Claude Fabre-Nys

Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone is a hypothalamic peptide that provides a molecular switch between reproduction and feeding

Objective: Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH)-3 is a neuropeptide that plays a major role in the regulation of reproduction and feeding in mammals. Materials and Methods: We measured endocrine and behavioural parameters of reproduction in sheep, and sexual behaviour in sheep, mice and cynomolgus monkeys. In addition, GnIH gene expression (in situ hybridization) was examined in ewes, and effects of GnIH-3 on food intake and energy expenditure were measured in various species. GnIH-3 was infused (i.v.) into ewes after an i.m. injection of estradiol benzoate to determine whether the peptide blocks the surge in luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. Results: GnIH gene expression was reduced in the preovulatory period in ewes. Infusion (i.v.) of GnIH-3 blocked the estrogen-induced LH surge (in ewes). Intracerebroventricular infusion had no effect on female or male sexual behaviour in each of the three species, but increased food intake. There were no effects on energy expenditure in sheep or rats. GnIH increased fos protein (immunohistochemistry) was seen in orexigenic neurons (in sheep and rats), but also in anorexigenic neurons (in sheep). Conclusions: GnIH-3 reduces reproductive hormone levels and increases food intake in mammals without reducing energy expenditure. There is minimal effect on reproductive behaviour. The dual effect on reproduction and feeding suggests that GnIH-3 provides a molecular switch between these two functions. Blockade of the positive feedback effect of estrogen with parenteral infusion indicates that this peptide may have utility as a blocker of reproductive function in mammals.

Hormonal control of proceptive and receptive sexual behavior and the preovulatory LH surge in the ewe : reassessment of the respective roles of estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone

When estrous behavior is induced in ovariectomized ewes by subjecting them to progestagen priming followed by a dose of estrogen large enough to guarantee estrus in all animals, an abnormally long period of estrus in induced, suggesting that the regime of steroid replacement needs modification. Using quantitative tests for proceptivity and receptivity, we studied the patterns of sexual behavior of intact ewes and then attempted to reproduce them in the same animals after they had been ovariectomized. We used various combinations of exogenous estrogen, androgen, and progestagen and compared the behavioral responses with an endocrine response, the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH). In intact ewes, sexual behavior and the LH surge were closely synchronized and their characteristics differed slightly between the middle and the end of the breeding season. Proceptive behavior was not greatly affected by the frequency of tests, but the duration of receptivity was significantly reduced by frequent testing. In ovariectomized ewes, we found that: (a) progesterone priming is essential for normal patterns of receptive and proceptive behavior, and for synchronizing the behavioral and endocrine responses to estrogen; (b) androgens do not play a major role in the control of either receptive or proceptive behavior; and (c) the inclusion of a low dose of estrogen with the progestagen in the priming regime improves the responses to estradiol-17 beta. Under these conditions, the timing, intensity and duration of the behavior are very close to those observed in the same ewes when they were intact and cycling spontaneously.

Regulation by Estradiol of Hypothalamic Somatostatin Gene Expression: Possible Involvement of Somatostatin in the Control of Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in the Ewe

Abstract In the ewe, the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) is the primary central site for estradiol to generate the preovulatory GnRH/LH surges and sexual behavior. This area contains numerous neurons expressing the estradiol receptor alpha, distributed in the ventromedial nucleus (VMN) and the infundibular nucleus (IN). A large proportion of these neurons express somatostatin, making this neuropeptide a potential candidate for transmission of the estradiol signal to the GnRH neurons located in the preoptic area. We tested this hypothesis using ovariectomized ewes that had been subjected to an artificial estrous cycle. In the first experiment, 22 h after progesterone removal, ewes received estradiol (treated ewes) or empty implants (control ewes) for 4 h and then were killed. Using in situ hybridization, we showed that this short estradiol treatment increased the somatostatin mRNA amount by about 50% in the VMN and 42% in the IN. In the second experiment, preovulatory estradiol signal was replaced by somatostatin intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration. This treatment abolished LH pulsatility and dramatically decreased the mean basal level of LH secretion while it did not affect the mean plasma GH concentration. We demonstrated that an increase in somatostatin mRNA occurs at the time of the negative feedback effect of estradiol on LH secretion during the early stage of the GnRH surge induction. As ICV somatostatin administration inhibits the pulsatile LH secretion by acting on the central nervous system, we suggest that somatostatin synthesized in the MBH could be involved in the estradiol negative feedback before the onset of the preovulatory surge.

Inhibition of sexual behaviour and the luteinizing hormone surge by intracerebral progesterone implants in the female sheep

In female sheep, progesterone blocks the induction by oestradiol of both sexual behaviour and the pre-ovulatory surges of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinising hormone (LH). However, the central sites of action of progesterone remain poorly defined, so we attempted to locate them by implanting progesterone intracerebrally in ovariectomised ewes treated with exogenous steroids to induce oestrous behaviour and the LH surge. Single bilateral implants or a double bilateral implants filled with progesterone or cholesterol were placed in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) or the preoptic area (POA). Control ewes were not implanted. To determine the inhibitory capacity of the central progesterone implants, ewes received an injection (i.m.) of 8 micrograms or 16 micrograms of oestradiol. The single bilateral implants of progesterone failed to block oestrous behaviour and the LH surge induced by 8 micrograms of oestradiol. Double bilateral progesterone implants in the VMH blocked the sexual behaviour (P < 0.05) and the LH surge (P < 0.05), but implants in the POA blocked only sexual receptivity (P < 0.05). No changes were observed after central implantation of cholesterol. Our results support the hypothesis that progesterone acts centrally in the VMH and the POA to inhibit the induction of LH surge and sexual behaviour by oestradiol.

Ovarian parameters and fertility of dairy cows selected for one QTL located on BTA3

Recently, one Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) of female fertility located on Bos Taurus chromosome 3 (BTA3), QTL-F-Fert-BTA3, has been identified in Holstein breed. It is implied in the success rate after the first AI (AI1) in cow. The failure of pregnancy can be due to several factors involved in the different steps of the reproductive process. The aim of our study was to finely phenotype heifers and primiparous cows selected for their haplotype at the QTL-F-Fert-BTA3. We specifically studied the ovarian follicular dynamic and several fertility parameters. Females carrying the favourable haplotype fertil+ or unfavourable haplotype fertil- were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography during their cycle before the first AI (AI1). Follicular dynamic was similar between the two groups. However, the length of the estrus cycle was shorter in heifers than in primiparous cows and two-wave cycles were shorter than three-wave cycles, regardless of the age and the haplotype. The concentration of plasma anti-Müllerian hormone was correlated with the number of small antral follicles. It was higher in heifers than in primiparous cows, independently of their haplotype. The success rate at the AI1 was significantly higher in fertil+ than in fertil- primiparous cows, 35 d after the AI1 (70% vs 39%). In both haplotypes, pregnancy failure occurred mainly before 21 d after AI1. The commencement of luteal activity after calving was significantly earlier in fertil+ than in fertil- primiparous cows. Calving-AI1 and calving-calving intervals were similar between fertil+ and fertil- primiparous cows. Taken together, fertil+ and fertil- primiparous cows present a difference in the success rate after AI1 that is not explained by variations of ovarian dynamics.

The “ram effect”: new insights into neural modulation of the gonadotropic axis by male odors and socio-sexual interactions

Reproduction in mammals is controlled by the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis under the influence of external and internal factors such as photoperiod, stress, nutrition, and social interactions. Sheep are seasonal breeders and stop mating when day length is increasing (anestrus). However, interactions with a sexually active ram during this period can override the steroid negative feedback responsible for the anoestrus state, stimulate luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and eventually reinstate cyclicity. This is known as the “ram effect” and research into the mechanisms underlying it is shedding new light on HPG axis regulation. The first step in the ram effect is increased LH pulsatile secretion in anestrus ewes exposed to a sexually active male or only to its fleece, the latter finding indicating a “pheromone-like” effect. Estradiol secretion increases in all ewes and this eventually induces a LH surge and ovulation, just as during the breeding season. An exception is a minority of ewes that exhibit a precocious LH surge (within 4 h) with no prior increase in estradiol. The main olfactory system and the cortical nucleus of the amygdala are critical brain structures in mediating the ram effect since it is blocked by their inactivation. Sexual experience is also important since activation (increased c-fos expression) in these and other regions is greatly reduced in sexually naïve ewes. In adult ewes kisspeptin neurons in both arcuate and preoptic regions and some preoptic GnRH neurons are activated 2 h after exposure to a ram. Exposure to rams also activates noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus and A1 nucleus and increased noradrenalin release occurs in the posterior preoptic area. Pharmacological modulation of this system modifies LH secretion in response to the male or his odor. Together these results show that the ram effect can be a fruitful model to promote both a better understanding of the neural and hormonal regulation of the HPG axis in general and also the specific mechanisms by which male cues can overcome negative steroid feedback and trigger LH release and ovulatory cycles.

The "Ram Effect": A "Non-Classical" Mechanism for Inducing LH Surges in Sheep.

During spring sheep do not normally ovulate but exposure to a ram can induce ovulation. In some ewes an LH surge is induced immediately after exposure to a ram thus raising questions about the control of this precocious LH surge. Our first aim was to determine the plasma concentrations of oestradiol (E2) E2 in anoestrous ewes before and after the “ram effect” in ewes that had a “precocious” LH surge (starting within 6 hours), a “normal” surge (between 6 and 28h) and “late» surge (not detected by 56h). In another experiment we tested if a small increase in circulating E2 could induce an LH surge in anoestrus ewes. The concentration of E2 significantly was not different at the time of ram introduction among ewes with the three types of LH surge. “Precocious” LH surges were not preceded by a large increase in E2 unlike “normal” surges and small elevations of circulating E2 alone were unable to induce LH surges. These results show that the “precocious” LH surge was not the result of E2 positive feedback. Our second aim was to test if noradrenaline (NA) is involved in the LH response to the “ram effect”. Using double labelling for Fos and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) we showed that exposure of anoestrous ewes to a ram induced a higher density of cells positive for both in the A1 nucleus and the Locus Coeruleus complex compared to unstimulated controls. Finally, the administration by retrodialysis into the preoptic area, of NA increased the proportion of ewes with an LH response to ram odor whereas treatment with the α1 antagonist Prazosin decreased the LH pulse frequency and amplitude induced by a sexually active ram. Collectively these results suggest that in anoestrous ewes NA is involved in ram-induced LH secretion as observed in other induced ovulators.

Onset of the preovulatory LH surge and of oestrus in intact ewes: Night is a preferred period

Oestrous cycles were induced in seasonally anoestrous ewes by introducing rams into the flock and giving to the ewes one intramuscular injection of 20 mg progesterone. At the second ovulation the onset of oestrus and the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) were recorded. It was found that the LH surge began in significantly more ewes during the night (79%) than during the day (21%). The onset of oestrus tended to follow a similar pattern. This temporal pattern was not related to the time of ram introduction, but may be the result of daily rhythms in ovarian activity. Furthermore, a preferred period for the LH surge indicates a preferred period for ovulation and this may be important in deciding when to begin artificial insemination.

Noradrenaline concentrations in the hypothalamus of anoestrus ewes following the ram-induced luteinizing hormone release.

Sheep are seasonal breeders, but exposure of anoestrus ewes to rams results in a rapid increase in luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, eventually leading to surge in LH. Although LH secretion is known to be under the control of many neurotransmitters, noradrenaline (NA) is of particular importance for the LH surge in induced ovulators, although little is known about its role in LH secretion induced by males in spontaneous ovulators. To address this question, anoestrus ewes fitted with guide-tubes in the medial preoptic area (MPOA) or the ventromedial hypothalamus were subjected to microdialysis and blood sampling every 15u2009min for an hour before and 2u2009h after exposure to rams, and the concentrations of LH, monoamine and amino acid transmitters were measured. In ewes implanted in the posterior MPOA that responded to the ram by an increase in LH pulses, NA concentrations changed after exposure to the ram (P<0.018) and were higher at 15 (P<0.054) and 45u2009min (P<0.03) after male introduction than before. By contrast, no change in NA could be detected in ewes implanted in the same region, but not responding to the ram, or in those showing increased LH pulsatility, but implanted in the anterior MPOA or in the ventromedial hypothalamus. No changes were observed in other neurotransmitters or when the ewes were exposed to male odour alone. These results suggest that NA release in the posterior MPOA is selectively involved in the triggering of LH secretion by rams in anoestrus ewes.

Contents Vol. 95, 2012

D.H. Abbott, Madison, Wisc. H. Ahlman, Gothenburg E. Arzt, Buenos Aires T. Bartness, Atlanta, Ga. C.L. Bethea, Beaverton, Oreg. D.W. Brann, Augusta, Ga. B. Canny, Monash, Vic. M. Caplin, London K. Catt, Bethesda, Md. A. Chodobski, Providence, R.I. W. de Herder, Rotterdam S.L. Dickson, Gothenburg J. Drouin, Montreal, Que. P.J. Enriori, Monash, Vic. W. Farrell, Keele M. Freeman, Tallahasse, Fla. A.C. Gore, Austin, Tex. K. Grove, Beaverton, Oreg. T. Harmar, Edinburgh A. Herbison, Dunedin J. Herman, Cincinnati, Ohio J.J. Hirst, Callaghan, N.S.W. T. Hökfelt, Stockholm U. Kaiser, Boston, Mass. A. Kauff man, La Jolla, Calif. K. Kim, Seoul J.Z. Kiss, Geneva A.C. Latronico, São Paulo G. Leng, Edinburgh J. Levine, Evanston, Ill. C. Libertun, Buenos Aires C. Llorens-Cortes, Paris A. Loudon, Manchester Z.-L. Lu, Edinburgh G. Martinez de la Escalera, Querétaro R. Melcangi, Milano I. Modlin, New Haven, Conn. Z. Naor, Tel Aviv M. Palkovits, Budapest I. Parhar, Kuala Lumpur D.W. Pfaff , New York, N.Y. T.M. Plant, Pittsburgh, Pa. J. Reul, Bristol R. Reynolds, Edinburgh E. Rissman, Charlottesville, Va. J.L. Roberts, San Antonio, Tex. I. Robinson, London P. Ruszniewski, Clichy W. Schlegel, Geneva D. Skinner, Laramie, Wyo. E. Spinedi, La Plata R. Steiner, Seattle, Wash. E. Terasawa, Madison, Wisc. A. Tilbrook, Roseworthy, S.A. B. Walker, Edinburgh H. Watanobe, Chiba M. Wierman, Denver, Colo. J. Wingfi eld, Seattle, Wash. S. Wray, Bethesda, Md. International Journal for Basic and Clinical Studies on Neuroendocrine Relationships