Chunsen Wu

Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis: risk factor identification and treatment strategy comparison

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. To identify risk factors for the presence of distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis and compare different treatment strategies. Summary of Background Data. Distal adding-on is often accompanied by unsatisfactory clinical outcome and high risk of reoperation. However, very few studies have focused on distal adding-on and its attendant risk factors and optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. Methods. All surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were retrieved from a single institutional database. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Lenke 1A scoliosis patients treated with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs, (2) minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Distal adding-on was defined as a progressive increase in the number of vertebrae included distally within the primary curve combined with either an increase of more than 5 mm in deviation of the first vertebra below instrumentation from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or an increase of more than 5° in the angulation of the first disc below the instrumentation at 1 year follow-up. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher exact test, and Spearman correlation test were used to identify the risk factors for adding-on. A multiple logistic regression model was built to identify independent predictive factor(s). Risk factors included: (1) age at surgery; (2) preoperative Cobb angle; (3) correction rate; (4) the gap difference of stable vertebra-lowest instrumented vertebra (SV-LIV), neutral vertebra-lowest instrumented vertebra (NV-LIV), and end vertebra-lowest instrumented vertebra (EV-LIV). Gap difference means, for example, if SV is at L2 and LIV is at Th12, then the difference of SV-LIV is 2; (5) the preoperative deviation of LIV + 1 (the first vertebra below the instrumentation) from the CSVL (the vertical line that bisects proximal sacrum). Five methods for determining LIV were compared in both the adding-on group and no adding-on group. Results. Out of the 278 patients reviewed, 45 met the inclusion criteria; 23 of these met the definition for distal adding-on, and were included in the adding-on group. The remaining 22 patients were included in the no adding-on group. The average follow-up was 3.6 years. Age, SV-LIV difference, EV-LIV difference, and LIV + 1 deviation from CSVL were significantly different (P < 0.05) between the two groups, and were also found to be significantly correlated with the presence of adding-on (P < 0.05). Preoperative Cobb angle, correction rate, and NV-LIV difference were not found to be affiliated with the presence of adding-on. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative LIV + 1 deviation from CSVL was an independent predictive factor. Among the five methods, choosing EV as LIV was nearly unable to prevent distal adding-on; choosing EV + 1 as LIV resulted in fusing many more segments than necessary; only choosing DV as LIV showed satisfactory outcome from both perspectives. Conclusion. In Lenke 1A type scoliosis, the selection of LIV is highly correlated with the presence of adding-on; incidence increases dramatically when the preoperative LIV + 1 deviation from CSVL is more than 10 mm. Choosing DV (the first vertebra in cephalad direction from sacrum with deviation from CSVL of more than 10 mm) as LIV may provide the best outcome as it not only prevents adding-on but also conserves more lumbar motion.

Prevalence of complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a literature meta-analysis from the past 15 years

PurposeOur objectives were primarily to review the published literature on complications in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) surgery and secondarily, by means of a meta-analysis, to determine the overall pooled rates (PR) of various complications associated with NMS surgery.MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes and complications of NMS surgery, published from 1997 to May 2011. We focused on NMS as defined by the Scoliosis Research Society’s classification. We measured the pooled estimate of the overall complication rates (PR) using a random effects meta-analytic model. This model considers both intra- and inter-study variation in calculating PR.ResultsSystematic review and meta-analysis were performed for 68 cohort and case–control studies with a total of 15,218 NMS patients. Pulmonary complications were the most reported (PRxa0=xa022.71xa0%) followed by implant complications (PRxa0=xa012.51xa0%), infections (PRxa0=xa010.91xa0%), neurological complications (PRxa0=xa03.01xa0%) and pseudoarthrosis (PRxa0=xa01.88xa0%). Revision, removal and extension of implant had highest PR (7.87xa0%) followed by malplacement of the pedicle screws (4.81xa0%). Rates of individual studies have moderate to high variability. The studies were heterogeneous in methodology and outcome types, which are plausible explanations for the variability; sensitivity analysis with respect to age at surgery, sample size, publication year and diagnosis could also partly explain this variability. In regard to surgical complications affiliated with various surgical techniques in NMS, the level of evidence of published literature ranges between 2+xa0to 2−; the subsequent recommendations are level C.ConclusionNMS patients have diverse and high complication rates after scoliosis surgery. High PRs of complications warrant more attention from the surgical community. Although the PR of all complications are affected by heterogeneity, they nevertheless provide valuable insights into the impact of methodological settings (sample size), patient characteristics (age at surgery), and continual advances in patient care on complication rates.

Predictive Value of Tokuhashi Scoring Systems in Spinal Metastases, Focusing on Various Primary Tumor Groups : Evaluation of 448 Patients in the Aarhus Spinal Metastases Database

Study Design. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 448 patients with spinal metastases from a variety of cancer groups. Objective. To determine the specific predictive value of the Tokuhashi scoring system (T12) and its revised version (T15) in spinal metastases of various primary tumors. Summary of Background Data. The life expectancy of patients with spinal metastases is one of the most important factors in selecting the treatment modality. Tokuhashi et al formulated a prognostic scoring system with a total sum of 12 points for preoperative prediction of life expectancy in 1990 and revised it in 2005 to a total sum of 15 points. There is a lack of knowledge about the specific predictive value of those scoring systems in patients with spinal metastases from a variety of cancer groups. Methods. We included 448 patients with vertebral metastases who underwent surgical treatment during November 1992 to November 2009 in Aarhus University Hospital NBG. Data were retrieved from Aarhus Metastases Database. Scores based on T12 and T15 were calculated prospectively for each patient. We divided all the patients into different groups dictated by the site of their primary tumor. Predictive value and accuracy rate of the 2 scoring systems were compared in each cancer group. Results. Both the T12 and T15 scoring systems showed statistically significant predictive value when the 448 patients were analyzed in total (T12, P < 0.0001; T15, P < 0.0001). The accuracy rate was significantly higher in T15 (P < 0.0001) than in T12. The further analyses by primary cancer groups showed that the predictive value of T12 and T15 was primarily determined by the prostate (P = 0.0003) and breast group (P = 0.0385). Only T12 displayed predictive value in the colon group (P = 0.0011). Neither of the scoring systems showed significant predictive value in the lung (P > 0.05), renal (P > 0.05), or miscellaneous primary tumor groups (P > 0.05). The accuracy rate of prognosis in T15 was significantly improved in the prostate (P = 0.0032) and breast group (P < 0.0001). Conclusion. Both T12 and T15 showed significant predictive value in patients with spinal metastases. T15 has a statistically higher accuracy rate than T12. Among the various cancer groups, the 2 scoring systems are especially reliable in prostate and breast metastases groups. T15 is recommended as superior to T12 because of its higher accuracy rate.

Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up.

Study Design. A radiographical follow-up and analysis. Objective. To investigate the postoperative curve change in Lenke 5C scoliosis, and to discuss how to select lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Summary of Background Data. 5C curves are relatively rare in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and few studies have focused on this type of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Such questions as “How does the curve change over time in the postoperative period?” “Is LIV selection correlated with final correction and balance?” and “How should we select LIV for Lenke 5C curves?” need to be answered. Methods. We reviewed all the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cases surgically treated in an institution from 2002 through 2008. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 5C curves who were treated with selective lumbar fusion; (2) minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up. All image data were available and all measurements were performed in picture archiving and communication systems. Standing posteroanterior and lateral digital radiographs were reviewed at 4 junctures: preoperative, immediate postoperative, 3 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Results. Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. The following results were observed: (1) From the perspectives of both Cobb angle and vertebral translation, significant correction was achieved; (2) The correction obtained by surgery was well retained in the postoperative period; (3) Although preoperative spinal imbalance was common in this group of patients, the majority eventually attained balance at 2 years; (4) LIV selection was significantly correlated with the 2-year correction and balance; (5) In the literature as well as in this study, the overall preoperative LIV-center sacral vertical line distance is 28 mm and the overall preoperative LIV tilt is 25°. Conclusion. In Lenke 5C scoliosis, preoperative spinal imbalance is common, although the majority of patients attain balance at 2 years. Significant correction loss is not common in the postoperative period. LIV selection significantly correlates with 2-year correction and balance. A translation of 28 mm and a tilt of 25° may be used as a general criterion for selecting LIV. Level of Evidence: 2

Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to more effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on.

Study Design. A radiographical follow-up and analysis. Objective. To identify appropriate radiographical parameters for measuring the extent of distal adding-on and to discuss criteria for determining the onset of distal adding-on. Summary of Background Data. There is no consensus on how to determine the onset of distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis. Such questions as: “Which radiographical parameters should be used for measuring the extent of distal adding-on?” and “What criteria should be applied in determining the onset of distal adding-on?” need to be answered. Methods. We reviewed all the AIS cases surgically treated in an institution from 2003 through 2009. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 1A curves who were treated with selective thoracic fusion; (2) age less than 30 years; (3) 2-year radiographical follow-up. Eight radiographical parameters were tested to see if they are potential instruments in the detection of distal adding-on. Results. Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. No pseudarthrosis or crankshaft phenomenon was observed in the current cohort. Five out of 8 radiographical parameters: thoracic Cobb, LIV-CSVL distance, LIV + 1-CSVL distance, thoracic AV-CSVL distance and LIV + 1 tilt angle, in the 2 years after surgery, showed significant increase. The remaining 3 parameters: LIV tilt angle, T1-CSVL distance and number of vertebrae within Cobb, however, did not show significant increase. In regard to the 5 parameters that have the potential to detect the onset of distal adding-on, we found a high correlation between every 2 of them. The correlation coefficients range from 0.504 to 0.962 (P = 0.001), suggesting that all of them are in a positive linear relationship. Regarding the criterion for determining the onset of distal adding-on, an increase of more than 10 mm in LIV-CSVL distance in the postoperative period can be considered as a the main criterion because it is unlikely to be induced by measurement errors. Conclusion. LIV-CSVL distance could be an ideal parameter for measuring the extent of distal adding-on. Distal adding-on can be determined when the LIV-CSVL distance increases by 10 mm in the postoperative period.

Survival analysis of breast cancer subtypes in patients with spinal metastases

Study Design. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 151 patients with breast cancer spinal metastases. Objective. To investigate the influence of breast cancer subtypes on survival duration of patients with breast cancer spinal metastases, and to aid spine surgeons in selecting treatments on a more precise basis. Summary of Background Data. There is lack of knowledge about specific prognosis of patients with spinal metastases in various breast cancer subtypes. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2) status are the key factors in determining breast cancer subtypes and predicting patients response to adjuvant treatments. Methods. Until August 2013, we retrieved 151 surgically treated patients with breast cancer spinal metastases and followed up all the patients for at least 2 years. Survival duration analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model unadjusted and adjusted by age were used. Results. Patients with ER-negative (−) breast cancer had 11 months shorter median survival duration (10.6 vs. 21.5 mo) and 48% higher mortality risk (P = 0.03) than those with ER-positive (+) breast cancer. Patients with PgR (−) status had 59% higher mortality risk than those with PgR (+) status (P = 0.02). Hormone receptor (HR) status is a combination of ER and PgR status. Patients with HR (−) status had an 11-month shorter median survival duration and 52% higher mortality risk (P = 0.01) than patients with HR (+) status. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtypes had similar median survival duration and mortality risk. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a median survival duration of only 9.9 months. Conclusion. Patients with spinal metastases with ER/HR (−) status and triple-negative breast cancer could be downgraded from score “5” to “3” in Tokuhashi scoring system and from “slow growth” to “moderate growth” in Tomita scoring system. Spine surgeons should be critical before performing high-risk extensive surgery in patients with ER/HR (−) status, and especially, in those with triple-negative status. Level of Evidence: 3

Postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis: what causes it? How can it be prevented?

Study Design. A risk factor analysis study. Objective. To identify the causative factors for postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis and investigate how to prevent it. Summary of Background Data. When selective thoracic fusion is performed, postoperative trunk shift is a significant problem in the management of Lenke 1C scoliosis. It is often accompanied by unsatisfactory clinical outcomes and a risk of reoperation. Methods. We reviewed all the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgically treated in our institution from 2002 through 2008. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 1C curves who were treated with selective thoracic fusion using posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; (2) the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ending at L1 level or above; and (3) 2-year radiographical follow-up. Eighteen radiographical parameters were chosen as potential risk factors. The 18 parameters measured (1) amount of correction obtained by surgery; (2) preoperative position of LIV; (3) magnitude of major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (MT and TL/L) curves and ratio of MT: TL/L curve; and (4) curve flexibility. Both comparative and correlation analyses were performed. Those parameters that had shown highest correlation with the 2-year thoracic apical vertebra–center sacral vertical line (AV-CSVL) distance were selected to form a linear regression model, by which the correlations were quantified. Results. Of the 278 patients reviewed, 44 met the inclusion criteria. The parameters that measured the preoperative position of LIV and ratio of MT: TL/L curve showed high correlation with the 2-year thoracic AV-CSVL distance. With regard to the parameters that measured the amount of correction obtained by surgery, only the correction of the thoracic AV-T1 distance showed low correlation. Among the 18 parameters, preoperative lowest instrumented vertebra–lower end vertebra (LIV-LEV) difference and ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle were selected to form a formula to help predict postoperative trunk shift. The formula was as follows: 2-year thoracic AV-CSVL distance = −26.6 + 22.7 (ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle) − 3.9 (preoperative LIV-LEV difference). The model R2 = 0.55. Conclusion. Both LIV selection and ratio of MT: TL/L curve were found to be highly correlated with the onset of postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis. Amount of correction obtained by surgery, however, did not seem to be an independent causative factor. Postoperative trunk shift is less likely to occur when selecting LEV as LIV and the ratio of MT: TL/L Cobb angle of 1.2° or more.

Postoperative spinal alignment remodeling in Lenke 1C scoliosis treated with selective thoracic fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTnSelective thoracic fusion may cause spinal imbalance in certain patients; how the spinal alignment changes over time after surgery is highly correlated with the final spinal balance.nnnPURPOSEnTo investigate how spinal alignment changes over time after selective thoracic fusion and how spinal alignment remodeling affects spinal balance.nnnMETHODSnAll adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) cases surgically treated in our institution between 2002 and 2008 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Lenke 1C scoliosis patients treated with posterior pedicle screw-only constructs; the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) ended at L1 level or above; and 2-year radiographic follow-up. Standing anteroposterior and lateral digital radiographs from four different time points (preoperatively, immediately, 3 months, and 2 years postoperatively) were reviewed. In each standing anteroposterior radiograph, the center sacral vertical line (CSVL, the vertical line that bisects the proximal sacrum) was first drawn, and the translation (deviation from the CSVL) of some key vertebrae was measured, such as the LIV, LIV+1 (the first vertebra below LIV), LIV+2 (the second vertebra below LIV), LIV+3 (the third vertebra below LIV), lumbar apical vertebra (AV), thoracic AV, and T1. Additionally, the Cobb angles of the major thoracic and lumbar curves were measured at different time points, and the correction rates were calculated. Furthermore, clinical photographs of the patients from the back were taken preoperatively and postoperatively.nnnRESULTSnOf 278 AIS patients reviewed, 29 met the inclusion criteria. The continuous follow-up of our present study revealed an interesting phenomenon: postoperative spinal alignment remodeling. A hypothetical criterion was established to determine the onset of the phenomenon. By means of a series of analyses, the criterion was validated. The results of our present study showed that selective thoracic fusion tended to cause leftward spinal imbalance in these Lenke 1C AIS patients. Twenty of the 29 patients had leftward spinal imbalance immediately after surgery. Although some patients regained spinal balance through postoperative spinal alignment remodeling, 11 patients remained imbalanced at 2-year follow-up.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSelective thoracic fusion is prone to cause leftward spinal imbalance in Lenke 1C scoliosis patients. Postoperative spinal alignment remodeling can facilitate recovery of spinal balance in some patients. Postoperative spinal imbalance in Lenke 1C scoliosis patients could be prevented by selecting stable vertebra or the vertebrae above as LIV, checking the balance condition during surgery, or considering ratio criteria when selecting candidates for selective thoracic fusion.

Improved patient selection by stratified surgical intervention: Aarhus Spinal Metastases Algorithm

BACKGROUND CONTEXTnChoosing the best surgical treatment for patients with spinal metastases remains a significant challenge for spine surgeons. There is currently no gold standard for surgical treatments. The Aarhus Spinal Metastases Algorithm (ASMA) was established to help surgeons choose the most appropriate surgical intervention for patients with spinal metastases.nnnPURPOSEnThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of stratified surgical interventions based on the ASMA, which combines life expectancy and the anatomical classification of patients with spinal metastases to inform surgical decision making.nnnSTUDY DESIGN/SETTINGnThis is a retrospective study based on a prospective database.nnnPATIENT SAMPLEnA consecutive series of 515 spinal metastatic patients who underwent surgically treatment from December 1992 to June 2012 in Aarhus University Hospital were included prospectively and analyzed in detail retrospectively.nnnOUTCOME MEASURESnSurvival time after surgery was determined for all patients. Neurological function was assessed using the Frankel score preoperatively and postoperatively (at the time of discharge). Complete outcome data were retrieved in 97.5% of this cohort.nnnMETHODSnPatients with spinal metastases were identified from an institutional database that prospectively collected data since 1992. Survival status data were obtained from a national registry. Neurological function was determined from the same institutional database or local Electronic Patient Journal system. Surgeons evaluated and classified patients into five surgical groups preoperatively by using the revised Tokuhashi score (TS) and the Tomita anatomical classification (TC).nnnRESULTSnThe overall median survival time of the cohort was 6.8 (95% confidence interval: 6.1-7.9) months. The median survival times in the five surgical groups determined by the ASMA were 2.1 (TS 0-4, TC 1-7), 5.1 (TS 5-8, TC 1-7), 12.1 (TS 9-11, TC 1-7 or TS 12-15, TC 7), 26.0 (TS 12-15, TC 4-6), and 36.0 (TS 12-15, TC 1-3) months. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.5%. Postoperative neurological function was maintained or improved in 469 patients (92.3%). Overall reoperation rate was 13.5%, commonly because of postoperative hematoma and new limb weakness.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe ASMA recommends at least two surgical options for a particular patient by determining the preoperative life expectancy and anatomical classification of the spinal metastases. This algorithm could help spine surgeons to discriminate the risks of surgeries. The ASMA provides a tool to guild surgeons to evaluate the spinal metastases patients, select potential optimal surgery, and avoid life-threatening risks.

Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

PurposeTo examine correlation between postoperative radiographic and cosmetic improvements in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with patients’ self-rated outcomes of health and disability at follow-up as determined by the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-30), Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI) and measure of overall health quality Euroqol-5d (EQ-5D).Methods24 Lenke 1C scoliosis patients, mean age 16.5 (12.8–38.1) years, treated with posterior pedicle screw-only construct, were included. The coronal profile indices (radiographic and cosmetic) regarding magnitude of spinal deformity and truncal balance were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at final follow-up. A comprehensive index of overall back symmetry was also measured by means of the Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI). Pearson’s correlation analysis determined the association between the radiographic–cosmetic indices and patient-rated outcomes.ResultsMean follow-up for the cohort was 4.4 (±1.86) years. The thoracic apical vertebra-first thoracic vertebra horizontal distance (AV-TI) correction had significant correlation with function, self-image, and mental health SRS-30 scores (0.55, 0.54, 0.66). Similarly, thoracic apical vertebra horizontal translation from central sacral vertical line (AV-CSVL) correction at follow-up had significant correlation with self-image and management domains (0.57, 0.50). Follow-up POTSI correlated well with SRS-30 and EQ-5D scores (rxa0=xa0−0.64, −0.54). Postoperative leftward trunk shift/spinal imbalance did not influence overall cosmesis and outcomes; significant spinal realignment was evident in follow-up resulting in physiological balance and acceptable cosmesis and outcomes.ConclusionSignificant, but less than “perfect” correlations were observed between the radiographic, cosmetic measures and patient-rated outcomes. Thoracic AV-CSVL, AV-T1 correction and POTSI associated significantly with SRS-30 scores. Whereas, thoracic Cobb angle, Cobb correction, and coronal balance did not correlate with any patient-rated outcome measure. It is, therefore, inferred that the patients-rated subjective outcomes are only poorly reflected by the objectively measured radiographic and cosmetic measures of deformity correction.