Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Clare Chambers is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Clare Chambers.


Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy | 2010

Coercive redistribution and public agreement: re‐evaluating the libertarian challenge of charity

Clare Chambers; Philip Parvin

In this article, we evaluate the capacity of liberal egalitarianism to rebut what we call the libertarian challenge of charity. This challenge states that coercive redistributive taxation is neither needed nor justified, since those who endorse redistribution can give charitably, and those who do not endorse redistribution cannot justifiably be coerced. We argue that contemporary developments in liberal political thought render liberalism more vulnerable to this libertarian challenge. Many liberals have, in recent years, sought to recast liberalism such that it is more hospitable to cultural, religious, and ethnic diversity. This move has resulted in increased support for the claim that liberalism should be understood as a political rather than comprehensive doctrine, and that liberal institutions should draw their legitimacy from agreements made among members of an appropriately conceived deliberative community, rather than from controversial liberal principles like individual autonomy. We argue that, while this move may indeed make liberalism more compatible with cultural diversity, it also makes it more vulnerable to the libertarian challenge of charity. Not all versions of liberalism are troubled by the challenge, but those that are troubled by it are increasingly dominant. We also discuss G.A. Cohens claim that liberal equality requires an ‘egalitarian ethos’ and argue that, if Cohen is right, it is difficult to see how there can be an adequate response to the libertarian challenge of charity. In general, our argument can be summarised as follows: the more that liberalism is concerned accurately to model the actual democratic wishes and motivations of the people it governs, the less it is able to justify coercively imposing redistributive principles of justice.


International Feminist Journal of Politics | 2017

Undoing monogamy: the politics of science and the possibilities of biology, by Angela Willey

Clare Chambers

Harrison, Olivia. 2017. “30 Virginia Woolf Photos And Quotes In Celebration Of Her Birthday.” Bust.Com. Accessed January 7. http://bust.com/books/15466-virginia-woolf.html. Särmä, Saara. 2015. Junk Feminism and Nuclear Wannabes. Tampere: Tampereen Yliopisto. Wibben, Annick. 2016. “Whose Academy Is It Anyway? Duck Of Minerva.” Duckofminerva.Com. http:// duckofminerva.com/2016/05/whose-academy.html.


Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy | 2004

Are breast implants better than female genital mutilation? autonomy, gender equality and nussbaum's political liberalism

Clare Chambers


Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) | 2013

VII—The Marriage-Free State

Clare Chambers


Criminal Law and Philosophy | 2008

Torture as an Evil: Response to Claudia Card, “Ticking Bombs and Interrogation”

Clare Chambers


The American journal of jurisprudence | 2018

Reasonable Disagreement and the Neutralist Dilemma: Abortion and circumcision in Matthew Kramer’s Liberalism with Excellence

Clare Chambers


Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume | 2017

II—Ideology and Normativity

Clare Chambers


The Philosophical Quarterly | 2015

Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy

Clare Chambers


Political Theory | 2015

Book Review: Our Bodies, Whose Property?, by Anne Phillips

Clare Chambers


Archive | 2015

Judith Butler, Gender Trouble

Clare Chambers

Collaboration


Dive into the Clare Chambers's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge