Christopher S. Parshuram

Pediatric in-intensive-care-unit cardiac arrest: incidence, survival, and predictive factors.

Objective:To describe the incidence, survival, and neurologic outcome of in–intensive-care-unit (ICU) cardiac arrest and to identify factors predictive of survival to hospital discharge. Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were <18 yrs of age and experienced a cardiac arrest during their admission to a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit in the 5.5-yr period ending June 2002. Cardiac arrest was defined as the administration of chest compressions or defibrillation for a nonperfusing cardiac rhythm. Mortality and the Paediatric Cerebral Performance Score were measured and presented according to the Utstein style. Factors predictive of survival to hospital discharge were identified by univariate analysis and independent predictors were identified by multivariate analysis. Main Measurements and Results:Ninety-one children had cardiac arrest, yielding an incidence of 0.94 cardiac arrests per 100 admissions. Resuscitation was successful in 75 (82%) children, 61 (67%) survived 24 hrs, 25 (27%) children survived to ICU discharge and 23 (25%) to hospital discharge. At hospital discharge, the median Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score was 2 (range, 1–3) and the median Pediatric Overall Performance Category score was 3 (range, 1–4). No child was assessed as normal on both scores. The independent positive predictors of hospital mortality were the presence of renal failure before cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR], 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–31), being on epinephrine infusion at time of cardiac arrest (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 1.5–62), and the administration of one or more calcium boluses during resuscitation (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.1–25). The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 24 hrs after cardiac arrest was associated with reduced hospital mortality (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04–0.76). Conclusions:In-ICU cardiac arrest is associated with high in-hospital mortality and subsequent morbidity in survivors. Prearrest renal dysfunction and epinephrine infusion were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. The use of post-arrest ECMO within 24 hrs was associated with reduced mortality. Rigorous prospective evaluation of the role of ECMO following cardiac arrest is needed.

Hypothermia Therapy After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

Background— Hypothermia therapy improves mortality and functional outcome after cardiac arrest and birth asphyxia in adults and newborns. The effect of hypothermia therapy in infants and children with cardiac arrest is unknown. Methods and Results— A 2-year, retrospective, 5-center study was conducted, and 222 patients with cardiac arrest were identified. Seventy-nine (35.6%) of these patients met eligibility criteria for the study (age >40 weeks postconception and <18 years, cardiac arrest >3 minutes in duration, survival for ≥12 hours after return of circulation, and no birth asphyxia). Twenty-nine (36.7%) of these 79 patients received hypothermia therapy and were cooled to 33.7±1.3°C for 20.8±11.9 hours. Hypothermia therapy was associated with higher mortality (P=0.009), greater duration of cardiac arrest (P=0.005), more resuscitative interventions (P<0.001), higher postresuscitation lactate levels (P<0.001), and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P<0.001). When adjustment was made for duration of cardiac arrest, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and propensity scores by use of a logistic regression model, no statistically significant differences in mortality were found (P=0.502) between patients treated with hypothermia therapy and those treated with normothermia. Also, no differences in hypothermia-related adverse events were found between groups. Conclusions— Hypothermia therapy was used in resuscitation scenarios that are associated with greater risk of poor outcome. In an adjusted analysis, the effectiveness of hypothermia therapy was neither supported nor refuted. A randomized controlled trial is needed to rigorously evaluate the benefits and harms of hypothermia therapy after pediatric cardiac arrest.

Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication

Introduction: Errors in the concentration of intravenous medications are not uncommon. We evaluated steps in the infusion-preparation process to identify factors associated with preventable medication errors. Methods: We included 118 health care professionals who would be involved in the preparation of intravenous medication infusions as part of their regular clinical activities. Participants performed 5 infusion-preparation tasks (drug-volume calculation, rounding, volume measurement, dose-volume calculation, mixing) and prepared 4 morphine infusions to specified concentrations. The primary outcome was the occurrence of error (deviation of > 5% for volume measurement and > 10% for other measures). The secondary outcome was the magnitude of error. Results: Participants performed 1180 drug-volume calculations, 1180 rounding calculations and made 1767 syringe-volume measurements, and they prepared 464 morphine infusions. We detected errors in 58 (4.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7% to 6.2%) drug-volume calculations, 30 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.6% to 3.4%) rounding calculations and 29 (1.6%, 95% CI 1.1% to 2.2%) volume measurements. We found 7 errors (1.6%, 95% CI 0.4% to 2.7%) in drug mixing. Of the 464 infusion preparations, 161 (34.7%, 95% CI 30.4% to 39%) contained concentration errors. Calculator use was associated with fewer errors in dose-volume calculations (4% v. 10%, p = 0.001). Four factors were positively associated with the occurence of a concentration error: fewer infusions prepared in the previous week (p = 0.007), increased number of years of professional experience (p = 0.01), the use of the more concentrated stock solution (p < 0.001) and the preparation of smaller dose volumes (p < 0.001). Larger magnitude errors were associated with fewer hours of sleep in the previous 24 hours (p = 0.02), the use of more concentrated solutions (p < 0.001) and preparation of smaller infusion doses (p < 0.001). Interpretation: Our data suggest that the reduction of provider fatigue and production of pediatric-strength solutions or industry-prepared infusions may reduce medication errors.

Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children

IntroductionThe timely provision of critical care to hospitalised patients at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest is contingent upon identification and referral by frontline providers. Current approaches require improvement. In a single-centre study, we developed the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System (Bedside PEWS) score to identify patients at risk. The objective of this study was to validate the Bedside PEWS score in a large patient population at multiple hospitals.MethodsWe performed an international, multicentre, case-control study of children admitted to hospital inpatient units with no limitations on care. Case patients had experienced a clinical deterioration event involving either an immediate call to a resuscitation team or urgent admission to a paediatric intensive care unit. Control patients had no events. The scores ranged from 0 to 26 and were assessed in the 24 hours prior to the clinical deterioration event. Score performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) curve by comparison with the retrospective rating of nurses and the temporal progression of scores in case patients.ResultsA total of 2,074 patients were evaluated at 4 participating hospitals. The median (interquartile range) maximum Bedside PEWS scores for the 12 hours ending 1 hour before the clinical deterioration event were 8 (5 to 12) in case patients and 2 (1 to 4) in control patients (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.87 (0.85 to 0.89). In case patients, mean scores were 5.3 at 20 to 24 hours and 8.4 at 0 to 4 hours before the event (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% CI) of the retrospective nurse ratings was 0.83 (0.81 to 0.86). This was significantly lower than that of the Bedside PEWS score (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe Bedside PEWS score identified children at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest. Scores were elevated and continued to increase in the 24 hours before the clinical deterioration event. Prospective clinical evaluation is needed to determine whether this score will improve the quality of care and patient outcomes.

Implementation of a Multicenter Rapid Response System in Pediatric Academic Hospitals Is Effective

OBJECTIVES: This is the first large multicenter study to examine the effectiveness of a pediatric rapid response system (PRRS). The primary objective was to determine the effect of a PRRS using a physician-led team on the rate of actual cardiopulmonary arrests, defined as an event requiring chest compressions, epinephrine, or positive pressure ventilation. The secondary objectives were to determine the effect of PRRSs on the rate of PICU readmission within 48 hours of discharge and PICU mortality after readmission and urgent PICU admission. METHODS: A PRRS was developed, implemented, and evaluated in a standardized manner across 4 pediatric academic centers in Ontario, Canada. The team responded to activations for inpatients and followed patients discharged from the PICU for 48 hours. A 2-year, prospective, observational study was conducted after implementation, and outcomes were compared with data collected 2 years before implementation. RESULTS: After PRRS implementation, there were 55 963 hospital admissions and a team activation rate of 44 per 1000 hospital admissions. There were 7302 patients followed after PICU discharge. Implementation of the PRRS was not associated with a reduction in the rate of actual cardiopulmonary arrests (1.9 vs 1.8 per 1000 hospital admissions; P = .68) or PICU mortality after urgent admission (1.3 vs 1.1 per 1000 hospital admissions; P = .25). There was a reduction in the PICU mortality rate after readmission (0.3 vs 0.1 death per 1000 hospital admissions; P = .05). CONCLUSION: The standardized implementation of a multicenter PRRS was associated with a decrease in the rate of PICU mortality after readmission but not actual cardiopulmonary arrests.

Fellowship training, workload, fatigue and physical stress: a prospective observational study

Background: Fatigue in physician trainees may compromise patient safety and the well-being of the trainees and limit the educational opportunities provided by training programs. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the on-call workload and physical demands experienced by trainees are significant despite duty-hour regulation and support from nursing staff, other trainees and staff physicians. Methods: We measured the workload and the level of fatigue and physical stress of 11 senior fellows during 35 shifts in the critical care unit at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. We determined number of rostered hours, number of admissions and discharges, number and type of procedures, nurse:patient ratios and related measures of workload. Fellows self-reported the number of pages they received and the amount of time they slept. We estimated physical stress by using a commercially available pedometer to measure the distance walked, by using ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to determine arrhythmias and by determining urine specific gravity and ketone levels to estimate hydration. Results: The number of rostered hours were within current Ontario guidelines. The mean shift duration was 25.5 hours (range 24–27 hours). The fellows worked on average 69 hours (range 55–106) per week. On average during a shift, the fellows received 41 pages, were on non-sleeping breaks for 1.2 hours, slept 1.9 hours and walked 6.3 km. Ketonuria was found in participants in 7 (21%) of the 33 shifts during which it was measured. Arrhythmia (1 atrial, 1 ventricular) or heart rate abnormalities occurred in all 6 participants. These fellows were the most senior in-house physician for a mean of 9.4 hours per shift and were responsible for performing invasive procedures in two-thirds of their shifts. Interpretation: Established Canadian and proposed American guidelines expose trainees to significant on-call workload, physical stress and sleep deprivation.

A survey of physicians knowledge regarding awareness of maternal alcohol use and the diagnosis of FAS.

BackgroundAlcohol is the most widely used drug in the world that is a human teratogen whose use among women of childbearing age has been steadily increasing. It is also probable that Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is under diagnosed by physicians. The objectives of this study were twofold: 1) to evaluate the experience, knowledge and confidence of family physicians with respect to the diagnosis of FAS and 2) to evaluate physicians awareness of maternal drinking patterns.Methods and ParticipantsA multiple choice anonymous questionnaire was sent to a randomly selected group of family physicians in the Metropolitan Toronto area.ResultsThere was a 73% (75/103) total response rate; Overall, 6/75 (8%) of family physicians reported that they had actually diagnosed a child with FAS. 17.9% had suspicions but did not make a diagnosis and 12.7% reported making a referral to confirm the diagnosis. Physician rated confidence in the ability to diagnosis FAS was low, with 49% feeling they had very little confidence. 75% reported counselling pregnant women and 60.8% reported counselling childbearing women in general on the use of alcohol. When asked what screening test they used to detect the use of alcohol, 75% described frequency/quantity. Not a single respondent identified using the current accepted screening method for alcohol use (TWEAK) which is recommended by The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.ConclusionsFamily physicians do not feel confident about diagnosing FAS. None of the physicians were aware of the current screening methods to accurately gage alcohol use in pregnant and childbearing women

Quantifying the volume of documented clinical information in critical illness

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to describe the volume of clinical information documented in critical illness, its relationship to the use of intensive care unit (ICU) technology, and changes over time. METHODS We performed a 6-year retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were admitted to a university-affiliated pediatric ICU for at least 24 hours during the years 2000 to 2005. For each complete 24-hour period (midnight-midnight) that each patient was admitted to the ICU, we extracted the total number of items of documented clinical information and the use of 5 ICU technologies. For each day of the study, we calculated the total volume of documented information available to inform the daily ward round. A 2-level hierarchical linear model was used to analyze the primary outcome variable. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS There were 5623 admissions and 41202 complete patient-days studied. The median number of items of documented clinical data for each complete 24-hour period was 1348 (interquartile range, 1018-1664; mean, 1341). Significantly, more clinical information was documented about children who were ventilated with conventional ventilation (1483), children on inotropes or vasoactive medications (1685) and high-frequency oscillation (1726), and children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (2354) or hemodialysis (1889) than children not in these categories (all P < .0001). The number of items documented per patient-day increased by 26% from 1165 in 2000 to 1471 items in 2005 (P < .0001). This finding was independent of ICU technology use. CONCLUSIONS A large and increasing volume of information was documented during the course of critical illness. More information was documented in patients receiving ICU technologies, suggesting that the volume of documented information is a marker of therapeutic intensity. It is also a source of workload and provides opportunity for error. Our findings underscore the importance of effective information management and communication strategies. Additional work is needed to evaluate the implications of current documentation practices for workload and quality of care.

Discrepancies between ordered and delivered concentrations of opiate infusions in critical care.

ObjectivesWe sought to test the assumption that the measured concentrations of medication infusions are within pharmaceutical standards (±10% of intended concentrations) and whether, at the time the infusion was mixed, the professional background of persons preparing the infusion or the unit for which the infusion was prepared were related to the observed variation. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective, observational study was conducted in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units of a university-affiliated tertiary pediatric center. Morphine infusions prepared for clinical use were randomly sampled over a 7-month period. Those with no error between labeled and ordered concentration were further analyzed. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentration of morphine infusions. The primary outcome was a difference of >10% between ordered and measured concentrations. Measurements and Main ResultsThe measured concentration of 65% of the 232 infusions was >10% different from the ordered concentration (95% confidence interval, 58–71%). The concentrations of 6% of infusions represented two-fold errors (95% confidence interval, 3–9%). The difference was normally distributed around zero, suggesting a cumulative effect of random errors, rather than a systematic bias. The time that the infusion was prepared, the professional background of the persons preparing the infusion, and the unit for which the infusion was mixed were not significant predictors of discrepancy (p = .74, analysis of variance). ConclusionsThe concentration of two thirds of infusions prepared for clinical use was outside accepted industry standards. These findings are likely to be broadly representative of intravenous drug administration in hospitalized children and pediatric pharmacokinetic studies. Further study of the causes and clinical impact is required.

Have changes in ventilation practice improved outcome in children with acute lung injury

Objectives: To describe the changes that have occurred in mechanical ventilation in children with acute lung injury in our institution over the last 10–15 yrs and to examine the impact of these changes, in particular of the delivered tidal volume on mortality. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University-affiliated childrens hospital. Patients: The management of mechanical ventilation between 1988 and 1992 (past group, n = 79) was compared with the management between 2000 and 2004 (recent group, n = 85). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The past group patients were ventilated with a significantly higher mean tidal volume (10.2 ± 1.7 vs. 8.1 ± 1.4 mL·kg−1 actual body weight, p < .001), lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (6.1 ± 2.7 vs. 7.1 ± 2.4 cm H2O, p = .007), and higher mean peak inspiratory pressure (31.5 ± 7.3 vs. 27.8 ± 4.2 cm H2O, p < .001) than the recent group patients. The recent group had a lower mortality (21% vs. 35%, p = .04) and a greater number of ventilator-free days (16.0 ± 9.0 vs. 12.6 ± 9.9 days, p = .03) than the past group. A higher tidal volume was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.20, 2.10, p < .001) and reduction in ventilation-free days (95% confidence interval −1.24, −0.77, p < .001). Conclusions: The changes in the clinical practice of mechanical ventilation in children in our institution reflect those reported for adults. In our experience, mortality among children with acute lung injury was reduced by 40%, and tidal volume was independently associated with reduced mortality and an increase in ventilation-free days.