Claudia Maria Hattinger

Overcoming glutathione S-transferase P1-related cisplatin resistance in osteosarcoma.

Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, CDDP) is one of the most used drugs for osteosarcoma chemotherapy. By using a series of CDDP-resistant variants, which were established from the U-2OS and Saos-2 human osteosarcoma cell lines, we found that CDDP resistance was mainly associated with the increase of both the intracellular level and enzymatic activity of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1). On the basis of these findings, we evaluated the clinical effect of GSTP1 in a series of 34 high-grade osteosarcoma patients and we found that the increased expression of GSTP1 gene was associated with a significantly higher relapse rate and a worse clinical outcome. These indications prompted us to assess the in vitro effectiveness of 6-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-ylthio)hexanol (NBDHEX), a promising new anticancer agent that is a highly efficient inhibitor of GSTP1. NBDHEX was tested on a panel of 10 human osteosarcoma cell lines and 20 variants of the U-2OS or Saos-2 cell lines that were resistant to CDDP, doxorubicin, or methotrexate. NBDHEX proved to be very active on the vast majority of these cell lines, including those with higher GSTP1 levels and enzymatic activity. Drug combination studies showed that NBDHEX can be used in association with CDDP and provided useful information about the best modality of their combined administration. In conclusion, our findings show that GSTP1 has a relevant effect for both CDDP resistance and clinical outcome of high-grade osteosarcoma and that targeting GSTP1 with NBDHEX may be considered a promising new therapeutic possibility for osteosarcoma patients who fail to respond to conventional chemotherapy.

Emerging drugs for high-grade osteosarcoma.

Importance of the field: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in children and adolescents. This review focuses on the most promising therapeutic markers and drugs which may potentially be considered for innovative high-grade OS treatments. Areas covered in this review: The list of drugs and compounds reviewed has been generated by taking into account those which target markers of potential clinical interest for high-grade OS and have been included in Phase I, II or III clinical trials. The literature search covers the last 40 years, starting from the first OS chemotherapy reports of the early 1970s. Particular relevance was given to reports and reviews on new targeted therapies of possible clinical usefulness for high-grade OS. What the reader will gain: This review gives an updated overview of novel therapeutic approaches which have been or are going to be evaluated in Phase I/II/III clinical studies for high-grade OS. Take home message: On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it can be predicted that in the next 5 – 10 years, new agents to be included in innovative treatment strategies for selected subgroups of high-grade OS patients may become available.

Advances in emerging drugs for osteosarcoma

Introduction: Osteosarcoma (OS), the most common primary malignant bone tumor, is currently treated with pre- and postoperative chemotherapy in association with the surgical removal of the tumor. Conventional treatments allow to cure about 60 – 65% of patients with primary tumors and only 20 – 25% of patients with recurrent disease. New treatment approaches and drugs are therefore highly warranted to improve prognosis. Areas covered: This review focuses on the therapeutic approaches that are under development or clinical evaluation in OS. Information was obtained from different and continuously updated data bases, as well as from literature searches, in which particular relevance was given to reports and reviews on new targeted therapies under clinical investigation in high-grade OS. Expert opinion: OS is a heterogeneous tumor, with a great variability in treatment response between patients. It is therefore unlikely that a single therapeutic tool will be uniformly successful for all OS patients. This claims for the validation of new treatment approaches together with biologic/(pharmaco)genetic markers, which may select the most appropriate subgroup of patients for each treatment approach. Since some promising novel agents and treatment strategies are currently tested in Phase I/II/III clinical trials, we may hope that new therapies with superior efficacy and safety profiles will be identified in the next few years.

Array comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent alterations of G1/S checkpoint genes in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone.

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone (UPSb) is a rare tumor often difficult to differentiate from fibrosarcoma of bone (FSb), diagnostically. We applied array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) to screen for genes with potential importance in the tumor and compared the results with alterations seen in FSb. Twenty‐two fresh frozen tissue specimens from 20 patients (18 primary tumors and 4 local recurrences) with UPSb were studied. DNA was isolated and hybridized onto Agilent 244K CGH oligoarrays. The hybridization data were analyzed using Agilent DNA Analytics Software. The number of changes ranged from 2 to 168 (average = 66). Losses were most frequently seen at 8p, 9p, 10, 13q, and 18q, and gains at 4q, 5p, 6p, 7p, 8q, 12p, 14q, 17q, 19p, 20q, 22q, and X. Homozygous deletions of CDKN2A, RB1, TP53, and ING1 were seen in 8/20, 7/20, 3/20, and 2/20 cases, respectively. Hypermethylation of both p16INK4a and p14ARF was found in two cases with loss at CDKN2A. Inactivation either of CDKN2A, RB1, or TP53 was detected in 18/20 cases. One case showed high level gains of CDK4 and MDM2. Frequent gains were seen at MYC, PDGFRA, KIT, and KDR. Immunohistochemical positivity of KIT, PDGFRA, KDR, and PDGFRB was found in 8/14, 5/14, 4/14, and 4/14 cases, respectively. The regions most significantly discriminating between UPSb and FSb included RB1 and MYC. No homozygous deletions of RB1 were found in FSb. In conclusion, our analysis showed the disruption of G1/S checkpoint regulation to be crucial for the oncogenesis of UPSb.

Preclinical validation of Aurora kinases-targeting drugs in osteosarcoma

Background:Aurora kinases are key regulators of cell cycle and represent new promising therapeutic targets in several human tumours.Methods:Biological relevance of Aurora kinase-A and -B was assessed on osteosarcoma clinical samples and by silencing these genes with specific siRNA in three human osteosarcoma cell lines. In vitro efficacy of two Aurora kinases-targeting drugs (VX-680 and ZM447439) was evaluated on a panel of four drug-sensitive and six drug-resistant human osteosarcoma cell lines.Results:Human osteosarcoma cell lines proved to be highly sensitive to both drugs. A decreased drug sensitivity was observed in doxorubicin-resistant cell lines, most probably related to ABCB1/MDR1 overexpression. Both drugs variably induced hyperploidy and apoptosis in the majority of cell lines. VX-680 also reduced in vitro cell motility and soft-agar cloning efficiency. Drug association experiments showed that VX-680 positively interacts with all conventional drugs used in osteosarcoma chemotherapy, overcoming the cross-resistance observed in the single-drug treatments.Conclusion:Aurora kinase-A and -B represent new candidate therapeutic targets for osteosarcoma. In vitro analysis of the Aurora kinases inhibitors VX-680 and ZM447439 indicated in VX-680 a new promising drug of potential clinical usefulness in association with conventional osteosarcoma chemotherapeutic agents.

Fine-mapping of cytogenetically undetectable EWS/ERG fusions on DNA fibers of Ewing tumors

In contrast to the EWS/FLI1 fusion which is represented by a t(11;22)(q24;q12), EWS/ERG fusions are frequently cytogenetically not detectable. Three Ewing tumors (ET), two with apparently normal chromosomes 21 and 22, and one ET with a t(2;22)(p25;q12), were studied by FISH on interphase nuclei, metaphase chromosomes and on DNA fibers. EWS/ERG transcripts were detected by RT-PCR in all cases. FISH, using cosmids located proximally (F10, G9) and distally (F7) to the EWS breakpoint region, revealed no detectable separation of these probes in two cases. In contrast, co-hybridization of probe PT1526 containing the ERG breakpoint region with G9 revealed the juxtaposition of two signals per interphase nucleus in all three cases indicating the EWS/ERG fusions. Chromosome preparations displayed the juxtaposed signals on the der(22), and hybridization signals of the probes PT1526 and G9 on the non-rearranged chromosomes 21 and 22 in all cases, respectively. The PT1526 signal on the der(21) was seen only in cases 1 and 2. These results were confirmed by triple-target FISH on tumor DNA fibers. In all three cases, the hybridization pattern F10 – G9 – PT1526 indicates a centromere to telomere orientation. This finding suggests that EWS/ERG fusions in ETs may be generated by an inversion of the ERG gene or a part thereof followed by an insertion into the EWS gene on the der(22). Double-target FISH on interphase nuclei using probes flanking the EWS breakpoint region and probe PT1526 enables the detection of virtually all 22q12 rearrangements in ETs, thus providing a reliable diagnostic assay.

H2S-Donating Doxorubicins May Overcome Cardiotoxicity and Multidrug Resistance

Doxorubicin (DOXO) is one of the most effective antineoplastic agents in clinical practice. Its use is limited by acute and chronic side effects, in particular by its cardiotoxicity and by the rapid development of resistance to it. As part of a program aimed at developing new DOXO derivatives endowed with reduced cardiotoxicity, and active against DOXO-resistant tumor cells, a series of H2S-releasing DOXOs (H2S-DOXOs) were obtained by combining DOXO with appropriate H2S donor substructures. The resulting compounds were studied on H9c2 cardiomyocytes and in DOXO-sensitive U-2OS osteosarcoma cells, as well as in related cell variants with increasing degrees of DOXO-resistance. Differently from DOXO, most of the products were not toxic at 5 μM concentration on H9c2 cells. A few of them triggered high activity on the cancer cells. H2S-DOXOs 10 and 11 emerged as the most interesting members of the series. The capacity of 10 to impair Pgp transporter is also discussed.

Role of pharmacogenetics of drug-metabolizing enzymes in treating osteosarcoma

Introduction: Drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) biotransform several toxins and xenobiotics in both tumor and normal cells, resulting in either their detoxification or their activation. Since DMEs also metabolize several chemotherapeutic drugs, they can significantly influence tumor response to chemotherapy and susceptibility of normal tissues to collateral toxicity of anticancer treatments. Areas covered: This review discusses the pharmacogenetics of DMEs involved in the metabolism of drugs which constitute the backbone of osteosarcoma (OS) chemotherapy, highlighting what is presently known for this tumor and their possible impact on the modulation of future treatment approaches. Expert opinion: Achieving further insight into pharmacogenetic markers and biological determinants related to treatment response in OS may ultimately lead to individualized treatment regimens, based on a combination of genotype and tumor characteristics of each patient.

Targeting ABCB1 and ABCC1 with their Specific Inhibitor CBT-1® can Overcome Drug Resistance in Osteosarcoma.

Clinical treatment response achievable with conventional chemotherapy in high-grade osteosarcoma (OS) is severely limited by the presence of intrinsic or acquired drug resistance, which in previous studies has been mainly addressed for overexpression of ABCB1 (MDR1/P-glycoprotein). This study was aimed to estimate the impact on OS drug resistance of a group of ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which in other human tumors have been associated with unresponsiveness to the drugs that represent the backbone of multidrug treatment regimens for OS (doxorubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin). By using a group of 6 drug-sensitive and 20 drug-resistant human OS cell lines, the most relevant transporter which proved to be associated with the degree of drug resistance in OS cells, in addition to ABCB1, was ABCC1. We therefore evaluated the in vitro activity of the orally administrable ABCB1/ABCC1 inhibitor CBT-1(®) (Tetrandrine, NSC-77037). We found that in our OS cell lines this agent was able to revert the ABCB1/ABCC1-mediated resistance against doxorubicin, as well as against the drugs used in second-line OS treatments that are substrates of these transporters (taxotere, etoposide, vinorelbine). Our findings indicated that inhibiting ABCB1 and ABCC1 with CBT-1(®), used in association with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, may become an interesting new therapeutic option for unresponsive or relapsed OS patients.

Frequent deletion of CDKN2A and recurrent coamplification of KIT, PDGFRA, and KDR in fibrosarcoma of bone--an array comparative genomic hybridization study.

Very little is known about the genetics of fibrosarcoma (FS) of bone. We applied array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to identify genes and genomic regions with potential role in the pathogenesis of this tumor. Seventeen patients with FS of bone were included in the study. Array CGH analysis was carried out in 13 fresh frozen tissue specimens from 11 of these patients (nine primary tumors and four local recurrences). DNA was extracted and hybridizations were performed on Agilent 244K CGH oligoarrays. The data were analyzed using Agilent DNA Analytics Software. The number of changes per patient ranged from 0 to 132 (average = 43). Losses were most commonly detected at 6q, 8p, 9p, 10, 13q, and 20p. CDKN2A was homozygously deleted in 7/11 patients. Hypermethylation of both p16INK4a and p14ARF was found in 1/14 patients. An internal deletion of STARD13 was found in a region with common losses at 13q13.1. The most frequent gains were seen at 1q, 4q, 5p, 8q, 12p, 15q, 16q, 17q, 20q, 22q, and Xp. Single recurrent high level amplification was detected at 4q12, including KIT, PDGFRA, and KDR. No activating mutations were found in any of them. Immunohistochemistry revealed expression of PDGFRA and/or PDGFRB in 12/17 samples. Moreover, small regions of gains pinpointed genes of particular interest, such as IGF1R at 15q26.3 and CHD1L at 1q21.1. In conclusion, our analysis provided novel findings that can be exploited when searching for markers for diagnosis and prognosis, and targets of therapy in this tumor type.