Christopher J. Packard

Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease.

CONTEXT Associations of major lipids and apolipoproteins with the risk of vascular disease have not been reliably quantified. OBJECTIVE To assess major lipids and apolipoproteins in vascular risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual records were supplied on 302,430 people without initial vascular disease from 68 long-term prospective studies, mostly in Europe and North America. During 2.79 million person-years of follow-up, there were 8857 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 3928 coronary heart disease [CHD] deaths, 2534 ischemic strokes, 513 hemorrhagic strokes, and 2536 unclassified strokes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for several conventional factors, were calculated for 1-SD higher values: 0.52 log(e) triglyceride, 15 mg/dL high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 43 mg/dL non-HDL-C, 29 mg/dL apolipoprotein AI, 29 mg/dL apolipoprotein B, and 33 mg/dL directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Within-study regression analyses were adjusted for within-person variation and combined using meta-analysis. RESULTS The rates of CHD per 1000 person-years in the bottom and top thirds of baseline lipid distributions, respectively, were 2.6 and 6.2 with triglyceride, 6.4 and 2.4 with HDL-C, and 2.3 and 6.7 with non-HDL-C. Adjusted HRs for CHD were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.05) with triglyceride, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82) with HDL-C, and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.39-1.61) with non-HDL-C. Hazard ratios were at least as strong in participants who did not fast as in those who did. The HR for CHD was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.30-0.42) with a combination of 80 mg/dL lower non-HDL-C and 15 mg/dL higher HDL-C. For the subset with apolipoproteins or directly measured LDL-C, HRs were 1.50 (95% CI, 1.38-1.62) with the ratio non-HDL-C/HDL-C, 1.49 (95% CI, 1.39-1.60) with the ratio apo B/apo AI, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.06-1.91) with non-HDL-C, and 1.38 (95% CI, 1.09-1.73) with directly measured LDL-C. Hazard ratios for ischemic stroke were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.94-1.11) with triglyceride, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.02) with HDL-C, and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.04-1.20) with non-HDL-C. CONCLUSION Lipid assessment in vascular disease can be simplified by measurement of either total and HDL cholesterol levels or apolipoproteins without the need to fast and without regard to triglyceride.

Pravastatin and the Development of Diabetes Mellitus Evidence for a Protective Treatment Effect in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

BackgroundWe examined the development of new diabetes mellitus in men aged 45 to 64 years during the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Methods and ResultsOur definition of diabetes mellitus was based on the American Diabetic Association threshold of a blood glucose level of ≥7.0 mmol/L. Subjects who self-reported diabetes at baseline or had a baseline glucose level of ≥7.0 mmol/L were excluded from the analyses. A total of 5974 of the 6595 randomized subjects were included in the analysis, and 139 subjects became diabetic during the study. The baseline predictors of the transition from normal glucose control to diabetes were studied. In the univariate model, body mass index, log triglyceride, log white blood cell count, systolic blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, glucose, and randomized treatment assignment to pravastatin were significant predictors. In a multivariate model, body mass index, log triglyceride, glucose, and pravastatin therapy were retained as predictors of diabetes in this cohort. ConclusionsWe concluded that the assignment to pravastatin therapy resulted in a 30% reduction (P =0.042) in the hazard of becoming diabetic. By lowering plasma triglyceride levels, pravastatin therapy may favorably influence the development of diabetes, but other explanations, such as the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug in combination with its endothelial effects, cannot be excluded with these analyses.

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

BACKGROUND Chronic inflammation is believed to increase the risk of coronary events by making atherosclerotic plaques in coronary vessels prone to rupture. We examined blood constituents potentially affected by inflammation as predictors of risk in men with hypercholesterolemia who were enrolled in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study, a trial that evaluated the value of pravastatin in the prevention of coronary events. METHODS A total of 580 men who had had a coronary event (nonfatal myocardial infarction, death from coronary heart disease, or a revascularization procedure) were each matched for age and smoking status with 2 control subjects (total, 1160) from the same cohort who had not had a coronary event. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels, and the white-cell count were measured at base line, along with other traditional risk factors. The association of these variables with the risk of coronary events was tested in regression models and by dividing the range of values according to quintiles. RESULTS Levels of C-reactive protein, the white-cell count, and fibrinogen levels were strong predictors of the risk of coronary events; the risk in the highest quintile of the study cohort for each variable was approximately twice that in the lowest quintile. However, the association of these variables with risk was markedly attenuated when age, systolic blood pressure, and lipoprotein levels were included in multivariate models. Levels of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase), the expression of which is regulated by mediators of inflammation, had a strong, positive association with risk that was not confounded by other factors. It was associated with almost a doubling of the risk in the highest quintile as compared with the lowest quintile. CONCLUSIONS Inflammatory markers are predictors of the risk of coronary events, but their predictive ability is attenuated by associations with other coronary risk factors. Elevated levels of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 appear to be a strong risk factor for coronary heart disease, a finding that has implications for atherogenesis and the assessment of risk.

Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk

The concentration of plasma LDL subfractions is described in four groups of normocholesterolaemic (total plasma cholesterol < 6.5 mmol/l) male subjects consisting of men with and without coronary artery disease (CAD+/-), as determined by angiography, post-myocardial infarct survivors (PMI) and normal, healthy controls. The CAD(+) and PMI groups were distinguished from the CAD(-) and controls by raised concentrations of plasma triglyceride, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, small, dense LDL (LDL-III density (d) 1.044-1.060 g/ml) and lower concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and large, buoyant LDL (LDL-I d 1.025-1.034 g/ml). In all groups, a subfraction of intermediate density, LDL-II (d 1.034-1.044 g/ml), was the predominant LDL species but was not related to coronary heart disease risk. Plasma triglyceride showed a positive association with LDL-II (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) below a triglyceride level of 1.5 mmol/l. Above this threshold of 1.5 mmol/l, LDL-II and LDL-I showed significant negative associations with triglyceride (LDL-II r = -0.5, P < 0.001; LDL-I r = -0.45, P < 0.001). Small, dense LDL-III showed a weak positive association with triglyceride that became highly significant above the 1.5 mmol/l threshold (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). While age was positively related to LDL-II within the control subjects (r = 0.3, P < 0.05), there was no difference in the percentage abundance or concentration of LDL-III within control and CAD(-) subjects above and below the age of 40 years. Smoking was associated with a relative deficiency of the LDL-I subfraction (LDL-I to LDL-III ratio in smokers = 0.77, in ex-smokers = 0.95, in non-smokers = 1.89; P < 0.01), as was beta-blocker medication (% LDL-I, users vs. non-users, P < 0.05). Both of these effects could be explained by their primary influence on plasma triglyceride. Analysis of the frequency distributions for the three LDL subfractions revealed the concentration of small, dense LDL-III to be bimodal around a concentration of 100 mg (lipoprotein mass)/100 ml plasma. The calculation of odds ratios based on this figure indicated relative risk estimates of 4.5 (chi 2: P < 0.01) for the presence of coronary artery disease and 6.9 (chi 2: P < 0.001) for myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of Dietary Polyunsaturated and Saturated Fat on the Properties of High Density Lipoproteins and the Metabolism of Apolipoprotein A-I

In this study we have investigated, in four normal males the effects of dietary saturated and polyunsaturated fat on the chemical composition and thermotropic properties of human high density lipoproteins (HDL) and have measured the influence of the diets on the metabolism of that fraction of HDL apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) that undergoes exchange in vitro and accounts for approximately two-thirds of the lipoproteins apoA-I complement. When compared with the saturated fat diet, the polyunsaturated diet reduced plasma cholesterol (24%, P < 0.01) by affecting the cholesterol content in the very low density lipoprotein ( downward arrow25%, P < 0.02), low density lipoprotein ( downward arrow20%, P < 0.01), and high density lipoprotein fractions ( downward arrow33%, P < 0.01). Plasma triglyceride was also lowered (by 13%, P < 0.01). Furthermore, polyunsaturated fat ingestion caused a significant fall in the palmitate and stearate content of HDL triglyceride (41 and 37%, respectively), cholesteryl esters (29 and 35%), and phospholipids (17 and 9%) with a concomitant increase in the linoleate content of these moieties (157, 28, and 29%, respectively). The polyunsaturated diet also produced reciprocal changes in the percentage protein ( downward arrow9%, P < 0.02) and phospholipid ( downward arrow11.5%, P < 0.01) in HDl. These compositional changes were associated with an increase in the microscopic fluidity of the polyunsaturated HDL, although both diets had little effect on the fluidity parameters of HDL at body temperature. Rate zonal ultracentrifugation indicated that the HDL(2)/HDL(3) ratio fell by 28% (P < 0.05) on the polyunsaturated fat diet. In addition to the above, this diet reduced plasma apoA-I by 21% (P < 0.01). No change was seen in the fractional catabolic rate or the distribution of the apoprotein between intravascular and extravascular compartments on the two diets. However, when compared with the saturated diet, the synthetic rate of apoA-I was reduced by 26% during polyunsaturated fat feeding. The results show that polyunsaturated fat alters the chemical composition, thermotropic properties, and subfraction distribution of HDL without changing the fractional rate of catabolism of their major protein, apoA-I.These findings deserve careful consideration in determining the applicability and efficacy of polyunsaturated fat diet therapy in the prevention of atherosclerosis in man.

Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Disease Events in Subgroups Defined by Coronary Risk Factors The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project

BackgroundPrevious trials have had insufficient numbers of coronary events to address definitively the effect of lipid-modifying therapy on coronary heart disease in subgroups of patients with varying baseline characteristics. Methods and ResultsThe data from 3 large randomized trials with pravastatin 40 mg were pooled and analyzed with the use of a prospectively defined protocol. Included were 19 768 patients, 102 559 person-years of follow-up, 2194 primary end points (coronary death or nonfatal myocardial infarction), and 3717 expanded end points (primary end point, CABG, or PTCA). Pravastatin significantly reduced relative risk in younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, men and women, smokers and nonsmokers, and patients with or without diabetes or hypertension. The relative effect was smaller, but absolute risk reduction was similar in patients with hypertension compared with those without hypertension. Relative risk reduction was significant in predefined categories of baseline lipid concentrations. Tests for interaction were not significant between relative risk reduction and baseline total cholesterol (5% to 95% range 177 to 297 mg/dL, 4.6 to 7.7 mmol/L), HDL cholesterol (27 to 58 mg/dL, 0.7 to 1.5 mmol/L), and triglyceride (74 to 302 mg/dL, 0.8 to 3.4 mmol/L) concentrations, analyzed as continuous variables. However, for LDL cholesterol, the probability values for interaction were 0.068 for the prespecified primary end point and 0.019 for the expanded end point. Relative risk reduction was similar throughout most of the baseline LDL cholesterol range (125 to 212 mg/dL, 3.2 to 5.5 mmol/L) with the possible exception of the lowest quintile of CARE/LIPID (<125 mg/dL) (relative risk reduction 5%, 95% CI 19% to −12%). ConclusionsPravastatin treatment is effective in reducing coronary heart disease events in patients with high or low risk factor status and across a wide range of pretreatment lipid concentrations.

Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel.

There is abundant evidence that the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease is directly related to plasma cholesterol levels. Accordingly, all of the national and transnational screening and therapeutic guidelines are based on total or LDL cholesterol. This presumes that cholesterol is the most important lipoprotein‐related proatherogenic risk variable. On the contrary, risk appears to be more directly related to the number of circulating atherogenic particles that contact and enter the arterial wall than to the measured concentration of cholesterol in these lipoprotein fractions. Each of the atherogenic lipoprotein particles contains a single molecule of apolipoprotein (apo) B and therefore the concentration of apo B provides a direct measure of the number of circulating atherogenic lipoproteins. Evidence from fundamental, epidemiological and clinical trial studies indicates that apo B is superior to any of the cholesterol indices to recognize those at increased risk of vascular disease and to judge the adequacy of lipid‐lowering therapy. On the basis of this evidence, we believe that apo B should be included in all guidelines as an indicator of cardiovascular risk. In addition, the present target adopted by the Canadian guideline groups of an apo B <90 mg dL−1 in high‐risk patients should be reassessed in the light of the new clinical trial results and a new ultra‐low target of <80 mg dL−1 be considered. The evidence also indicates that the apo B/apo A‐I ratio is superior to any of the conventional cholesterol ratios in patients without symptomatic vascular disease or diabetes to evaluate the lipoprotein‐related risk of vascular disease.

Cholestyramine Promotes Receptor-Mediated Low-Density-Lipoprotein Catabolism

We studied the influence of cholestyramine (24 g per day) on receptor-mediated and receptor-independent low-density-lipoprotein catabolism in five women with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Cholestyramine lowered the level of circulating low-density-lipoprotein apoprotein by doubling (P less than 0.01) its fractional clearance via the receptor path, but fractional catabolism by the receptor-independent route remained unchanged. Moreover, although the absolute rate of catabolism of the apoprotein was not affected by treatment, the amounts handled by each pathway altered. Catabolism via the physiologically controllable receptor route increased by 71 per cent (P less than 0.05), but there was a 12 per cent drop in clearance by the nonreceptor pathway. These data demonstrate the utility of cholestyramine in promoting low-density-lipoprotein catabolism via its specific physiologic clearance pathway. They also show that heterozygotes with familial hypercholesterolemia can increase the activity of their low-density-lipoprotein receptors when presented with an appropriate stimulus.

Defective regulation of triglyceride metabolism by insulin in the liver in NIDDM

Summary Insulin administration to healthy subjects inhibits the production of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)1 (Svedbergs flotation (Sf) rate 60–400) without affecting that of VLDL2 (Sf 20–60) subclass. This study was designed to test whether this hormonal action is impaired in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We studied six men with NIDDM (age 53 ± 3 years, body mass index 27.0 ± 1.0 kg/m2, plasma triglycerides 1.89 ± 0.22 mmol/l) during an 8.5 h infusion of saline (control) and then in hyperinsulinaemic (serum insulin ∼ 540 pmol/l) conditions during 8.5 h infusions of glucose and insulin to give either hyper- and normoglycaemic conditions. [3-2H]-leucine was used as tracer and kinetic constants derived using a non-steady-state multicompartmental model. Compared to the control study, patients with NIDDM reduced VLDL1 apo B production by only 3 ± 8 % after 8.5 h of hyperinsulinaemia (701 ± 102 vs 672 ± 94 mg/day respectively, NS) in hyperglycaemic conditions and by 9 ± 21 % under normoglycaemic conditions (603 ± 145 mg/day). In contrast, in normal subjects insulin induced a 50 ± 15 % decrement in VLDL1 apo B production (p < 0.05). Direct synthesis of VLDL2 apo B in patients with NIDDM was not markedly affected by insulin. We conclude that a contributory factor to hypertriglyceridaemia in NIDDM is the inability of insulin to inhibit acutely the release of VLDL1 from the liver, despite efficient suppression of serum non-esterfied fatty acids. [Diabetologia (1997) 40: 454–462]

Metabolism of apolipoprotein B in large triglyceride-rich very low density lipoproteins of normal and hypertriglyceridemic subjects.

The metabolic fate of very low density lipoprotein can be examined by following the transit of its apolipoprotein B moiety through the delipidation cascade, which leads to low density lipoprotein. In this study we have used cumulative flotation ultracentrifugation to follow the metabolism of various lipoprotein subclasses that participate in this process in normal, hypertriglyceridemic (Type IV), and dysbetalipoproteinemic (Type III) subjects. Large triglyceride-rich very low density lipoproteins of Svedberg units of flotation (Sf) 100-400 were converted virtually quantitatively in normal subjects to smaller Sf 12-100 remnant particles. Only a minor fraction appeared thereafter in low density lipoproteins (Sf 0-12), most being removed directly from the plasma. Type IV hyperlipoproteinemic individuals converted the larger Sf 100-400 very low density lipoproteins to intermediate particles at approximately 50% of the control rate but thereafter their metabolism was normal (fractional clearance of Sf 12-100 particles in controls, 1.29 +/- 0.23 pools/d; in Type IV hypertriglyceridemics, 1.38 +/- 0.23 pools/d; n = 4 in each case). Since the apolipoprotein B in large triglyceride-rich particles did not contribute significantly to the mass of the low density lipoprotein apoprotein pool, the latter must come largely from another source. This was examined by following the metabolic fate of small very low density lipoproteins of Sf 20-60 or of the total lipoprotein spectrum of d less than 1.006 kg/liter (approximate Sf 20-400). The small particles were rapidly and substantially converted to low density lipoproteins, suggesting that the major precursor of the latter was to be found in this density range. Whereas only 10% of apolipoprotein B in Sf 100-400 lipoproteins reached the low density lipoprotein flotation range, greater than 40% of Sf 20-100 B protein eventually appeared in Sf 0-12 particles; and when very low density lipoprotein of d less than 1.006 kg/liter is used as a tracer of apolipoprotein B metabolism it is primarily this population of small very low density lipoprotein particles in the Sf 12-100 flotation range that is labeled. A detailed examination was made of apolipoprotein B metabolism in three dysbetalipoproteinemic subjects. The plasma clearance curves of their Sf 100-400 lipoproteins were distinctly biphasic. The quickly decaying component converted rapidly into remnants of Sf 20-60 at a near normal rate (0.56 vs. 0.62 pools/d in normal subjects). Its subsequent processing, however, was retarded. The more slowly catabolized fraction, comprising 30% of the total apolipoprotein B radioactivity, had no counterpart in normal or Type IV hyperlipoproteinemic individuals. These data, taken together, suggest that the very low density lipoprotein consists of a complex mixture of particles with different origins and fates. Within the Sf 20-100 flotation range there are at least two subcomponents. One represents remnants of larger triglyceride-rich particles which are catabolized slowly and feeds little apolipoprotein B into low density lipoprotein. The other is apparently secreted directly into this flotation interval and transfers significant amounts of B protein rapidly into Sf 0-12 lipoproteins.