Christopher McCaskill
Baylor College of Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christopher McCaskill.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1997
Stuart K. Shapira; Christopher McCaskill; Hope Northrup; Aimee S. Spikes; Frederick F.B. Elder; V. Reid Sutton; Julie R. Korenberg; Frank Greenberg; Lisa G. Shaffer
Deletions of the distal short arm of chromosome 1 (1p36) represent a common, newly delineated deletion syndrome, characterized by moderate to severe psychomotor retardation, seizures, growth delay, and dysmorphic features. Previous cytogenetic underascertainment of this chromosomal deletion has made it difficult to characterize the clinical and molecular aspects of the syndrome. Recent advances in cytogenetic technology, particularly FISH, have greatly improved the ability to identify 1p36 deletions and have allowed a clearer definition of the clinical phenotype and molecular characteristics of this syndrome. We have identified 14 patients with chromosome 1p36 deletions and have assessed the frequency of each phenotypic feature and clinical manifestation in the 13 patients with pure 1p36 deletions. The physical extent and parental origin of each deletion were determined by use of FISH probes on cytogenetic preparations and by analysis of polymorphic DNA markers in the patients and their available parents. Clinical examinations revealed that the most common features and medical problems in patients with this deletion syndrome include large anterior fontanelle (100%), motor delay/hypotonia (92%), moderate to severe mental retardation (92%), growth delay (85%), pointed chin (80%), eye/vision problems (75%), seizures (72%), flat nasal bridge (65%), clinodactyly and/or short fifth finger(s) (64%), low-set ear(s) (59%), ear asymmetry (57%), hearing deficits (56%), abusive behavior (56%), thickened ear helices (53%), and deep-set eyes (50%). FISH and DNA polymorphism analysis showed that there is no uniform region of deletion but, rather, a spectrum of different deletion sizes with a common minimal region of deletion overlap.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 1998
Yanzhen Pan; Christopher McCaskill; Katherine H. Thompson; John Hicks; Brett Casey; Lisa G. Shaffer; William J. Craigen
The authors thank the family for their cooperation. This work was supported in part by the Baylor College of Medicine Mental Retardation Research Center (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] 2P30-HD24064) and Child Health Research Center (NICHD 1P30-HD27823) (to W.J.C.) and by a March of Dimes grant (to L.G.S.).
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2000
Yuan-Qing Wu; Jose L. Badano; Christopher McCaskill; Hannes Vogel; Lorraine Potocki; Lisa G. Shaffer
Heterozygous mutations in MSX2 are responsible for an autosomal dominant form of parietal foramina (PFM). PFM are oval defects of the parietal bones that are also a characteristic feature of a contiguous gene-deletion syndrome caused by a proximal deletion in the short arm of chromosome 11 (Potocki-Shaffer syndrome). We have identified a human bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone mapping to chromosome 11, containing a region homologous to the human homeobox gene MSX2. Further sequence analysis demonstrated that the human orthologue (ALX4) of the mouse Aristaless-like 4 gene (Alx4) is contained within this 11p clone. We used FISH to test for the presence-or for the heterozygous deletion-of this clone in two patients with the 11p11.2-deletion syndrome and showed that this clone is deleted in these patients. ALX4 and Alx4 were shown to be expressed in bone and to be absent from all other tissues tested. The involvement of Alx4 in murine skull development, its bone-specific expression pattern, the fact that Alx4 is a dosage-sensitive gene in mice, and the localization of a human genomic clone containing ALX4 to 11p11.2, with hemizygosity in patients with deletion of 11p11.2 who have biparietal foramina, support the contention that ALX4 is a candidate gene for the PFM in the 11p11.2-deletion syndrome.
American Journal of Human Genetics | 2000
Sue Ann Berend; Juli Horwitz; Christopher McCaskill; Lisa G. Shaffer
Rearrangements of the acrocentric chromosomes (Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes) are associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy. Given this, and the large number of reported cases of uniparental disomy (UPD) associated with an acrocentric rearrangement, carriers are presumed to be at risk for UPD. However, an accurate risk estimate for UPD associated with these rearrangements is lacking. A total of 174 prenatally identified acrocentric rearrangements, including both Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes, were studied prospectively to identify UPD for the chromosomes involved in the rearrangements. The overall goal of the study was to provide an estimate of the risk of UPD associated with nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations and homologous acrocentric rearrangements. Of the 168 nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations studied, one showed UPD for chromosome 13, providing a risk estimate of 0.6%. Four of the six homologous acrocentric rearrangements showed UPD, providing a risk estimate of 66%. These cases have also allowed delineation of the mechanisms involved in producing UPD unique to Robertsonian translocations. Given the relatively high risk for UPD in prenatally identified Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes, UPD testing should be considered, especially for cases involving the acrocentric chromosomes 14 and 15, in which UPD is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1996
Christi A. Walter; Lisa G. Shaffer; Celia I. Kaye; Robert W. Huff; Patricia D. Ghidoni; Christopher McCaskill; Melinda B. McFarland; Charleen M. Moore
Uniparental disomy (UPD) has been shown to result in specific disorders either due to imprinting and/or homozygosity of mutant alleles. Here we present the findings in a child with paternal UPD14. Ultrasound evaluation was performed at 30 weeks of gestation because of abnormally large uterine size. Pertinent ultrasound findings included polyhydramnios, short limbs, abnormal position of hands, small thorax, and nonvisualization of the fetal stomach. Post-natally the infant was found to have a low birth weight, short birth length, contractures, short limbs, and a small thorax with upslanting ribs. Assisted ventilation and gastrostomy were required. At age 6 months, the infant required hospitalization for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which responded to Atenolol. Initial cytogenetic studies demonstrated an apparently balanced de novo Robertsonian translocation involving chromosomes 14 and a karyotype designation of 45,XY,t(14q14q). No indication of mosaicism for trisomy 14 was observed in metaphase spreads prepared from peripheral blood lymphocytes or skin-derived fibroblasts. C-band and fluorescence in situ hybridization results demonstrated that the chromosome was dicentric. DNA analyses showed paternal uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 14. Based on the cytogenetic and DNA results a final karyotype designation of 45,XY,idic(14)(p11) was assigned to this infant with paternal isodisomy of chromosome 14.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1998
Lisa G. Shaffer; Christopher McCaskill; Kenneth Adkins; Terry Hassold
About 20% of all human conceptuses are estimated to be trisomic and trisomy of all chromosomes remains a common cause of early fetal loss. Uniparental disomy (UPD) has been reported for most human chromosomes and may be an underrecognized contributor to embryonic lethality. To investigate the contribution of UPD to spontaneous abortions, we devised a genome-based screening strategy to identify holochromosomic UPD in 18 fetal losses. No cases of UPD were identified using this approach. Based on our data, UPD does not appear to be a significant contributor to early embryonic lethality. The results of the study are presented along with a review of the cases of UPD reported in the literature by chromosome, parental origin, mode of ascertainment, and phenotypic consequences due to imprinting.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1999
Sue Ann Berend; Gerald L. Feldman; Christopher McCaskill; Paula Czarnecki; Daniel L. Van Dyke; Lisa G. Shaffer
Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the abnormal inheritance of two copies of a chromosome from the same parent. Possible mechanisms for UPD include trisomy rescue, monosomy rescue, gametic complementation, and somatic recombination. Most of these mechanisms can involve rearranged chromosomes, particularly isochromosomes and Robertsonian translocations. Both maternal and paternal UPD have been reported for most of the acrocentric chromosomes. However, only UPD for chromosomes 14 and 15 show an apparent imprinting effect. Herein, we present two cases of paternal UPD 13 involving isochromosomes. Both cases were referred for UPD studies due to the formation of a de novo rea(13q13q). Case 2 was complicated by the segregation of a familial rob(13q14q) of maternal origin. Both propositi were phenotypically normal at the time of examination. Polymorphic marker analysis in Case 1 showed the distribution of alleles of markers along chromosome 13 to be complete isodisomy, consistent with an isochromosome. This rearrangement could have occurred either meiotically, without recombination, or mitotically. A likely mechanism for UPD in this case is monosomy rescue, through postzygotic formation of the isochromosome. In Case 2 the distribution of proximal alleles indicated an isochromosome, but recombination was evident. Thus, this isochromosome must have formed prior to or during meiosis I. A likely mechanism for UPD in this case is gametic complementation, since the mother carries a rob(13q14q) and is at risk of producing aneuploid gametes. However, trisomy rescue of a trisomy 13 conceptus cannot be completely excluded. Given that both cases were phenotypically normal, these data further support that paternal UPD 13 does not have an adverse phenotypic outcome and, thus, does not show an apparent imprinting effect.
Human Genetics | 1996
Lisa G. Shaffer; Christopher McCaskill; Joseph H. Hersh; Frank Greenberg; James R. Lupski
Trisomy 17 has never been reported in a live birth. We present a case of mosaic trisomy 17 in a male presenting with mental retardation, seizures, attention deficit hyperactivity and autistic disorders, hearing loss, growth retardation, microcephaly, and minor anomalies. Although peripheral blood lymphocyte chromosomes were normal, trisomy 17 was present in the skin fibroblasts. The percentage of abnormal cells appears to have increased from 18% in an initial skin biopsy at age 3 years 8 months to 80% at age 8 years 8 months. Molecular analysis using 13 highly polymorphic markers spanning the length of chromosome 17 demonstrated the extra chromosome 17 in the skin to be of paternal origin. Three alleles were never seen in the trisomic cell line, suggesting that the extra chromosome arose through a mitotic duplication error after conception. Uniparental disomy was excluded in the euploid blood sample. Although Smith-Magenis syndrome involves a deletion of proximal 17p, some of the clinical features of this mosaic trisomy 17 patient, such as decreased REM sleep and increased tolerance to pain, are suggestive of phenotypic features observed in Smith-Magenis syndrome. We speculate that there are dosage-sensitive genes located in 17p11.2 that produce these phenotypes for either deficiencies or overexpression of their gene products.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1996
Adele Schneider; Farideh Z. Bischoff; Christopher McCaskill; Mary Luz Coady; Jill E. Stopfer; Lisa G. Shaffer
Uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 has been previously identified in fetal deaths and newborn infants with limited follow-up. Thus there is a lack of information about the long-term effects of maternal uniparental disomy 16 on growth and development. We present a case of maternal heterodisomy for chromosome 16 and a comprehensive 4-year physical and cognitive evaluation. Cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villus obtained at 10 weeks gestation for advanced maternal age showed trisomy 16. At 15 weeks, amniocentesis demonstrated low level mosaicism 47,XY,+16[1]/46,XY[25]. Decreased fetal growth was noted in the last 2 months of pregnancy and the infant was small for gestational age at birth. Molecular studies revealed only maternal alleles for chromosome 16 in a peripheral blood sample from the child, consistent with maternal uniparental heterodisomy 16. Although short stature remains a concern, there appears to be no major cognitive effects of maternal disomy 16. Clinical evaluation and follow-up on additional cases should further clarify the role of placental mosaicism and maternal disomy 16 in intrauterine growth retardation and its effects on long-term growth in childhood.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1998
Sue Ann Berend; Sonia Canún; Christopher McCaskill; Scott L. Page; Lisa G. Shaffer
Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) involving chromosome 21 occur in about 5% of individuals with Down syndrome. ROBs are the most common chromosomal rearrangements in humans and are formed through whole arm exchanges of any two acrocentric chromosomes. The de novo formation of ROBs occurs at exceptionally high rates. The present case concerns a child with mosaic Down syndrome who has two cell lines that contain two different de novo ROBs: 45,XX,rob(14;21)(q10;q10) and 46,XX,rea(21;21)(q10;q10),+21. To elucidate the mechanisms by which the rearrangements formed, somatic cell hybrids were constructed to allow the parental origins of the chromosomes involved in the ROBs to be distinguished. The analysis of the hybrids showed that the rob(14q21q) must have formed postzygotically because it contained a maternal chromosome 14 and a paternal chromosome 21. Furthermore, hybrid analysis of the rea(21q21q) demonstrated two copies of the same chromosome from the mother and thus, by definition, was an isochromosome [i(21q)]. All free-lying chromosomes 21 isolated in hybrids were of maternal origin. These chromosomes may have originated from either of the patients cell lines. We present four hypotheses for the formation of the two cell lines of this child. This case is part of an ongoing project to determine the mechanism(s) of de novo ROB formation and the results differ from the other de novo rob(14q21q) studied in our laboratory (n = 7) in that all previously studied translocations were maternally derived, leading to the conclusion that most de novo rob(14q21q) occur in oogenesis. The current case illustrates that other mechanisms may contribute to ROB formation.