Christopher Junker

Neurological intensive care admissions: identifying candidates for intermediate care and the services they receive.

OBJECTIVE The high cost and scarcity of intensive care unit (ICU) beds has resulted in a need for improved utilization. This study describes the characteristics of patients who are admitted to the ICU for neurosurgical and neurological care, identifies patients who might receive all or most of their care in an intermediate care unit, and describes the services the patients would receive in an intermediate care unit. METHODS We describe patients who received neurological care and who were part of a prospective study of 17,440 patients admitted to 42 ICUs at 40 United States hospitals. We identified patients who received only monitoring during ICU Day 1 and then used a previously validated equation to distinguish which patients were at low risk (< 10%) for subsequent active life-supporting therapy. We also describe the services these patients received during their ICU stay. RESULTS Among 3000 patients admitted to the ICU for neurological care, 1350 received active therapy and 1650 (55%) underwent monitoring and received concentrated nursing care on ICU Day 1. After excluding those patients who received active therapy at admission, 1288 (78%) of the 1650 patients who underwent monitoring at admission were at low risk (< 10%) for subsequent active therapy; 95.8% received no active therapy. These patients who were at low risk for subsequent active therapy were significantly (P < 0.001) more often admitted postoperatively, were younger and less severely ill, and had lower ICU and hospital mortality rates (0.9 and 3.9%, respectively) than patients who received active treatment at admission. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving neurological care at an ICU who receive only monitoring during their 1st ICU day and have a less than 10% predicted risk of active treatment can be safely transferred to an intermediate care unit. Some of these patients may not require ICU admission. We suggest guidelines for equipping and staffing neurological intermediate care units based on the type and amount of therapy received by these patients.

Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema: Successful Treatment With IV Phentolamine

Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the acute onset of pulmonary edema following a significant CNS insult. The cause is believed to be a surge of catecholamines that results in cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Although there are myriad case reports describing CNS events that are associated with this syndrome, few studies have identified specific treatment modalities. We present a case of NPE caused by an intracranial hemorrhage from a ruptured arteriovenous malformation. We uniquely document a rise and fall of serum catecholamine levels correlating with disease activity and a dramatic clinical response to IV phentolamine.

Femoral-based central venous oxygen saturation is not a reliable substitute for subclavian/internal jugular-based central venous oxygen saturation in patients who are critically ill.

BACKGROUND Central venous oxygen saturation (Scv(O(2))) has been used as a surrogate marker for mixed venous oxygen saturation (Sv(O(2))). Femoral venous oxygen saturation (Sfv(O(2))) is sometimes used as a substitute for Scv(O(2)). The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that these values can be used interchangeably in a population of patients who are critically ill. METHODS We conducted a survey to assess the frequency of femoral line insertion during the initial treatment of patients who are critically ill. Scv(O(2)) vs Sfv(O(2)) STUDY: Patients with femoral and nonfemoral central venous catheters (CVCs) were included in this prospective study. Two sets of paired blood samples were drawn simultaneously from the femoral and nonfemoral CVCs. Blood samples were analyzed for oxygen saturation and lactate. RESULTS One hundred and fifty physicians responded to the survey. More than one-third of the physicians insert a femoral line at least 10% of the time during the initial treatment of patients who were critically ill. Scv(O(2)) vs Sfv(O(2)) STUDY: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. The mean Scv(O(2)) and Sfv(O(2)) were 73.1% +/- 11.6% and 69.1% +/- 12.9%, respectively (P = .002), with a mean bias of 4.0% +/- 11.2% (95% limits of agreement: -18.4% to 26.4%). The mean serum lactate from the nonfemoral and femoral CVCs was 2.84 +/- 4.0 and 2.72 +/- 3.2, respectively (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS This study revealed a significant difference between paired samples of Scv(O(2)) and Sfv(O(2)). More than 50% of Scv(O(2)) and Sfv(O(2)) values diverged by > 5%. Sfv(O(2)) is not always a reliable substitute for Scv(O(2)) and should not routinely be used in protocols to help guide resuscitation.

Anion gap, anion gap corrected for albumin, base deficit and unmeasured anions in critically ill patients: implications on the assessment of metabolic acidosis and the diagnosis of hyperlactatemia

BackgroundBase deficit (BD), anion gap (AG), and albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) are used by clinicians to assess the presence or absence of hyperlactatemia (HL). We set out to determine if these tools can diagnose the presence of HL using cotemporaneous samples.MethodsWe conducted a chart review of ICU patients who had cotemporaneous arterial blood gas, serum chemistry, serum albumin (Alb) and lactate(Lac) levels measured from the same sample. We assessed the capacity of AG, BD, and ACAG to diagnose HL and severe hyperlactatemia (SHL). HL was defined as Lac > 2.5 mmol/L. SHL was defined as a Lac of > 4.0 mmol/L.ResultsFrom 143 patients we identified 497 series of lab values that met our study criteria. Mean age was 62.2 ± 15.7 years. Mean Lac was 2.11 ± 2.6 mmol/L, mean AG was 9.0 ± 5.1, mean ACAG was 14.1 ± 3.8, mean BD was 1.50 ± 5.4. The area under the curve for the ROC for BD, AG, and ACAG to diagnose HL were 0.79, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively.ConclusionAG and BD failed to reliably detect the presence of clinically significant hyperlactatemia. Under idealized conditions, ACAG has the capacity to rule out the presence of hyperlactatemia. Lac levels should be obtained routinely in all patients admitted to the ICU in whom the possibility of shock/hypoperfusion is being considered. If an AG assessment is required in the ICU, it must be corrected for albumin for there to be sufficient diagnostic utility.

Anion Gap, Anion Gap Corrected for Albumin, and Base Deficit Fail to Accurately Diagnose Clinically Significant Hyperlactatemia in Critically Ill Patients

Anion gap, anion gap corrected for serum albumin, and base deficit are often used as surrogates for measuring serum lactate. None of these surrogates is postulated to predict hyperlactatemia in the critically ill. We prospectively collected data from September 2004 through August 2005 for 1381 consecutive admissions. Patients with renal disease, ketoacidosis, or toxic ingestion were excluded. Anion gap, anion gap corrected for albumin, and base deficit were calculated for all patients. We identified 286 patients who met our inclusion or exclusion criteria. The receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve for the prediction of hyperlactatemia for anion gap, anion gap corrected for albumin, and base deficit were 0.55, 0.57, and 0.64, respectively. Anion gap, anion gap corrected for albumin, and base deficit do not predict the presence or absence of clinically significant hyperlactatemia. Serum lactate should be measured in all critically ill adults in whom hypoperfusion is suspected.

Utilization of base deficit and reliability of base deficit as a surrogate for serum lactate in the peri-operative setting

AbstractBackgroundBase deficit (BD) is commonly used in the operating room (OR) as an endpoint of resuscitation. BD is used as a surrogate marker for the accumulation of lactic acid(Lac). However, the BD can be affected by large amounts of saline.MethodsWe conducted a survey of anesthesiologists regarding the use of BD. We also studied the reliability of BD to determine the presence of hyperlactatemia (HL). Patients undergoing general anesthesia were eligible for enrollment if they were receiving an arterial line as part of their routine care. If an arterial blood gas was drawn by the operative team as part of the routine care, the remainder of the unused blood was also used to measure Lac.ResultsSurvey: 73 staff anesthesiologists were surveyed. Over 70% of respondents used BD as an endpoint of resuscitation. Base Deficit Study: 35 patients were enrolled resulting in 88 arterial blood gases with corresponding Lac. Mean age was 61.4 ± 14.3 years, 43% were male. Mean pH was 7.39 ± 0.05, the mean bicarbonate was 23.0 ± 2.3 meq/L, the mean BD 1.34 ± 2.3, and the mean Lac was 1.58 ± 0.71 mmol/L. Mean ASA risk score was 3.16 ± 0.71. ROC area under the curve for base deficit to detect HL was 0.58.ConclusionBD can often mislead the clinician as to the actual Lac. Lac can now be measured in the OR in real time. Therefore, if clinicians in the operative setting want to know the Lac, it should be measured directly.

Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Environment

Hemodynamic monitoring is essential to the care of the critically ill patient. In the hemodynamically unstable patient where volume status is not only difficult to determine, but excess fluid administration can lead to adverse consequences, utilizing markers that guide resuscitation can greatly affect outcomes. Several markers and devices have been developed to aid the clinician in assessing volume status with the ultimate goal of optimizing tissue oxygenation and organ perfusion. Early static measures of volume status, including pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure, have largely been replaced by newer dynamic measures that rely on real-time measurements of physiological parameters to calculate volume responsiveness. Technological advances have lead to the creation of invasive and noninvasive devices that guide the physician through the resuscitative process. In this manuscript, we review the physiologic rationale behind hemodynamic monitoring, define the markers of volume status and volume responsiveness, and explore the various devices and technologies available for the bedside clinician.

Advances in Critical Care for the Nephrologist: Hemodynamic Monitoring and Volume Management

The monitoring of physiologic variables is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of the critically ill patient. Restoration of tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery is the ultimate goal for any state of circulatory collapse. Insight into a patients intravascular volume status and cardiac performance, particularly in the early stages of shock, can help guide management and potentially change outcome. In the past 30 years, various bedside monitoring techniques and indices have been developed in an effort to determine and optimize a patients cardiac performance. This article reviews the physiologic parameters that best predict intravascular volume status and volume responsiveness. We examine the controversies surrounding the pulmonary arterial catheter and describe the less invasive methods of measuring cardiac performance.

Characterization of end-of-life electroencephalographic surges in critically ill patients

ABSTRACT Neuromonitoring devices to assess level of sedation are now used commonly in many hospital settings. The authors previously reported that electroencephalicgraphic (EEG) spikes frequently occurred after the time of death in patients being neuromonitored at the time of cessation of circulation. In addition to the initial report, end-of-life electrical surges (ELES) have been subsequently documented in animal and human studies by other investigators. The frequency, character, intensity, and significance of ELES are unknown. Some have proposed that patients should not be declared dead for purposes of organ donation prior to the occurrence of an ELES. If clinical practice were altered to await the presence of an ELES, there could be detrimental consequences to donated organs and their recipients. To better characterize ELES, the authors retrospectively assessed the frequency and nature of ELES in serial patients. To better document ELES, they collected neuromonitoring, demographic, and clinical data on consecutive patients who expired while being actively monitored as part of their standard palliative care. These data were retrospectively collected when available as a convenience sample. The authors assessed 35 patients of which 7 were clinically confirmed as brain dead. None of the brain-dead patients displayed an ELES. Thirteen of the 28 remaining patients (46.4%) exhibited an ELES. The ELES observed were demonstrated to have high frequency EEG signal. The mean peak amplitude of ELES as measured by Patient State IndexTM (PSI) was 58.5 ± 25.7. In this preliminary assessment, the authors found that ELES are common in critically ill patients who succumb. The exact cause and significance of ELES remain unknown; further study is warranted.