Christopher Rinsch

Delivery of FGF-2 but not VEGF by encapsulated genetically engineered myoblasts improves survival and vascularization in a model of acute skin flap ischemia

Stimulating angiogenesis by gene transfer approaches offers the hope of treating tissue ischemia which is untreatable by currently practiced techniques of vessel grafting and bypass surgery. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) are potent angiogenic molecules, making them ideal candidates for novel gene transfer protocols designed to promote new blood vessel growth. In this study, an ex vivo gene therapy approach utilizing cell encapsulation was employed to deliver VEGF and FGF-2 in a continuous and localized manner. C2C12 myoblasts were genetically engineered to secrete VEGF121, VEGF165 and FGF-2. These cell lines were encapsulated in hollow microporous polymer membranes for transplantation in vivo. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in a model of acute skin flap ischemia. Capsules were positioned under the distal, ischemic region of the flap. Control flaps showed 50% necrosis at 1 week. Capsules releasing either form of VEGF had no effect on flap survival, but induced a modest increase in distal vascular supply. Delivery of FGF-2 significantly improved flap survival, reducing necrosis to 34.2% (P < 0.001). Flap vascularization was significantly increased by FGF-2 (P < 0.01), with numerous vessels, many of which had a large lumen diameter, growing in the proximity of the implanted capsules. These results demonstrate that FGF-2, delivered from encapsulated cells, is more efficacious than either VEGF121 or VEGF165 in treating acute skin ischemia and improving skin flap survival. Furthermore, these data attest to the applicability of cell encapsulation for the delivery of angiogenic factors for the treatment and prevention of tissue ischemia.

Inducing host acceptance to encapsulated xenogeneic myoblasts

Background. Cell encapsulation holds promise for the chronic delivery of recombinant proteins such as erythropoietin. Encapsulated xenogeneic mouse C2C12 myoblasts display long-term survival in the central nervous system whereas they do not in the subcutaneous tissue, suggesting that encapsulation only partially prevents affector and effector mechanisms of the host immune response. Transient immunosuppression with FK506 at the time of subcutaneous implantation leads, however, to their long-term survival. The nature of this acceptance was further investigated in this report. Methods. Fischer rats were rendered unresponsive to encapsulated murine C2C12 myoblasts secreting mouse erythropoietin by either a 1- or 4-week initial treatment of FK506. To examine the extent of xenograft acceptance, animal were challenged with a second implant 9 weeks after the initial implantation. Results. Challenging animals treated only 1 week with FK506 led to rejection of both primary and secondary implants. Animals administered FK506 for 4 weeks accepted both implants over the period investigated. However, these animals rejected unencapsulated xenogeneic cells injected at a later time, highlighting the requirement of the polymer membrane for immune protection. Developed unresponsiveness to encapsulated xenogeneic myoblasts lasted over extended periods (at least 7 months), in the absence of both immunosuppression and stimulating xenoantigens. Conclusions. These findings reveal that host acceptance of encapsulated but not unencapsulated xenogeneic myoblasts can be developed in the subcutaneous tissue after transient FK506 immunosuppression. This may have direct clinical relevance as it enables capsules to be replaced without additional immunosuppression, facilitating long-term cell-based therapies.

Highlights of the cell transplantation meeting at Montreux, March 1999.

Keywords: Animals ; Artificial Organs ; Biomedical Engineering ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Brain Tissue Transplantation ; Cell Transplantation ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation ; Regeneration ; Societies ; Scientific ; Switzerland Note: Division of Surgical Research and Gene Therapy Center, CHUV Pavillon 4, Lausanne, Switzerland. Reference LEN-ARTICLE-1999-005 Record created on 2007-03-09, modified on 2017-05-12