Christopher W. Crank

High-dose daptomycin for treatment of complicated gram-positive infections: A large, multicenter, retrospective study

Study Objective. To evaluate the clinical response and safety of high‐dose daptomycin for treatment of complicated gram‐positive infections.

Daptomycin for the Treatment of Gram‐Positive Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: A Retrospective Case Series of 31 Patients

Study Objective. To evaluate the outcomes in patients with bacteremia and/or infective endocarditis who were treated with daptomycin.

Use of daptomycin to treat drug-resistant Gram-positive bone and joint infections

ABSTRACT Objective: Drug-resistant, Gram-positive bacteria are a growing concern in treating bone and joint infections, including osteomyelitis. This report describes the experience in a series of cases of the use of a novel antibiotic, daptomycin, for the treatment of bone and joint infections. Research design and methods: This retrospective analysis included patients from two medical centers diagnosed with Gram-positive bone and joint infections and treated with daptomycin. Results: A total of 10 patients were included in this report, of which nine received previous antibiotic therapy, including vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from eight patients while the remaining patients were infected with enterococci or streptococci. All patients initially resolved the infection while undergoing daptomycin treatment and were discharged from the hospital. One patient was switched to ampicillin (after receiving daptomycin for 4 days) once the infection was identified due to vancomycin-susceptible enterococcus. However, one patient was readmitted after 18 days due to a clinical relapse, possibly caused by under-dosing of daptomycin. Conclusion: Eight out of nine patients who received daptomycin for at least 8 days were successfully treated with the agent for Gram-positive bone and joint infections. Daptomycin was found to be well tolerated, even up to 44 days of treatment.

Multicenter Study of High-Dose Daptomycin for Treatment of Enterococcal Infections

ABSTRACT Enterococci are among the leading pathogens isolated in hospital-acquired infections. Current antimicrobial options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are limited. Prior data suggest that daptomycin at >6 mg/kg of body weight/day may be used to treat enterococcal infections. We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of high-dose daptomycin (HD-daptomycin) therapy (>6 mg/kg) in a multicenter cohort of adult patients with enterococcal infections to describe the characteristics and outcomes. Two hundred forty-five patients were evaluated. Enterococcus faecium was identified in 175 (71%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis in 49 (20%) and Enterococcus spp. in 21 (9%); overall, 204 (83%) isolates were VRE. Enterococcal infections included bacteremia (173, 71%) and intra-abdominal (35, 14%) and bone and joint (25, 10%) infections. The median dosage and duration of HD-daptomycin were 8.2 mg/kg/day (interquartile range [IQR], 7.7 to 9.7) and 10 days (IQR, 6 to 15), respectively. The overall clinical success rate was 89% (193/218), and microbiological eradication was observed in 93% (177/191) of patients. The median time to clearance of blood cultures on HD-daptomycin was 3 days (IQR, 2 to 5). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 27%, and 5 (2%) patients developed daptomycin-nonsusceptible enterococcal strains while on HD-daptomycin. Seven patients (3%) had creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation, yet no HD-daptomycin regimen was discontinued due to an elevated CPK and all patients were asymptomatic. Overall, there was a high frequency of clinical success and microbiological eradication in patients treated with HD-daptomycin for enterococcal infections, even in patients with complicated and difficult-to-treat infections. No adverse event-related discontinuation of HD-daptomycin was noted. HD-daptomycin may be an option for the treatment of enterococcal infections.

The effect of time to antifungal therapy on mortality in Candidemia associated septic shock.

The timely administration of appropriate antifungal therapy for Candida bloodstream infections (CBSI) improves clinical outcomes. However, little data exist on the effect of antifungal therapy in patients with septic shock and candidemia. We describe antifungal treatment of patients with septic shock due to CBSI and its impact on in-hospital mortality. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of hospitalized patients identified with at least one positive blood culture for Candida between January 2003 and June 2007. All septic shock patients received vasopressor therapy and had candidemia within 72 hours of refractory shock. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, antibiotic exposure, in-hospital mortality, and intensive care-related factors. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were calculated. Time to antifungal therapy was defined as the interval between time of collection of the first positive Candida blood culture and the time when appropriate antifungal therapy was initiated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with in-patient mortality. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify the mortality breakpoint between early and late antifungal therapy. Septic shock developed in 23% (31 of 135) patients with CBSI. In-hospital mortality was 68%. Nonalbicans Candida spp. accounted for 48% of blood isolates. Appropriate antifungal therapy was administered to 24 patients; 15 (63%) of these patients died. Classification and regression tree analysis revealed that patients who received appropriate antifungal therapy within 15 hours of collecting the first positive Candida blood culture had improved survival (P = 0.03). Early, appropriate antifungal therapy improves survival among patients with septic shock due to CBSI.

A multicentre evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of high-dose daptomycin for the treatment of infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES Despite significant medical advances, infective endocarditis (IE) remains an infection associated with high morbidity and mortality. The objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of high-dose daptomycin, defined as ≥ 8 mg/kg/day, in patients with confirmed or suspected staphylococcal and/or enterococcal IE. METHODS This was a multicentre, retrospective observational study (2005-11). Adult patients, not undergoing haemodialysis, with blood cultures positive for staphylococci or enterococci and a definitive or possible diagnosis of IE, who received daptomycin ≥ 8 mg/kg/day (based on total body weight) for ≥ 72 h were included. RESULTS Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria and comprised 33 (47.1%) with right-sided IE (RIE), 35 (50%) with left-sided IE (LIE) and 2 with both RIE and LIE. Several patients had concomitant sites of infection, with bone/joint infection being most prevalent (12.9%). Sixty-five patients received daptomycin as salvage therapy. Pathogens were isolated from 64 patients, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as the most common organism (84.4%), followed by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (7.8%). The median (IQR) daptomycin dose was 9.8 mg/kg/day (8.2-10.0 mg/kg/day), and was similar in RIE and LIE patients (9.8 and 9.3 mg/kg/day, respectively). A total of 24 (34.3%) received combination therapy. For those patients with pathogens isolated (n = 64), the organism was eradicated in 57 (89.1%) patients. Among 64 clinically evaluable patients, 55 (85.9%) achieved clinical success. No patients required discontinuation of high-dose daptomycin due to creatine phosphokinase elevations. CONCLUSIONS Patients with both RIE and LIE had successful outcomes with high-dose daptomycin therapy. Additional clinical trials evaluating high daptomycin dosages in patients with IE are warranted.

Comparison of outcomes from daptomycin or linezolid treatment for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for bloodstream infections (BSIs) with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is unknown. OBJECTIVE This study examined outcomes in patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid for VRE BSI. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed via chart review. Hospitalized patients treated for VRE BSI with daptomycin or linezolid from September 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007, were identified via pharmacy and microbiology reports at each institution. Patients aged <18 years or with polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded from analysis. Linezolid and daptomycin were included because the participating institutions used either of the 2 agents as first-line treatment for VRE BSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of drug selection on mortality and duration of BSI. Duration of BSI was defined as the amount of time from the draw date of the first positive blood culture to the draw date of the first finalized negative blood culture. Adverse events were not assessed. RESULTS One-hundred one patients from 3 participating US hospitals experiencing VRE BSI were identified. Sixty-seven patients were treated with daptomycin and 34 with linezolid. Baseline characteristics appeared comparable between the daptomycin- and linezolidtreated groups, with the exception of shock (P = 0.049), prior vancomycin treatment (P = 0.002), and prior linezolid treatment (P < 0.001), all of which occurred significantly more often in daptomycin-treated patients. Inpatient mortality occurred in 31 daptomycin- and 10 linezolid-treated patients (46.3% vs 29.4%; P = NS). Linear regression found that shock (P = 0.015), infective endocarditis (P = 0.021), and concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (P = 0.01) were associated with prolonged duration of positive cultures. Logistic regression revealed that shock (odds ratio [OR] = 14.24; P = 0.008), infection with Enterococcus faecium (OR = 53.10; P = 0.024), previous linezolid treatment (OR = 6.63; P = 0.031), concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (OR = 6.48; P = 0.046), and a nonline source of infection (OR = 6.67; P = 0.019) were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective cohort analysis, there were no significant differences in mortality of VRE BSI between patients receiving daptomycin or linezolid. Underlying comorbidities appeared to best predict outcome; however, given the retrospective nature of this study, larger, prospective, randomized, comparative studies are needed to control for potential biases and determine definitive outcome differences between these 2 antimicrobials.

Carbapenem stewardship: does ertapenem affect Pseudomonas susceptibility to other carbapenems? A review of the evidence

The group 2 carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem and, more recently, doripenem) have been a mainstay of treatment for patients with serious hospital infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae and other difficult-to-treat Gram-negative pathogens as well as mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections. When ertapenem, a group 1 carbapenem, was introduced, questions were raised about the potential for ertapenem to select for imipenem- and meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas. Results from ten clinical studies evaluating the effect of ertapenem use on the susceptibility of Pseudomonas to carbapenems have uniformly shown that ertapenem use does not result in decreased Pseudomonas susceptibility to these antipseudomonal carbapenems. Here we review these studies evaluating the evidence of how ertapenem use affects P. aeruginosa as well as provide considerations for ertapenem use in the context of institutional stewardship initiatives.

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Led Admission Medication Reconciliation for Geriatric Patients:

Purpose: Pharmacists have been shown to improve medication reconciliation at hospital admission. Limited resources may obligate pharmacy departments to target resources for medication reconciliation rather than extend services to the entire hospital. We conducted a prospective, randomized, nonblinded assessment of the effectiveness and feasibility of pharmacist-led admission medication reconciliation for geriatric patients. Methods: Eighty-one geriatric patients were randomized 1:1 to receive medication reconciliation per current hospital practice or to pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at admission. The primary end point was medication profile appropriateness by pharmacist review at 48 hours postadmission. Secondary end points involved in determining the impact and feasibility of this program. Results: Pharmacist-led medication was superior to standard hospital practice, with 48% of controls and 71% of intervention patients having appropriate medication profiles at 48 hours postadmission (P = .033). Pharmacists identified 116 discrepancies among 81 patients including predominantly omissions (41%) and a composite of wrong dose, route, or frequency (35%). Pharmacists spent a median 15 minutes per patient. Conclusion: Pharmacists improved admission medication reconciliation for geriatric patients. Pharmacists identified a significant number of discrepancies, including predominantly omissions and wrong dose, dosage form, or frequency. Pharmacists’ contributions to medication reconciliation could yield substantial benefit to patient care.

Treatment Outcomes with Cefazolin versus Oxacillin for Deep-Seated Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

ABSTRACT Clinical preference for a semisynthetic penicillin (oxacillin or nafcillin) over cefazolin for deep-seated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) perseveres despite limited data to support this approach. A retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MSSA BSI with either oxacillin or cefazolin was performed across two medical centers in Chicago, IL. The outcome measures included documented in-hospital treatment failure, all-cause in-hospital mortality, duration of MSSA BSI, and incidence of documented adverse events. Of 161 patients with MSSA BSI, 103 (64%) received cefazolin, and 58 (36%) received oxacillin. The identified sources of BSI were central line (37.9%), osteoarticular (18%), and skin and soft tissue (17.4%). Patients with endocarditis (29/52 [44.2%]) and other deep-seated infections (23/52 [55.8%]) were classified under the subset of deep-seated infections (52/161 [32.3%]). Multivariate models found deep-seated infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 16.6; P = 0.023), metastatic disease (aOR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.13 to 15.7; P = 0.033), and intensive care unit (ICU) onset of infection (aOR, 4.80; 95% CI, 1.26 to 18.4; P = 0.022) to be independent risk factors for in-hospital treatment failure. Treatment group was not an independent predictor of failure (aOR, 3.76; 95% CI, 0.98 to 14.4; P = 0.053). The rates of treatment failure were similar among cefazolin-treated (5/32 [15.6%]) and oxacillin-treated (4/20 [20.0%]) patients (P = 0.72) in the subset of deep-seated infections. Mortality was observed in 1 (1%) and 3 (5.2%) cases of cefazolin- and oxacillin-treated patients, respectively (P = 0.13). Cefazolin was not associated with higher rates of treatment failure and appears to be an effective alternative to oxacillin for treatment of deep-seated MSSA BSI.