Cindy K. Cook

Treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate significantly improves ocular symptoms in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Background If monotherapy with an intranasal corticosteroid can alleviate both nasal and ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis, treatment may be simplified and costs may be reduced.

Intranasal fluticasone propionate is effective for perennial nonallergic rhinitis with or without eosinophilia

BACKGROUND Although response to intranasal corticosteroid therapy has been reported in patients with nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilic syndrome (NARES), efficacy specifically in non-NARES patients has not been fully characterized. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP) in the treatment of patients with perennial nonallergic rhinitis, with and without nasal eosinophilia. METHODS Data from 983 patients in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PNAR trials were integrated. Patients received a total daily dose of FP 200 microg (n = 332), FP 400 microg (n = 325), or placebo (n = 326) for 28 days. Patients were > or =12 years of age with perennial rhinitis and negative skin tests to all allergens relevant to the geographic region. Nasal eosinophils were evaluated using a five-point scale. Patients were classified as non-NARES with a point score of 0 (n = 674; 69%); patients with a point score between I and 4 were classified as NARES (n = 309; 31%). Efficacy of FP was evaluated by the mean change in total nasal symptom score (TNSS), a sum of patient ratings of nasal obstruction, postnasal drip, and rhinorrhea. RESULTS Patients with either NARES or non-NARES had similar statistically significant improvement with FP 200 microg or 400 microg compared with placebo; thus, the total group comprising both varieties of rhinitis responded to FP. In the total population, both FP treatment groups showed significantly greater improvement in TNSS compared with placebo during each week of treatment (P < or = 0.002), with mean changes in TNSS for day 22 to day 28 ranging from -84 and -85 in the FP 200 microg and FP 400 microg groups, respectively, to -64 in the placebo group. The three study treatment groups had similar proportions of non-NARES (68 to 69%) and NARES (31 to 32%) patients at baseline. In the non-NARES subgroup, mean changes in TNSS for each treatment group were similar to changes seen in the total population. In the NARES subgroup, mean changes in TNSS for the FP 200 microg and placebo groups were similar to changes seen in the total population; mean change in TNSS for the FP 400 microg group was somewhat greater than changes seen in the total population. CONCLUSIONS Intranasal FP is an effective treatment for perennial nonallergic rhinitis with or without nasal eosinophilia (NARES or non-NARES).

Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Inhibits Recovery of Chemokines and Other Cytokines in Nasal Secretions in Allergen-Induced Rhinitis

BACKGROUND Allergen-induced nasal responses are associated with the recovery of proinflammatory mediators and cytokines. In recent years, a distinct group of chemotactic cytokines, chemokines, has been the focus of intense investigation as to their possible role in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Although corticosteroids have been known to be effective in the treatment of allergic diseases, their mechanism(s) of action has not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVES To study the effect of topical fluticasone on the recovery of chemokines (IL-8, MIP-1 alpha, and RANTES) and other cytokines (IL-1 beta, IL-6, and GM-CSF) from nasal mucosa following allergen challenge. To correlate the improvement of rhinitis symptoms with cytokine levels during early-phase and late-phase allergic responses. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms q d, was performed in ten subjects with allergic rhinitis. Allergen challenge was administered after 1 week of treatment. Nasal secretions were collected immediately after challenge and during the late-phase reactions; symptom scores were recorded simultaneously. Nasal cytokines were assayed by specific ELISA. RESULTS The allergen challenge caused early-phase and late-phase allergic reactions and increased recovery of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and GM-CSF from the nasal mucosa. Intranasal fluticasone inhibited the allergen-induced increase in nasal symptoms. This was associated with decreases in cytokine recovery. A significant correlation was observed between decreases in cytokine levels and in symptom scores after treatment. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that treatment with topical fluticasone propionate inhibits allergen-induced nasal responses and the associated increase in the production/secretion of chemokines and other proinflammatory cytokines.