Christopher J. Hetherington

CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) and AML1 (CBF alpha2) synergistically activate the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter.

Transcription factors play a key role in the development and differentiation of specific lineages from multipotential progenitors. Identification of these regulators and determining the mechanism of how they activate their target genes are important for understanding normal development of monocytes and macrophages and the pathogenesis of a common form of adult acute leukemia, in which the differentiation of monocytic cells is blocked. Our previous work has shown that the monocyte-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor is regulated by three transcription factors interacting with critical regions of the M-CSF receptor promoter, including PU.1 and AML1.PU.1 is essential for myeloid cell development, while the AML1 gene is involved in several common leukemia-related chromosome translocations, although its role in hematopoiesis has not been fully identified. Along with AML1, a third factor, Mono A, interacts with a small region of the promoter which can function as a monocyte-specific enhancer when multimerized and linked to a heterologous basal promoter. Here, we demonstrate by electrophoretic mobility shift assays with monocytic nuclear extracts, COS-7 cell-transfected factors, and specific antibodies that the monocyte-enriched factor Mono A is CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP). C/EBP has been shown previously to be an important transcription factor involved in hepatocyte and adipocyte differentiation; in hematopoietic cells, C/EBP is specifically expressed in myeloid cells. In vitro binding analysis reveals a physical interaction between C/EBP and AML1. Further transfection studies show that C/EBP and AML1 in concert with the AML1 heterodimer partner CBF beta synergistically activate M-CSF receptor by more then 60 fold. These results demonstrate that C/EBP and AML1 are important factors for regulating a critical hematopoietic growth factor receptor, the M-CSF receptor, suggesting a mechanism of how the AML1 fusion protein could contribute to acute myeloid leukemia. Furthermore, they demonstrate physical and functional interactions between AML1 and C/EBP transcription factor family members.

AML1-ETO expression is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukemia in the presence of additional mutations.

The t(8;21) is one of the most frequent chromosomal abnormalities associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The translocation, which involves the AML1 gene on chromosome 21 and the ETO gene on chromosome 8, generates an AML1-ETO fusion transcription factor. To examine the effect of the AML1-ETO fusion protein on leukemogenesis, we made transgenic mice in which expression of AML1-ETO is under the control of the human MRP8 promoter (hMRP8-AML1-ETO). AML1-ETO is specifically expressed in myeloid cells, including common myeloid progenitors of hMRP8-AML1-ETO transgenic mice. The transgenic mice were healthy during their life spans, suggesting that AML1-ETO alone is not sufficient for leukemogenesis. However, after treatment of newborn hMRP8-AML1-ETO transgenic mice and their wild-type littermates with a strong DNA-alkylating mutagen, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, 55% of transgenic mice developed AML and the other 45% of transgenic mice and all of the wild-type littermates developed acute T lymphoblastic leukemia. Our results provide direct evidence that AML1-ETO is critical for causing myeloid leukemia, but one or more additional mutations are required for leukemogenesis. The hMRP8-AML1-ETO-transgenic mice provide an excellent model that can be used to isolate additional genetic events and to further understand the molecular pathogenesis of AML1-ETO-related leukemia.

Function of PU.1 (Spi-1), C/EBP, and AML1 in Early Myelopoiesis: Regulation of Multiple Myeloid CSF Receptor Promoters

Our studies of the promoters of the myeloid CSF receptors (M, GM, and G) in cell lines have led to the findings that the promoters are small, and are all activated by the PU.1 and C/EBP proteins. To date, we have only found evidence for involvement of C/EBP alpha, although further experiments will be needed to exclude the role of C/EBP beta and C/EBP delta in receptor gene expression. These studies suggest a model of hematopoiesis (Fig. 2) in which the lineage commitment decisions of multipotential cells are made by the alternative patterns of expression of certain transcription factors, which then activate growth factor receptors which allow those cells to respond to the appropriate growth factor to proliferate and survive. For example, expression of GATA-1 activates its own expression, as well as that of the erythropoietin receptor, inducing these cells to be capable of responding to erythropoietin. Similarly, expression of PU.1 activates its own promoter, and turns on the three myeloid CSF receptors (M, GM, and G), pushing these cells along the pathway of myeloid differentiation. C/EBP proteins, particularly C/EBP alpha, are also critical for myeloid receptor promoter function, and may also act via autoregulatory mechanisms. Murine C/EBP alpha has a C/EBP binding site in its own promoter. Human C/EBP alpha autoregulates its own expression in adipocytes by activating the USF transcription factor. Myeloid genes expressed later during differentiation, such as CD11b, are also activated by PU.1, which is expressed at highest levels in mature myeloid cells, but not by C/EBP alpha, which is downregulated in a differentiated murine myeloid cell line. Consistent with this model are the findings that overexpression of PU.1 in erythroid cells blocks erythroid differentiation, leading to erythroleukemia, and overexpression of GATA-1 in a myeloid line blocks myeloid differentiation. While these findings have provided some framework for understanding myeloid gene regulation, there are a number of critical questions to be addressed in the near future: What is the pattern of expression of the C/EBP proteins during the course of myeloid differentiation and activation of human CD34+ cells? What is the effect of targeted disruption and other mutations of the C/EBP and AML1 proteins on myeloid development and receptor expression? What are the interactions among these three different types of factors (ets, basic region-zipper, and Runt domain proteins) to activate the promoters? What is the effect of translocations, mutations, and alterations in expression of these factors, particularly in different forms of AML?

Hepatocytes contribute to soluble CD14 production, and CD14 expression is differentially regulated in hepatocytes and monocytes.

CD14 presents as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked membrane protein on the surface of monocytes/macrophages and as a soluble protein in the serum. Our previous studies have shown that an 80-kilobase pair (kb) genomic DNA fragment containing the human CD14 gene is sufficient to direct CD14 expression in a monocyte-specific manner in transgenic mice. In addition, we discovered that human CD14 is highly expressed in hepatocytes. Here, we report the generation of transgenic mice with either a 24- or 33-kb human CD14 genomic DNA fragment. Data from multiple transgenic lines show that neither the 24- nor the 33-kb transgenic mice express human CD14 in monocytes/macrophages. However, human CD14 is highly expressed in the liver of the 33-kb transgenic mice. These results demonstrate that human CD14 expression is regulated differently in monocytes and hepatocytes. Furthermore, we identified an upstream regulatory element beyond the 24-kb region, but within the 33-kb region of the human CD14 gene, which is critical for CD14 expression in hepatocytes, but not in monocytes/macrophages. Most importantly, the data demonstrate that the liver is one of the major organs for the production of soluble CD14. These transgenic mice provide an excellent system to further explore the functions of soluble CD14.

RUNX1 regulates the CD34 gene in haematopoietic stem cells by mediating interactions with a distal regulatory element

The transcription factor RUNX1 is essential to establish the haematopoietic gene expression programme; however, the mechanism of how it activates transcription of haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) genes is still elusive. Here, we obtained novel insights into RUNX1 function by studying regulation of the human CD34 gene, which is expressed in HSCs. Using transgenic mice carrying human CD34 PAC constructs, we identified a novel downstream regulatory element (DRE), which is bound by RUNX1 and is necessary for human CD34 expression in long‐term (LT)‐HSCs. Conditional deletion of Runx1 in mice harbouring human CD34 promoter–DRE constructs abrogates human CD34 expression. We demonstrate by chromosome conformation capture assays in LT‐HSCs that the DRE physically interacts with the human CD34 promoter. Targeted mutagenesis of RUNX binding sites leads to perturbation of this interaction and decreased human CD34 expression in LT‐HSCs. Overall, our in vivo data provide novel evidence about the role of RUNX1 in mediating interactions between distal and proximal elements of the HSC gene CD34.

C/EBPα is required for development of dendritic cell progenitors

Dendritic cells (DCs) are master regulators of the immune system, but molecular regulation of early DC differentiation has been poorly understood. Here, we report that the transcription factor C/EBPα coordinates the development of progenitor cells required for production of multiple categories of DCs. C/EBPα was needed for differentiation from stem/progenitor cells to common DC progenitors (CDPs), but not for transition of CDP to mature DCs. C/EBPα deletion in mature DCs did not affect their numbers or function, suggesting that this transcription factor is not needed for maintenance of DCs in lymphoid tissues. ChIP-seq and microarrays were used to identify candidate genes regulated by C/EBPα and required for DC formation. Genes previously shown to be critical for DC formation were bound by C/EBPα, and their expression was decreased in the earliest hematopoietic compartments in the absence of C/EBPα. These data indicate that C/EBPα is important for the earliest stages of steady-state DC differentiation.

Targeted BMI1 inhibition impairs tumor growth in lung adenocarcinomas with low CEBPα expression

In lung cancers with low expression of C/EBPα, BMI1 expression correlates with worse prognosis but can be targeted with a drug. The right drug for the right tumor The expression of a tumor suppressor called C/EBPα is often lost in non–small cell lung cancer, as well as in other cancer types. Yong et al. discovered that lung tumors deficient in C/EBPα often overexpress a particular oncogenic protein, BMI1, and that higher expression of BMI1 correlates with worse prognosis in this group of patients. The authors characterized the role of these two proteins and their interaction in lung cancer development, then used cell lines and a genetic mouse model to test a therapeutic approach, showing that a pharmaceutical inhibitor of BMI1 is effective against non–small cell lung cancer with low C/EBPα and high BMI1. Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths. The expression of the transcription factor C/EBPα (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α) is frequently lost in non–small cell lung cancer, but the mechanisms by which C/EBPα suppresses tumor formation are not fully understood. In addition, no pharmacological therapy is available to specifically target C/EBPα expression. We discovered a subset of pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients in whom negative/low C/EBPα expression and positive expression of the oncogenic protein BMI1 (B lymphoma Mo-MLV insertion region 1 homolog) have prognostic value. We also generated a lung-specific mouse model of C/EBPα deletion that develops lung adenocarcinomas, which are prevented by Bmi1 haploinsufficiency. BMI1 activity is required for both tumor initiation and maintenance in the C/EBPα-null background, and pharmacological inhibition of BMI1 exhibits antitumor effects in both murine and human adenocarcinoma lines. Overall, we show that C/EBPα is a tumor suppressor in lung cancer and that BMI1 is required for the oncogenic process downstream of C/EBPα loss. Therefore, anti-BMI1 pharmacological inhibition may offer a therapeutic benefit for lung cancer patients with low expression of C/EBPα and high BMI1.