Cinzia Valzania

Phrenic stimulation: a challenge for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Background—Phrenic stimulation (PS) may hinder left ventricular (LV) pacing. We prospectively observed its prevalence in consecutive patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and Results—In the years 2003 to 2006, 197 patients received a CRT device. PS and LV threshold measurements were carried out at implantation and at 6-month follow-up. LV reverse remodeling was assessed by echocardiography before implantation and at follow-up. LV lead placement was lateral/posterolateral in 86% of patients. Both PS and LV reverse remodeling occurred most frequently at the lateral/posterolateral LV pacing sites (P<0.001). PS was detected in 73 (37%) of patients and was clinically relevant in 41 (22%). The detection of PS at implantation had a poor sensitivity, as it occurred only in left lateral or sitting position in 27 patients. Ten patients (5%) underwent repeated surgery and 4 (2%) had their CRT turned off because of PS. At follow-up, we could manage PS noninvasively in 32 patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference: in 20 by cathode programmability (3 also thanks to automatic management of LV output) and in 12 (without cathode programmability) by programming the LV output as threshold +1 V. Conclusions—PS may seriously hinder CRT. A bipolar LV lead and cathode programmability are mandatory to avoid PS by changing the LV pacing vector at target sites for CRT. LV stability at target sites despite PS should also be pursued by these means. The automatic adjustment of LV pacing output is complementary in patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference.Background— Phrenic stimulation (PS) may hinder left ventricular (LV) pacing. We prospectively observed its prevalence in consecutive patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Methods and Results— In the years 2003 to 2006, 197 patients received a CRT device. PS and LV threshold measurements were carried out at implantation and at 6-month follow-up. LV reverse remodeling was assessed by echocardiography before implantation and at follow-up. LV lead placement was lateral/posterolateral in 86% of patients. Both PS and LV reverse remodeling occurred most frequently at the lateral/posterolateral LV pacing sites ( P <0.001). PS was detected in 73 (37%) of patients and was clinically relevant in 41 (22%). The detection of PS at implantation had a poor sensitivity, as it occurred only in left lateral or sitting position in 27 patients. Ten patients (5%) underwent repeated surgery and 4 (2%) had their CRT turned off because of PS. At follow-up, we could manage PS noninvasively in 32 patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference: in 20 by cathode programmability (3 also thanks to automatic management of LV output) and in 12 (without cathode programmability) by programming the LV output as threshold +1 V. Conclusions— PS may seriously hinder CRT. A bipolar LV lead and cathode programmability are mandatory to avoid PS by changing the LV pacing vector at target sites for CRT. LV stability at target sites despite PS should also be pursued by these means. The automatic adjustment of LV pacing output is complementary in patients with a small PS-LV threshold difference. Received December 14, 2008; accepted June 10, 2009. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-2}

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Variations in Echo‐Guided Optimized Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delays During Follow‐Up

Background: Relatively few data are available on long‐term echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We assessed variations in optimized AV and VV delays during long‐term follow‐up. Methods: Thirty‐seven consecutive heart failure patients received Doppler echocardiographic optimization of AV and VV delay within 48 hours from CRT device implantation, at 6 months and at 12 months (the last for the first enrolled 14 patients). Results: After implantation, median optimized AV delay was 100 ms (range, 45 ms); VV optimization led to simultaneous biventricular activation in 4 patients, left ventricular preactivation in 17 patients and right ventricular preactivation in 16 patients. At 12 months median AV delay decreased to 85 ms (23 ms) (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). With respect to previous assessment, VV delay variations ≥40 ms were observed in 41% of the patients at 6 months and in 57% of the tested patients at 12 months. A nonconcordance (by Kappa test) of optimized VV delays was found between each new assessment and the previous one. VV delay optimization was associated with significant (P < 0.001) increases in aortic velocity time integral both at baseline and during follow‐up. Conclusions: Echocardiographic optimization of AV and VV delay is associated with broad intraindividual variability during follow‐up. A new assessment of optimized VV delays during long‐term follow‐up reveals a nonconcordance with previous values and provides increases in forward stroke volume.

Telecardiology and Remote Monitoring of Implanted Electrical Devices: The Potential for Fresh Clinical Care Perspectives

Telecardiology may help confront the growing burden of monitoring the reliability of implantable defibrillators/pacemakers. Herein, we suggest that the evolving capabilities of implanted devices to monitor patients’ status (heart rhythm, fluid overload, right ventricular pressure, oximetry, etc.) may imply a shift from strictly device-centered follow-up to perspectives centered on the patient (and patient-device interactions). Such approaches could provide improvements in health care delivery and clinical outcomes, especially in the field of heart failure. Major professional, policy, and ethical issues will have to be overcome to enable real-world implementation. This challenge may be relevant for the evolution of our health care systems.

Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.

AIMS The National Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry collects prospective data on all pacemaker and ICD implants in Sweden. We aimed to report the 2012 findings of the Registry concerning electrical devices implantation rates and changes over time, 1 year complications, long-term device longevity and patient survival. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-four Swedish implanting centres continuously contribute implantation of pacemakers and ICDs to the Registry by direct data entry on a specific website. Clinical and technical information on 2012 first implants and postoperative complications were analysed and compared with previous years. Patient survival data were obtained from the Swedish population register database. In 2012, the mean pacemaker and ICD first implantation rates were 697 and 136 per million inhabitants, respectively. The number of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implantations/million capita was 41 (CRT pacemakers) and 55 (CRT defibrillators), with only a slight increase in CRT-ICD rate compared with 2011. Most device implantations were performed in men. Complication rates for pacemaker and ICD procedures were 5.3 and 10.1% at 1 year, respectively. Device and lead longevity differed among manufacturers. Pacemaker patients were older at the time of first implant and had generally worse survival rate than ICD patients (63 vs. 82% after 5 years). CONCLUSION Pacemaker and ICD implantation rates seem to have reached a level phase in Sweden. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT implantation rates are very low and do not reflect guideline indications. Gender differences in CRT and ICD implantations are pronounced. Device and patient survival rates are variable, and should be considered when deciding device type.

Interventricular Delay Interval Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Echocardiography Versus Guided by Electrocardiographic QRS Interval Width

Present devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy offer the possibility of tailoring the hemodynamic effect of biventricular pacing by optimization of the interventricular delay (VV) beyond atrioventricular (AV)-interval optimization. It was not yet defined whether a QRS width-based strategy may be a helpful tool for echocardiography for device programming. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between VV-interval optimization guided by echocardiography and guided by QRS interval width. One hundred six patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device for > or =3 months were enrolled. All patients underwent echocardiographic AV and VV delay optimization. The AV interval was optimized according to the E wave-A wave (EA) interval and left ventricular filling time. At the optimal AV delay, VV optimization was performed by measuring the aortic velocity time integral at 5 different settings: simultaneous right and left ventricle output, left ventricle pre-excitation (left ventricle + 40 and 80 ms, respectively), and right ventricle pre-excitation (right ventricle + 40 and 80 ms, respectively). A 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded and QRS duration was measured in the lead with the greatest QRS width. The electrocardiographic (ECG)-optimized VV interval was defined according to the narrowest achievable QRS interval among 5 VV intervals. The echocardiographic-optimized VV interval was left ventricle + 40 ms in 28 patients, left ventricle + 80 ms in 15 patients, simultaneous in 46 patients, right ventricle + 40 ms in 14 patients, and right ventricle + 80 ms in 3 patients. Significant concordance (kappa = 0.69, p <0.001) was found between the echocardiographic- and ECG-optimized VV interval. In conclusion, significant concordance appeared to exist during biventricular pacing between VV programming based on the shortest QRS interval at 12-lead ECG pacing and echocardiographic-guided VV-interval optimization. A combined ECG- and echocardiographic approach could be a less time-consuming solution in performing this operation.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating left ventricular vs. biventricular pacing in heart failure: effect on all-cause mortality and hospitalizations.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that biventricular (BiV) pacing reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and mortality in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV HF, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and wide QRS. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the RCTs comparing LV‐only vs. biventricular (BiV) pacing in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in clinical practice: predictors of long‐term outcome

Despite the results of Atrial Fibrillation Follow‐up Investigation of Rhythm Management and Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trials, which favour a general shift in atrial fibrillation (AF) therapeutic approach towards control of ventricular rate, a strategy based on restoration of sinus rhythm could still play a role in selected patients at lower risk of AF recurrence. We explored possible predictors of relapses after external electrical cardioversion among patients with persistent AF or atrial flutter (AFL).

Clinical implications of left superior vena cava persistence in candidates for pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation

Persistence of a left superior vena cava (LSVC) has been reported in 0.3%–0.4% of candidates for pacemaker (PM) or cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical implications of LSVC persistence for proper device performance. We observed the prevalence of LSVC during a 15-year period. A total of 2077 consecutive patients underwent PM implantation over a 15-year period: 7 had persistent LSVCs (0.34%). Among 599 patients undergoing ICD implantation, 4 LSVCs (0.66%) were observed. Overall LSVC persistence was found in 11/2676 (0.41%) patients. The right superior vena cava was absent in 4/11 (36%) patients. The leads were placed from the left subclavian approach in 5/7 PM patients: 2 received an elective right sided approach due to physician preference. All ICD patients had the device placed left pectoral with a single-coil lead: defibrillation therapy was effective in the long term in all but one patient, who required the addition of a subcutaneous array. Left superior vena cava persistence in PM/ICD patients is similar to the general population (0.41% in our study). The left-sided implant may be skill-demanding during lead placement; however, this task can be accomplished in the majority of cases, with a reliable outcome in the short term and appropriate device performance at follow-up.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods

Aims Optimal exercise programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices is unknown. We aimed to: (i) investigate variations in optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays from rest to exercise, assessed by both echocardiography and an automated intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method; (ii) evaluate the acute haemodynamic impact of CRT optimization performed during exercise. Methods and results Twenty-four heart failure patients, previously implanted with a CRT defibrillator, underwent AV and VV delay optimization, by echocardiography and IEGM methods, both at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Rest-to-exercise variations in optimal VV delay were observed in 58% of patients. Conversely, optimal AV delay did not change during exercise compared with rest. Substantial agreement of AV and VV delays was observed between both the optimization methods. Exercise optimization of VV delay by either method improved intraventricular dyssynchrony and increased aortic velocity time integral compared with the resting setting (P < 0.001). Conclusion In patients implanted with a CRT device, optimal VV delay varied considerably from rest to exercise, while AV delay did not change. Re-assessment of the optimal pacing configuration during supine exercise, by echocardiography as well as IEGM methods, yielded an additional haemodynamic benefit to that provided by resting optimization.

Outcome of cardioverter–defibrillator implant in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) treatment in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We reviewed baseline/follow-up data of 15 consecutive ARVC patients (mean age 55 ± 15 years) and 30 randomly drawn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (mean age 60 ± 10 years) with matching durations of follow-up (all implanted with ICDs for primary/secondary prevention of sudden death). At implant, appropriate placement of the RV lead was more difficult in ARVC patients. During follow-up (median 41 months), appropriate interventions for any ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 8 (53%) ARVC patients and 17 (57%) CAD patients, but the occurrence of high rate (>240 beats/min) ventricular tachyarrhythmias was higher in ARVC patients. Inappropriate ICD interventions occurred in 5 (33%) ARVC patients and 10 (33%) CAD patients. Lead-related adverse events requiring surgical revision occurred in 7 (47%) ARVC patients as compared with 4 (13%) CAD patients (P = 0.0004). While ICD implantation is highly effective for prevention of sudden death in ARVC, it does carry elevated burdens of long-term lead-related adverse events. These findings underline the need of careful follow-up in ARVC aimed at early recognition of complications that can impair ICD function.