Clélia Sirami

Value of an urban habitat for the native Mediterranean avifauna

Mediterranean landscapes resulted from complex land uses that produced a mosaic of extensive crops, grasslands, scrublands and scattered woodlands. During the twentieth century the decrease in traditional agriculture triggered a decrease in open habitats and an increase in forests. In the meantime urban centres grew dramatically. Both spread of forest and urban areas have been suspected to participate in the decline of typical Mediterranean bird species and, in general, to cause faunal loss. However, modern cities offer a variety of landscape types and, in the Mediterranean, their value for native bird species has been little assessed. We compared the bird communities from an urban landscape, including built up and natural or semi natural units within the limits of the city of Montpellier, to the bird communities from non-urban habitats (cropland, grassland and woodland) located nearby but away from direct urban influence. Fifty four percent of the bird species recorded in the non-urban habitats also occurred in the urban landscape. On average, estimated species richness in the urban landscape was similar to values obtained for non-urban habitats. Within the urban landscape species richness was lowest in the dense historical centre and highest in the residential areas. The residential areas and urban woods were suitable habitats for most generalist species but also for several more specialized species recorded in the non-urban habitats. Some species actually reached their highest observation frequency in the urban landscape. Urban landscape was least favourable to the same farmland and open-habitat specialists that have been negatively affected by agricultural abandonment in the region. Finally, five of the species common in the urban landscape had an unfavorable conservation status in 2004 in the EU. This study emphasizes that Mediterranean urban areas have the potential to host a diverse native bird community. Finding ways to improve their carrying capacity for the local avifauna might be a worthwhile objective for animal conservation.

Do bird spatial distribution patterns reflect population trends in changing landscapes

Strong relations between population trends and spatial distribution have been suggested at the regional scale: declining species should have more fragmented distributions because decline causes range retractions towards optimal habitats, whereas increasing species should have more aggregated distributions, because colonization processes are constrained by distance. Most analyses of the effects of land use changes on animal populations are diachronic studies of population dynamics or synchronic studies of species habitat selection. Few studies take simultaneously into account temporal changes in habitat distribution and changes in species spatial distribution. We applied the above rationale to the landscape scale and analysed how population declines, increases or stability, as diagnosed in a long term study, correlate with population connectivity or fragmentation at that scale. We used data on changes in faunal distribution and information on temporal changes in the vegetation in a Mediterranean area that had been subjected to land abandonment. We found that species declining at the landscape scale had retracting fragmented distributions and that expanding species had expanding continuous distributions. However, for the latter, we suggest that the factors involved are related to landscape structure and not to dispersal mediated meta-population processes, which are of little relevance at this local scale. We also show that even species that are numerically stable can show fragmentation of their distribution and major spatial distribution shifts in response to land use changes, especially in species that have low occurrence levels or that are associated with transitory habitats such as heterogeneous shrublands (e.g. Sylvia melanocephala). Studying the spatial structure of species distribution patterns at the landscape scale may provide information about population declines and increases both at the regional and the landscape scale and can improve our understanding of short-term risks of local extinction.Strong relations between population trends and spatial distribution have been suggested at the regional scale: declining species should have more fragmented distributions because decline causes range retractions towards optimal habitats, whereas increasing species should have more aggregated distributions, because colonization processes are constrained by distance. Most analyses of the effects of land use changes on animal populations are diachronic studies of population dynamics or synchronic studies of species habitat selection. Few studies take simultaneously into account temporal changes in habitat distribution and changes in species spatial distribution. We applied the above rationale to the landscape scale and analysed how population declines, increases or stability, as diagnosed in a long term study, correlate with population connectivity or fragmentation at that scale. We used data on changes in faunal distribution and information on temporal changes in the vegetation in a Mediterranean area that had been subjected to land abandonment. We found that species declining at the landscape scale had retracting fragmented distributions and that expanding species had expanding continuous distributions. However, for the latter, we suggest that the factors involved are related to landscape structure and not to dispersal mediated meta-population processes, which are of little relevance at this local scale. We also show that even species that are numerically stable can show fragmentation of their distribution and major spatial distribution shifts in response to land use changes, especially in species that have low occurrence levels or that are associated with transitory habitats such as heterogeneous shrublands (e.g. Sylvia melanocephala). Studying the spatial structure of species distribution patterns at the landscape scale may provide information about population declines and increases both at the regional and the landscape scale and can improve our understanding of short-term risks of local extinction.

Woodlarks Lullula arborea and landscape heterogeneity created by land abandonment

Capsule Fine‐grained landscape heterogeneity may be a major factor in the recent expansion of Woodlark populations. Aim To determine the factors which may have led to the increase in Woodlark populations in the Mediterranean region. Methods Woodlark habitat selection was determined using territory mapping in an area that had undergone widespread land abandonment during the past 50 years. Remote sensing data were used to study landscape changes within the study area between 1978 and 2003. Results Most Woodlark territories included a combination of farmland and shrubland patches. These fulfilled the birds’ requirements for territorial display and for foraging. Land abandonment has increased the availability of open shrubland, the dominant land‐cover type selected by Woodlarks. Conclusions Increased fine‐grained landscape heterogeneity following farm abandonment has created opportunities for habitat use by Woodlarks and may be a major factor in the Woodlark population expansion observed between 1978 and 2003.

Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework

The governance of ecosystem services (ES) has been predominantly thought of in terms of market or state-based instruments. Comparatively, collective action mechanisms have rarely been considered. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a conceptual framework that brings together ES, social interdependencies, and collective action thinking. We use an ES conceptual lens to highlight social interdependencies among people so as to reflect on existing or potential collective actions among them. This framework can also contribute to increasing people’s awareness of their mutual interdependencies and thereby fostering, framing, or enriching collective action, in ways that take into account the diversity and complexity of ecological processes underlying human activities. Our approach can contribute in particular to agroecological transitions that require landscape level innovations and coordination mechanisms among land users and managers. The framework distinguishes three types of social interdependencies: (i) between ES beneficiaries and ES providers, (ii) among beneficiaries, and (iii) among providers. These social interdependencies are in turn analyzed according to four main dimensions that are critical for collective action: (i) cognitive framing of interdependencies, (ii) levels of organization, (iii) formal and informal institutions, and (iv) power relations. Finally, we propose a strategy to turn this framework into action in contexts of participatory action research, a strategy grounded on a number of methodological principles and tools that convey complexity and increase people’s awareness of interdependencies in agrarian social-ecological systems.