Claudia Schumacher

Benchmarking the quality of breast cancer care in a nationwide voluntary system: the first five-year results (2003–2007) from Germany as a proof of concept

BackgroundThe main study objectives were: to establish a nationwide voluntary collaborative network of breast centres with independent data analysis; to define suitable quality indicators (QIs) for benchmarking the quality of breast cancer (BC) care; to demonstrate existing differences in BC care quality; and to show that BC care quality improved with benchmarking from 2003 to 2007.MethodsBC centres participated voluntarily in a scientific benchmarking procedure. A generic XML-based data set was developed and used for data collection. Nine guideline-based quality targets serving as rate-based QIs were initially defined, reviewed annually and modified or expanded accordingly. QI changes over time were analysed descriptively.ResultsDuring 2003–2007, respective increases in participating breast centres and postoperatively confirmed BCs were from 59 to 220 and from 5,994 to 31,656 (> 60% of new BCs/year in Germany). Starting from 9 process QIs, 12 QIs were developed by 2007 as surrogates for long-term outcome. Results for most QIs increased. From 2003 to 2007, the most notable increases seen were for preoperative histological confirmation of diagnosis (58% (in 2003) to 88% (in 2007)), appropriate endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive patients (27 to 93%), appropriate radiotherapy after breast-conserving therapy (20 to 79%) and appropriate radiotherapy after mastectomy (8 to 65%).ConclusionNationwide external benchmarking of BC care is feasible and successful. The benchmarking system described allows both comparisons among participating institutions as well as the tracking of changes in average quality of care over time for the network as a whole. Marked QI increases indicate improved quality of BC care.

Abstract S5-03: Final analysis of WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR+ phase II trial: Efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12-weeks of neoadjuvant TDM1 with or without endocrine therapy versus trastuzumab+endocrine therapy in HER2-positive hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer

Background: In HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC) pCR rates after standard neoadjuvant chemo- + anti-HER2 therapy differ according to hormone-receptor (HR) status. Molecular analysis reveals HER2+/HR+ BC as a distinct entity within HER2+ BC. The ADAPT HER2+/HR+ phase II trial aims to identify early responders to endocrine + anti-HER2 therapy. Methods: The trial completed recruitment in January 2015 (n=376). Patients (pts.) were randomized to 12 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy: A:T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg q3w) vs. B:T-DM1 with endocrine therapy (ET) (pre-: tamoxifen; postmenopausal: aromatase inhibitor) vs C:trastuzumab q3w+ET. After surgery, standard chemotherapy at investigators9 discretion and completion of 1y trastuzumab were recommended. Trial tests pCR (yPN0 and ypT0/is) in after T-DM1 or T-DM1+ET compared to T+ET. Biomarkers are measured at baseline and after 3 weeks. Results: Pre-planned interim analysis (n=130) aimed to identify an early-response biomarker (e.g. Ki-67 drop) and to validate trial assumptions. Median age was 49 years; 55% were pre-menopausal; 40% had cT1 tumors, 51% cT2; 68% had cN0, 27% cN1; 75% had G3. Median baseline Ki67 was 30%. In all arms, more than 95% received all 4 therapy cycles. 16 SAEs were reported in 13 pts (A:7; B:6; C:3); all CTC grade 1 (1), 2 (11) or 3 (4); all pts completely recovered without sequelae. Overall pCR rate was 30.8%: T-DM1: 40.5%, T-DM1+ET: 45.8%, T+ET: 6.7%. The difference between either arm T-DM1 arm vs. T+ET was significant (p Conclusions: The WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR+ phase II trial is internationally the first large prospective randomized phase II trial specifically conducted within this distinct subtype. Interim analysis demonstrated for the first time clinically meaningful pCR rates (>40%) after short therapy (12 weeks) of T-DM1 ± ET without systemic chemotherapy in HER2+/HR+ eBC. Final efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting together with results of the correlative science program. Citation Format: Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Braun M, Kuemmel S, Schumacher C, Potenberg J, Kraemer S, Kleine-Tebbe A, Augustin D, Aktas B, Forstbauer H, Tio J, Liedtke C, Kates RE, Wuerstlein R, de Haas SL, Kiermaier A, Kreipe HH, Nitz U. Final analysis of WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR+ phase II trial: Efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12-weeks of neoadjuvant TDM1 with or without endocrine therapy versus trastuzumab+endocrine therapy in HER2-positive hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-03.

Abstract S6-07: Comparison of 12 weeks neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatinum vs. gemcitabine in triple- negative breast cancer: WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in TNBC, but optimal chemotherapy remains unclear. Use of weekly nab- paclitaxel (Nab-Pac) vs. conventional paclitaxel and also addition of carboplatinum(Carbo) to anthracycline-taxane(A/T) containing chemotherapy results in significantly higher pCR rates in TNBC with unclear impact on survival and increased toxicity. The ADAPT study seeks to compare Carbo vs. gemcitabine(Gem) added to nab- paclitaxel as a short 12-week A-free regimen. It also assesses efficacy in early responders vs. non-responders by 3-week proliferation and/or imaging response. Methods: ADAPT TN compares 12-week neoadjuvant regimens: Carbo vs. Gem combined with Nab-Pac and aims to identify early-response markers for pCR (yPN0 and ypT0/is). TNBC patients (centrally confirmed ER/PR Results: 336 patients were enrolled from 47 centers between 06/13-02/15 (n=182 ArmA: Nab-Pac/Gem and n=154 ArmB: Nab-Pac/Carbo). 90% and 95% completed therapy according to protocol respectively (n.s.). Median age was 50y. At baseline: A/B: 73% and 74%% had G3 tumors, median Ki-67 of 70% and 75%; 62.6% and 62.9%% had cT2-4c tumors, pN0 status prior to chemotherapy was confirmed in 50.5% and 50%, respectively. pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0) was A: 28.7% and B: 45.9% (p Nab/Gem arm was associated with significantly higher frequency of dose reductions (20.6% vs. 11.9% (p=0.03), treatment related SAE9s (13% vs. 5%, p=0.02), grade 3-4 infections (6.1% vs. 1.3%, p=0.04) and ALAT elevations (11.7 vs. 3.3%, p=0.01) compared to the Nab-Carbo arm. Within the planned interim analysis (n=130: A/B: 69/61), baseline Ki-67 (Nab- Pac/Carbo arm), age>50 years, and low cellularity ( Validation of responder definitions for the whole study will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This is the first large randomized study comparing two short 12-week anthracycline- free regimens in unselected TNBC. Our results suggest superior efficacy and excellent toxicity of Nab-Pac/Carbo vs. Gem. Longer A/T-Carbo containing regimens render quite comparable pCR rates, thus overtreatment by 4xEC in unselected TNBC may be present in some patients. Early response criteria seem to differ according to regimen; their assessment may be impaired by substantial tumor necrosis already after the first therapy cycle. Citation Format: Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, Christgen M, Sotlar K, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Bangemann N, Lindner C, Kuemmel S, Clemens M, Potenberg J, Staib P, Kohls A, Pelz E, Kates RE, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Comparison of 12 weeks neoadjuvant Nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatinum vs. gemcitabine in triple- negative breast cancer: WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-01.

Association of HER2 Overexpression and Prognosis in Small (T1N0) Primary Breast Cancers

Background: There is some controversy regarding the precise role and need for adjuvant therapy in patients with pT1a/pT1bN0 breast cancer, although studies have indicated that a HER2-positive status is one of the most powerful poor prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) among 960 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 with T1N0 primary breast cancer treated at 3 German centers, and determined prognostic risk factors. Univariate analysis was used to determine associations with potential risk factors. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months, DFS was 94.8%, DDFS 96.3%, and OS 97.5%. Risk factors for decreased 1-year DFS were: peritumoral lymphatic invasion (L1) (p = 0.031), negative hormone receptor status (p = 0.003), non-use of hormonal therapy (p = 0.001), and a positive HER2 status (p = 0.003). Amongst the HER2-positive patients only 2.7% (n = 1/37) of those treated with trastuzumab had a DFS event compared with 20% (n = 10/50) without trastuzumab. Conclusion: Patients with HER2-positive T1 breast cancer should be considered for inclusion in prospective trials of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy to determine the risk-to-benefit ratio and association with other prognostic factors.

De-escalation strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): final analysis of the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR− phase II trial: efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12 weeks of neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab ± weekly paclitaxel

BACKGROUND Response rates in HER2-overexpressing EBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (T) have been improved by addition of pertuzumab (P). The prospective, phase II, neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial assessed whether patients with strong early response to dual blockade alone might achieve pathological complete response (pCR) comparable to that of patients receiving dual blockade and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Female patients with HER2+/HR- EBC (M0) were randomized (5:2) to 12weeks of T+P±weekly paclitaxel (pac) at 80mg/m2. Early response was defined as proliferation decrease≥30% of Ki-67 (versus baseline) or low cellularity (<500 invasive tumor cells) in the 3-week biopsy. The trial was designed to test non-inferiority for pCR in early responding patients of the T+P arm versus all chemotherapy-treated patients. RESULTS From February 2014 to December 2015, 160 patients were screened, 92 were randomized to T+P and 42 to T+P+pac. Baseline characteristics were well balanced (median age 54 versus 51.5years, cT251.1 versus 52.4%, cN054.3 versus 61.9%); 91.3% of patients completed T+P per protocol and 92.9% T+P+pac. The pCR rate in the T+P+pac arm was 90.5%, compared with 36.3% in the T+P arm as a whole. In the T+P arm, 24/92 were classified as non-responders, and their pCR rate was only 8.3% compared with 44.7% in responders (38/92) and 42.9% in patients with unclassified early response (30/92). No new safety signals were observed in the study population. CONCLUSION Addition of taxane monotherapy to dual HER2 blockade in a 12-week neoadjuvant setting substantially increases pCR rates in HER2+/HR- EBC compared with dual blockade alone, even within early responders to dual blockade. Early non-response under dual blockade strongly predicts failure to achieve pCR.Background Response rates in HER2-overexpressing EBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (T) have been improved by addition of pertuzumab (P). The prospective, phase II, neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial assessed whether patients with strong early response to dual blockade alone might achieve pathological complete response (pCR) comparable to that of patients receiving dual blockade and chemotherapy. Patients and methods Female patients with HER2+/HR- EBC (M0) were randomized (5:2) to 12 weeks of T + P ± weekly paclitaxel (pac) at 80 mg/m2. Early response was defined as proliferation decrease ≥30% of Ki-67 (versus baseline) or low cellularity (<500 invasive tumor cells) in the 3-week biopsy. The trial was designed to test non-inferiority for pCR in early responding patients of the T + P arm versus all chemotherapy-treated patients. Results From February 2014 to December 2015, 160 patients were screened, 92 were randomized to T + P and 42 to T + P+pac. Baseline characteristics were well balanced (median age 54 versus 51.5 years, cT2 51.1 versus 52.4%, cN0 54.3 versus 61.9%); 91.3% of patients completed T + P per protocol and 92.9% T + P+pac. The pCR rate in the T + P+pac arm was 90.5%, compared with 36.3% in the T + P arm as a whole. In the T + P arm, 24/92 were classified as non-responders, and their pCR rate was only 8.3% compared with 44.7% in responders (38/92) and 42.9% in patients with unclassified early response (30/92). No new safety signals were observed in the study population. Conclusion Addition of taxane monotherapy to dual HER2 blockade in a 12-week neoadjuvant setting substantially increases pCR rates in HER2+/HR- EBC compared with dual blockade alone, even within early responders to dual blockade. Early non-response under dual blockade strongly predicts failure to achieve pCR.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results

Background Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The optimal chemotherapy regimen is unclear. Weekly nab-paclitaxel vs conventional paclitaxel or addition of carboplatin to anthracycline-taxane results in higher pCR rates with uncertain survival impact. We evaluated carboplatin vs gemcitabine with a nab-paclitaxel backbone as a short 12-week A-free regimen with a focus on early response. Methods Patients with TNBC (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor < 1%, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, cT1c-cT4c, cN0/+) were randomly assigned to A: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1,8 three times weekly (q3w); vs B: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC2 day 1,8 q3w. The trial was powered for a pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) comparison by therapy arm and early response (defined as Ki-67 decrease >30% or < 500 invasive tumor cells in the three-week serial biopsy). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 336 patients were enrolled (48 centers, arms A/B: n = 182/154). The median age was 50 years. At baseline (A vs B), 62.6% and 62.9% had cT2-4c tumors; 86.8% and 90.9% completed therapy per protocol, respectively. pCR favored arm B (28.7%, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.36, vs 45.9%, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.54; 95% CI(dBA) = 6.2% to 27.9%, P = .002) and was lower in nonresponders than in early responders (19.5% vs 44.4%, P < .001) or in patients with unclassifiable early response (50.0%). The nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was associated with more frequent dose reductions (20.6% vs 11.9%, P = .04), treatment-related serious adverse events (11.1% vs 5.3%, P = .07), grade 3-4 infections (7.2% vs 2.6%, P = .07), and grade 3-4 ALAT elevations (11.7 vs 3.3%, P = .01). Conclusions This first large randomized trial suggests high efficacy and excellent tolerability of a neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, superior to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in TNBC. De-escalation of further chemotherapy in patients with early pCR after a short anthracycline-free regimen is a promising field of future research. Early necrotic morphological changes and/or proliferation decrease after the first therapy cycle seem to be associated with subsequent pCR.

Abstract OT3-2-04: ADAPT - Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

Background: Early therapy response is currently not regarded for further treatment decisions as standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Predictive markers for the success of a certain therapy could support the physician’s choice of adequate and beneficial therapies by simultaneous reduction of unnecessary toxicity. Proliferation makers as Ki-67 seem to be a suitable tool, as dynamic changes of proliferation (as result of induction therapy) have been shown to be most important for outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prediction in patients with pCR in distinct BC subtypes (luminal B, TNBC, HER2+). Methods: Trial design: ADAPT combines early assessment of prognosis by conventional markers (e.g. molecular classification, nodal status) with dynamic measurement of proliferation changes during a 3-week induction therapy, using baseline diagnostic core biopsy and a second biopsy after induction therapy. ADAPT consists of an umbrella trial and five different sub-trials (HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, HR-/HER2-, Elderly) and is set up as prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-blinded, randomized phase II/III trial. Subtype-specific treatment across the sub-trials is highly innovative and involves the following treatment strategies: • HR+/HER2-: endocrine therapy (ET) vs. chemotherapy (4xPac q2w – 4xEC q2w vs. 8xNab-Pac q1w – 4xEC q2w) + ET, depending on risk classification/early response. • HER2+/HR+: T-DM1 vs. T-DM1 + ET vs. trastuzumab + ET. • HER2+/HR-: Trastuzumab + Pertzumab ± Paclitaxel q1w. • TN: Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine vs. nab-Pac + Carboplatin. • Elderly: 2xMyocet + Cyclophosphamide q3w, depending on cPR/cCR or NC/toxicity the treatment will be continued for two more cycles or changed to 6xPac q1w. Adaptation/change in therapy regimens can be made by interim analysis after n=130 in each sub-trial. Eligibility criteria: Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive BC with known HR-/HER2-status (central pathology) for allocation to the respective sub-trial. Pts requiring chemo- or targeted (anti-HER2) therapy must have adequate laboratory values and organ function and must have no contraindications for the planned treatment. Primary endpoints: Evaluation of dynamic test for outcome prediction/prospective comparison of 5yr EFS in responders (intermediate risk (RS 12-25) / good response to short-term ET in HR+/HER2- or pts with pCR in HER2+/TN BC) compared to low risk HR+/HER2- (RS≤11, N0-1) pts (control group). Statistical methods: Assumption across sub-protocols: adjuvant CTx can be spared in HR+/HER2- or pCR be achieved in HER2+/TN in expected 1120 (HR+/HER2-) or 170 (HER2+/TN) pts, respectively. Outcome will be compared to the control group (expected n=640 HR+/HER2- pts: low risk (by RS), i.e. no CTx). Assuming 94% 5yr survival in control group, one-sided test of non-inferiority at 95% CI will have 80% power for survival non-inferiority margin of 3.2% (i.e. 90.8% survival). Present and target accrual: By June 2014, 73 active sites have recruited 1820 pts for ADAPT HR+/HER2-. Target accrual is 4000 pts. 190 of 380 pts were successfully randomized for ADAPT HER2+/HR+. ADAPT HER2+/HR- has included 17 of 220 pts and ADAPT Triple Negative has recruited 150 of 336 pts. Citation Format: Ulrike Nitz, Oleg Gluz, Raquel von Schumann, Daniel Hofmann, Ronald E Kates, Sherko Kuemmel, Michael Braun, Claudia Schumacher, Benno Nuding, Bahriye Aktas, Helmut Forstbauer, Nicolai Maass, Mahdi Rezai, Stefan Kraemer, Mathias Warm, Rachel Wuerstlein, Nadia Harbeck. ADAPT - Adjuvant Dynamic marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-2-04.

Final results from the prospective phase III WSG-ARA trial: impact of adjuvant darbepoetin alfa on event-free survival in early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND WSG-ARA plus trial evaluated the effect of adjuvant darbepoetin alfa (DA) on outcome in node positive primary breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand two hundred thirty-four patients were randomized to chemotherapy either with DA (DA+; n = 615) or without DA (DA-; n = 619). DA (500 µg q3w) was started at hemoglobin (Hb) levels <13.0 g/dl (<12 g/dl after DA label amendment) and stopped at Hb levels ≥14.0 g/dl (12 g/dl after label amendment). Primary efficacy end point was event-free survival (EFS); secondary end points were toxicity, quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Venous thrombosis (DA+: 3.0%, DA-: 1.0%; P = 0.013) was significantly higher for DA+, but not pulmonary embolism (0.3% in both arms). Median Hb levels were stable in DA+ (12.6 g/dl) and decreased in DA- (11.7 g/dl). Hb levels >15 g/dl were reported in 0.8% of cycles. QoL parameters did not significantly differ between arms. At 39 months, DA had no significant impact on EFS (DA+: 89.3%, DA-: 87.5%; Plog-rank = 0.55) or OS (DA+: 95.5%, DA-: 95.4%; Plog-rank = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS DA treatment did not impact EFS or OS in routine adjuvant BC treatment.

PD07-06: Adjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Darbepoetin alpha in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Survival and Quality of Life Analysis from the Prospective Randomized WSG ARA Plus Trial.

Background: Darbepoetin alpha (ARA) is currently used to reduce chemotherapy-associated anemia (CAA) rates in various solid tumors. A possible negative impact of ARA on patient survival has been suggested in some clinical trials. The objective of the prospective randomized phase III ARA Plus trial is to compare the survival effect of darbepoetin alpha use (ARA+/ARA-) in combination with modern standard adjuvant chemotherapy targeting guideline-recommended Hb-levels in high-risk breast cancer (BC). Methods: ARA Plus compared 6 cycles T 75 A 50 C 500 q3w or 6 cycles F 500 E 100 C 500 q3w (at discretion of each center) in patients with node positive BC (aged 18–65 years). Patients were randomized to darbepoetin (ARA+) 500 μg q3w until completion of radiotherapy or to standard supportive care (ARA-). ARA was started at Hb-levels ≤13 g/dL (amendment 01/2008: Hb ≤12 g/dL) and stopped at >14 g/dL (>12 g/dL). Primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS: relapses, death without disease evidence, second malignancy). Overall survival (OS), toxicity, Hb-levels and quality of life are secondary endpoints. Survival analysis was planned after 7 years of study duration. EFS was tested using χ2-test (α=0.05) with a statistical power of β=80% and log-rank test. Quality of life was measured using FACT questionnaires at beginning of therapy, mid, end of therapy, and at 1 year afterwards. Results: 1234 pts (616 ARA+/618 ARA-) from 70 centres in Germany were randomized between 01/04 and 06/08. 1198 intent to treat patients (ITT) were analysed (1096 TAC; 102 CEF). Baseline characteristics were well balanced in ARA+ and ARA- arms: median age 53/53 years; tumor size 2.4/2.4cm; number of + LN 3/3; HR+ 80%/ 83.5%, G3 40.7%/36.7%. Toxicity data have been reported earlier (SABCS 2008). At median follow up of 40 months, 168 events (81 ARA+, 83 ARA-) and 134 relapses (65 ARA+, 69 ARA-) were reported. There was no significant difference in 3-year EFS between ARA+ and ARA- arms (89.2% vs. 87.6%, p=0.97, χ2-test). 37 deaths were reported in the ARA- and 36 in the ARA+ arm. 3-year OS was 95.4% and 95.1% for ARA+ and ARA-, respectively (p=0.85). Only nodal involvement (≥4 vs. 1–3), negative HR, tumor size >2 cm and G3 were significant survival predictors by multivariate analysis. Unplanned retrospective analysis revealed better EFS for ARA+ vs. ARA- in HR- (p=0.05), and no difference in HR+ group (p=0.6). In ARA+ patients, Hb-levels were stable over the whole treatment period with rare overstimulation. In ARA- patients, Hb-levels decreased during therapy (median of all cycles ARA+/ARA-: 12.5/11.6 g/dL). There was no correlation between mean Hb-levels and survival in either study arm. There were no significant differences in mean FACT scores changes (general, anemia, cognitive) from begin to end of therapy in either study arm. More detailed analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: To date, the WSG ARA plus trial is the only prospectively randomized trial in early high-risk BC exclusively focusing on the impact of adjuvant ARA on patient outcome. Supportive administration of ARA appears to be safe and to have no significant survival effect when used in combination with TAC or CEF according to current guidelines. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-06.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Bevacizumab (BEV) Combined with Paclitaxel (PAC) According to Age: Subpopulation Analysis of a Large, Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study in Patients (Pts) with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC).

Background: In three randomized phase III trials (E2100, AVADO, RIBBON-1), the combination of Bev with taxane-based therapy significantly improved PFS and response rate versus taxane alone in HER2-negative MBC. Subpopulation analysis of AVADO suggested that the magnitude of the benefit derived from Bev was similar in older and younger pts (≥65 vs Materials and methods: Pts who had received no prior chemotherapy for their MBC were treated with Bev–pac according to the European indication. Efficacy and safety data were collected for up to 1 year (or until progression, death, or discontinuation of Bev if earlier). Results: Safety and efficacy data are currently available for 307 pts, of whom 102 (33%) are ≥65 years and 56 (18%) are ≥70 years (Table). Mean duration of documented Bev therapy was 7.0 months in pts a No grade 4 b 69% (95% CI: 56–84) in pts aged ≥70 years Conclusions: In this study in pts representing real-life practice, the efficacy and safety profile of Bev–pac supports results from prospective randomized clinical trials of Bev combined with taxane-based therapy. Although differences in baseline characteristics complicate interpretation of this analysis, there appeared to be no increase in the incidence of Bev-related AEs of special interest in pts ≥65 versus Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 6085.