Christopher F. Bryan

A2 /A2 B to B Renal Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future Directions.

One component of the new national kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States that was implemented on December 4, 2014, was the allocation of kidneys from A2 and A2B (A, non‐A1 and AB, non‐A1B) deceased donors into blood group B candidates (A2/A2B → B). In so far as this is an important component of the new KAS that has the potential to further increase the access to transplantation for blood group B candidates on the waiting list, most of whom are minority candidates, we will review the body of evidence and historical perspectives that led to its inclusion in the new KAS. This review will also describe prospects for more widespread use of A2/A2B → B transplantation and a novel mechanism of humoral immunosuppression in B patients before and after transplantation with an A2 or A2B kidney.

Ten-year experience in transplantation of A2 kidneys into B and O recipients

BACKGROUND This article summarizes our 10-year multicenter experience with transplantation of 50 blood group A2 and A2B kidneys into B and O patients. METHODS Since 1986, we have transplanted kidneys from 46 cadaver donors and 4 living donors who were blood group A2 (47 donors) or A2B (3 donors) into 19 B and 31 O patients. In 1991, we began allocating these kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients who were selected based on a history of low (< or =4) anti-A IgG isoagglutinin titers. Immunosuppression was no different from that used in ABO-compatible grafts. RESULTS The 1-month function rate before thus selecting the patients was 68% (19/28), but is now 94% (17/18). Two-year cadaver-donor graft survival with this selection method is 94%, compared with 88% for 640 concurrent and consecutive ABO-compatible transplants (log-rank, 0.15). All four living-related transplants are still functioning, with a mean follow-up of 71 months. Since we began allocating A2 kidneys preferentially to B and O recipients, the percentage of the B patients who received A2 or A2B kidneys has increased from 29% (8/28) to 55% (10/18). CONCLUSIONS Transplantation of A2 or A2B kidneys into B and O patients is clinically equivalent to that of ABO-compatible transplantation when recipients are selected by low pretransplant anti-A titer histories. This approach increases access of blood group B recipients to kidneys.

Long-term graft survival is improved in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow cytometric crossmatching.

BACKGROUND Cadaveric renal retransplantation is associated with a higher risk of early graft failure than primary grafts. A large proportion of those graft losses is likely attributable to donor-directed HLA class I antibodies, detectable by flow cytometry cross-matching but not by conventional crossmatching techniques. METHODS Long-term graft survival in a group of 106 recipients of consecutive cadaveric renal regrafts between 1990 and 1997, in whom a negative flow T-cell IgG crossmatch was required for transplantation, was compared with two other groups of cadaveric transplant recipients. The first group consisted of 174 cadaveric regrafts transplanted between 1985 and 1995 using only a negative anti-human globulin (AHG) T-cell IgG crossmatch. The second group was primary cadaveric transplants done concurrently with the flow group (1990 to 1997) using only the AHG T-cell IgG crossmatch. RESULTS The long-term (7 year) graft survival rate of flow crossmatch-selected regraft recipients (68%; n= 106) was significantly improved over that of regraft recipients who were selected for transplantation by only the AHG crossmatch technique (45%; n=174; log-rank=0.001; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Graft outcome for the flow cross-matched regraft recipients was not significantly different from that of primary cadaveric patients (72%; n=889; log-rank=0.2; censored for patients dying with a functioning graft). Finally, a positive B-cell IgG flow cytometric crossmatch had no influence on long-term regraft outcome. CONCLUSIONS The use of the flow T-cell IgG cross-match as the exclusion criterion for cadaveric renal retransplantation yields an improved long-term graft outcome over that obtained when only the AHG cross-match is used and has improved survival of regraft recipients to the level of our primary cadaveric renal transplant population.

Current experience with renal transplantation across the ABO barrier.

Solid organ transplantation has traditionally been governed by the rules of blood group compatibility. Thus, it has been demonstrated that crossing the ABO blood group barrier generally results in hyperacute rejection. However, the A2 subtype of the blood group A is a weaker antigen. Under certain circumstances, organs from donors with blood group A2 can be transplanted across the ABO blood group barrier into recipients of O or B blood type. Since 1986, 33 patients including 24 blood group O and 9 blood group B patients received A2 (30) or A2B (3) donor kidneys. Both cadaver donor (31) and living-related grafts (2) have been undertaken. The mean follow-up since transplantation for the 21 patients with functioning grafts is 36 months, with a 67.2% current graft survival. Immunosuppression for these transplants consisted of azathioprine, prednisone, and cyclosporine, often in combination with prophylactic OKT3 or antilymphocyte globulin as protocol dictated. Special immunosuppressive protocols such as splenectomy or plasmapheresis were not used. The serum of the potential recipient was analyzed for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) forms of antibody against A1 and A2 red blood cells. There is a strong correlation between a low (less than or equal to 1:8) anti-A1 IgG titer and both early and long-term graft function. Recipients with an IgG titer greater than 1:8 in the pretransplant serum had a much higher incidence of early graft failure. We no longer recommend transplantation of A2 kidneys into O or B recipients with a pretransplant titer of greater than 1:8 but found that recipients with low titers have graft function rates essentially equal to those of ABO-compatible patients. Patients with blood group B have, over time, lower anti-A IgG titers than do blood group O patients. In addition, the graft survival among blood group B patients is 89% compared with 58% among group O recipients. This may be due to the generally low titers found in blood group B recipients. Since instituting a policy in 1988 of not transplanting the kidney when the anti-A IgG titer is greater than 1:8, the survival in O patients is 88%. We recommend the screening of all organ donors with blood group A for the A2 subgroup and believe that transplantation can be safely and successfully performed in certain patients with blood group O or B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Increased access to transplantation for blood group B cadaveric waiting list candidates by using A2 kidneys: time for a new national system?

Since blood group B end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have less access to donor kidneys and a higher minority composition than any other blood group, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) approved a voluntary national kidney allocation variance to allow organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to preferentially allocate A2 and A2B kidneys to B candidates.

Cold ischemia time: An independent predictor of increased HLA class I antibody production after rejection of a primary cadaveric renal allograft

Background. Cadaveric kidneys experiencing longer cold ischemia time (CIT) are associated with higher levels of delayed graft function, acute rejection, and early graft loss. One mechanism to explain these results is that ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury makes the allograft more immunogenic by upregulating molecules involved in the immune response (e.g., HLA Class I/II). Methods. We evaluated the influence of CIT on the production of HLA Class I antibody level, measured by an antihuman globulin panel reactive antibody (AHG PRA) level, in 90 unsensitized recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants (from a total of 1442 between 1985 and 1997) who rejected their kidneys. Results. By multivariate analysis, a CIT of 15 hr or more (vs.<15 hr) independently increased the risk of the AHG Class I PRA level being ≥20% after unsensitized patients rejected their first kidneys (relative risk=3.57; 95% confidence interval=1.26 to 10.14;P =0.01), despite the same degree of Class I/II mismatch between the two CIT groups. The overall mean peak PRA level after primary kidney rejection was significantly lower for the CIT<15 hr group (25.9%±33.9; n=24) compared with the CIT≥15 hr group (46.3%±36.5; n=66) (P <0.001). Conclusion. Longer CIT induces a humorally more immunogenic kidney.

Long‐Term Survival of Kidneys Transplanted from Live A2 Donors to O and B Recipients

The long‐term outcome of kidneys transplanted from blood group A2 live donors into blood group O or B candidates is not known. From 1986 through 2006, we transplanted eight blood group O patients and one blood group B patient with kidneys from blood group A2 live donors. Immunosuppression was no different for these patients than for ABO‐compatible recipients. All patients received methylprednisolone, cyclosporine or tacrolimus and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil with or without antibody induction (monoclonal or polyclonal). Of the nine live‐donor A2 to O and B transplants performed, seven grafts remain functioning. One of those seven was lost to follow‐up at 9.2 years with a functioning kidney. Of the remaining six patients, length of follow‐up is 10.4, 6.5, 5.3, 4, 2.1 and 1 years. Of the two patients who lost their grafts, one died with a functioning graft (DWFG) at 8.8 years and one lost his graft at 13.2 years due to noncompliance with immunosuppression. These data show that good long‐term graft survival can be expected in live‐donor A2 to O and B transplantation despite some of those patients experiencing the type of clinical problems seen with ABO‐compatible transplants.

HLA Points Assigned in Cadaveric Kidney Allocation Should Be Revisited: An Analysis of HLA Class II Molecularly Typed Patients and Donors

The points now assigned for the quality of HLA match have received significant scrutiny to be modified in an effort to help reduce disparity in access to kidneys of minority groups, and since differences in graft survival between groups of patients in each of the HLA matched groups is less now than in the past.

Detection of HLA IgG antibodies by two enzyme-linked immunoassays, solubilized HLA class I and PRA-STAT : comparison with the AHG PRA

HLA class I-directed IgG antibodies have traditionally been detected with a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDL) technique. We have evaluated two solid-phase enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIA) and compared them with the CDL antihuman globulin (AHG) dithiothreitol-treated (DTT) PRA in their ability to discriminate between the presence or absence of HLA class I-directed IgG antibodies in serum from patients awaiting transplantation. The EIA were: (1) an EIA that uses solubilized HLA class I antigens (sHLA-I) isolated from a 240-member platelet donor pool, and (2) the PRA-STAT ELISA kit. For the first comparison, we used 691 serum samples from 272 patients taken before they had been transplanted. The data show a significant (P < 0.0001) linear correlation (r = 0.77 between the AHG DTT PRA and the sHLA EIA. They also demonstrate that the mean sHLA-I EIA ratio significantly increases (P < 0.01) above background levels with each stepwise increase in AHG DTT PRA level. Discordant results were 1.0% (7/691) for sHLA-I EIA+ PRA- and 6.3% (44/691) for PRA+ sHLA-I EIA-. However, a lower correlation was noted between the AHG DTT PRA and the PRA-STAT (Nextran) PRA results (n = 230; r = 0.42). The sHLA-I EIA is able to determine whether or not HLA Class I IgG antibodies are present in serum from transplant candidates and is an appropriate adjunct to the traditional CDL PRA assay, whereas the PRA-STAT is not.

Renal graft survival is not influenced by a positive flow B‐cell crossmatch

Abstract:  Introduction:  The influence of a positive B‐cell crossmatch on graft outcome in renal transplantation is controversial.