Clement Orczyk

Prostate tumour volumes: evaluation of the agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and histology using novel co-registration software

To evaluate the agreement between prostate tumour volume determined using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that determined by histological assessment, using detailed software‐assisted co‐registration.

Preliminary experience with a novel method of three-dimensional co-registration of prostate cancer digital histology and in vivo multiparametric MRI

AIM To assess a novel method of three-dimensional (3D) co-registration of prostate cancer digital histology and in-vivo multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) image sets for clinical usefulness. MATERIAL AND METHODS A software platform was developed to achieve 3D co-registration. This software was prospectively applied to three patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Data comprised in-vivo mpMRI [T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced weighted images (DCE); apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)], ex-vivo T2-weighted imaging, 3D-rebuilt pathological specimen, and digital histology. Internal landmarks from zonal anatomy served as reference points for assessing co-registration accuracy and precision. RESULTS Applying a method of deformable transformation based on 22 internal landmarks, a 1.6 mm accuracy was reached to align T2-weighted images and the 3D-rebuilt pathological specimen, an improvement over rigid transformation of 32% (p = 0.003). The 22 zonal anatomy landmarks were more accurately mapped using deformable transformation than rigid transformation (p = 0.0008). An automatic method based on mutual information, enabled automation of the process and to include perfusion and diffusion MRI images. Evaluation of co-registration accuracy using the volume overlap index (Dice index) met clinically relevant requirements, ranging from 0.81-0.96 for sequences tested. Ex-vivo images of the specimen did not significantly improve co-registration accuracy. CONCLUSION This preliminary analysis suggests that deformable transformation based on zonal anatomy landmarks is accurate in the co-registration of mpMRI and histology. Including diffusion and perfusion sequences in the same 3D space as histology is essential further clinical information. The ability to localize cancer in 3D space may improve targeting for image-guided biopsy, focal therapy, and disease quantification in surveillance protocols.

Assessment of change in prostate volume and shape following surgical resection through co-registration of in-vivo MRI and fresh specimen ex-vivo MRI.

AIM To compare the size and shape of the prostate between in-vivo and fresh ex-vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to quantify alterations in the prostate resulting from surgical resection. MATERIAL AND METHOD Ten patients who had undergone 3 T prostate MRI using a phased-array coil and who were scheduled for prostatectomy were included in this prospective study. The ex-vivo specimen underwent MRI prior to formalin fixation or any other histopathological processing. Prostate volume in vivo and ex vivo was assessed using planimetry. Prostate shape was assessed by calculating ratios between the diameters of the prostate in all three dimensions. RESULTS Mean prostate volume was significantly smaller ex vivo than in vivo (39.7 ± 18.6 versus 50.8 ± 26.8 cm(3); p = 0.008), with an average change in volume of -19.5%. The right-to-left (RL)/anteroposterior (AP) ratio of the prostate, representing the shape of the prostate within its axial plane, was significantly larger ex vivo than in vivo (1.33 ± 0.14 versus 1.21 ± 0.12; p = 0.015), with an average percent change in RL/AP ratio of the prostate of +12.2%. There was no significant difference between in-vivo and ex-vivo acquisitions in terms of craniocaudal (CC)/AP (p = 0.963, median change = -2.1%) or RL/CC (p = 0.265, median change = +1.3%) ratios. CONCLUSION The observed volume and shape change following resection has not previously been assessed by comparison of in-vivo and fresh ex-vivo MRI and likely represents loss of vascularity and of connective tissue attachments in the ex-vivo state. These findings have implications for co-registration platforms under development to facilitate improved understanding of the accuracy of MRI in spatial localization of prostate tumours.

A prospective comparative analysis of the accuracy of HistoScanning and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the localization of prostate cancer among men undergoing radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION There is increasing interest in using imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer (PCa). Both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and HistoScanning (HS) have been independently evaluated in the detection and localization of PCa. We undertook a prospective, blinded comparison of mpMRI and HS for cancer localization among men undergoing radical prostatectomy. METHODS Following approval by the institutional review board, men scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy, who had previously undergone mpMRI at our institution, were offered inclusion in the study. Those consenting underwent preoperative HS following induction of anesthesia; mpMRI, HS, and surgical step-section pathology were independently read by a single radiologist, urologist, and pathologist, respectively, in a blinded fashion. Disease maps created by each independent reader were compared and evaluated for concordance by a 5 persons committee consisting of 2 urologists, 2 pathologists, and 1 radiologist. Logistic regression for correlated data was used to assess and compare mpMRI and HS in terms of diagnostic accuracy for cancer detection. Generalized estimating equations based on binary logistic regression were used to model concordance between reader opinion and the reference standard assessment of the same lesion site or region as a function of imaging modality. RESULTS Data from 31/35 men enrolled in the trial were deemed to be evaluable. On evaluation of cancer localization, HS identified cancer in 36/78 (46.2%) regions of interest, as compared with 41/78 (52.6%) on mpMRI (P = 0.3968). The overall accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and specificity for detection of disease within a region of interest were significantly better with mpMRI as compared with HS. HS detected 36/84 (42.9%) cancer foci as compared with 42/84 (50%) detected by mpMRI (P = 0.3678). Among tumors with Gleason score>6, mpMRI detected 19/22 (86.4%) whereas HS detected only 11/22 (50%, P = 0.0078). Similarly, among tumors>10mm in maximal diameter, mpMRI detected 28/34 (82.4%) whereas HS detected only 19/34 (55.9%, P = 0.0352). CONCLUSION In our institution, the diagnostic accuracy of HS was inferior to that of mpMRI in PCa for PCa detection and localization. Although our study warrants validation from larger cohorts, it would suggest that the HS protocol requires further refinement before clinical implementation.

3D Registration of mpMRI for Assessment of Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess a novel method of three-dimensional (3D) co-registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed before and after prostate cancer focal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a software platform for automatic 3D deformable co-registration of prostate MRI at different time points and applied this method to 10 patients who underwent focal ablative therapy. MRI examinations were performed preoperatively, as well as 1 week and 6 months post treatment. Rigid registration served as reference for assessing co-registration accuracy and precision. RESULTS Segmentation of preoperative and postoperative prostate revealed a significant postoperative volume decrease of the gland that averaged 6.49 cc (P = .017). Applying deformable transformation based on mutual information from 120 pairs of MRI slices, we refined by 2.9 mm (max. 6.25 mm) the alignment of the ablation zone, segmented from contrast-enhanced images on the 1-week postoperative examination, to the 6-month postoperative T2-weighted images. This represented a 500% improvement over the rigid approach (P = .001), corrected by volume. The dissimilarity by Dice index of the mapped ablation zone using deformable transformation vs rigid control was significantly (P = .04) higher at the ablation site than in the whole gland. CONCLUSIONS Our findings illustrate our methods ability to correct for deformation at the ablation site. The preliminary analysis suggests that deformable transformation computed from mutual information of preoperative and follow-up MRI is accurate in co-registration of MRI examinations performed before and after focal therapy. The ability to localize the previously ablated tissue in 3D space may improve targeting for image-guided follow-up biopsy within focal therapy protocols.

MP70-02 CORRELATION OF MPMRI CONTOURS WITH 3-DIMENSIONAL 5MM TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE MAPPING BIOPSY WITHIN THE PROMIS TRIAL PILOT: WHAT MARGINS ARE REQUIRED?

Source of Funding: This research was made possible through the NIH Medical Research Scholars Program, a public-private partnership supported jointly by the NIH and generous contributions to the Foundation for the NIH by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Grant #2014194), the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate-Palmolive Company, Genentech, and other private donors. For a complete list, visit the foundation website at http://www.fnih. org.

MP38-07 SHOULD WE AIM FOR THE CENTRE OF AN MRI PROSTATE LESION? CORRELATION BETWEEN MPMRI AND 3-DIMENSIONAL 5MM TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE MAPPING BIOPSIES FROM THE PROMIS TRIAL

Should we aim for the centre of an MRI prostate lesion? Correlation between mpMRI and 3-Dimensional 5mm Transperineal Prostate Mapping biopsies from the PROMIS trial. Clement Orczyk*, Yi Peng Hu, Eli Gibson, Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily, London, United Kingdom, Alex Kirkham, LONDON, United Kingdom, Shonit Punwani, Louise Brown, Esther Bonmati, Yolana Coraco-Moraes, Katie Ward, Rick Kaplan, Dean Barratt, Mark Emberton, Hashim U Ahmed, London, United Kingdom

MP70-18 PROSTATE RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOCAL TREATMENT (PRORAFT): INTERIM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

CONCLUSIONS: Prior interventional therapy for BPH is associated with increased risks of urinary retention and incontinence after whole gland prostate cryoablation. Nevertheless, in properly selected patients, prior bladder outlet procedures are not an absolute contraindication to cryotherapy. Consideration should be given to management protocol in those men including but not limited to time for catheter removal postoperatively and continuing BPH medical treatment