Claudio Lombardo

Comparative cancer survival information in Europe

Franco Berrino*, Arduino Verdecchia, Jean Michel Lutz, Claudio Lombardo, Andrea Micheli, Riccardo Capocaccia, the EUROCARE Working Group Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, National Institute for Cancer Epidemiology and Registration (NICER), University of Zurich, Sumatrastrasse 30, Zurich, Switzerland Focal Point International Affairs Executive, Alleanza Contro il Cancro, IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, Genova, Italy Descriptive Epidemiology and Health Planning Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, Milan, Italy

Colorectal cancer survival in the USA and Europe: a CONCORD high-resolution study

Objectives To assess the extent to which stage at diagnosis and adherence to treatment guidelines may explain the persistent differences in colorectal cancer survival between the USA and Europe. Design A high-resolution study using detailed clinical data on Dukes’ stage, diagnostic procedures, treatment and follow-up, collected directly from medical records by trained abstractors under a single protocol, with standardised quality control and central statistical analysis. Setting and participants 21 population-based registries in seven US states and nine European countries provided data for random samples comprising 12 523 adults (15–99 years) diagnosed with colorectal cancer during 1996–1998. Outcome measures Logistic regression models were used to compare adherence to ‘standard care’ in the USA and Europe. Net survival and excess risk of death were estimated with flexible parametric models. Results The proportion of Dukes’ A and B tumours was similar in the USA and Europe, while that of Dukes’ C was more frequent in the USA (38% vs 21%) and of Dukes’ D more frequent in Europe (22% vs 10%). Resection with curative intent was more frequent in the USA (85% vs 75%). Elderly patients (75–99 years) were 70–90% less likely to receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Age-standardised 5-year net survival was similar in the USA (58%) and Northern and Western Europe (54–56%) and lowest in Eastern Europe (42%). The mean excess hazard up to 5 years after diagnosis was highest in Eastern Europe, especially among elderly patients and those with Dukes’ D tumours. Conclusions The wide differences in colorectal cancer survival between Europe and the USA in the late 1990s are probably attributable to earlier stage and more extensive use of surgery and adjuvant treatment in the USA. Elderly patients with colorectal cancer received surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy less often than younger patients, despite evidence that they could also have benefited.

Pioneering Quality Assessment in European Cancer Centers: A Data Analysis of the Organization for European Cancer Institutes Accreditation and Designation Program

PURPOSE In order to improve the quality of care in Cancer Centers (CC) and designate Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs), the Organization for European Cancer Institutes (OECI) launched an Accreditation and Designation (A&D) program. The program facilitates the collection of defined data and the assessment of cancer center quality. This study analyzes the results of the first 10 European centers that entered the program. METHODS The assessment included 927 items divided across qualitative and quantitative questionnaires. Data collected during self-assessment and peer-review from the 10 first participating centers were combined in a database for comparative analysis using simple statistics. Quantitative and qualitative results were validated by auditors during the peer review visits. RESULTS Volumes of various functions and activities dedicated to care, research, and education varied widely among centers. There were no significant differences in resources for radiology, radiotherapy, pathologic diagnostic, and surgery. Differences were observed in the use of clinical pathways but not for the practices of holding multidisciplinary team meetings and conforming to guidelines. Regarding human resources, main differences were in the composition and number of supportive care and research staff. All 10 centers applied as CCCs; five obtained the label, and five were designated as CCs. CONCLUSION The OECI A&D program allows comparisons between centers with regard to management, research, care, education, and designation as CCs or CCCs. Through the peer review system, recommendations for improvements are given. Assessing the added value of the program, as well as research and patient treatment outcomes, is the next step.

Cancer research in the European Community and other non-EC countries.

Aims We assessed the scientific productivity in the field of cancer research of countries in the European Community (EC) and the most important non-EC countries by counting the number of papers published during the period 1988-1990 in 15 of the top scientific journals (as defined by the Journal Citation Reports, Oncology). The global and per capita data are presented for each country. Methods Qualitative parameters like the impact factor and the half-life were also considered in the analysis. The selection of cancer journals with a high average quotation rate gave significant results. Introducing the average impact factor and half-life of each journal modified the results only slightly. The per capita data for each country were not corrected for the number of investigators working in oncology (a datum difficult to obtain). The parameters thus do not define the performance of the average investigator but are more « economic » parameters specifically related to the field of cancer research. Results and conclusions Small, wealthy Western countries tended to have an advantage over large, less developed countries, as expected. However, additional individual differences that could be of interest were present in the group of developed countries.

Cancer research performance in the European Union: a study of published output from 2000 to 2008.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND Although several studies have assessed cancer research performance in individual European countries, comparisons of European Union (EU27) performance with countries of similar population size are not available. METHODS We compared cancer research performance in 2000-2008 between EU27 and 11 countries with over 100 million inhabitants. Performance should not have been affected by the 2007-2009 recession. We examined 143 journals considered oncology journals by Journal Citation Reports, accessing them via Scopus. Publications were attributed to countries using a published counting procedure. RESULTS For number of publications, the USA held a clear lead in 2006-2008 (yearly averages: 10,293 USA vs 9,962 EU27), whereas the EU27 held the lead previously. EU27 was also second to the USA for total impact factor. China markedly improved its cancer publications record over the period. Compared to the USA, EU27 and Japan, the other countries (all developing) had a poor publications record. CONCLUSIONS Comparative cancer research spending data are not available. However from 2002 to 2007, gross domestic expenditure on research and development (UNESCO data) increased by 34% in North America, 161% in China and only 28% in EU27. Thus the European Union is lagging behind North America and may well be eclipsed by China in research and development spending in the near future. We suggest that these new findings should be considered by policymakers in Europe and other countries when developing policies for cancer control.

Improvement of European translational cancer research. Collaboration between comprehensive cancer centers

Even though the increasing incidence of cancer is mainly a consequence of a population with a longer life span, part of this augmentation is related to the increasing prevalence of patients living with a chronic cancer disease. To fight the problem, improved preventive strategies are mandatory in combination with an innovative health care provision that is driven by research. To overcome the weakness of translational research the OECI is proposing a practical approach as part of a strategy foreseen by the EUROCAN+PLUS feasibility study, which was launched by the EC in order to identify mechanisms for the coordination of cancer research in Europe.

A dedicated website for cancer subjects, the nutritional support study: preliminary results

Background The Internet has become a widely used resource for information on cancer and for support. As part of the EuroCancerComs project (www.eurocancercoms.eu), an intervention study has been designed. The study aims to help patients with cancer providing an Internet “space” where to find information about nutritional care. Methods The study consists of a randomized 6-month intervention. The website (www.supportonutrizionale.it) hosts a contents area, prepared according to guidelines and recommendations, a forum and a blog. Subjects have been randomly allocated in intervention (IG) and control group (CG). IG has a free access to the website and it is involved in live activities, discussions and examinations. CG receives the same information by e-mail, without having access to the website. Three questionnaires are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach, concerning quality of life (QoL), psychological status and nutrition facts. Results Since the study startup, 191 subjects have been screened, and 58 (30%) have been randomized. Participants in both groups are mainly females, married and have at least a high school education level. Participants experienced a high psychological distress for 27% of IG and 33% of CG considering the four classes of scores at the baseline. Regarding QoL, a low “role functioning” score for IG and “emotional functioning” and “social functioning” scores for both groups are reported, while “fatigue” and “nausea and vomiting” respectively for IG and CG are the worsened symptoms compared with reference values. Considering the nutrition facts questionnaire, subjects showed a medium-high score profile and the worst scale regards “Nutrition and cancer knowledge”. From the beginning of the study, a total of 48 actions have been registered, including votes to contents, comments and forum messages. Conclusion The Internet has made possible the new forms of interaction and knowledge, and it is likely to become essential to gain access to health information. The results of this randomized intervention may help in the evaluation of the efficacy of these interventions in cancer setting.

Nanotechnology: Going small for a giant leap in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics

“There is Plenty of Room at the Bottom” - not just “There is Room at the Bottom.” What I have demonstrated is that there is room - that you can decrease the size of things in a practical way. I now want to show that there is plenty of room. Richard Feynman, December 29, 1959 More than 30 years ago Richard Feynman pointed out that physicists knew no limits to prevent us from doing engineering at the level of atoms. Until recently, though, while the lack of physical limits was accepted as commonplace, molecular engineering was thought of as impractical, unnecessary, or requiring breakthroughs in knowledge and technique that placed it somewhere in the distant future. Many visionaries intimately familiar with the development of silicon technology still forecast it would take between 20 and 50 years before molecular engineering became a reality. This is well beyond the planning horizon of most companies. But recently, everything has begun to change. After the industrial revolution and the “computer age”, are we really facing a new era?

Quality assurance guidelines for a biomedical information web system: The working experience of the BreakIT project

The paper outlines the quality control issues that arise in the implementation of a Web site which delivers biomedical information. At the heart of this study is the need for a methodology to guarantee that the information contained in the site is viable and accurate from both an informatic and a content point of view. This methodology is currently adopted in the Web development of the BreakIT project sponsored by the EU INFO2000 Programme.

Genetic alterations in sporadic triple negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND Recent studies have aimed to identify gene mutation profiles to explain the cause of TNBC therapy limitations. METHODS The purpose of our study was to use Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of 46 genes with a well-defined role in cancer in a cohort of TNBC patients in order to identify novel markers that could lead to the development of strategic, adjuvant, gene-targeted therapies. RESULTS A total of 118 gene mutations in 35 genes, 75 mutations in BRCA1 and 92 mutations in BRCA2 were identified. The clinical assessment of the identified mutations showed 27 to be possibly damaging and 59 to be damaging. TP53, KDR, PIK3CA (rs3729687), ATM, AKT1 and KIT were among the most frequently mutated genes in our TNBC cohort. The SNP AKT1 (rs3730358) was suggested to modify the risk of breast cancer. SNP PIK3CA (rs3729687) is a damaging mutation that we found to be correlated with the prognosis of TNBC. The survival curve analysis showed that the presence of AKT1, TP53, KDR, KIT, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is correlated with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSION We show a strong association between TNBC and mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and the poor outcome of these patients. Moreover, we identified several other unknown mutations putatively associated with the poor prognosis of TNBC tumors. We also discovered novel mutations never before associated with breast cancer that could putatively account for the poor prognosis of the TNBC tumors.