1982) Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.), 22, 144], suggesting that motion perception from stereoscopic (second-order) and luminance (first-order) attributes is mediated by a common neural substrate.

Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single feature discrimination within the same object?

In the present study, we investigated whether judging the presence of multiple features within an object would be superior to judging the presence of only one feature. Feature discriminability and the number of features to discriminate within an object were varied. Specific features were judged as present or absent. Results showed that judging the presence of two or three features was faster than judging the presence of the less discriminable of these two or three features alone (multiple-feature benefits). These findings suggest that relevant features within an object activate (prime) a decision or response in a parallel, asynchronous fashion based on discriminability (Miller, 1982a). The ability of a response priming model, a response mapping model, and a template model to account for multiple feature benefits is discussed.

Enduring stereoscopic motion aftereffects induced by prolonged adaptation

This study investigated the effects of prolonged adaptation on the recovery of the stereoscopic motion aftereffect (adaptation induced by moving binocular disparity information). The adapting and test stimuli were stereoscopic grating patterns created from disparity, embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Motion aftereffects induced by luminance stimuli were included in the study for comparison. Adaptation duration was either 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 or 64 min and the duration of the ensuing aftereffect was the variable of interest. The results showed that aftereffect duration was proportional to the square root of adaptation duration for both stereoscopic and luminance stimuli; on log-log axes, the relation between aftereffect duration and adaptation duration was a power law with the slope near 0.5 in both cases. For both kinds of stimuli, there was no sign of adaptation saturation even at the longest adaptation duration.

Disparity tuning of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect

Across five experiments this study investigated the disparity tuning of the stereoscopic motion aftereffect (adaptation from moving retinal disparity). Adapting and test stimuli were moving and stationary stereoscopic grating patterns, respectively, created from dynamic random-dot stereograms. Observers adapted to moving stereoscopic grating patterns presented with a given disparity and viewed stationary test patterns presented with the same or differing disparity to examine whether the motion aftereffect is disparity contingent. Across experiments aftereffect duration was greatest when adapting motion and test pattern both were presented with zero disparity and in the plane of fixation. Aftereffect declined as disparity of adapting motion and/or test pattern increased away from fixation, even under conditions in which depth position of adapt and test was equal. This argues against a relative depth separation explanation of the decline, and instead suggests that the amount of adaptable substrate decreases away from fixation.

Direction discrimination of cyclopean (stereoscopic) and luminance motion

This study compared direction discrimination of cyclopean (stereoscopic) and luminance motion involving stimuli equated for effective strength. The stimuli were random-walk cinematogram (RWC) displays whose signal and noise discs were created from binocular disparity differences embedded in a dynamic random-dot stereogram or from luminance differences. Experiment 1 measured global motion detection thresholds for cyclopean and luminance stimuli by manipulating the proportion of signal to noise discs. Detection thresholds for cyclopean motion were about 25% whereas detection thresholds for luminance motion were 5%, thus five times more cyclopean motion events than luminance events were necessary to elicit threshold responding. Experiment 2 measured thresholds for discriminating the direction of cyclopean and luminance motion under conditions of equal stimulus strength by presenting the motion displays at equal multiples of detection threshold. Direction discrimination thresholds (ranging from about 5-30 deg, depending upon conditions) were similar for cyclopean and luminance motion, thus the precision with which the pooling of local motion events in one direction can be discriminated from the pooling of events in a slightly different direction is the same for cyclopean and luminance stimuli. The finding that cyclopean motion information is pooled is consistent with the idea that the direction of cyclopean motion is coded in the responses of a population of directionally selective mechanisms.

Interference From Multi-dimensional Objects During Feature and Conjunction Discriminations

Feature discrimination performance within an attended object and interference from irrelevant, multi-dimensional objects (distractors) were examined in a two-choice, response compatibility paradigm. Results showed that the amount of interference by multi-dimensional distractors was dependent on three factors: (1) the discriminability of the incompatible, task-relevant distractor features; (2) the number of incompatible, task-relevant distractor features; and (3) whether the task-relevant, incompatible features matched the task goals. The most interesting finding was that additive priming effects were found for multiple, task-relevant features that matched the task goals, whether these features were present in the attended object or in the ignored object. Models that assume that each task-relevant feature primes its corresponding decision/response asynchronously and that this priming is combined to meet a decision/response criterion (at least when attended) can account for distractor interference during conjunction discriminations. Implications of these findings for feature integration models, template models, and a response selection model are discussed.

The stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect is selective for spatial frequency and orientation of disparity modulation

Across two experiments, this study investigated the spatial frequency tuning and orientation tuning (both in the disparity domain) of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect. In Experiment 1, observers adapted to a moving stereoscopic grating of a given cyclopean spatial frequency and tested for the motion aftereffect with a static grating of the same or different spatial frequency. Robust motion aftereffects were induced only when the spatial frequency of the adapt and test stimuli was the same. In Experiment 2, observers adapted to a moving stereoscopic grating of a given cyclopean orientation and tested for the motion aftereffect with a static grating of the same or different orientation. Robust motion aftereffects were induced only when the orientation of the adapt and test stimuli was the same. Together, these results suggest that the stereoscopic motion aftereffect is tuned for cyclopean spatial frequency and orientation which, in turn, suggest that the stereoscopic motion aftereffect is mediated by low-level oriented spatial-frequency mechanisms.

Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays

Stereoscopic depth discrimination was investigated in crossed and uncrossed directions using stimuli defined by binocular disparity differences embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Across three experiments, fixation was directed to a point on the display screen (which placed crossed stimuli in front of and uncrossed stimuli behind, the background dots of the stereogram), to a point in front of the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli in front of the background dots), and to a point behind the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli behind the background dots). Results showed that depth discrimination was always good when the stimuli appeared in front of the background dots of the stereogram, whereas discrimination was always poor when the stimuli appeared behind the background dots. These results suggest that differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis as reported in past research arose, in part, from effects related to occlusion.

Cross-domain adaptation reveals that a common mechanism computes stereoscopic (cyclopean) and luminance plaid motion.

Across three experiments, this study investigated the visual processing of moving stereoscopic plaid patterns (plaids created with cyclopean components defined by moving binocular disparity embedded in a dynamic random-dot stereogram). Results showed that adaptation to a moving stereoscopic plaid or its components affected the perceived coherence of a luminance test plaid, and vice versa. Cross-domain adaptation suggests that stereoscopic and luminance motion signals feed into a common pattern-motion mechanism, consistent with the idea that stereoscopic motion signals are computed early in the motion processing stream.