Claire Pouteil-Noble

Retraction: Interleukin 17 acts in synergy with B cell-activating factor to influence B cell biology and the pathophysiology of systemic lupus erythematosus

Nicole Boucheron, Roland Tschismarov, Lisa Goeschl, Mirjam A Moser, Sabine Lagger, Shinya Sakaguchi, Mircea Winter, Florian Lenz, Dijana Vitko, Florian P Breitwieser, Lena Müller, Hammad Hassan, Keiryn L Bennett, Jacques Colinge, Wolfgang Schreiner, Takeshi Egawa, Ichiro Taniuchi, Patrick Matthias, Christian Seiser& Wilfried Ellmeier Nat. Immunol. 15, 439–448 (2014); published online 30 March 2014; corrected after print 6 June 2014

Sirolimus and Secondary Skin-Cancer Prevention in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND Transplant recipients in whom cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas develop are at high risk for multiple subsequent skin cancers. Whether sirolimus is useful in the prevention of secondary skin cancer has not been assessed. METHODS In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned transplant recipients who were taking calcineurin inhibitors and had at least one cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma either to receive sirolimus as a substitute for calcineurin inhibitors (in 64 patients) or to maintain their initial treatment (in 56). The primary end point was survival free of squamous-cell carcinoma at 2 years. Secondary end points included the time until the onset of new squamous-cell carcinomas, occurrence of other skin tumors, graft function, and problems with sirolimus. RESULTS Survival free of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was significantly longer in the sirolimus group than in the calcineurin-inhibitor group. Overall, new squamous-cell carcinomas developed in 14 patients (22%) in the sirolimus group (6 after withdrawal of sirolimus) and in 22 (39%) in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (median time until onset, 15 vs. 7 months; P=0.02), with a relative risk in the sirolimus group of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.98). There were 60 serious adverse events in the sirolimus group, as compared with 14 such events in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (average, 0.938 vs. 0.250). There were twice as many serious adverse events in patients who had been converted to sirolimus with rapid protocols as in those with progressive protocols. In the sirolimus group, 23% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events. Graft function remained stable in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS Switching from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus had an antitumoral effect among kidney-transplant recipients with previous squamous-cell carcinoma. These observations may have implications concerning immunosuppressive treatment of patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas. (Funded by Hospices Civils de Lyon and others; TUMORAPA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133887.).

Comparative epidemiologic study of premalignant and malignant epithelial cutaneous lesions developing after kidney and heart transplantation

BACKGROUND Cutaneous carcinomas are the most frequent cancers in organ transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to compare the epidemiologic data of cutaneous premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions in kidney and heart transplant recipients. METHODS A total of 580 kidney and 150 heart transplant recipients were examined for the presence of premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions. RESULTS A twofold increase in incidence of premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions was found in heart compared with kidney transplant recipients. Heart transplant recipients were older at transplantation, received more intense immunosuppressive treatment, and had a shorter delay from transplantation to the development of the first lesion. The squamous cell carcinoma/basal cell carcinoma ratio was 2.37:1 in kidney and 1.08:1 in heart transplant recipients. The extracephalic location represented 60% of the premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions in kidney and 30% in heart transplant recipients. CONCLUSION Cutaneous premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions in kidney and heart transplant recipients show epidemiologic differences that can tentatively be explained by the older age and the more intense immunosuppressive treatment of heart transplant recipients.

INF2 Mutations in Charcot–Marie–Tooth Disease with Glomerulopathy

BACKGROUND Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy has been reported to be associated with renal diseases, mostly focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). However, the common mechanisms underlying the neuropathy and FSGS remain unknown. Mutations in INF2 were recently identified in patients with autosomal dominant FSGS. INF2 encodes a formin protein that interacts with the Rho-GTPase CDC42 and myelin and lymphocyte protein (MAL) that are implicated in essential steps of myelination and myelin maintenance. We therefore hypothesized that INF2 may be responsible for cases of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy associated with FSGS. METHODS We performed direct genotyping of INF2 in 16 index patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy and FSGS who did not have a mutation in PMP22 or MPZ, encoding peripheral myelin protein 22 and myelin protein zero, respectively. Histologic and functional studies were also conducted. RESULTS We identified nine new heterozygous mutations in 12 of the 16 index patients (75%), all located in exons 2 and 3, encoding the diaphanous-inhibitory domain of INF2. Patients presented with an intermediate form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy as well as a glomerulopathy with FSGS on kidney biopsy. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed strong INF2 expression in Schwann-cell cytoplasm and podocytes. Moreover, we demonstrated that INF2 colocalizes and interacts with MAL in Schwann cells. The INF2 mutants perturbed the INF2-MAL-CDC42 pathway, resulting in cytoskeleton disorganization, enhanced INF2 binding to CDC42 and mislocalization of INF2, MAL, and CDC42. CONCLUSIONS INF2 mutations appear to cause many cases of FSGS-associated Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy, showing that INF2 is involved in a disease affecting both the kidney glomerulus and the peripheral nervous system. These findings provide new insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms linking formin proteins to podocyte and Schwann-cell function. (Funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche and others.).

Multivariate analysis of donor risk factors for graft survival in kidney transplantation.

Background. The results of the transplantation of marginal donor kidneys remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of donor risk factors as predictors of kidney-graft outcome. Methods. Allograft failure risk factors were studied in 7,209 cadaveric kidney-transplant recipients reporting to the Etablissement français des Greffes (EfG) from 1996 to 2000, of which 544 (7.6%) were from donors aged over 60. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were used to assess the effect of donor risk factors and were stratified according to recipient age. Results. Overall graft survival was 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.5–91.8) at 1 year, 88.6% (95% CI 87.8–89.4) at 2 years, and 85.6% (95% CI 84.6–86.6) at 3 years posttransplant. Univariate analysis of risk factors showed a significant reduction of graft survival in recipients transplanted with kidneys coming from donors older than 60 years, donors with a history of hypertension, a cerebrovascular cause of death, and a preharvesting serum creatinine greater than 150 &mgr;mol/L. Multivariate analysis revealed significantly higher failure rate associated with cerebrovascular cause of death (RR=1.2, P =0.02), history of hypertension (RR=1.2, P =0.04), and elevated serum creatinine (RR=1.3, P =0.03), whereas donor age greater than 60 years was not found as an independent risk factor. Conclusions. Our results suggest that cerebrovascular cause of death, history of hypertension, and elevated creatinine are significant independent donor risk factors for graft survival, whereas donor age is a statistically significant, but dependent, risk factor. This result is important for the design of allocation and transplantation strategies for kidneys procured in elderly donors.

Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. Methods. This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1–2 mg/kg per day. Results. At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P =0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P =0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P =0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P <0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P =0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P =0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P =0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). Conclusion. Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.

Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma.

Background. The increased incidence of skin cancers in transplant patients is well documented; however, few data exist on the risk of subsequent skin tumors in a given patient after the first skin cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the individual rate of subsequent skin cancers in kidney (KTR) and heart transplant recipients (HTR) after the first squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to assess risk factors for tumor multiplicity. Methods. In all, 188 patients (121 KTR/67 HTR) were studied for up to 5 years. The cumulative number of SCC, basal cell carcinomas, Bowen’s diseases, premalignant keratoses, and keratoacanthomas was recorded yearly after the first SCC. Results. Overall, 71% of patients developed 757 new skin tumors. At 5 years, 100% of HTR and 88% of KTR had presented new tumors. However, the mean number of all tumors was significantly higher in KTR (3.4 vs. 2.0, 4.8 vs. 2.6, 6.6 vs. 2.9, 8.5 vs. 3.5, and 9.7 vs. 4.6 at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively). Transplantation before 1984, multiple tumors at first consultation, eye and hair color, and skin type were predictive of multiple tumors. Early minimization of immunosuppression and of sun exposure tended to be associated with a reduced rate of all tumors and of SCC, respectively. Conclusions. Although the proportion of HTR developing new tumors is greater as compared with KTR, the mean number of tumors per patient is higher in KTR. This could be due to a longer immunosuppression in patients younger at transplantation.

A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients.

Background. Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) reduces the incidence of acute rejection after transplantation. A study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of ATG induction on tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine A (CsA)-based therapies compared with immediate tacrolimus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Methods. In a 6-month, open-label, randomized, prospective study conducted in 30 European centers, 555 renal transplant patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus triple therapy (Tac triple, n=185), ATG induction with tacrolimus (ATG-Tac, n=186), or ATG induction with CsA microemulsion (ATG-CsA, n=184); all were combined with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection episode confirmed by biopsy. Results. Patient demographics and clinical parameters at baseline were similar. Patient and graft survival rates were similar in all groups. The incidence of clinically apparent acute rejection was significantly higher (P =0.003) for Tac triple (33.0%) compared with ATG-Tac (22.6%) and the incidence for ATG-Tac was significantly lower (P =0.004) than for ATG-CsA (37.0%). The incidences of acute rejection confirmed by biopsy (primary endpoint) were 25.4%, 15.1%, and 21.2% for Tac triple, ATG-Tac, and ATG-CsA, respectively (Tac triple vs. ATG-Tac, P =0.004). The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 7.0% (Tac triple), 4.8% (ATG-Tac), and 10.9% (ATG-CsA) (ATG-Tac vs. ATG-CsA, P =0.038). In the ATG groups, the incidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, serum sickness, fever, and cytomegalovirus infection were significantly higher (P <0.05). Conclusions. Acute rejection was significantly lower in the ATG-Tac group compared with the ATG-CsA and Tac triple groups. Significantly more hematologic and infectious adverse events were observed in both ATG induction groups.

Sirolimus Conversion for Patients with Posttransplant Kaposi's Sarcoma

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the benefit of switching from calcineurin inhibitors (CnI) to sirolimus in posttransplant Kaposis sarcoma (KS). Fourteen patients monitored in five French departments who had developed posttransplant KS were switched from CnI to sirolimus either abruptly (n = 9) or progressively (n = 5) with trough levels 5–12 ng/mL. Two patients had a complete remission, eight a partial response, and five no significant improvement of KS. The mean time to response was 3.9 months. After a mean follow‐up of 16 months, 3 partial responders, with previous severe and refractory KS, suffered again from KS progression despite the lack of concomitant infectious or neoplastic event. These relapses occurred 5–9 months after switching. The tolerance of sirolimus has been excellent except for in one patient who developed severe interstitial pneumonitis. Sirolimus is usually useful in the management of posttransplant KS. It may be, however, ineffective or transiently effective in some patients with severe KS. Prospective studies with pharmacodynamic evaluation are important in order to better assess the duration of responses and the mechanisms of primary and acquired drug resistance.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with antiviral agents in solid organ transplantation : a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of antiviral agents to prevent, in solid organ transplant recipients, cytomegalovirus infection and symptomatic disease and to decrease the incidence of acute rejection, graft loss, and death. METHODS Of the studies identified, 13 met the following inclusion criteria: prospective randomized study, in adults or pediatric recipients of a solid organ transplant, where one group in the study received a prophylactic treatment with acyclovir and/or ganciclovir begun before the cytomegalovirus infection and a control group was not treated or receive placebo. RESULTS Prophylactic treatment was found to be associated with a significant decrease of cytomegalovirus disease compared with placebo or no treatment, using the logarithm of relative risk method (relative risk=0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.62; P-value for chi-square association <0.001). Prophylactic treatment decreased also the rate of cytomegalovirus infection (relative risk=0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.88; P<0.001). Our analysis failed to show a significant decrease of graft loss, acute rejection, and death in the prophylactic treatment group. Subgroup analysis based on the type of antiviral agent (acyclovir or ganciclovir) and on the type of organ (kidney or liver) gave comparable results. CONCLUSION The use of antiviral agents for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease and cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation is supported by this meta-analysis.