Clemens Richter

Predictors and correlates of adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for chronic HIV infection: a meta-analysis

BackgroundAdherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a key predictor of the success of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment, and is potentially amenable to intervention. Insight into predictors or correlates of non-adherence to ART may help guide targets for the development of adherence-enhancing interventions. Our objective was to review evidence on predictors/correlates of adherence to ART, and to aggregate findings into quantitative estimates of their impact on adherence.MethodsWe searched PubMed for original English-language papers, published between 1996 and June 2014, and the reference lists of all relevant articles found. Studies reporting on predictors/correlates of adherence of adults prescribed ART for chronic HIV infection were included without restriction to adherence assessment method, study design or geographical location. Two researchers independently extracted the data from the same papers. Random effects models with inverse variance weights were used to aggregate findings into pooled effects estimates with 95% confidence intervals. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the common effect size. The impact of study design features (adherence assessment method, study design, and the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) of the country in which the study was set) was investigated using categorical mixed effects meta-regression.ResultsIn total, 207 studies were included. The following predictors/correlates were most strongly associated with adherence: adherence self-efficacy (SMDu2009=u20090.603, Pu2009=u20090.001), current substance use (SMDu2009=u2009-0.395, Pu2009=u20090.001), concerns about ART (SMDu2009=u2009-0.388, Pu2009=u20090.001), beliefs about the necessity/utility of ART (SMDu2009=u20090.357, Pu2009=u20090.001), trust/satisfaction with the HIV care provider (SMDu2009=u20090.377, Pu2009=u20090.001), depressive symptoms (SMDu2009=u2009-0.305, Pu2009=u20090.001), stigma about HIV (SMDu2009=u2009-0.282, Pu2009=u20090.001), and social support (SMDu2009=u20090.237, Pu2009=u20090.001). Smaller but significant associations were observed for the following being prescribed a protease inhibitor-containing regimen (SMDu2009=u2009-0.196, Pu2009=u20090.001), daily dosing frequency (SMDu2009=u2009-0.193, Pu2009=u20090.001), financial constraints (SMD -0.187, Pu2009=u20090.001) and pill burden (SMDu2009=u2009-0.124, Pu2009=u20090.001). Higher trust/satisfaction with the HIV care provider, a lower daily dosing frequency, and fewer depressive symptoms were more strongly related with higher adherence in low and medium HDI countries than in high HDI countries.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that adherence-enhancing interventions should particularly target psychological factors such as self-efficacy and concerns/beliefs about the efficacy and safety of ART. Moreover, these findings suggest that simplification of regimens might have smaller but significant effects.

Long-Term Therapy With Tenofovir Is Effective for Patients Co-Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis B Virus

BACKGROUND & AIMSnWe investigated the long-term efficacy and renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), administered to patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus (HBV) as part of an antiretroviral therapy.nnnMETHODSnWe performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 102 patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and HBV who were treated with TDF.nnnRESULTSnAt baseline, 80% of patients had a detectable viral load (HBV DNA >20 IU/mL). Among patients positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (n = 67), 92% had a virologic response (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) after 5 years of treatment. There was no difference between patients with or without lamivudine resistance at baseline (P = .39). Loss rates of HBeAg and hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) were 46% and 12%, respectively. Among HBeAg-negative patients (n = 15), 100% had a virologic response after 4 years of treatment and 2 (13%) lost HBsAg. Twenty subjects (20%, all HBeAg-negative) had undetectable HBV DNA at baseline; during a median follow-up period of 52 months (interquartile range, 41-63 mo), 19 (95%) maintained a virologic response and 2 (10%) lost HBsAg. Overall, one patient acquired a combination of resistance mutations for anti-HBV drugs and experienced a virologic breakthrough. Three (3%) patients discontinued TDF because of increased serum creatinine levels. The estimated decrease in renal function after 5 years of TDF therapy was 9.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2), which was most pronounced shortly after TDF therapy was initiated.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTDF, administered as part of antiretroviral therapy, is a potent anti-HBV agent with a good resistance profile throughout 5 years of therapy. Only small nonprogressive decreases in renal function were observed.

Randomized trial comparing saquinavir soft gelatin capsules versus indinavir as part of triple therapy (CHEESE study)

OBJECTIVEnTo compare efficacy and tolerability of saquinavir soft gelatin capsule (SQV-SGC) formulation and indinavir, both given as part of a triple drug regimen containing zidovudine and lamivudine, in HIV-1-infected individuals.nnnDESIGNnRandomized, open label, multicentre study.nnnPATIENTSnA total of 70 patients who were antiretroviral-naive and who had a CD4 cell count < 500 x 10(6)/I and/or > 10000 HIV RNA copies/ml plasma and/or HIV-related symptoms. Subjects were assigned randomly to zidovudine 200 mg three times per day plus lamivudine 150 mg twice per day plus either SQV-SGC 1200 mg three times per day (SQV-SGC group) or indinavir 800 mg three times per day (indinavir group). Data are presented for all patients up to week 24.nnnRESULTSnMean baseline CD4 cell counts (+/- SE) were 301+/-29 x 10(6) cells/l and 310 +/-43 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC and indinavir groups, respectively. The log10 median baseline HIV RNA load was 5.00 copies/ml in the SQV-SGC group and 4.98 copies/ml in the indinavir group. No difference in antiretroviral effect between the treatment arms could be demonstrated. Intention-to-treat analysis (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at week 24 revealed that RNA levels decreased to < 50 copies/ml in 74.3% of patients in the SQV-SGC group and in 71.4% of the patients in the indinavir group (P = 0.78). In the on-treatment analysis the proportion of patients < 50 copies/ml at week 24 was 88.0% in the SQV-SGC group and 84.6% in the indinavir group (P = 0.725). Intriguingly, the mean increase of CD4 cells in the first 24 weeks was 162+/-20 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC group and 89+/-21 x 10(6) cells/l in the indinavir group (P = 0.01), but preliminary data indicate that this difference in CD4 cell count gain may disappear after 24 weeks of treatment. Both regimens were generally well tolerated.nnnCONCLUSIONnDuring the first 24 weeks of the study, we found no difference in antiviral potency between the indinavir group and the SQV-SGC group. A significantly higher CD4 response in the SQV-SGC group was observed.

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Declines and Clearance During Long-Term Tenofovir Therapy in Patients Coinfected With HBV and HIV

BACKGROUNDnThe kinetics of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are predictive in HBV-infected patients treated with pegylated interferon. Knowledge about the value of HBsAg levels in patients coinfected with HBV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is lacking.nnnMETHODSnWe quantified serum HBsAg in a Dutch multicenter cohort of 104 patients coinfected with HIV and HBV who were treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The median duration of therapy was 57 months (interquartile range, 34-72 months).nnnRESULTSnHepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients achieved a decline of 2.2 log IU/mL in HBsAg, whereas HBeAg-negative patients only achieved a decline of 0.6 log IU/mL during 6 years of TDF therapy. Declines in HBsAg at months 6 and 12 correlated with CD4 cell count for HBeAg-positive patients. Five HBeAg-positive patients (8%) and 3 HBeAg-negative patients (8%) cleared HBsAg. HBeAg-negative patients who cleared HBsAg had lower baseline HBsAg as compared to patients who remained HBsAg positive. The majority of patients who cleared HBsAg achieved this end point within the first year. In HBeAg-positive patients, decline in HBsAg at month 6 was predictive of achieving HBsAg seroclearance.nnnCONCLUSIONSnReceipt of TDF therapy by HIV/HBV-coinfected patients for up to 6 years led to a significant decrease in HBsAg in the HBeAg-positive population. HBsAg kinetics early during treatment were predictive of HBsAg seroclearance and correlated with an increased CD4 cell count, underlining the importance of immune restoration in HBV clearance.

Lower atovaquone/proguanil concentrations in patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir.

HIV-infected travellers frequently use atovaquone/proguanil as malaria prophylaxis. We compared atovaquone/proguanil pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) area under the curve (AUC)0→t for atovaquone relative to the healthy volunteers was 0.25 (0.16–0.38), 0.26 (0.17–0.41) and 0.54 (0.35–0.83) for patients on efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir, respectively. Proguanil plasma concentrations were also significantly lower (38–43%). Physicians should be alert for atovaquone/proguanil prophylaxis failures in patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir.

Efavirenz Dose Reduction Is Safe in Patients With High Plasma Concentrations and May Prevent Efavirenz Discontinuations

Objective:To establish whether efavirenz dose reduction in patients with high plasma concentrations prevents toxicity-induced efavirenz discontinuations. Methods:HIV-infected patients with a high efavirenz plasma concentration (≥4.0 mg/L) while using efavirenz 600 mg once daily as part of their highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen were selected from the AIDS Therapy Evaluation in The Netherlands cohort study. These patients were classified into 2 groups. The reduced-dose group contained all patients who underwent dose reduction after the high plasma concentration measurement; the standard-dose group consisted of patients who had no dose reduction. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to assess the impact of dose reduction on toxicity-induced efavirenz discontinuations. Results:One hundred eighty patients with high plasma efavirenz levels were included, 47 of them subsequently had their efavirenz dose reduced from 600 mg to 400 mg once-daily, which resulted in a 41% decrease in the median efavirenz plasma concentration. At week 48, the Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence of toxicity-induced efavirenz discontinuations was 11.5% in patients who continued the standard dose versus 2.3% in patients who had a dose reduction; P = 0.066 (log-rank test). Dose reduction was not associated with loss of virological suppression. Conclusions:Dose reduction may prevent toxicity-induced discontinuations in patients with high efavirenz plasma concentrations, whereas not compromising virological efficacy.

Replacing ritonavir by nelfinavir or nelfinavir/saquinavir as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy leads to an improvement of triglyceride levels.

In a randomized, parallel arm, open-label study, the effect of switching from ritonavir to either nelfinavir or nelfinavir plus saquinavir as part of a triple antiretroviral regimen was investigated in 16 patients with undetectable HIV-1 loads. Patients continued to use the same nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as before the switch of protease inhibitor. The period of follow-up was 48 weeks. In all patients HIV-1 load remained undetectable, whereas CD4 cell counts remained stable. Furthermore, lipid markers improved after the switch.

Maraviroc Intensification of cART in Patients with Suboptimal Immunological Recovery: A 48-Week, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial

Objective The immunomodulatory effects of the CCR5-antagonist maraviroc might be beneficial in patients with a suboptimal immunological response, but results of different cART (combination antiretroviral therapy) intensification studies are conflicting. Therefore, we performed a 48-week placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of maraviroc intensification on CD4+ T-cell counts and immune activation in these patients. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Methods Major inclusion criteria were 1. CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/μL while at least two years on cART or CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/μL while at least one year on cART, and 2. viral suppression for at least the previous 6 months. HIV-infected patients were randomized to add maraviroc (41 patients) or placebo (44 patients) to their cART regimen for 48 weeks. Changes in CD4+ T-cell counts (primary endpoint) and other immunological parameters were modeled using linear mixed effects models. Results No significant differences for the modelled increase in CD4+ T-cell count (placebo 15.3 CD4+ T cells/μL (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.0, 29.5] versus maraviroc arm 22.9 CD4+ T cells/μL (95% CI [7.4, 38.5] p = 0.51) or alterations in the expression of markers for T-cell activation, proliferation and microbial translocation were found between the arms. However, maraviroc intensification did increase the percentage of CCR5 expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and the plasma levels of the CCR5 ligand MIP-1β. In contrast, the percentage of ex-vivo apoptotic CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells decreased in the maraviroc arm. Conclusions Maraviroc intensification of cART did not increase CD4+ T-cell restoration or decrease immune activation as compared to placebo. However, ex-vivo T-cell apoptosis was decreased in the maraviroc arm. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00875368

Adherence to HIV therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in The Netherlands

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended in several international HIV treatment guidelines. The adherence of clinicians to these recommendations is unknown. The authors evaluated the adherence to the Dutch TDM guideline of 2005. Methods: From the ATHENA cohort study, three scenarios were selected for which the guideline recommended TDM: 1) start of a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir + efavirenz or nevirapine (drug-drug interaction); 2) start of efavirenz (routine TDM); and 3) use of nelfinavir during pregnancy. For each scenario, we determined the proportion of patients for whom TDM was performed. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify determinants for the use of TDM. Results: The adherence to the TDM guideline was 46.7% in patients who started lopinavir/ritonavir plus efavirenz or nevirapine; 9.5% for patients who started efavirenz; and 58.5% for patients who used nelfinavir during pregnancy. Patients treated in clinics that had a TDM assay available locally and patients treated in academic clinics were more likely to receive TDM. A higher baseline HIV viral load was another significant predictor for the performing TDM. Conclusion: The adherence of clinicians to the Dutch TDM guidelines varied from low to moderate for the three investigated TDM scenarios. This study identifies several determinants for the use of TDM, which may be useful information for those responsible for generating TDM guidelines.

Infection with the frequently transmitted HIV-1 M41L variant has no influence on selection of tenofovir resistance

OBJECTIVESnIn ∼10% of newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients, drug-resistant viral variants are detected. In such transmitted HIV-1 variants, the thymidine analogue mutation (TAM) M41L is frequently observed as a single resistance mutation and these viral variants often belong to phylogenetic transmission clusters. The presence of at least three TAMs, in particular patterns with M41L/L210W, impairs the efficacy of the extensively used drug tenofovir. We investigated whether the presence of a single M41L mutation at baseline influences the selection of resistance to tenofovir and emtricitabine in vitro and in vivo.nnnMETHODSnThe impact of M41L on the development of drug resistance to tenofovir and emtricitabine was determined by extensive in vitro selection experiments and investigation of the virological outcome of patients on a first-line regimen.nnnRESULTSnThe presence of a single M41L mutation did not influence the selected mutational profile or the genetic barrier to resistance to tenofovir and/or emtricitabine during long-term in vitro selection experiments. In vivo, virological outcome of first-line regimens containing tenofovir and emtricitabine was comparable between patients diagnosed with HIV-1 harbouring M41L (n=17, 16 were part of one transmission cluster) and WT virus (n=248).nnnCONCLUSIONSnDetection of a single M41L reverse transcriptase mutation at baseline did not influence the development of resistance in vitro or virological outcome on tenofovir-containing regimens in patients belonging to a large transmission cluster. Our results indicate that a high genetic barrier regimen may not be required when patients are diagnosed with HIV variants containing a single M41L mutation in reverse transcriptase.