Christopher H. Yeo

Classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit

SummaryThe nictitating membrane response (NMR) of 15 rabbits was conditioned to light and white noise conditional stimuli (CSs) using a periorbital shock unconditional stimulus (US). Unilateral lesions of the inferior olive were then made. Lesions restricted to the medial parts of rostral dorsal accessory olive (DAO) and principal olive (PO) abolished conditioning and prevented subsequent acquisition on either side. Unconditional responses to the US were intact. Lesions in all other parts of the olive did not impair conditioning. The effective lesions were located in that part of the olive which supplies somatosensory information from the face to cerebellar lobule HVI. Lobule HVI is also essential for NMR conditioning. We suggest that this region of the inferior olive is part of a circuit which provides US information to the cerebellar cortex during NMR conditioning.

Time and tide in cerebellar memory formation

The notion that the olivocerebellar system is crucial for motor learning is well established. In recent years, it has become evident that there can be many forms of both synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity within this system and that each might have a different role in developing and maintaining motor learning across a wide range of tasks. There are several possible molecular and cellular mechanisms that could underlie adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex and eyeblink conditioning. Although causal relationships between particular cellular processes and individual components of a learned behaviour have not been demonstrated unequivocally, an overall picture is emerging that the different types and sites of cellular plasticity relate importantly to the stage of learning and/or its temporal specifics.

Cerebellum and conditioned reflexes

The central assumption of existing models of motor learning in the cerebellum is that cerebellar mossy fibres signal information about the context in which a movement is to be performed and climbing fibres signal in relation to a movement error. This leads to changes in the responsiveness of Purkinje cells, which on the next occasion will generate a corrected output in a given context. Support for this view has come mainly from work on adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. The discovery that classically conditioned eyeblink responses depend critically on the cerebellum offers the possibility to study the learning of a novel behaviour, rather than modification of an existing reflex. After repeated pairing of a neutral stimulus, such as a tone, with a blink-eliciting stimulus, the tone will acquire the ability to elicit a blink on its own. We review evidence from studies employing a wide variety of techniques that the cerebellum is critical in this type of learning as well as evidence that mossy and climbing fibres have roles assigned to them in cerebellar learning models.

Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: bilateral regulation of conditioned responses

We examined the role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response (NMR) of rabbits by comparing the effects of unilateral and bilateral cerebellar cortical lesions. Using extended preoperative conditioning to ensure high levels of learning, we confirmed that unilateral lesions of lobules HVI and ansiform lobe impaired conditioned responses (CRs) previously established to an auditory conditioned stimulus, but did not prevent some relearning with post-operative retraining. Bilateral lesions of HVI and ansiform lobe produced similar impairments of CRs, but also prevented subsequent relearning. Unilateral cortical lesions produced significant enhancement of unconditioned response (UR) amplitudes to periorbital electrical stimulation. Bilateral cortical lesions enhanced UR amplitudes to a lesser extent. Because there was no correlation between the degree of CR impairment and UR enhancement across the unilateral and bilateral lesion groups, the suggestion that the lesions impaired CRs due to general effects upon performance, rather than due to losses of learning, is not supported. Both sides of the cerebellar cortex contribute towards learning a unilaterally trained CR. This finding is important for the re-interpretation of unilateral, reversible inactivation studies that have found no involvement of the cerebellar deep nuclei in the acquisition of NMR conditioning. In addition, we found conditioning-dependent modifications of unconditioned responses that were particularly apparent at low intensities of periorbital electrical stimulation. This finding is important for the re-interpretation of studies that have found apparent changes in the UR of conditioned subjects after cerebellar lesions.

Cerebellar Function in Consolidation of a Motor Memory

Several forms of motor learning, including classical conditioning of the eyeblink and nictitating membrane response (NMR), are dependent upon the cerebellum, but it is not known how motor memories are stored within the cerebellar circuitry. Localized infusions of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol were used to target putative consolidation processes by producing reversible inactivations after NMR conditioning sessions. Posttraining inactivations of eyeblink control regions in cerebellar cortical lobule HVI completely prevented conditioning from developing over four sessions. In contrast, similar inactivations of eyeblink control regions in the cerebellar nuclei allowed conditioning to develop normally. These findings provide evidence that there are critical posttraining memory consolidation processes for eyeblink conditioning mediated by the cerebellar cortex.

Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning : a reexamination

SummaryWe examined the effects of cerebellar cortical lesions upon conditioned nictitating membrane responses in rabbits. Using extended postoperative conditioning and unpaired presentations of the conditioned stimuli (CSs), we confirmed that combined lesions of lobules HVI and ansiform lobe abolished conditioned responses (CRs) established to light and white noise CSs. Extended retraining enabled some slight recovery of CR frequencies. Less extensive cortical lesions produced initial abolition of CRs but allowed more complete recoveries. Although CR frequencies and amplitudes were profoundly depressed by cortical lesions, unconditioned response (UR) amplitudes to periorbital electrical stimulation were enhanced. The dissociation of lesion effects upon conditioned and unconditioned responses is consistent with the suggestion that cerebellar cortical mechanisms are important for the learning and execution of eyeblink conditioning.

Cerebellum and neuronal plasticity

Structure and Function of the Cerebellum.- Parasagittal Zonation of the Cerebellum in Macaques: An analysis based on Acetylcholinesterase Histochemistry.- Quantitative Studies of Pontine Projections from Visual Cortical Areas in the Cat.- Cerebellar Transcommissural Neurons.- Afferent Control of the Cerebellum. An Hypothesis to Explain the Differences in the Mediolateral Distribution of Mossy Fibre Terminals in the Cerebellar Cortex.- The Role of the Lateral Reticular Nucleus in the Cerebro-Cerebellar Linkage.- Comparative Study of Cerebellar Somatosensory Representations: The Importance of Micromapping and Natural Stimulation.- Functional Implications of Inferior Olivary Response Properties.- Cerebellar Inhibition of the Inferior Olive.- Vestibular Responses in the Inferior Olive.- Convergence of Afferent Paths to Olivo-Cerebellar Complexes.- The Role of the Cerebellum in the Visual Guidance of Movement.- The Cerebellum and the Physics of Movement: Some Speculations.- Inferior Olive and Motor Control.- Climbing Fibre Activity Associated with Unperturbed and Perturbed Step Cycles During Skilled Locomotion in the Cat.- Model of the Cerebellum as an Array of Adjustable Pattern Generators.- The Relation between Purkinje Cell Simple Cell Responses and the Action of the Climbing Fibre System in Unconditioned and Conditioned Responses of the Forelimb to Perturbed Locomotion.- Visual Control of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex in the Rabbit. A Multi-level Interaction..- The Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptive Regulation of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex.- Cerebellum and Limb Flexion Conditioning.- Cerebellum and Classical Conditioning.- Purkinje Cell Activity and the Conditioned Nictitating Membrane Response.- Contributors.

Reversible inactivations of the cerebellum with muscimol prevent the acquisition and extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit

Lesions of the cerebellum severely impair the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response (NMR) in rabbits. Thus, the cerebellum is essential for the production of conditioned responses (CRs), either because it is actively involved in NMR conditioning or because damage to it causes motor or other general deficits. To distinguish between these alternatives, the cerebellum may be inactivated during training. Inactivation of the cerebellum during acquisition training might result in the absence of CRs on initial trials of subsequent training without the neuronal blockade. The blockade may have prevented learning but it may have produced other deficits that require time or further training to overcome. This problem can be addressed by inactivating the cerebellum during extinction training. If inactivation during extinction training results in the immediate production of CRs when training is resumed without the blockade, then it may be concluded that extinction learning was prevented by the blockade — the presence of CRs argues against any deficits not associated with learning. We used muscimol to inactivate the cerebellum and test its involvement in acquisition and extinction of NMR conditioning in the same subjects. We injected muscimol close to the interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum 1 h before each of four daily training sessions of delay conditioning. Almost no CRs were produced in these training sessions — there was little or no acquisition of NMR conditioning during cerebellar inactivation. The subjects were then trained for four daily sessions without injections of muscimol. There were no CRs on initial trials of the first session of retraining, but all subjects produced CRs by the end of this session. The subjects then received four daily sessions of extinction training with muscimol inactivation of the nuclei — no CRs were produced. Extinction training then continued for four daily sessions without muscimol inactivation. On the first of these sessions, all subjects immediately produced high levels of CRs. These responses then extinguished within and between sessions with characteristic beginning-of-session spontaneous recovery. There was little or no extinction of NMR conditioning during cerebellar inactivation. After inactivation, the muscimolinactivated subjects went on to acquire and extinguish NM responses at rates similar to those of appropriate controls. We conclude that cerebellar circuitry is essential for, and actively engaged in, both acquisition and extinction of this simple form of motor learning.

Hippocampal lesions and trace conditioning in the rabbit

Trace conditioning of the nictitating membrane response (NMR) was examined in rabbits with lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and fimbria-fornix. Using a white noise conditional stimulus and an electrical shock unconditional stimulus, the number and amplitude of conditional responses (CRs) was similar in hippocampus-lesioned and control subjects. At some stages of conditioning, the latencies of CRs from hippocampus-lesioned subjects were slightly shorter than those of the controls. We suggest that the hippocampus is not essential for trace conditioning but may exert a modulatory influence on the timing of the CR.

Cerebellar Mechanisms in Eyeblink Conditioning

Abstract: A recent model of cerebellar learning in eyeblink conditioning predicts two sites of plasticity, the cerebellar cortex and cerebellar nuclei, which store information relating to timing and driving the movement, respectively. Consistent with this idea, lesions of the cortex or reversible “disconnections” of Purkinje cell output to the nuclei have been shown to disrupt response timing to produce short‐latency conditioned eyeblinks. To better characterize potential cortical and nuclear plasticities, we analyzed the effects upon nictitating membrane (NM) and eyeblink conditioned responses (CRs) of different drugs administered to the cortex and to the nuclei. When either excitatory or inhibitory inputs to the cerebellar cortical lobule HVI were blocked by infusions of the AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX or the GABA‐A receptor antagonists picrotoxin or SR95531, CRs were abolished. Similarly GABA‐A receptor antagonists in the cerebellar nuclei abolished CRs. CR latencies were never shortened. However, blockade of AMPA/kainate receptor‐mediated excitatory transmission to the nuclei had no effect upon CR frequencies or latencies. These results suggest that normal cortical and nuclear function is required for performance of NM and eyeblink CRs. We saw no evidence that CRs can be driven by AMPA/kainate receptor‐mediated transmission from mossy fiber afferents to the cerebellar nuclei. So, although plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei is not ruled out, it is unlikely that a long‐term change in AMPA receptor‐mediated transmission from mossy fiber inputs to the nuclei is an essential mechanism in eyeblink conditioning. Our findings indicate that a fully functional olivo‐cortico‐nuclear loop is required to express all characteristics of associatively conditioned responses.