Christopher P. Houk

Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders

The birth of an intersex child prompts a long-term management strategy that involves a myriad of professionals working with the family. There has been progress in diagnosis, surgical techniques, understanding psychosocial issues and in recognizing and accepting the place of patient advocacy. The Lawson Wilkins Paediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) considered it timely to review the management of intersex disorders from a broad perspective, to review data on longer term outcome and to formulate proposals for future studies. The methodology comprised establishing a number of working groups whose membership was drawn from 50 international experts in the field. The groups prepared prior written responses to a defined set of questions resulting from an evidence based review of the literature. At a subsequent gathering of participants, a framework for a consensus document was agreed. This paper constitutes its final form.

Summary of Consensus Statement on Intersex Disorders and Their Management

Advances in understanding of genetic control of sexual determination and differentiation, improvements in diagnostic testing and surgical genital repair, and the persistent controversies inherent to clinical management were all compelling factors that led to the organization of an international consensus conference. The goals were to acknowledge and discuss the more controversial issues in intersex management, provide management guidelines for intersex patients, and identify and prioritize questions that need additional investigation. This is a summary statement. Advances in molecular genetic causes of abnormal sexual development and heightened awareness of the ethical and patient-advocacy issues mandate reexamination of existing nomenclature for patients with intersex.1 Terminology such as “pseudohermaphroditism” is controversial, potentially pejorative to patients,2 and inherently confusing. Therefore, the term “disorders of sex development” (DSD) is proposed to indicate congenital conditions with atypical development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex. Additional rationale for new classification is the need for modern categorization to integrate the modern molecular genetic aspects, to maximize precision when applying definitions and diagnostic labels,3 and to meet the need for psychologically sensitive yet descriptive medical terminology. Nomenclature should be flexible enough to incorporate new information, robust enough to maintain a consistent framework, use descriptive terms, reflect genetic etiology, accommodate phenotypic variation spectrum, and be useful for clinicians, scientists, patients, and families. Hence, we propose a new classification (see “Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders”4 in this months issue of Pediatrics Electronic Edition ). Three traditionally conceptualized domains of psychosexual development are gender identity (ones self-representation [ie, male or female]), gender role (sexually dimorphic behaviors within the general population, such as toy preferences, aggression, and spatial ability), and sexual orientation (direction[s] of erotic interest). Gender dissatisfaction denotes unhappiness with assigned sex and may result in gender self-reassignment. Psychosexual developmental factors relate to parental psychopathology, parent-child … Address correspondence to Peter A. Lee, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, MC-H085, Penn State College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Box 850, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033-0850. E-mail: plee{at}psu.edu

Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006: Perceptions, Approach and Care

The goal of this update regarding the diagnosis and care of persons with disorders of sex development (DSDs) is to address changes in the clinical approach since the 2005 Consensus Conference, since knowledge and viewpoints change. An effort was made to include representatives from a broad perspective including support and advocacy groups. The goal of patient care is focused upon the best possible quality of life (QoL). The field of DSD is continuously developing. An update on the clinical evaluation of infants and older individuals with ambiguous genitalia including perceptions regarding male or female assignment is discussed. Topics include biochemical and genetic assessment, the risk of germ cell tumor development, approaches to psychosocial and psychosexual well-being and an update on support groups. Open and on-going communication with patients and parents must involve full disclosure, with the recognition that, while DSD conditions are life-long, enhancement of the best possible outcome improves QoL. The evolution of diagnosis and care continues, while it is still impossible to predict gender development in an individual case with certainty. Such decisions and decisions regarding surgery during infancy that alters external genital anatomy or removes germ cells continue to carry risk.

Approach to Assigning Gender in 46,XX Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia with Male External Genitalia: Replacing Dogmatism with Pragmatism

The goal of sex assignment is to facilitate the best possible quality of life for the patient. Factors such as reproductive system development, sexual identity, sexual function, and fertility are important considerations in this regard. Although some DSD gender assignments are relatively straightforward, those with midstage genital ambiguity and unclear gonadal function represent a major challenge. A recent major change in DSD care has been to encourage a male assignment for 46,XY infants with ambiguous genitalia who have evidence of testicular function and in utero central nervous system androgen exposure. In contrast, assignment of virilized 46,XX DSD patients remains female when ovaries and internal organs are present, regardless of the extent of virilization of the external genitalia. In this paper, we propose consideration of male assignment for these 46,XX patients who have fully developed male genitalia based on available outcome data.

Adequacy of a single unstimulated luteinizing hormone level to diagnose central precocious puberty in girls.

OBJECTIVE. Using basal specimens from original gonadotropin radioimmunoassays, it was not possible to differentiate prepuberty from puberty hence gonadotropin-releasing hormone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) testing was required to make this distinction. Third-generation gonadotropin assays have far greater specificity and sensitivity. Using a group of patients who had the diagnosis of central precocious puberty (CPP) verified or excluded by using GnRHa and traditional diagnostic criteria, the objective of this study was to determine if a single basal gonadotropin measurement was adequate to verify the diagnosis of CPP by using 2 third-generation gonadotropin assays. METHODS. Girls referred for assessment of early puberty had previously been evaluated for central precocious puberty including gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog stimulation testing with gonadotropin measurements by 2 different chemiluminescent third-generation immunoassays. Diagnosis of central precocious puberty was made on the basis of the response to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog, and clinical criteria. Girls with central precocious puberty had luteinizing hormone responses ranging from 9.1 to 67.6 U/L, the prepubertal luteinizing hormone response range was 0.2 to 5.0 U/L. Basal serum luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations from these girls have been assessed to determine the utility of using such a single sample to diagnose central precocious puberty. RESULTS. Basal luteinizing hormone levels using the 2 third-generation gonadotropin assays were sufficient to diagnose central precocious puberty in >90% of the girls. Luteinizing hormone values were undetectable in both assays with different lower limits of detection (<0.15 and <0.20 U/L) in 29 of 34 prepubertal girls; the detectible values in 5 girls ranged from 0.20 to 0.66 U/L. All girls with central precocious puberty had values of >0.83 U/L, except a single value of 0.46 U/L. The basal follicle-stimulating hormone failed to differentiate prepubertal girls from those with central precocious puberty, whereas luteinizing hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone ratios would seem to have limited discernment. CONCLUSION. A single basal luteinizing hormone measurement is adequate to document a pubertal hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in most but not all girls with central precocious puberty.

Should Male Gender Assignment be Considered in the Markedly Virilized Patient With 46,XX and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia?

PURPOSE We assess the outcome in 46,XX men with congenital adrenal hyperplasia who were born with Prader 4 or 5 genitalia and assigned male gender at birth. MATERIALS AND METHODS After receiving institutional review board approval and subject consent we reviewed the medical records of 12 men 35 to 69 years old with 46,XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia, of whom 6 completed social and gender issue questionnaires. RESULTS All subjects were assigned male gender at birth, were diagnosed with virilizing congenital adrenal hyperplasia at age greater than 3 years and indicated a male gender identity with sexual orientation to females. Ten of the 12 subjects had always lived as male and 2 who were reassigned to female gender in childhood subsequently self-reassigned as male. Nine of the 12 men had long-term female partners, including 7 married 12 years or more. The 3 subjects without a long-term female partner included 1 priest, 1 who was reassigned female gender, married, divorced and self-reassigned as male, and 1 with a girlfriend and sexual activity. All except the priest and the subject who was previously married when female indicated a strong libido and frequent orgasmic sexual activity. Responses to self-esteem, masculinity, body image, social adjustment and symptom questionnaires suggested adjustments related to the extent of familial and social support. CONCLUSIONS Outcome data on severely masculinized 46,XX patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia who were assigned male gender at birth indicate male gender identity in adulthood with satisfactory male sexual function in those retaining male genitalia. In men who completed questionnaires results were poorer in those lacking familial/social support. Male gender of rearing may be a viable option for parents whose children are born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, a 46,XX karyotype and male genitalia, although positive parental and other support, and counseling are needed for adjustment.

Outcome studies among men with micropenis.

Adult stretched penile length (SPL) was determined among 22 males who were diagnosed with micropenis. These adult SPL values were compared with SPL at the time of diagnosis, age of diagnosis and etiologic category in 20 men who were diagnosed before puberty. A portion of this group completed a structured questionnaire interview, the Social Adjustment Self Report Questionnaire and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist to assess social and psychosexual milestones and the presence of psychiatric morbidity. Results show that the majority of men who had been diagnosed with micropenis had an adult SPL within 2 standard deviations of the normal adult mean, with only a minority showing values below this. It appeared that men with micropenis might have greater than average interval SPL growth between diagnosis and adulthood; it remains unclear whether this supranormal growth represents a catch-up phenomenon or results from augmentation by intermittent androgen therapy. There was no clear relationship between SPL at diagnosis and SPL in adulthood. The responses to the questionnaires indicated that men who had been diagnosed with micropenis were comparable to control men in regard to gender issues, body image, social fitness, sexuality, work, family adjustment and the presence of psychopathology.

Review of Outcome Information in 46,XX Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Assigned/Reared Male: What Does It Say about Gender Assignment?

There is ample historical verification of 46,XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) patients being born with essentially male genitaliawhile outcome information is scant. Prior to glucocorticoid therapy, most patients died very young from adrenal insufficiency. Most available reports from laterchildhood, contain little information concerning sexual identity. Reports on older individuals lack adequate information about sexual identity and quality of life. The difficulty in assessing the relative impact of multiple dynamic environmental factors on the development of sexual identity, self- and body esteem and overall adjustment to life is clear. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether those infants whose masculine genitalia at birth resulted in an initial male assignment would have enjoyed a better adult outcome had they been allowed to remain male rather than the female reassignment that most received. Further, one could ask whether a male sex of rearing should be considered in 46,XX CAH infants with male external genitalia. After reviewing available literature, we conclude that because those extremely virlized 46,XX CAH patients who were reared male with healthy social support demonstrated satisfactory levels of social and sexual function as adults a male sex assignment should be considered in these types of infants when social and cultural environment are supportive.

Update on disorders of sex development.

Purpose of reviewTo review the recent information regarding disorders of sex development (DSD) which contribute to, as well as highlight, the need for greater understanding of genetic mutations and the dire need for specific outcome information. Recent findingsNew information is primarily related to the identification of genetic mutations and other gene variations that impact reproductive system development. These new data add to the increasingly complex list of genes and the multigenetic effects involved in DSD. Several reviews outline the approach to diagnosis and management of the patient with DSD and the importance of a multidisciplinary team. These reviews continue to demonstrate the lack of specific guidelines for complex DSD patients for whom sex assignment is problematic. SummaryAlthough genetic research continues to define new and multigenetic factors involved in the development of DSD, this review of the medical literature also underscores the fact that scientific understanding remains inadequate in many areas of DSD to provide solid guidelines for approaching the more controversial questions in the DSD patient. Accordingly, the need for larger, outcome studies using subjects with verified diagnoses are needed. Optimally, these studies would account for potentially confounding differences in genetic, social, and psychological factors to help answer the pressing question facing every clinician dealing with DSD patients – what is the relationship between medical decision-making (such as sex assignment and genital surgery) and future quality of life and adaptation.

Assignment of the sex of rearing in the neonate with a disorder of sex development

Purpose of review Infants born with ambiguous genitalia [henceforth referred to as Disorder of Sex Development (DSD)] present a unique set of clinical challenges requiring an organized yet practical approach. Given the low frequency with which these types of patients are encountered, their management is best accomplished by practitioners experienced with DSDs. The goal is to discuss, in light of recent publications, information required to make rational management decisions and provide our perspective. Recent findings An overview of DSD with recent publications germane to diagnosis, management, and sex of rearing decisions is presented. Most DSD etiologies are rare and outcome studies are scarce. A high degree of uncertainty and low level of scientific support have led to most of the controversies in this field. Summary Care of a DSD infant must be individualized. Management decisions are based on multiple factors including reproductive anatomy, DSD etiology, parental/cultural factors, and most importantly outcome. Parents should be provided with an objective, realistic, and complete assessment of their childs condition including a discussion of the level of uncertainty (regarding outcome) inherent in each individual case. The medical care team must strike a balance between presenting available outcome data and differing opinions on DSD management in helping parents reach management decisions, particularly concerning sex of rearing.