Claude Attali

Physicians’ understanding of patients’ personal representations of their diabetes: Accuracy and association with self-care

The degree of accuracy with which physicians understand their patients’ views may be of central importance for promoting self-care in the majority of chronic illnesses and in type 2 diabetes in particular. The objectives of this study were to measure the accuracy of the general practitioners’ understanding of the patients’ views and relate it to health behavioural outcomes in patients with non-complicated type 2 diabetes. The participants in this cross-sectional study consisted of 14 clinicians and 78 of their patients from Paris, France. The predictors were levels of accuracy in understanding the patients’ views derived from the illness perception questionnaire-revised (IPQ-R). The outcomes were patient-reported self-care measures. In regression models controlling for clinical and personal variables, higher accuracy on chronicity beliefs was associated with an improved diet and increased blood glucose self-testing and higher accuracy in identifying treatment control beliefs was associated with better dietary self-care. Accuracy was higher with regard to beliefs about causes, treatment control and consequences. These results suggest that accuracy may impact self-care in specific domains of illness perception but not others. The results may help identify useful avenues of communication training designed for professionals.

Colorectal cancer screening: factors associated with colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood test

Background:Contextual socio-economic factors, health-care access, and general practitioner (GP) involvement may influence colonoscopy uptake and its timing after positive faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Our objectives were to identify predictors of delayed or no colonoscopy and to assess the role for GPs in colonoscopy uptake.Methods:We included all residents of a French district with positive FOBTs (n=2369) during one of the two screening rounds (2007–2010). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify individual and area-level predictors of delayed colonoscopy, no colonoscopy, and no information on colonoscopy.Results:A total of 998 (45.2%) individuals underwent early, 989 (44.8%) delayed, and 102 (4.6%) no colonoscopy; no information was available for 119 (5.4%) individuals. Delayed colonoscopy was independently associated with first FOBT (odds ratio, (OR)), 1.61; 95% confidence interval ((95% CI), 1.16–2.25); and no colonoscopy and no information with first FOBT (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02–3.97), FOBT kit not received from the GP (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.67–3.14), and socio-economically deprived area (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.98–5.08). Colonoscopy uptake varied significantly across GPs (P=0.01).Conclusion:Socio-economic factors, GP-related factors, and history of previous FOBT influenced colonoscopy uptake after a positive FOBT. Interventions should target GPs and individuals performing their first screening FOBT and/or living in socio-economically deprived areas.

Improving participation in colorectal cancer screening: Targets for action

OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine whether physician-related factors influenced patient participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs and to identify patient characteristics associated with lower participation in order to facilitate the development of targeted actions to improve participation. METHOD A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a French department during its first CRC screening campaign from June 2007 to May 2010. Data for 157,766 patients followed by 903 general practitioners (GPs) were analyzed. Patient participation was assessed using multilevel logistic modeling. RESULTS The overall participation rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 29.8-30.2) and varied across the 903 GPs from 0% to 75.5% (median, 30; interquartile range, 24-35). Inter-GP variance explained only 5.5% of the participation rate variance. Participation was significantly lower in males (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91), the youngest age group (55-59 years, OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.63), and patients living in socioeconomically deprived areas (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.87). CONCLUSION Targeted actions to improve CRC screening participation should focus on patients younger than 60 years, males, and individuals living in deprived areas. Actions to enhance the influence of GPs on patient participation should be directed to the overall population of GPs.

Therapeutic management of orally treated type 2 diabetic patients, by French general practitioners in 2010: the DIAttitude Study

AIM To describe the behaviour of French general practitioners (GP) regarding intensification of hypoglycaemic agents in orally treated type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients, according to their HbA(1c) level. METHODS General practitioners were recruited from a panel of office-based general practitioners. T2D patients who had been orally treated for at least 6 months were included in the study; their characteristics were recorded, and their HbA(1c) values and hypoglycaemic treatments over the previous 24 months extracted from electronic records The major reasons for intensification (or no intensification) of hypoglycaemic agents were recorded at the inclusion visit. RESULTS A total of 236 general practitioners recruited 2109 T2D patients: 1732 had at least one HbA(1c) value recorded in the previous 6 months, and 52%, 33% and 14% had been treated, with oral hypoglycaemic agents in monotherapy, bitherapy or tri-or quadritherapy, respectively. Of these patients, 702 (41%) remained uncontrolled (47%, 39% and 20% respectively) and according to the current French guidelines needed treatment intensification. Only 46 (7%) had their treatment intensified at inclusion. Of those without intensified treatment, 60% were treated with monotherapy; the main reason given by the general practitioners for not intensifying treatment was a satisfactory HbA(1c) level (53%), although 32% had an HbA(1c)>7%. Other reasons were: lifestyle advice had greater priority (20%); decision was postponed until the next visit (11%); HbA(1c) had decreased since last visit (7%; not confirmed by available data in 58% of cases); a medical priority other than diabetes (6%) and other reasons related to the patient (3%). CONCLUSION For T2D patients managed by French general practitioners, guidelines are not consistently followed: HbA(1c) should be monitored more frequently and treatment adjusted according to HbA(1c) levels.

Long-term effects of an educational seminar on antibiotic prescribing by GPs: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND High levels of outpatient antibiotic use remain observed in many European countries. Several studies have shown a strong relationship between antibiotic use and bacterial resistance. AIM To assess the long-term effect of a standardised educational seminar on antibiotic prescriptions by GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING Randomised controlled trial of 171 GPs (of 203 initially randomised) in France. METHOD GPs in the control group (n = 99) received no antibiotic prescription recommendation. Intervention group GPs (n = 72) attended an interactive seminar presenting evidence-based guidelines on antibiotic prescription for respiratory infections. The proportion of prescriptions containing an antibiotic in each group and related costs were compared to the baseline up to 30 months following the intervention. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance System database. RESULTS In the intervention group, 4-6 months after the intervention, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of prescriptions containing an antibiotic from 15.2 ± 5.4% to 12.3 ± 5.8% (-2.8% [95% CI = -3.8 to -1.9], P<0.001). By contrast, an increase was observed in controls from 15.3 ± 6.0 to 16.4 ± 6.7% (+1.1% [95% CI = +0.4 to +1.8], P<0.01), resulting in a between-group difference of 3.93% ([95% CI = 2.75 to 5.11], P<0.001). The between-group difference was maintained 30 months after intervention (1.99% [95% CI = 0.56 to 3.42], P<0.01). Persistence of the intervention effect over the entire study period was confirmed in a hierarchical multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION This randomised trial shows that a standardised and interactive educational seminar results in a long-term reduction in antibiotic prescribing and could justify a large-scale implementation of this intervention.

Clinical inertia: viewpoints of general practitioners and diabetologists

Large clinical studies have enabled best practice guidelines to be issued. Intended to serve practitioners in their daily practice, the guidelines are also excellent tools for assessing physician performance. It was therefore demonstrated that despite the observation of insufficient glycaemic control, physicians did not systematically increase drug treatments. As a result, they have been accused of clinical inertia! In this journal, we first try to reveal what is behind this concept and to differentiate true inertia from pseudo inertia. Secondly, we consider how general practitioners and diabetologists, through their respective positions, can develop a synergy that is able to fight against inertia but that can especially, improve the glycaemic control of our patients.

Effects 4.5 years after an interactive GP educational seminar on antibiotic therapy for respiratory tract infections: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND The few studies assessing long-term effects of educational interventions on antibiotic prescription have produced conflicting results. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to assess the effects after 4.5 years of an interactive educational seminar designed for GPs and focused on antibiotic therapy in respiratory tract infections (RTIs). The seminar was expected to decrease antibiotic prescriptions for any diagnosis. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled parallel-group trial in a Paris suburb (France), with GPs as the randomization unit and prescriptions as the analysis unit. The intervention occurred in September 2004 and the final assessment in March 2009. Among 203 randomized GPs, 168 completed the study, 70 in the intervention group and 98 in the control group. Intervention GPs were randomized to attending only a 2-day interactive educational seminar on evidence-based guidelines about managing RTIs or also 1 day of problem-solving training. The primary outcome was the percentage of change in the proportion of prescriptions containing an antibiotic for any diagnosis in 2009 versus 2004. An intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis was performed using multiple imputation. RESULTS After 4.5 years, absolute changes in the primary outcome measure were -1.1% (95% confidence interval: -2.2 to 0.0) in the intervention group and +1.4% (0.3-2.6) in the control group, yielding an adjusted between-group difference of -2.2% (-2.7 to -1.7; P < 0.001). Both intervention modalities had significant effects, and multiple imputation produced similar results. CONCLUSIONS A single, standardized and interactive educational seminar targeting GPs significantly decreased antibiotic use for RTIs after 4.5 years.

Understanding barriers to organized breast cancer screening in France: women's perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge

BACKGROUND The participation rate in organized breast cancer screening in France is lower than recommended. Non-participants either use opportunistic screening or do not use either screening modality. OBJECTIVE To assess any differences in perceptions, attitudes and knowledge related to breast cancer screening between users of opportunistic screening and non-users of any screening mammograms and to identify potential barriers to participation in organized screening. METHODS Six focus groups were conducted in May 2010 with 34 French non-participants in organized screening, 15 who used opportunistic screening (OpS group) and 19 who used no screening (NoS group). The guide used for both groups explored perceptions and attitudes related to health, cancer and screening; perceptions of femininity; and knowledge about breast cancer screening. Thematic content analysis was performed. RESULTS Perceptions, attitudes and knowledge differed between the two groups. Women in the OpS group perceived a high susceptibility to breast cancer, visited their gynaecologist regularly, were unfamiliar with organized screening modalities and had doubts about its quality. NoS women had very high- or low-perceived susceptibility to breast cancer, knew about screening modalities, had doubts about its usefulness and expressed negative opinions of mammograms. CONCLUSIONS Differences in perceptions and attitudes related to breast cancer screening partially explain why some women choose opportunistic screening or no screening. General practitioners and gynaecologists are in a unique position to provide individually tailored preventative messages to improve participation in organized screening.

« Arrêtez de tirer sur le pianiste ! »* Le point de vue du médecin généraliste sur l’inertie thérapeutique*

Resume La preoccupation croissante d’apporter des soins de la meilleure qualite possible aux patients a ete a l’origine de la mise en place durant les dernieres decennies de mesures visant a ameliorer les pratiques des medecins. L’evaluation des pratiques medicales s’est imposee comme un recours adequat et le constat d’un ecart entre les pratiques et les recommandations est devenu un espace de reflexion privilegie. L’inertie therapeutique est au coeur de ce debat et dans la mesure ou l’on manque actuellement d’outils qualitatifs pertinents pour comprendre les raisons profondes de la dite inertie, il faut etre particulierement mefiant avec les raisons parfois trop simplistes evoquees pour expliquer ce constat et avec les solutions ne tenant souvent pas compte de la personne malade pour offrir en toutes circonstances des soins de qualite. C’est l’analyse des situations concretes qui permet de differentier l’inertie vraie des pseudos inerties et de proposer des systemes d’action visant un impact reel sur l’amelioration de la qualite des soins des patients diabetiques, qui ne sont le plus souvent pas seulement que des diabetiques. L’approche centree sur le patient semble etre actuellement la seule capable de prendre reellement en compte a la fois la globalite et la complexite des situations que le medecin generaliste a a gerer quotidiennement. Une cause d’inertie vraie est la routine et la banalisation des « situations problemes » par le couple medecin patient qui incite a ne pas modifier les habitudes des uns et des autres. Une piste de travail interessante pour combattre cette inertie est d’ameliorer la reflexivite des medecins. La question se pose alors de l’evaluation de la reflexivite dans l’evaluation des pratiques medicales.

Efficacy of nurse-led and general practitioner-led comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: protocol of a pragmatic three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (CEpiA study)

Introduction Older patients raise therapeutic challenges, because they constitute a heterogeneous population with multimorbidity. To appraise this complexity, geriatricians have developed a multidimensional comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), which may be difficult to apply in primary care settings. Our primary objective was to compare the effect on morbimortality of usual care compared with two complex interventions combining educational seminars about CGA: a dedicated geriatric hotline for general practitioners (GPs) and CGA by trained nurses or GPs. Methods and analysis The Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing study is an open-label, pragmatic, multicentre, three-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing two intervention groups and one control group. Patients must be 70 years or older with a long-term illness or with unscheduled hospitalisation in the past 3 months (750 patients planned). This study involves volunteering GPs practising in French primary care centres, with randomisation at the practice level. The multifaceted interventions for interventional arms comprise an educational interactive multiprofessional seminar for GPs and nurses, a geriatric hotline dedicated to GPs in case of difficulties and the performance of a CGA updated to primary care. The CGA is systematically performed by a nurse in arm 1 but is GP-led on a case-by-case basis in arm 2. The primary endpoint is a composite criterion comprising overall death, unscheduled hospitalisations, emergency admissions and institutionalisation within 12 months after inclusion. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed using mixed-effects logistic regression models, with adjustment for potential confounders. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was approved by an appropriate ethics committee (CPP Ile-de-France IV, Paris, France, approval April 2015;15 664). This study is conducted according to principles of good clinical practice in the context of current care and will provide useful knowledge on the clinical benefits achievable by CGA in primary care. Trial registration number NCT02664454; Pre-results.