Christos Vottis

Complications After Hip Nailing for Fractures.

Pertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients represent a major health issue. The available surgical options are fixation with extramedullary devices, intramedullary nailing, and arthroplasty. Intramedullary nailing for hip fractures has become more popular in recent years. Advantages of intramedullary nailing for hip fracture fixation include a more efficient load transfer due to the proximity of the implant to the medial calcar, less implant strain and shorter lever arm because of its closer positioning to the mechanical axis of the femur, significantly less soft tissue disruption and periosteal stripping of the femoral cortex, shorter operative time and hospital stay, fewer blood transfusions, better postoperative walking ability, and lower rates of leg-length discrepancy. Compromise of the posteromedial cortex and/or the lateral cortex, a subtrochanteric extension of the fracture, and a reversed obliquity fracture pattern represent signs of fracture instability, warranting the use of intramedullary nailing. However, the use of intramedullary nailing, with its unique set of clinical implications, has introduced a new set of complications. The reported complications include malalignment, cutout, infection, false drilling, wrong lag screw length and drill bit breakage during the interlocking procedure, external or internal malrotation (≥20°) of the femoral diaphysis, elongation of the femur (2 cm), impaired bone healing, periprosthetic fracture distal to the tip of the nail, fracture collapse, implant failure, lag screw intrapelvic migration, neurovascular injury, secondary varus deviation, complications after implant removal, trochanteric pain, and refracture. Many of these complications are related to technical mistakes. This article reviews intramedullary nailing for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures, with an emphasis on complications.

State-of-the-art approach for bone sarcomas

Abstract Bone sarcomas are a variety of non-epithelial, malignant neoplasms of bone. The most common bone sarcomas are osteosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. The approach to a patient with a suspected bone sarcoma from initial examination to the histological diagnosis and classification is staging. Staging is of critical importance, in order to classify different treatment options and point out which combination of them is more suitable depending on the severity of the tumor in every individual patient. Staging should include medical history, physical and imaging examination, and biopsy. This article presents the current approach for staging, principles of biopsy, tumor classification, treatment, and follow-up of patients with bone sarcomas.

PEEK rod systems for the spine

Abstract Traditional materials for the spine such as titanium and stainless steel have produced satisfying long-term fusion rates, mainly due to their strength and stiffness. However, although fixation with titanium rods leads to high fusion rates, increased stiffness of titanium constructs may also contribute to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. Dynamic and flexible materials such as the Dynesys system allow better stress distribution to all of the spinal columns, but increase the rate of complications including screw loosening, infection, back and leg pain, and endplate vertebral fracture. Semi-rigid instrumentation systems using rods made from synthetic polymers such as the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) have been recently introduced as an alternative biomaterial for the spine. PEEK is a fully biocompatible and inert semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer with minimal toxicity; it has a modulus of elasticity between that of cortical and cancellous bone, and significantly lower than titanium. However, there are very few clinical studies with small sample size and short-term follow-up using PEEK rod-pedicle screw spinal instrumentation systems. Additionally, their results are conflicting. To enhance the literature, this review discusses the effect of this medical for the spine and summarizes the results of the most important related series.

Human dermal allograft for massive rotator cuff tears.

Previously published studies reported variable results using various suture techniques and reconstruction options for massive rotator cuff tears. Therefore, the current authors retrospectively studied 21 consecutive patients/shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears treated from January 2005 to October 2011 with a human dermal allograft through a mini-open approach. Mean patient age was 58 years (range, 33-72 years). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 18-52 months). Ten patients underwent revision repair for a failed rotator cuff repair. The authors measured the tendon gap (mean, 1.7 cm) and acromiohumeral interval (mean, 6.5 mm). They evaluated pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM) and function, patient satisfaction with the operation and outcome, and complications. At last follow-up, all patients experienced significant pain relief (P=.001) and improved ROM (P=.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P=.001). Eighteen patients reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied and 3 reported that they were not satisfied with the operation and outcome. Comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent primary repair and those who underwent revision repair and between patients who had muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration grades 0 to II and those who had grades III to IV showed no statistically significant differences. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the size of the tendon gap and postoperative pain, ROM (except external rotation), and ASES score (P<.050). No significant correlation was observed between postoperative pain, ROM, and ASES score and the acromiohumeral interval (P>.050). Complications related to the dermal human allograft were not observed.

Salvage of Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty With Proximal Femoral Replacement

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: 1. Identify the available types of reconstruction for failed total hip arthroplasty. 2. Summarize the preoperative workup of patients with failed total hip arthroplasty and massive proximal femoral bone loss. 3. Assess the surgical technique of proximal femoral replacement for failed total hip arthroplasty. 4. Recognize treatment complications, patient outcomes, and survival of proximal femoral megaprostheses for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty. Despite recent advances in device manufacturing and surgical techniques, the management of proximal femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty remains challenging. Currently, failed total hip arthroplasty in elderly and less active patients, nonunion of the proximal femur with multiple failed attempts at osteosynthesis, resection arthroplasty, and massive proximal femoral bone loss can be salvaged with proximal femoral replacement using a megaprosthesis. The procedure is technically demanding and requires careful preoperative planning. Instability and aseptic loosening are the major complications, especially in younger and more active patients. The new generation of modular proximal femoral replacement megaprostheses and the increased experience obtained with these surgeries have reduced complication rates and improved outcomes.

Fall Risk Assessment Metrics for Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures

The most common surgery performed by orthopedic surgeons likely involves that for hip fractures. The incidence of hip fractures is anticipated to rise in the coming decades. Hip fractures most commonly occur in elderly women with osteoporosis after a fall from standing position. In an effort to reduce the incidence, improve the postoperative care, and accelerate the rehabilitation of hip fractures, it is important to evaluate the fall risk of these patients, as it is an objective indication of their level of physical activity. Metrics currently available for the evaluation of fall risk in the elderly vary widely, with each having been designed to assess a specific patient population. However, their applicability has often proved to be much broader than expected. This review summarizes the metrics available for fall risk assessment of elderly patients with hip fractures, describes their individual features and efficacy, and highlights those that seem to be more reliable for the assessment of rehabilitation of these patients after hip fracture surgery. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):142-156.].

Similar 2-point discrimination and stereognosia but better locognosia at long term with an independent home-based sensory reeducation program vs no reeducation after low-median nerve transection and repair

STUDY DESIGN Prospective controlled study. INTRODUCTION Previous studies evaluated the effectiveness of sensory reeducation (SR) after peripheral nerve injury and repair. However, evidence for long-term clinical usefulness of SR is inconclusive. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to compare the sensory results of patients with low-median nerve complete transection and microsurgical repair, with and without SR at long term. METHODS We prospectively studied 52 consecutive patients (mean age, 36 years; range, 20-47 years) with low-median nerve complete transection and microsurgical repair. When reinnervation was considered complete with perception of vibration with a 256-cycles per second tuning fork (mean, 3.5 months after nerve injury and repair), the patients were sequentially allocated (into 2 groups [group SR, 26 patients, SR; group R, 26 patients, reassured on recovery without SR). SR was conducted in a standardized fashion, in 2 stages, as an independent home-based program: the first stage was initiated when reinnervation was considered complete, and included instruction in home exercises to identify familiar objects and papers of different roughness, and localization of light touch (eyes open and closed); the second stage was initiated when the patients experienced normal static and moving 2-point discrimination (2PD) at the index fingertip of injured hand, and included instruction in home exercises for stereognosia, supplementary exercises for localization of light touch, and identification of small objects (eyes open and closed). Exercises were prescribed for 5-10 minutes, 4 times per day. At 1.5, 3, and 6 years after nerve injury and repair, we evaluated the static and moving 2PD, stereognosia with the Mobergs pick-up test, and locognosia with the modified Marsh test. Comparison between groups and time points was done with the nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance). RESULTS Static and moving 2PD and stereognosia were not significantly different between groups at any study period. Locognosia was significantly better at 1.5 and 3 years in group SR; locognosia was excellent in 17 patients of group SR vs 5 patients of group R at 1.5-year follow-up and in 14 patients of group SR vs 5 patients of group R at 3-year follow-up. Locognosia was not different between the study groups at 6-year follow-up. CONCLUSION A 2-stage home program of SR improved locognosia at 1.5 and 3 years after low-median nerve complete transection and repair without significant differences in other modalities or the 6-year follow-up of a small subsample.

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction for an angiosarcoma of the distal radius

Angiosarcoma of bone is a rare high-grade malignant vascular tumor accounting for <1% of malignant bone tumors. Tumor location in the distal radius is very rare. Complete surgical resection with limb salvage surgery or amputation is essential for the outcome of the patient. However, the literature is vague regarding the best surgical approach for resection of the distal radius and the optimal reconstruction option after a bone tumor resection. Several reconstruction techniques have been described, varying from arthrodesis to arthroplasties. In this article, we present a report of a patient with angiosarcoma of the distal radius treated with complete resection and reconstruction with a distal radius osteoarticular allograft. We discuss the advantages and the limitations of this surgical technique for the distal radius.