Christopher P Howson
March of Dimes
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christopher P Howson.
Reproductive Health | 2012
Mary V Kinney; Joy E Lawn; Christopher P Howson; José M. Belizán
Each year, more than 1 in 10 of the world’s babies are born preterm, resulting in 15 million babies born too soon. World Prematurity Day, November 17, is a global effort to raise awareness about prematurity. This past year, there has been increased awareness of the problem, through new data and evidence, global partnership and country champions. Actions to improve care would save hundreds of thousands of babies born too soon from death and disability. Accelerated prevention requires urgent research breakthroughs.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2016
Gary L. Darmstadt; Christopher P Howson; Gijs Walraven; Robert Armstrong; Hannah Blencowe; Arnold L. Christianson; Alastair Kent; Helen Louise Malherbe; Jeffrey C. Murray; Carmencita D. Padilla; Salimah R. Walani
As the Sustainable Development Goals are adopted by United Nations member states, children with congenital disorders remain left behind in policies, programs, research, and funding. Although this finding was recognized by the creation and endorsement of the 63rd World Health Assembly Resolution in 2010 calling on United Nations member states to strengthen prevention of congenital disorders and the improvement of care of those affected, there has been little to no action since then. The Sustainable Development Goals call for the global health and development community to focus first and foremost on the most vulnerable and those left behind in the Millennium Development Goal era. To maximize the opportunity for every woman and couple to have a healthy child and to reduce the mortality and severe disability associated with potentially avoidable congenital disorders and their consequences for the children affected, their families and communities, and national health care systems, we propose priority measures that should be taken urgently to address this issue.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014
Xinliang Zhao; Xiaoqing Jiang; Junzhen Zhu; Guozheng Li; Xiaoyan He; Fengying Ma; Qian Meng; Qinying Cao; Yucui Meng; Christopher P Howson; Nanbert Zhong; Yaping Tian
BackgroundPreconception care is defined as the promotion of the health and well-being of a woman and her partner before pregnancy. Improving preconception health can result in improved reproductive health outcomes. China has issued latest version official guideline for preconception care in 2011. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine whether there is a variation in the quality of preconception healthcare services in distinct eastern and northern populations of China, and what factors are associated with such variation.MethodsA cross-sectional survey using our previously developed preconception instrument was conducted. Women at reproductive age planning for pregnancy were surveyed along with their partners at hospitals during their pre-pregnancy health examination. Data collected include general health/life profiles, pregnancy history, alcohol/tobacco/drug exposures, immunizations, micronutrient supplements and the demands in preconception care. After quality assessment, statistical analysis were applied to evaluate the variations in preconception factors between people from Hebei and Jiangsu Provinces.Results3202 women of reproductive age in from eastern province, Jiangsu, and in a northern province, Hebei, participated this study. 2806 of them and their partners have completed the questionnaire, at a rate of 87.6%, 1011 were from Jiangsu and 1795 were from Hebei. Statistical significance was obtained for maternal age (P < 0.001), body mass index (u =13.590, P <0.001), education (χ2 = 916.33, P < 0.001), occupation (χ2 = 901.78, P < 0.001), health status/common disease, immunization status, and need for preconception care.ConclusionsFor a country as large as China, the centralized guideline for standardized preconception healthcare does have a very crucial positive role in reproductive healthcare, but it may not be suited for all populations. Regional authorities should consider the demographics and healthcare needs of the local population and modify the centralized guideline accordingly, as well as provide a better education and professional services for the public, to improve the quality of preconception services at both the regional and the national level.
Journal of Community Genetics | 2018
Sowmiya Moorthie; Hannah Blencowe; Matthew Darlison; Joy E Lawn; Joan K. Morris; Bernadette Modell; A.H. Bittles; H. Blencowe; Arnold L. Christianson; Simon Cousens; M. W. Darlison; Stephen Gibbons; Hanan Hamamy; Babak Khoshnood; Christopher P Howson; J. Lawn; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; B. Modell; S. Moorthie; John Morris; Peter A. Mossey; Amanda J. Neville; Mary Petrou; Sue Povey; Judith Rankin; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; C. Wren; K. A. Yunnis
Congenital anomaly registries have two main surveillance aims: firstly to define baseline epidemiology of important congenital anomalies to facilitate programme, policy and resource planning, and secondly to identify clusters of cases and any other epidemiological changes that could give early warning of environmental or infectious hazards. However, setting up a sustainable registry and surveillance system is resource-intensive requiring national infrastructure for recording all cases and diagnostic facilities to identify those malformations that that are not externally visible. Consequently, not all countries have yet established robust surveillance systems. For these countries, methods are needed to generate estimates of prevalence of these disorders which can act as a starting point for assessing disease burden and service implications. Here, we describe how registry data from high-income settings can be used for generating reference rates that can be used as provisional estimates for countries with little or no observational data on non-syndromic congenital malformations.
The Lancet | 2013
Hannah H Chang; Jim Larson; Hannah Blencowe; Catherine Y. Spong; Christopher P Howson; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Eve M. Lackritz; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth Mason; Andrew C Serazin; Salimah R. Walani; Joe Leigh Simpson; Joy E Lawn
Reproductive Health | 2013
Christopher P Howson; Mary V Kinney; Lori McDougall; Joy E Lawn
The Lancet | 2012
Bernadette Modell; Rj Berry; Coleen A. Boyle; Arnold Christianson; Matthew Darlison; Helen Dolk; Christopher P Howson; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Peter A. Mossey; Judith Rankin
Reproductive Health | 2013
Joy E Lawn; Mary V Kinney; José M. Belizán; Elizabeth Mason; Lori McDougall; Jim Larson; Eve M. Lackritz; Ingrid K. Friberg; Christopher P Howson
Reproductive Health | 2013
Sohni V Dean; Elizabeth Mason; Christopher P Howson; Zohra S Lassi; Ayesha M Imam; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
PLOS Medicine | 2013
Sohni V Dean; Igor Rudan; Fernando Althabe; Aimee Webb Girard; Christopher P Howson; Ana Langer; Joy E Lawn; Mary-Elizabeth Reeve; Katherine C. Teela; Mireille B. Toledano; Chandra-Mouli Venkatraman; José M. Belizán; Josip Car; Kit Yee Chan; Subidita Chatterjee; Stanley Chitekwe; Tanya Doherty; Majid Ezzati; Khadija Nuzhat Humayun; Brian W. Jack; Zohra S Lassi; Reynaldo Martorell; Ysbrand Poortman; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta