Christopher D. Scott

Arrhythmias after cardiac transplantation.

The etiology and clinical significance of sustained arrhythmias, and atrial and ventricular premature complexes (APCs and VPCs, respectively) after heart transplantation are controversial. Fifty adult recipients surviving > 2 weeks were studied by continuous telemetry while in the hospital and by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 weeks after transplantation. The median APC frequency was greater among subjects who experienced allograft rejection in the early postoperative period (0.7/hour, range 0 to 23) than among those who did not (0.2/hour, range 0 to 10.4) (p = 0.04). The APC frequency in all subjects decreased from 0.25/hour (range 0 to 23) early to 0/hour (0 to 14) later (p = 0.04). Atrial flutter was the most frequent sustained arrhythmia; it was recorded in 5 of 21 rejectors and in 1 of 29 nonrejectors (p = 0.04), and 11 of 16 episodes (69%) were related to acute rejection temporally. VPCs were recorded in all patients early after transplantation, but the median frequency subsequently decreased from 4.6/hour (range 0.5 to 470) early to 1.25/hour (range 0 to 225) later (p < 0.001). VPC frequency was unrelated to rejection. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was recorded once and was caused by the proarrhythmic effect of flecainide. Thus, APCs and VPCs occur frequently after transplantation. Frequent APCs are associated with rejection, whereas the main determinant of VPC frequency is time after transplantation. Atrial flutter is closely associated with rejection and should be regarded as an indication for endomyocardial biopsy. Ventricular tachycardia occurs seldom, and in this study was due to proarrhythmic drug effects.

Upper gastrointestinal dysmotility in heart-lung transplant recipients

Recipient pneumonectomy and the necessity for meticulous hemostasis in heart-lung transplantation can result in injury to the vagus nerves as they course through the posterior mediastinum, with consequent delay in gastric emptying. This has been reported to lead to chronic aspiration and associated pulmonary sequelae. To study the association between delayed gastric emptying, bronchiectasis, and bronchiolitis obliterans after heart-lung transplantation, we performed esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and radioisotopic gastric emptying in 10 patients who underwent heart-lung transplantation. Three patients had grossly delayed liquid and solid emptying that was compatible with complete vagotomy. Six other patients had delayed liquid but normal solid emptying--an unexplained finding that is the reverse of what one would expect from vagal injury. Two of these 9 patients had esophageal dysmotility, but none demonstrated gastroesophageal reflux. One remaining patient had faster than normal gastric emptying for both solids and liquids. Of the 10, 2 patients have radiologic changes of bronchiectasis and 3 have biopsy evidence of obliterative bronchiolitis. There is no relationship between these sequelae and the occurrence of esophageal dysmotility, gastroesophageal reflux, or vagotomy. We conclude that gastric emptying abnormalities can occur after heart-lung transplantation, but such abnormalities are not associated with gastroesophageal reflux and the development of pulmonary sequelae, as previously reported.

Sinus node function after cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine changes over time in sinus mode function after cardiac transplantation; to determine the incidence, natural history and etiology of sinus node dysfunction in transplant recipients; and to identify any early predictors of long-term sinus node function. BACKGROUND Bradyarrhythmias caused by sinus node dysfunction are common immediately after cardiac transplantation. Existing electrophysiologic studies have been limited by small numbers and have reported an unexpectedly high incidence of sinus node dysfunction (approximately 50%) compared with the incidence of bradyarrhythmias in other studies. There have been no previous studies reporting serial electrophysiologic data. Thus, the natural history of sinus node dysfunction after transplantation has not been adequately described. METHODS Serial electrophysiologic studies of sinus node function and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings were performed at 1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after transplantation in 40 adult recipients. RESULTS The overall incidence of sinus node dysfunction was 17.5% (7 of 40). Six patients (15%) had sinus node dysfunction from week 1; one developed sinus node dysfunction at 3 months. Sinus node recovery time returned to normal by 6 weeks in all six patients with early sinus node dysfunction, but abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction persisted in two. Two patients who required pacing during ambulatory monitoring at 2 weeks after transplantation (temporary pacemaker 50 beats/min, demand) received a permanent pacemaker. One patient required pacing at 3 weeks and continued to require pacing 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of sinus node dysfunction after cardiac transplantation is lower than has been previously reported in electrophysiologic studies. Sinus node automaticity improves with time, although abnormalities of sinoatrial conduction may persist. The best predictor of permanent pacing requirements is the temporary pacing requirements during 24-h Holter monitoring 2 and 3 weeks after transplantation, with temporary pacing set at 50 beats/min on demand.

Long‐Term Pacing in Heart Transplant Recipients is Usually Unnecessary

The indications for and timing of permanent pacing were reviewed in all 17 of 154 adult heart transplant recipients at this center who have had permanent pacemakers implanted. Resting 12‐lead ECGs recorded during routine follow‐up were examined. A prospective study of pacing requirement was then undertaken. Holter monitoring was performed before and after reprogramming the pacemakers to VVI mode at 50 beats/min. Exercise responses in various pacing modes were then assessed in seven patients with rate responsive pacemakers using a standard Bruce protocol treadmill test. The indication for pacing was sinus node dysfunction in 59% (10/17) and atrioventricular (AV) block in 41% (7/17). The majority of pacemakers were implanted between seven and 21 days after transplantation. There was a progressive reduction in the frequency of pacing on 12‐Jead ECGs with time after transplantation. Eight of 14 patients with empirically selected programming paced during Holter monitoring. After reprogramming to 50 beats/ min VVI mode only three of 14 patients, all with sinus node dysfunction, paced. Rate responsive pacing made no difference to exercise time. The requirement for long‐term pacing in cardiac transplant recipients is small (3/154) and is limited lo patients with sinus node dysfunction. Rate responsive pacing did not increase exercise tolerance.

Evolution of the Chronotropic Response to Exercise After Cardiac Transplantation

The chronotropic response to exercise is abnormal in cardiac transplant recipients as a result of autonomic denervation. Differences in the response between recent transplant recipients and longer-term survivors have been described in previous cross-sectional studies. These changes have not been assessed directly using serial studies. The effect of sinus node dysfunction on the chronotropic response has not previously been determined. Thirty-one transplant recipients underwent serial treadmill exercise tests using the chronotropic exercise assessment protocol 3 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after transplantation. Sinus node function was assessed using standard electrophysiologic techniques. The chronotropic response increased between 3 and 6 weeks after transplantation in all subjects. Six months after transplantation, there was a further marked increase in the response in a subgroup of 5 subjects. These subjects also had a dramatic decrease in heart rate on cessation of exercise. Three subjects had abnormal sinus node function. Although heart rates and chronotropic response were below average in these subjects, 2 other subjects with normal sinus node function on electrophysiologic testing had lower heart rates and worse chronotropic responses. Thus, the chronotropic response to exercise evolves over the first 6 weeks after cardiac transplantation in all subjects. In a number of recipients (16%), there is a marked increase in chronotropic response between 3 and 6 months, which suggests efferent sympathetic reinnervation. There was no clear difference in chronotropic response between subjects with and without evidence of sinus node dysfunction.

Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the need for long-term pacing and optimum mode of pacing in cardiac transplant recipients. DESIGN--(a) A retrospective review of patient records. (b) A prospective study of pacemaker use by 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiography before and after reprogramming to minimise use of pacemakers. SETTING--Outpatient clinic, supra-regional cardiopulmonary transplant unit. PATIENTS--All 21 patients at this centre who had received permanent pacemakers after cardiac transplantation. 18 of 19 survivors completed the prospective part of the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--The presence of pacing during a 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recording (programming: 50 beats/min, rate sensor inactivated). RESULTS--21 of 191 (11%) recipients surviving one month or more received permanent pacemakers. The indication was sinus node dysfunction in 13 (62%) and atrioventricular (AV) block in eight (38%). Patients who paced on follow up 12 lead electrocardiograms declined from 38% at three months to 10% at three years after transplantation. After programming to 50 beats/min only five of 18 (28%) patients paced during a 24 hour ambulatory recording. Four of 11 (36%) recipients who received pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction paced compared with one of seven patients (14%) paced for AV block. No patient who had a pacemaker before the 16th day after operation continued to pace whereas five of nine implanted later were used long-term. CONCLUSION--Only five of 18 (28%) patients with pacemakers continued to pace long-term. Continued pacing was more common in those with persistent sinus node dysfunction after the second week after operation but the need for long-term pacing was not predictable.

Vasodepressor reactions after orthotopic cardiac transplantation: Relationship to reinnervation status

Ventricular vagal nerve endings are thought to trigger vasodepressor syncope. Reports of vasodepressor reactions associated with donor bradycardia after cardiac transplantation have led to speculation that vagal reinnervation occurs. We assessed reinnervation status in seven patients 23–36 months (median 24 months) post-transplantation. Heart rate responses to vagal manoeuvres (respiration, Valsalva) and sympathetic stimuli (exercise and injection of tyramine into the coronary artery supplying the sinus node) were measured. All patients underwent 60 min of 60° head-up tilt with foot plate support. During tilt four of the seven had vasodepressor reactions with a fall in mean arterial pressure of 20–90 mmHg. During vasodepression two patients had falls in donor heart rate of 13 and 40% relative to peak heart rate during tilt. These two patients had evidence of functional sympathetic reinnervation. By contrast the two patients without donor bradycardia during vasodepression had only limited or no evidence of sympathetic reinnervation. No patient had consistent evidence of parasympathetic reinnervation as judged by the heart rate response to vagal manoeuvres. Headup tilt can thus produce vasodepressor reactions with donor bradycardia after cardiac transplantation in the absence of consistent evidence of vagal reinnervation. Left ventricular nerve endings may not be the only mediators of tilt-induced vasodepressor reactions in man. Donor bradycardia during vasodepression may reflect sympathetic withdrawal and not vagal reinnervation.

Determinants of graft arteriosclerosis after heart transplantation

Accelerated graft coronary artery disease (TxCAD) is now the most common complication limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation. This study examines its association with several potentially causative factors. The study population comprised all 73 transplants recipients at this centre between May 1985 and June 1989 who survived at least 2 years. Coronary angiography was performed in every patient at 2 years after transplantation and annually thereafter. All angiograms were retrospectively examined for any evidence of TxCAD. The number of rejection episodes and history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were determined from patient records. Fasting serum triglycerides, and total and HDL cholesterol were measured at between 18 and 60 months after transplantation. Patients with advanced TxCAD (> 70% stenoses) had a mean of 1.4 +/- 1.4 rejection episodes in the first year compared with 0.5 +/- 0.8 episodes in those without TxCAD (P < 0.05). The mean number of episodes in all patients with any evidence of TxCAD was 0.8 +/- 1.1 which was not significantly different from those without TxCAD. There were no association between exposure to CMV infection and TxCAD or between hyperlipidaemia and TxCAD. We conclude that frequent episodes of allograft rejection are associated with the development of advanced TxCAD. Hyperlipidaemia is not associated with the development of TxCAD in the first 5 years after transplantation. A history of exposure to CMV is not associated with TxCAD in our patients possibly because of our routine use of anti-CMV hyperimmune globulin in CMV-mismatched patients.

Reproducibility of Electrophysiological Measurements in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

The clinical usefulness of certain electrophysiological measurements, particularly those of sinus node function, is limited by variation in autonomic tone resulting in poor reproducibility. The denervated transplanted heart is not susceptible to direct autonomic control and, therefore, electrophysiological measurements may be more reproducible in this group. To our knowledge, this hypothesis has not previously been systematically evaluated. Ten adult recipients underwent serial electrophysiological studies between 10–18 days after cardiac transplantation. Five studies were performed at 2‐hour intervals during a single day, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Spontaneous cycle length (SCL) was recorded. Sinus node recovery time (SNRT), sinoatrial conduction time (SACT), and atrioventricular (AV) Wenckebach cycle length were measured using standard techniques. The effective refractory periods of the complete AV conducting system (AVERP), atrium (AERP), and ventricle (VERP) were measured. Corrected maximal SNRT was normal in all subjects. Mean coefficients of variation (Cv) for SCL, corrected maximal SNRT, and SACT were 2.8%, 7.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. AVERP was less than AERP in seven subjects, limiting further analysis. The mean Cv for AV Wenckebach cycle length was 2.1%. The mean coefficients of variation for AERP were 3.6% and 3.7%, and for VERP 3% and 3.3%, at 600‐ and 400‐ms drive cycle lengths, respectively. Previous studies report much greater variation in innervated subjects particularly of indices of sinus node function. Thus, the reproducibility of electrophysiological measurements of sinus and AV node function in the transplanted heart is better than in normal subjects. This may have important implications for the reliability of electrophysiological testing in transplant recipients.