Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Clemens Woda is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Clemens Woda.


Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2011

Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures

Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; E Bakhanova; Joan Francesc Barquinero; M Brai; Chumak; Correcher; F. Darroudi; P. Fattibene; Gaëtan Gruel; İnci Güçlü; S Horn; Alicja Jaworska; Ulrike Kulka; Carita Lindholm; David C. Lloyd; Longo A; Maurizio Marrale; O. Monteiro Gil; Ursula Oestreicher; Jelena Pajic; Rakic B; Horst Romm; F. Trompier; I Veronese; Philippe Voisin; Anne Vral; Whitehouse Ca; Wieser A; Clemens Woda; Andrzej Wojcik

The current focus on networking and mutual assistance in the management of radiation accidents or incidents has demonstrated the importance of a joined-up approach in physical and biological dosimetry. To this end, the European Radiation Dosimetry Working Group 10 on Retrospective Dosimetry has been set up by individuals from a wide range of disciplines across Europe. Here, established and emerging dosimetry methods are reviewed, which can be used immediately and retrospectively following external ionising radiation exposure. Endpoints and assays include dicentrics, translocations, premature chromosome condensation, micronuclei, somatic mutations, gene expression, electron paramagnetic resonance, thermoluminescence, optically stimulated luminescence, neutron activation, haematology, protein biomarkers and analytical dose reconstruction. Individual characteristics of these techniques, their limitations and potential for further development are reviewed, and their usefulness in specific exposure scenarios is discussed. Whilst no single technique fulfils the criteria of an ideal dosemeter, an integrated approach using multiple techniques tailored to the exposure scenario can cover most requirements.


Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2015

Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB—status quo

Ulrike Kulka; L. Ainsbury; Michael J. Atkinson; Stephen Barnard; R. W. Smith; Joan Francesc Barquinero; Leonardo Barrios; C. Bassinet; Christina Beinke; Alexandra Cucu; F. Darroudi; P. Fattibene; E. Bortolin; S. Della Monaca; Octávia Monteiro Gil; Eric Gregoire; Valeria Hadjidekova; Siamak Haghdoost; Vasiliki I. Hatzi; W. Hempel; R. Herranz; Alicja Jaworska; Carita Lindholm; Katalin Lumniczky; R. Mkacher; S. Mörtl; Alegría Montoro; Jayne Moquet; Mercedes Moreno; Mihaela Noditi

Creating a sustainable network in biological and retrospective dosimetry that involves a large number of experienced laboratories throughout the European Union (EU) will significantly improve the accident and emergency response capabilities in case of a large-scale radiological emergency. A well-organised cooperative action involving EU laboratories will offer the best chance for fast and trustworthy dose assessments that are urgently needed in an emergency situation. To this end, the EC supports the establishment of a European network in biological dosimetry (RENEB). The RENEB project started in January 2012 involving cooperation of 23 organisations from 16 European countries. The purpose of RENEB is to increase the biodosimetry capacities in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. The progress of the project since its inception is presented, comprising the consolidation process of the network with its operational platform, intercomparison exercises, training activities, proceedings in quality assurance and horizon scanning for new methods and partners. Additionally, the benefit of the network for the radiation research community as a whole is addressed.


Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2015

Operational guidance for radiation emergency response organisations in Europe for using biodosimetric tools developed in EU MULTIBIODOSE project

Alicja Jaworska; Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; P. Fattibene; Carita Lindholm; Ursula Oestreicher; Kai Rothkamm; Horst Romm; Hubert Thierens; F. Trompier; Philippe Voisin; Anne Vral; Clemens Woda; Andrzej Wojcik

In the event of a large-scale radiological emergency, the triage of individuals according to their degree of exposure forms an important initial step of the accident management. Although clinical signs and symptoms of a serious exposure may be used for radiological triage, they are not necessarily radiation specific and can lead to a false diagnosis. Biodosimetry is a method based on the analysis of radiation-induced changes in cells of the human body or in portable electronic devices and enables the unequivocal identification of exposed people who should receive medical treatment. The MULTIBIODOSE (MBD) consortium developed and validated several biodosimetric assays and adapted and tested them as tools for biological dose assessment in a mass-casualty event. Different biodosimetric assays were validated against the gold standard of biological dosimetry-the dicentric assay. The assays were harmonised in such a way that, in an emergency situation, they can be run in parallel in a network of European laboratories. The aim of this guidance is to give a concise overview of the developed biodosimetric tools as well as how and when they can be used in an emergency situation.


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2017

RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry

Ulrike Kulka; Michael Abend; Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; Christophe Badie; Joan Francesc Barquinero; Lleonard Barrios; Christina Beinke; E. Bortolin; Alexandra Cucu; Andrea De Amicis; Inmaculada Domínguez; P. Fattibene; Anne Marie Frøvig; Eric Gregoire; Kamile Guogyte; Valeria Hadjidekova; Alicja Jaworska; Ralf Kriehuber; Carita Lindholm; David G. Lloyd; Katalin Lumniczky; Fiona M. Lyng; Roberta Meschini; Simone Mörtl; Sara Della Monaca; Octávia Monteiro Gil; Alegría Montoro; Jayne Moquet; Mercedes Moreno; Ursula Oestreicher

Abstract Purpose: A European network was initiated in 2012 by 23 partners from 16 European countries with the aim to significantly increase individualized dose reconstruction in case of large-scale radiological emergency scenarios. Results: The network was built on three complementary pillars: (1) an operational basis with seven biological and physical dosimetric assays in ready-to-use mode, (2) a basis for education, training and quality assurance, and (3) a basis for further network development regarding new techniques and members. Techniques for individual dose estimation based on biological samples and/or inert personalized devices as mobile phones or smart phones were optimized to support rapid categorization of many potential victims according to the received dose to the blood or personal devices. Communication and cross-border collaboration were also standardized. To assure long-term sustainability of the network, cooperation with national and international emergency preparedness organizations was initiated and links to radiation protection and research platforms have been developed. A legal framework, based on a Memorandum of Understanding, was established and signed by 27 organizations by the end of 2015. Conclusions: RENEB is a European Network of biological and physical-retrospective dosimetry, with the capacity and capability to perform large-scale rapid individualized dose estimation. Specialized to handle large numbers of samples, RENEB is able to contribute to radiological emergency preparedness and wider large-scale research projects.


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2017

Integration of new biological and physical retrospective dosimetry methods into EU emergency response plans – joint RENEB and EURADOS inter-laboratory comparisons

Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; Christophe Badie; Stephen Barnard; Grainne Manning; Jayne Moquet; Michael Abend; Ana Catarina Antunes; Lleonard Barrios; C. Bassinet; Christina Beinke; E. Bortolin; Lily Bossin; Clare Bricknell; Kamil Brzóska; Iwona Buraczewska; Carlos Castaño; Zina Čemusová; Maria Christiansson; Santiago Mateos Cordero; Guillaume Cosler; Sara Della Monaca; François Desangles; Michael Discher; Inmaculada Domínguez; Sven Doucha-Senf; Jon Eakins; P. Fattibene; Silvia Filippi; Monika Frenzel; Dimka Georgieva

Abstract Purpose: RENEB, ‘Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry and Physical Retrospective Dosimetry,’ is a network for research and emergency response mutual assistance in biodosimetry within the EU. Within this extremely active network, a number of new dosimetry methods have recently been proposed or developed. There is a requirement to test and/or validate these candidate techniques and inter-comparison exercises are a well-established method for such validation. Materials and methods: The authors present details of inter-comparisons of four such new methods: dicentric chromosome analysis including telomere and centromere staining; the gene expression assay carried out in whole blood; Raman spectroscopy on blood lymphocytes, and detection of radiation-induced thermoluminescent signals in glass screens taken from mobile phones. Results: In general the results show good agreement between the laboratories and methods within the expected levels of uncertainty, and thus demonstrate that there is a lot of potential for each of the candidate techniques. Conclusions: Further work is required before the new methods can be included within the suite of reliable dosimetry methods for use by RENEB partners and others in routine and emergency response scenarios.


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2017

Overview of physical dosimetry methods for triage application integrated in the new European network RENEB.

F. Trompier; Christopher Ian Burbidge; C. Bassinet; M. Baumann; E. Bortolin; Cinzia De Angelis; J. S. Eakins; Sara Della Monaca; P. Fattibene; Maria Cristina Quattrini; Rick Tanner; A. Wieser; Clemens Woda

Abstract Purpose: In the EC-funded project RENEB (Realizing the European Network in Biodosimetry), physical methods applied to fortuitous dosimetric materials are used to complement biological dosimetry, to increase dose assessment capacity for large-scale radiation/nuclear accidents. This paper describes the work performed to implement Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry techniques. Materials and methods: OSL is applied to electronic components and EPR to touch-screen glass from mobile phones. To implement these new approaches, several blind tests and inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) were organized for each assay. Results: OSL systems have shown good performances. EPR systems also show good performance in controlled conditions, but ILC have also demonstrated that post-irradiation exposure to sunlight increases the complexity of the EPR signal analysis. Conclusions: Physically-based dosimetry techniques present high capacity, new possibilities for accident dosimetry, especially in the case of large-scale events. Some of the techniques applied can be considered as operational (e.g. OSL on Surface Mounting Devices [SMD]) and provide a large increase of measurement capacity for existing networks. Other techniques and devices currently undergoing validation or development in Europe could lead to considerable increases in the capacity of the RENEB accident dosimetry network.


Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2015

EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation

Werner Rühm; E. Fantuzzi; R M Harrison; H. Schuhmacher; Filip Vanhavere; J. G. Alves; J. F. Bottollier Depois; P. Fattibene; Željka Knežević; M. A. Lopez; S. Mayer; Saveta Miljanić; S. Neumaier; P. Olko; H. Stadtmann; Rick Tanner; Clemens Woda

Since autumn 2012, the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has been developing its Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), which is intended to contribute to the identification of future research needs in radiation dosimetry in Europe. The present article summarises-based on input from EURADOS Working Groups (WGs) and Voting Members-five visions in dosimetry and defines key issues in dosimetry research that are considered important for the next decades. The five visions include scientific developments required towards (a) updated fundamental dose concepts and quantities, (b) improved radiation risk estimates deduced from epidemiological cohorts, (c) efficient dose assessment for radiological emergencies, (d) integrated personalised dosimetry in medical applications and (e) improved radiation protection of workers and the public. The SRA of EURADOS will be used as a guideline for future activities of the EURADOS WGs. A detailed version of the SRA can be downloaded as a EURADOS report from the EURADOS website (www.eurados.org).


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2017

RENEB accident simulation exercise

B. Brzozowska; Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; Annelot Baert; Lindsay A. Beaton-Green; Leonardo Barrios; Joan Francesc Barquinero; C. Bassinet; Christina Beinke; Anett Benedek; Philip Beukes; E. Bortolin; Iwona Buraczewska; Christopher Ian Burbidge; Andrea De Amicis; Cinzia De Angelis; Sara Della Monaca; Julie Depuydt; Stefania De Sanctis; Katalin Dobos; Mercedes Moreno Domene; Inmaculada Domínguez; Eva Facco; P. Fattibene; Monika Frenzel; Octávia Monteiro Gil; Géraldine Gonon; Eric Gregoire; Gaëtan Gruel; Valeria Hadjidekova; Vasiliki I. Hatzi

Abstract Purpose: The RENEB accident exercise was carried out in order to train the RENEB participants in coordinating and managing potentially large data sets that would be generated in case of a major radiological event. Materials and methods: Each participant was offered the possibility to activate the network by sending an alerting email about a simulated radiation emergency. The same participant had to collect, compile and report capacity, triage categorization and exposure scenario results obtained from all other participants. The exercise was performed over 27 weeks and involved the network consisting of 28 institutes: 21 RENEB members, four candidates and three non-RENEB partners. Results: The duration of a single exercise never exceeded 10 days, while the response from the assisting laboratories never came later than within half a day. During each week of the exercise, around 4500 samples were reported by all service laboratories (SL) to be examined and 54 scenarios were coherently estimated by all laboratories (the standard deviation from the mean of all SL answers for a given scenario category and a set of data was not larger than 3 patient codes). Conclusions: Each participant received training in both the role of a reference laboratory (activating the network) and of a service laboratory (responding to an activation request). The procedures in the case of radiological event were successfully established and tested.


International Journal of Radiation Biology | 2017

Uncertainty of fast biological radiation dose assessment for emergency response scenarios.

Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; Manuel Higueras; Pedro Puig; Jochen Einbeck; Daniel Samaga; Joan Francesc Barquinero; Lleonard Barrios; B. Brzozowska; P. Fattibene; Eric Gregoire; Alicja Jaworska; David G. Lloyd; Ursula Oestreicher; Horst Romm; Kai Rothkamm; Laurence Roy; Sylwester Sommer; Hubert Thierens; F. Trompier; Anne Vral; Clemens Woda

Abstract Purpose: Reliable dose estimation is an important factor in appropriate dosimetric triage categorization of exposed individuals to support radiation emergency response. Materials and methods: Following work done under the EU FP7 MULTIBIODOSE and RENEB projects, formal methods for defining uncertainties on biological dose estimates are compared using simulated and real data from recent exercises. Results: The results demonstrate that a Bayesian method of uncertainty assessment is the most appropriate, even in the absence of detailed prior information. The relative accuracy and relevance of techniques for calculating uncertainty and combining assay results to produce single dose and uncertainty estimates is further discussed. Conclusions: Finally, it is demonstrated that whatever uncertainty estimation method is employed, ignoring the uncertainty on fast dose assessments can have an important impact on rapid biodosimetric categorization.


Health Physics | 2014

Multibiodose radiation emergency triage categorization software.

Elizabeth A. Ainsbury; Stephen Barnard; Leonardo Barrios; P. Fattibene; V. de Gelder; Eric Gregoire; Carita Lindholm; David G. Lloyd; I. Nergaard; Kai Rothkamm; Horst Romm; Harry Scherthan; Hubert Thierens; Charlot Vandevoorde; Clemens Woda; Andrzej Wojcik

AbstractIn this note, the authors describe the MULTIBIODOSE software, which has been created as part of the MULTIBIODOSE project. The software enables doses estimated by networks of laboratories, using up to five retrospective (biological and physical) assays, to be combined to give a single estimate of triage category for each individual potentially exposed to ionizing radiation in a large scale radiation accident or incident. The MULTIBIODOSE software has been created in Java. The usage of the software is based on the MULTIBIODOSE Guidance: the program creates a link to a single SQLite database for each incident, and the database is administered by the lead laboratory. The software has been tested with Java runtime environment 6 and 7 on a number of different Windows, Mac, and Linux systems, using data from a recent intercomparison exercise. The Java program MULTIBIODOSE_1.0.jar is freely available to download from http://www.multibiodose.eu/software or by contacting the software administrator: [email protected].

Collaboration


Dive into the Clemens Woda's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Fattibene

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Bortolin

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alicja Jaworska

Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carita Lindholm

Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joan Francesc Barquinero

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Gregoire

Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge