Cindy E. Neunert

Severe hemorrhage in children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Controversy exists regarding management of children newly diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Drug treatment is usually administered to prevent severe hemorrhage, although the definition and frequency of severe bleeding are poorly characterized. Accordingly, the Intercontinental Childhood ITP Study Group (ICIS) conducted a prospective registry defining severe hemorrhage at diagnosis and during the following 28 days in children with ITP. Of 1106 ITP patients enrolled, 863 were eligible and evaluable for bleeding severity assessment at diagnosis and during the subsequent 4 weeks. Twenty-five children (2.9%) had severe bleeding at diagnosis. Among 505 patients with a platelet count less than or equal to 20 000/mm(3) and no or mild bleeding at diagnosis, 3 (0.6%), had new severe hemorrhagic events during the ensuing 28 days. Subsequent development of severe hemorrhage was unrelated to initial management (P = .82). These results show that severe bleeding is uncommon at diagnosis in children with ITP and rare during the next 4 weeks irrespective of treatment given. We conclude that it would be difficult to design an adequately powered therapeutic trial aimed at demonstrating prevention of severe bleeding during the first 4 weeks after diagnosis. This finding suggests that future studies of ITP management should emphasize other outcomes.

Severe bleeding events in adults and children with primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review

The burden of severe bleeding in adults and children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has not been established.

Bleeding manifestations and management of children with persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia: data from the Intercontinental Cooperative ITP Study Group (ICIS)

Long-term follow-up of children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) indicates that the majority undergo remission and severe thrombocytopenia is infrequent. Details regarding bleeding manifestations, however, remain poorly categorized. We report here long-term data from the Intercontinental Cooperative ITP Study Group Registry II focusing on natural history, bleeding manifestations, and management. Data on 1345 subjects were collected at diagnosis and at 28 days, 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter. Median platelet counts were 214 × 10(9)/L (interquartile range [IQR] 227, range 1-748), 211 × 10(9)/L (IQR 192, range 1-594), and 215 × 10(9)/L (IQR 198, range 1-598) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and a platelet count <20 × 10(9)/L was uncommon (7%, 7%, and 4%, respectively). Remission occurred in 37% of patients between 28 days and 6 months, 16% between 6 and 12 months, and 24% between 12 and 24 months. There were no reports of intracranial hemorrhage, and the most common site of bleeding was skin. In patients with severe thrombocytopenia we observed a trend toward more drug treatment with increasing number of bleeding sites. Our data support that ITP is a benign condition for most affected children and that major hemorrhage, even with prolonged severe thrombocytopenia, is rare.

Current management of immune thrombocytopenia

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-mediated condition that results from antibody-mediated destruction of platelets and impaired megakaryocyte platelet production. ITP patients exhibit severe thrombocytopenia and are at risk for significant hemorrhage. Few randomized trials exist to guide management of patients with ITP. Ultimately, each patient requires an individualized treatment plan that takes into consideration the platelet count, bleeding symptoms, health-related quality of life, and medication side effects. This article provides an up-to-date review of management strategies drawing on links between the expanding amounts of clinical trial data and associated biology studies to enhance understanding of the disease heterogeneity with regard to the complex pathogenesis and response to treatment.

Severe chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura during childhood: A survey of physician management

Physician attitudes regarding management of children with severe chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) have not been recently characterized.

How I treat refractory immune thrombocytopenia

This article summarizes our approach to the management of children and adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who do not respond to, cannot tolerate, or are unwilling to undergo splenectomy. We begin with a critical reassessment of the diagnosis and a deliberate attempt to exclude nonautoimmune causes of thrombocytopenia and secondary ITP. For patients in whom the diagnosis is affirmed, we consider observation without treatment. Observation is appropriate for most asymptomatic patients with a platelet count of 20 to 30 × 10(9)/L or higher. We use a tiered approach to treat patients who require therapy to increase the platelet count. Tier 1 options (rituximab, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, low-dose corticosteroids) have a relatively favorable therapeutic index. We exhaust all Tier 1 options before proceeding to Tier 2, which comprises a host of immunosuppressive agents with relatively lower response rates and/or greater toxicity. We often prescribe Tier 2 drugs not alone but in combination with a Tier 1 or a second Tier 2 drug with a different mechanism of action. We reserve Tier 3 strategies, which are of uncertain benefit and/or high toxicity with little supporting evidence, for the rare patient with serious bleeding who does not respond to Tier 1 and Tier 2 therapies.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist Use in Children: Data From the Pediatric ITP Consortium of North America ICON2 Study

Data on second‐line treatment options for pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are limited. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO‐RA) provide a nonimmunosuppressive option for children who require an increased platelet count.

Implantable central venous access device procedures in haemophilia patients without an inhibitor: systematic review of the literature and institutional experience.

Summary.  Elective surgical procedures involving central venous access devices (CVADs) in patients with haemophilia are often necessary for adequate factor delivery but there are few data regarding haemostatic coverage and acute complication rates accompanying these procedures. To describe experience with CVAD insertion, revision and removal in young haemophilia patients at our institution and in the literature and to assess acute complications following CVAD procedures. PubMed, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for articles, which included a description of factor coverage during CVAD procedures. A retrospective review of our comprehensive haemophilia database identified patients undergoing CVAD placement, revision and removal between January 1993 and August 2005. Manual and electronic searches of the published literature yielded 14 articles, which met inclusion criteria. Peri‐operative factor administration varied greatly among the reports. Mean acute infection and haematoma rates were 8% and 12.5% respectively. A retrospective review identified 49 CVAD placements, revisions, or removals meeting inclusion criteria. Most patients received outpatient bolus factor replacement to achieve a level of 100% preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7. Thirty‐six procedures were performed without hospitalization. Ten patients developed 11 (22%) minor haematomas postoperatively. Major haemorrhage, acute infection, or pneumothorax was not encountered. Few published data exist regarding haemostatic coverage and complications following CVAD procedures. Our institutional experience using a consistent management approach was favourable. Further studies are required to define optimal haemostatic coverage during minor surgical procedures in haemophilia.

Multicenter Cohort Study Comparing U.S. Management of Inpatient Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia to Current Treatment Guidelines

Recent pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) guidelines have significantly altered and are encouraging an observational approach for patients without significant bleeding regardless of their platelet count.

Controversies in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.

Purpose of reviewWe address three current controversies in management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Should asymptomatic children with newly diagnosed ITP and severe thrombocytopenia be treated? Does intensification of up-front therapy in adults with newly diagnosed ITP impact long-term outcomes? Is splenectomy still the second-line treatment of choice in adults with chronic ITP? Recent findingsSevere bleeding is rare in children with ITP. There is little evidence that the platelet count predicts or that treatment prevents severe bleeding in this population. Intensified treatment with high-dose dexamethasone and rituximab in adults with newly diagnosed ITP is associated with improved platelet responses at 6 and 12 months but greater toxicity compared with standard therapy. Rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists have emerged as suitable alternatives to splenectomy for second-line management of adults with chronic ITP. SummaryWe generally observe children with newly diagnosed ITP and mild or no bleeding symptoms, irrespective of platelet count. We do not routinely use intensified up-front therapy in adults with newly diagnosed ITP. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of splenectomy, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists with our patients and make a joint decision that takes into consideration age, comorbidities, lifestyle, values, preferences, and financial considerations.