Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christopher H. Dalton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christopher H. Dalton.


Human & Experimental Toxicology | 2003

Clinical manifestations of VX poisoning following percutaneous exposure in the domestic white pig

Robert P. Chilcott; Christopher H. Dalton; Ira Hill; C. M. Davidson; K. L. Blohm; Murray G. Hamilton

Nerve agents are a class of organophosphorus chemicals that inhibit certain cholinesterase enzymes (ChE). If untreated, percutaneous exposure to nerve agents, such as VX (O-ethyl-S-[2(diisopropylamino)ethyl] methylphosphonothioate) can cause paralysis, apnoea and death. Much of the information concerning the percutaneous absorption and subsequent toxicity of nerve agents has been obtained using various rodent models. However, the most relevant ‘skin model’ is arguably the pig. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the clinical manifestations of VX intoxication in the domestic white pig following a 2 LD50 (120 mg/kg) percutaneous challenge. There was a consistent onset of signs (where present) in each animal: mastication was followed by miosis, salivation, fasciculations and apnoea. Whilst ChE activity did not correlate with the onset of signs, there was a qualitative relationship in that mastication preceded substantial ChE inhibition, miosis lagged behind the linear decrease in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and fasciculations and apnoea occurred after maximum ChE inhibition had been attained (5 / 10% of normal). These observations may be of use for the triage of patients exposed to VX. In comparison with similar studies with GD, VX did not affect glucose utilization. However, VX was similar to GD in that it caused a mild hyperkalaemia and hyperphosphataemia, although the significance of this observation was not clear. There was substantial lateral diffusion of the initial droplet of VX over the application site, indicating that, when decontaminating exposed skin, attention should also be directed to areas peripheral to the original site of exposure.


Human & Experimental Toxicology | 2005

In vivo skin absorption and distribution of the nerve agent VX (O-ethyl-S-[2(diisopropylamino)ethyl] methylphosphonothioate) in the domestic white pig

Robert P. Chilcott; Christopher H. Dalton; Ira Hill; C. M. Davison; K. L. Blohm; E. D. Clarkson; Murray G. Hamilton

The purpose of this study was to characterize the skin absorption and distribution of VX (Oethyl–S–[2(diisopropylamino)ethyl] methylphosphonothioate) in the domestic pig in order to evaluate the animal as a potential model for assessing pretreatments against toxic anti–cholinesterase compounds. A liquid droplet (equivalent to a 2 LD50 dose) of radiolabelled VX was applied to the inner ear–skin of each anaesthetized animal. Blood and tissue samples (liver, lung, kidney, heart and skin exposure sites) were obtained post–mortem. The amount of radioactivity in each sample was measured by liquid scintillation counting, from which the skin absorption rate and dose distribution of VX were calculated. A substantial proportion (229±3%) of the applied dose remained within the skin at the site of application. It is conceivable that strategies to minimize or remove this reservoir may be of benefit in the early treatment of VX–exposed casualties. Image analysis of autoradiographs of exposed skin sites indicated that each milligram of radioactive VX covered an area of 1.29±0.5 cm2. The average skin absorption rate of 14C-VX was 6619±126 mg/cm2 per hour. Comparison of these data with previous studies suggests that human skin is less permeable to VX than pig skin, but VX spreads over a greater surface area when applied to human skin. Thus, paradoxically, while pig-ear skin is more permeable than human skin, the difference in skin surface spreading may lead to the absorption of an equivalent systemic dose.


Toxicology in Vitro | 2008

The skin reservoir of sulphur mustard.

I. J. Hattersley; John Jenner; Christopher H. Dalton; Robert P. Chilcott; John S. Graham

Studies of the percutaneous reservoir of sulphur mustard (HD) formed during absorption carried out during WWI and WWII are inconclusive. More recent studies have indicated that a significant amount of unreacted HD remains in human epidermal membranes during percutaneous penetration studies in vitro. The present study investigated the nature and persistence of the HD reservoir formed during in vitro penetration studies using dermatomed slices of human and pig skin (0.5mm thick). Amounts of (14)C-HD that (a) penetrated, (b) remained on the surface, (c) were extractable from and (d) remained in the skin after extraction were estimated by liquid scintillation counting (confirmed using GC-MS analysis). The results demonstrated that there is a reservoir of HD in human and pig skin for up to 24 h after contamination of the skin surface in vitro with liquid agent. At least some of this reservoir could be extracted with acetonitrile, and the amounts of extracted and unextracted HD exceed the amount required to produce injury in vivo by at least 20 fold. The study demonstrated the presence of a reservoir whether the skin was covered (occluded) or left open to the air (unoccluded). The study concluded that the extractable reservoir was significant in terms of the amount of HD required to induce a vesicant response in human skin. The extractable reservoir was at least 20 times the amount required per cm(2) estimated to cause a response in all of the human population, as defined by studies carried out in human volunteers during the 1940s.


Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology | 2007

Evaluation of Barrier Creams Against Sulphur Mustard: (II) In Vivo and In Vitro Studies using the Domestic White Pig

Robert P. Chilcott; Christopher H. Dalton; Zoe Ashley; Ceri E. Allen; Simon T. Bradley; Michael P. Maidment; John Jenner; Roger F. R. Brown; Robert J. Gwyther; Paul Rice

Previous studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that barrier creams, comprising perfluorinated polymers, are effective against the chemical warfare agent sulphur mustard (SM) when evaluated using human skin in vitro. The purpose of this follow-up study was to further evaluate three candidate (perfluorinated) barrier creams against SM (vapour) using the domestic white pig. The severity and progression of the resulting skin lesions were quantified daily for three weeks post-exposure using biophysical measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin reflectance spectroscopy (SRS). Skin biopsies obtained post-mortem were evaluated by light microscopy and additional skin samples were obtained from adjacent (unexposed) skin sites for a comparative in vitro skin absorption study. Samples of SM vapour within the dosing chambers were measured ex vivo to ascertain the exposure dose (Ct). The three creams were highly effective against SM in vivo (Ct∼5000 mg·min·m−3): After 3 weeks, barrier cream pre-treated sites were not significantly different from control (unexposed) skin when evaluated by TEWL, SRS or histology. In contrast, skin exposed to SM without pre-treatment showed evidence of persistent damage that was consistent with the slow healing time observed in humans. The amount of SM absorbed in vitro in untreated pig skin was similar to that required to cause comparable lesions in human skin (8–20 and 4–10 μg·cm−2, respectively), further validating the use of pigs as a toxicologically-relevant dermal model for SM exposure.


Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | 2015

Toxicity and medical countermeasure studies on the organophosphorus nerve agents VM and VX

Helen Rice; Christopher H. Dalton; Matthew E. Price; Stuart Graham; A. Christopher Green; John Jenner; Helen J. Groombridge; Christopher M. Timperley

To support the effort to eliminate the Syrian Arab Republic chemical weapons stockpile safely, there was a requirement to provide scientific advice based on experimentally derived information on both toxicity and medical countermeasures (MedCM) in the event of exposure to VM, VX or VM–VX mixtures. Complementary in vitro and in vivo studies were undertaken to inform that advice. The penetration rate of neat VM was not significantly different from that of neat VX, through either guinea pig or pig skin in vitro. The presence of VX did not affect the penetration rate of VM in mixtures of various proportions. A lethal dose of VM was approximately twice that of VX in guinea pigs poisoned via the percutaneous route. There was no interaction in mixed agent solutions which altered the in vivo toxicity of the agents. Percutaneous poisoning by VM responded to treatment with standard MedCM, although complete protection was not achieved.


Journal of Applied Toxicology | 2015

Development of haemostatic decontaminants for the treatment of wounds contaminated with chemical warfare agents. 2: Evaluation of in vitro topical decontamination efficacy using undamaged skin

Christopher H. Dalton; Charlotte Hall; Helen L. Lydon; James K. Chipman; John S. Graham; John Jenner; Robert P. Chilcott

The risk of penetrating, traumatic injury occurring in a chemically contaminated environment cannot be discounted. Should a traumatic injury be contaminated with a chemical warfare (CW) agent, it is likely that standard haemostatic treatment options would be complicated by the need to decontaminate the wound milieu. Thus, there is a need to develop haemostatic products that can simultaneously arrest haemorrhage and decontaminate CW agents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a number of candidate haemostats for efficacy as skin decontaminants against three CW agents (soman, VX and sulphur mustard) using an in vitro diffusion cell containing undamaged pig skin. One haemostatic product (WoundStat™) was shown to be as effective as the standard military decontaminants Fullers earth and M291 for the decontamination of all three CW agents. The most effective haemostatic agents were powder‐based and use fluid absorption as a mechanism of action to sequester CW agent (akin to the decontaminant Fullers earth). The envisaged use of haemostatic decontaminants would be to decontaminate from within wounds and from damaged skin. Therefore, WoundStat™ should be subject to further evaluation using an in vitro model of damaged skin. Copyright


Journal of Applied Toxicology | 2015

Development of haemostatic decontaminants for the treatment of wounds contaminated with chemical warfare agents. 1: Evaluation of in vitro clotting efficacy in the presence of certain contaminants

Charlotte Hall; Helen L. Lydon; Christopher H. Dalton; James K. Chipman; John S. Graham; Robert P. Chilcott

The treatment of penetrating, haemorrhaging injuries sustained within a hazardous environment may be complicated by contamination with toxic chemicals. There are currently no specific medical countermeasures for such injuries. Haemostats with an absorbent mechanism of action have the potential to simultaneously stop bleeding and decontaminate wounds. However, a primary requirement of a ‘haemostatic decontaminant’ is the retention of clotting function in the presence of chemical contaminants. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the haemostatic efficacy of seven commercially available haemostats in the presence of toxic chemicals (soman, VX, sulphur mustard, petrol, aviation fuel and motor oil). Clot viscosity was assessed ex vivo using thrombelastography following treatment of pig blood with: (i) toxic chemical; (ii) haemostat; or (iii) haemostat in combination with toxic chemical. Several contaminants (VX, petrol and GD) were found to be pro‐haemostatic and none had an adverse effect on the rate with which the test products attained haemostasis. However, the total clot strength for blood treated with certain haemostats in the presence of sulphur mustard, soman and petrol was significantly decreased. Three test products failed to demonstrate haemostatic function in this ex vivo (thrombelastography) model; this was tentatively ascribed to the products achieving haemostasis through a tamponade mechanism of action, which can only be replicated using in vivo models. Overall, this study has identified a number of commercial products that may have potential as haemostatic decontaminants and warrant further investigation to establish their decontaminant efficacy. Copyright


Journal of Applied Toxicology | 2017

Development of haemostatic decontaminants for treatment of wounds contaminated with chemical warfare agents. 3: Evaluation of in vitro topical decontamination efficacy using damaged skin: Evaluation of in vitro topical decontamination using damaged skin

Helen L. Lydon; Charlotte Hall; Christopher H. Dalton; J. Kevin Chipman; John S. Graham; Robert P. Chilcott

Previous studies have demonstrated that haemostatic products with an absorptive mechanism of action retain their clotting efficiency in the presence of toxic materials and are effective in decontaminating chemical warfare (CW) agents when applied to normal, intact skin. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess three candidate haemostatic products for effectiveness in the decontamination of superficially damaged porcine skin exposed to the radiolabelled CW agents, soman (GD), VX and sulphur mustard (HD). Controlled physical damage (removal of the upper 100 μm skin layer) resulted in a significant enhancement of the dermal absorption of all three CW agents. Of the haemostatic products assessed, WoundStat™ was consistently the most effective, being equivalent in performance to a standard military decontaminant (fullers earth). These data suggest that judicious application of haemostatic products to wounds contaminated with CW agents may be a viable option for the clinical management of casualties presenting with contaminated, haemorrhaging injuries. Further studies using a relevant animal model are required to confirm the potential clinical efficacy of WoundStat™ for treating wounds contaminated with CW agents. Copyright


Journal of Applied Toxicology | 2017

The percutaneous toxicokinetics of Sulphur mustard in a damaged skin porcine model and the evaluation of WoundStat™ as a topical decontaminant

Charlotte Hall; Helen L. Lydon; Christopher H. Dalton; J. Kevin Chipman; John S. Graham; Robert P. Chilcott

This study used a damaged skin, porcine model to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of WoundStat™ for decontamination of superficial (non‐haemorrhaging), sulphur mustard‐contaminated wounds. The dorsal skin of 12 female pigs was subjected to controlled physical damage and exposed to 10 μL 14C–radiolabelled sulphur mustard (14C–SM). Animals were randomly assigned to either a control or a treatment group. In the latter, WoundStat™ was applied 30 s post exposure and left in situ for 1 h. Skin lesion progression and decontaminant efficacy were quantified over 6 h using a range of biophysical measurements. Skin, blood and organ samples were taken post mortem for histopathological assessment, 14C–SM distribution and toxicokinetic analyses. Application of SM to damaged skin without decontamination was rapidly followed by advanced signs of toxicity, including ulceration and decreased blood flow at the exposure site in all animals. WoundStat™ prevented ulceration and improved blood flow at the exposure site in all decontaminated animals (n = 6). Furthermore, significantly smaller quantities of 14C–SM were detected in the blood (45% reduction), and recovered from skin (70% reduction) and skin surface swabs (99% reduction) at 6 h post‐challenge. Overall, the distribution of 14C–SM in the internal organs was similar for both groups, with the greatest concentration in the kidneys, followed by the liver and small intestine. WoundStat™ significantly reduced the amount of 14C–SM recovered from the liver, a key organ for SM metabolism and detoxification. This study demonstrates that WoundStat™ is a suitable product for reducing the ingress and toxicity of a chemical warfare agent. Copyright


Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology | 2018

The percutaneous absorption of soman in a damaged skin porcine model and the evaluation of WoundStat™ as a topical decontaminant

Christopher H. Dalton; Charlotte Hall; Helen L. Lydon; John Jenner; J. Kevin Chipman; John S. Graham; Robert P. Chilcott

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate a candidate haemostat (WoundStat™), down-selected from previous in vitro studies, for efficacy as a potential skin decontaminant against the chemical warfare agent pinacoyl methylfluorophosphonate (Soman, GD) using an in vivo pig model. Materials and methods: An area of approximately 3 cm2 was dermatomed from the dorsal ear skin to a nominal depth of 100 µm. A discrete droplet of 14C-GD (300 µg kg−1) was applied directly onto the surface of the damaged skin at the centre of the dosing site. Animals assigned to the treatment group were given a 2 g application of WoundStat™ 30 s after GD challenge. The decontamination efficacy of WoundStat™ against GD was measured by the direct quantification of the distribution of 14C-GD, as well as routine determination of whole blood cholinesterase and physiological measurements. Results: WoundStat™ sequestered approximately 70% of the applied 14C-GD. Internal radiolabel recovery from treated animals was approximately 1% of the initially applied dose. Whole blood cholinesterase levels decreased to less than 10% of the original value by 15 min post WoundStat™ treatment and gradually decreased until the onset of apnoea or until euthanasia. All treated animals showed signs of GD intoxication that could be grouped into early (mastication, fasciculations and tremor), intermediate (miosis, salivation and nasal secretions) and late onset (lacrimation, body spasm and apnoea) effects. Two of the six WoundStat™ treated animals survived the study duration. Conclusions: The current study has shown that the use of WoundStat™ as a decontaminant on damaged pig ear skin was unable to fully protect against GD toxicity. Importantly, the findings indicate that the use of WoundStat™ in GD contaminated wounds would not exacerbate GD toxicity. These data suggest that absorbent haemostatic products may offer some limited functionality as wound decontaminants.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christopher H. Dalton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert P. Chilcott

University of Hertfordshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John S. Graham

United States Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charlotte Hall

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen L. Lydon

Health Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ira Hill

Defence Research and Development Canada

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Murray G. Hamilton

Defence Research and Development Canada

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge